You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@geode.apache.org by Michael Stolz <ms...@pivotal.io> on 2016/02/01 14:31:48 UTC
RE: Geode vs Gemfire?
It is not exactly the same as 8.2 but that was the starting point.
--
Mike Stolz
Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager
Mobile: 631-835-4771
On Jan 31, 2016 9:08 AM, "Dor Ben Dov" <do...@amdocs.com> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
>
>
> The current github version is paralleled to GemFire 8.2 ?
>
>
>
> Dor
>
>
>
> *From:* Eric Pederson [mailto:ericacm@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* יום ו 29 ינואר 2016 02:36
> *To:* user@geode.incubator.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Geode vs Gemfire?
>
>
>
> Geode is going to have continuous query? That's great!
>
> On Thursday, January 28, 2016, Gregory Chase <gc...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> I'm happy to take a stab here, wearing my Pivotal hat.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Andrew Munn <an...@nmedia.net> wrote:
>
> What are the benefits of installing Geode vs Gemfire? What does Gemfire
> include that Geode does not?
>
>
>
> As soon as Apache Geode makes its release, which is coming soon, it will
> have much of what GemFire provides. Once the most recent code for WAN and
> continuous query are incorporated, Apache Geode will map even closer to
> GemFire.
>
>
>
> What's different is that Apache Geode is only supported here, in the
> forums. Releases will come on the schedule they come, and fixes will be
> incorporated, transparently, when they are completed in their own timeframe.
>
>
>
> With GemFire, you will have commercial support, which gives you the right
> to raise an SLA to get fixes and assistance. If, for example, you report a
> critical bug in GemFire, you will be issued a fix in a timely fashion.
> This fix, if it involves Apache Geode code, will eventually be contributed
> to the open source code, and incorporated as The Apache Way process allows.
>
>
>
> As time goes on, its likely that Apache Geode will spawn new features that
> GemFire will not adopt.
>
>
>
> As time goes on, its likely that GemFire will be more firmly meshed into
> Pivotal ecosystem components such as CloudFoundry, Spring, Greenplum, and
> other relevant technologies. The code for these integrate solutions will
> likely not be incorporated into Apache Geode.
>
>
>
> I hope this helps a bit.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Greg Chase
>
>
>
> Director of Big Data Communities
>
> http://www.pivotal.io/big-data
>
>
>
> Pivotal Software
>
> http://www.pivotal.io/
>
>
>
> 650-215-0477
>
> @GregChase
>
> Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
> This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
> confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at
> http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp
>
RE: Geode vs Gemfire?
Posted by Dor Ben Dov <do...@amdocs.com>.
You mean from 2.2.9 to 3.3.X --> Which as result transformed Apache Geode to be Apache License 2.0 ?
From: Michael Stolz [mailto:mstolz@pivotal.io]
Sent: יום ב 01 פברואר 2016 15:57
To: user@geode.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Geode vs Gemfire?
Biggest difference is the Jgroups update. That is pretty significant though.
--
Mike Stolz
Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager
Mobile: 631-835-4771
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Dor Ben Dov <do...@amdocs.com>> wrote:
Can you say what are the big differences if any?
From: Michael Stolz [mailto:mstolz@pivotal.io<ma...@pivotal.io>]
Sent: יום ב 01 פברואר 2016 15:32
To: user@geode.incubator.apache.org<ma...@geode.incubator.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Geode vs Gemfire?
It is not exactly the same as 8.2 but that was the starting point.
--
Mike Stolz
Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager
Mobile: 631-835-4771<tel:631-835-4771>
On Jan 31, 2016 9:08 AM, "Dor Ben Dov" <do...@amdocs.com>> wrote:
Andrew,
The current github version is paralleled to GemFire 8.2 ?
Dor
From: Eric Pederson [mailto:ericacm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>]
Sent: יום ו 29 ינואר 2016 02:36
To: user@geode.incubator.apache.org<ma...@geode.incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Geode vs Gemfire?
Geode is going to have continuous query? That's great!
On Thursday, January 28, 2016, Gregory Chase <gc...@pivotal.io>> wrote:
I'm happy to take a stab here, wearing my Pivotal hat.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Andrew Munn <an...@nmedia.net>> wrote:
What are the benefits of installing Geode vs Gemfire? What does Gemfire
include that Geode does not?
