Re: [DISCUSS] Make wicket-http2 a stable module

[Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>]

Thanks to all who responded!
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6887

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:03 PM Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 to make the module stable
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 5:23 PM Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > from mobile (sorry for typos ;)
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021, 16:52 Tobias Soloschenko
> > <to...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > Good idea. My suggestion would be to move it into core directly,
> because
> > > it is standard servlet API as of version 4.
> > >
> > > Any other opinions?
> > >
> > > kind regards
> > >
> > > Tobias
> > >
> > > > Am 21.04.2021 um 10:52 schrieb Martin Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org
> >:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Shall we make wicket-http2 a stable module now in master branch
> (Wicket
> > > > 10.x) ?
> > > > There we upgraded from Servlet 3 to Servlet 5 and this makes
> > PushBuilder
> > > > class available (it is introduced in Servlet 4).
> > > >
> > > > I suggest to drop the modules for Tomcat, Jetty and Undertow, and
> merge
> > > the
> > > > classes from -servlet4 and -core modules into one (wicket-http2) or
> to
> > > move
> > > > them to -core directly.
> > > >
> > > > WDYT ?
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrea Del Bene.
> Apache Wicket committer.
>