As soon as Apache Geode makes its release, which is coming soon, it will have much of what GemFire provides. Once the most recent code for WAN and continuous query are incorporated, Apache Geode will map even closer to GemFire.
What's different is that Apache Geode is only supported here, in the forums. Releases will come on the schedule they come, and fixes will be incorporated, transparently, when they are completed in their own timeframe.
With GemFire, you will have commercial support, which gives you the right to raise an SLA to get fixes and assistance. If, for example, you report a critical bug in GemFire, you will be issued a fix in a timely fashion. This fix, if it involves Apache Geode code, will eventually be contributed to the open source code, and incorporated as The Apache Way process allows.
As time goes on, its likely that Apache Geode will spawn new features that GemFire will not adopt.
As time goes on, its likely that GemFire will be more firmly meshed into Pivotal ecosystem components such as CloudFoundry, Spring, Greenplum, and other relevant technologies. The code for these integrate solutions will likely not be incorporated into Apache Geode.
I hope this helps a bit.
Thanks
--
Greg Chase
Director of Big Data Communities
http://www.pivotal.io/big-data
Pivotal Software
http://www.pivotal.io/
650-215-0477<tel:650-215-0477>
@GregChase
Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp
Re: Geode vs Gemfire?
Posted by Lyndon Adams <ly...@gmail.com>.
thanks
Lyndon Adams
Follow Me: Twitter <https://www.facebook.com/lyndon.adams.98> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1413336> | Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/gopivotal>
> On 1 Feb 2016, at 14:22, Michael Stolz <ms...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> Geode, and therefore Gemfire going forward membership management has been updated.
>
> --
> Mike Stolz
> Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager
> Mobile: 631-835-4771
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Lyndon Adams <lyndon.adams@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> On what side did the Groups update occur and what impact?
>
> Lyndon Adams
> Follow Me: Twitter <https://www.facebook.com/lyndon.adams.98> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1413336> | Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/gopivotal>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On 1 Feb 2016, at 13:56, Michael Stolz <mstolz@pivotal.io <ma...@pivotal.io>> wrote:
>>
>> Biggest difference is the Jgroups update. That is pretty significant though.
>>
>> --
>> Mike Stolz
>> Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager
>> Mobile: 631-835-4771 <tel:631-835-4771>
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Dor Ben Dov <dor.ben-dov@amdocs.com <ma...@amdocs.com>> wrote:
>> Can you say what are the big differences if any?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Michael Stolz [mailto:mstolz@pivotal.io <ma...@pivotal.io>]
>> Sent: יום ב 01 פברואר 2016 15:32
>> To: user@geode.incubator.apache.org <ma...@geode.incubator.apache.org>
>> Subject: RE: Geode vs Gemfire?
>>
>>
>>
>> It is not exactly the same as 8.2 but that was the starting point.
>>
>> --
>> Mike Stolz
>> Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager
>> Mobile: 631-835-4771 <tel:631-835-4771>
>> On Jan 31, 2016 9:08 AM, "Dor Ben Dov" <dor.ben-dov@amdocs.com <ma...@amdocs.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Andrew,
>>
>>
>>
>> The current github version is paralleled to GemFire 8.2 ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Dor
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Eric Pederson [mailto:ericacm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>]
>> Sent: יום ו 29 ינואר 2016 02:36
>> To: user@geode.incubator.apache.org <ma...@geode.incubator.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: Geode vs Gemfire?
>>
>>
>>
>> Geode is going to have continuous query? That's great!
>>
>> On Thursday, January 28, 2016, Gregory Chase <gchase@pivotal.io <ma...@pivotal.io>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm happy to take a stab here, wearing my Pivotal hat.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Andrew Munn <andrew@nmedia.net <ma...@nmedia.net>> wrote:
>>
>> What are the benefits of installing Geode vs Gemfire? What does Gemfire
>> include that Geode does not?
>>
>>
>>
>> As soon as Apache Geode makes its release, which is coming soon, it will have much of what GemFire provides. Once the most recent code for WAN and continuous query are incorporated, Apache Geode will map even closer to GemFire.
>>
>>
>>
>> What's different is that Apache Geode is only supported here, in the forums. Releases will come on the schedule they come, and fixes will be incorporated, transparently, when they are completed in their own timeframe.
>>
>>
>>
>> With GemFire, you will have commercial support, which gives you the right to raise an SLA to get fixes and assistance. If, for example, you report a critical bug in GemFire, you will be issued a fix in a timely fashion. This fix, if it involves Apache Geode code, will eventually be contributed to the open source code, and incorporated as The Apache Way process allows.
>>
>>
>>
>> As time goes on, its likely that Apache Geode will spawn new features that GemFire will not adopt.
>>
>>
>>
>> As time goes on, its likely that GemFire will be more firmly meshed into Pivotal ecosystem components such as CloudFoundry, Spring, Greenplum, and other relevant technologies. The code for these integrate solutions will likely not be incorporated into Apache Geode.
>>
>>
>>
>> I hope this helps a bit.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Greg Chase
>>
>>
>>
>> Director of Big Data Communities
>>
>> http://www.pivotal.io/big-data <http://www.pivotal.io/big-data>
>>
>>
>> Pivotal Software
>>
>> http://www.pivotal.io/ <http://www.pivotal.io/>
>>
>>
>> 650-215-0477 <tel:650-215-0477>
>> @GregChase
>>
>> Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/ <http://geekmarketing.biz/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>
>> This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp <http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp>
>
>
Re: Geode vs Gemfire?
Posted by Michael Stolz <ms...@pivotal.io>.
Geode, and therefore Gemfire going forward membership management has been
updated.
--
Mike Stolz
Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager
Mobile: 631-835-4771
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Lyndon Adams <ly...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On what side did the Groups update occur and what impact?
>
> Lyndon Adams
> Follow Me: Twitter <https://www.facebook.com/lyndon.adams.98> | LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1413336> | Facebook
> <http://www.facebook.com/gopivotal>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 1 Feb 2016, at 13:56, Michael Stolz <ms...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> Biggest difference is the Jgroups update. That is pretty significant
> though.
>
> --
> Mike Stolz
> Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager
> Mobile: 631-835-4771
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Dor Ben Dov <do...@amdocs.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Can you say what are the big differences if any?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Michael Stolz [mailto:mstolz@pivotal.io]
>> *Sent:* יום ב 01 פברואר 2016 15:32
>> *To:* user@geode.incubator.apache.org
>> *Subject:* RE: Geode vs Gemfire?
>>
>>
>>
>> It is not exactly the same as 8.2 but that was the starting point.
>>
>> --
>> Mike Stolz
>> Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager
>> Mobile: 631-835-4771
>>
>> On Jan 31, 2016 9:08 AM, "Dor Ben Dov" <do...@amdocs.com> wrote:
>>
>> Andrew,
>>
>>
>>
>> The current github version is paralleled to GemFire 8.2 ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Dor
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Eric Pederson [mailto:ericacm@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* יום ו 29 ינואר 2016 02:36
>> *To:* user@geode.incubator.apache.org
>> *Subject:* Re: Geode vs Gemfire?
>>
>>
>>
>> Geode is going to have continuous query? That's great!
>>
>> On Thursday, January 28, 2016, Gregory Chase <gc...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>>
>> I'm happy to take a stab here, wearing my Pivotal hat.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Andrew Munn <an...@nmedia.net> wrote:
>>
>> What are the benefits of installing Geode vs Gemfire? What does Gemfire
>> include that Geode does not?
>>
>>
>>
>> As soon as Apache Geode makes its release, which is coming soon, it will
>> have much of what GemFire provides. Once the most recent code for WAN and
>> continuous query are incorporated, Apache Geode will map even closer to
>> GemFire.
>>
>>
>>
>> What's different is that Apache Geode is only supported here, in the
>> forums. Releases will come on the schedule they come, and fixes will be
>> incorporated, transparently, when they are completed in their own timeframe.
>>
>>
>>
>> With GemFire, you will have commercial support, which gives you the right
>> to raise an SLA to get fixes and assistance. If, for example, you report a
>> critical bug in GemFire, you will be issued a fix in a timely fashion.
>> This fix, if it involves Apache Geode code, will eventually be contributed
>> to the open source code, and incorporated as The Apache Way process allows.
>>
>>
>>
>> As time goes on, its likely that Apache Geode will spawn new features
>> that GemFire will not adopt.
>>
>>
>>
>> As time goes on, its likely that GemFire will be more firmly meshed into
>> Pivotal ecosystem components such as CloudFoundry, Spring, Greenplum, and
>> other relevant technologies. The code for these integrate solutions will
>> likely not be incorporated into Apache Geode.
>>
>>
>>
>> I hope this helps a bit.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Greg Chase
>>
>>
>>
>> Director of Big Data Communities
>>
>> http://www.pivotal.io/big-data
>>
>>
>>
>> Pivotal Software
>>
>> http://www.pivotal.io/
>>
>>
>>
>> 650-215-0477
>>
>> @GregChase
>>
>> Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>
>> This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
>> confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at
>> http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Geode vs Gemfire?
Posted by Lyndon Adams <ly...@gmail.com>.
On what side did the Groups update occur and what impact?
Lyndon Adams
Follow Me: Twitter <https://www.facebook.com/lyndon.adams.98> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1413336> | Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/gopivotal>
> On 1 Feb 2016, at 13:56, Michael Stolz <ms...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> Biggest difference is the Jgroups update. That is pretty significant though.
>
> --
> Mike Stolz
> Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager
> Mobile: 631-835-4771
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Dor Ben Dov <dor.ben-dov@amdocs.com <ma...@amdocs.com>> wrote:
> Can you say what are the big differences if any?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Michael Stolz [mailto:mstolz@pivotal.io <ma...@pivotal.io>]
> Sent: יום ב 01 פברואר 2016 15:32
> To: user@geode.incubator.apache.org <ma...@geode.incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: Geode vs Gemfire?
>
>
>
> It is not exactly the same as 8.2 but that was the starting point.
>
> --
> Mike Stolz
> Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager
> Mobile: 631-835-4771 <tel:631-835-4771>
> On Jan 31, 2016 9:08 AM, "Dor Ben Dov" <dor.ben-dov@amdocs.com <ma...@amdocs.com>> wrote:
>
> Andrew,
>
>
>
> The current github version is paralleled to GemFire 8.2 ?
>
>
>
> Dor
>
>
>
> From: Eric Pederson [mailto:ericacm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>]
> Sent: יום ו 29 ינואר 2016 02:36
> To: user@geode.incubator.apache.org <ma...@geode.incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Geode vs Gemfire?
>
>
>
> Geode is going to have continuous query? That's great!
>
> On Thursday, January 28, 2016, Gregory Chase <gchase@pivotal.io <ma...@pivotal.io>> wrote:
>
> I'm happy to take a stab here, wearing my Pivotal hat.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Andrew Munn <andrew@nmedia.net <ma...@nmedia.net>> wrote:
>
> What are the benefits of installing Geode vs Gemfire? What does Gemfire
> include that Geode does not?
>
>
>
> As soon as Apache Geode makes its release, which is coming soon, it will have much of what GemFire provides. Once the most recent code for WAN and continuous query are incorporated, Apache Geode will map even closer to GemFire.
>
>
>
> What's different is that Apache Geode is only supported here, in the forums. Releases will come on the schedule they come, and fixes will be incorporated, transparently, when they are completed in their own timeframe.
>
>
>
> With GemFire, you will have commercial support, which gives you the right to raise an SLA to get fixes and assistance. If, for example, you report a critical bug in GemFire, you will be issued a fix in a timely fashion. This fix, if it involves Apache Geode code, will eventually be contributed to the open source code, and incorporated as The Apache Way process allows.
>
>
>
> As time goes on, its likely that Apache Geode will spawn new features that GemFire will not adopt.
>
>
>
> As time goes on, its likely that GemFire will be more firmly meshed into Pivotal ecosystem components such as CloudFoundry, Spring, Greenplum, and other relevant technologies. The code for these integrate solutions will likely not be incorporated into Apache Geode.
>
>
>
> I hope this helps a bit.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Greg Chase
>
>
>
> Director of Big Data Communities
>
> http://www.pivotal.io/big-data <http://www.pivotal.io/big-data>
>
>
> Pivotal Software
>
> http://www.pivotal.io/ <http://www.pivotal.io/>
>
>
> 650-215-0477 <tel:650-215-0477>
> @GregChase
>
> Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/ <http://geekmarketing.biz/>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
> This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp <http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp>
Re: Geode vs Gemfire?
Posted by Michael Stolz <ms...@pivotal.io>.
Biggest difference is the Jgroups update. That is pretty significant though.
--
Mike Stolz
Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager
Mobile: 631-835-4771
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Dor Ben Dov <do...@amdocs.com> wrote:
> Can you say what are the big differences if any?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Stolz [mailto:mstolz@pivotal.io]
> *Sent:* יום ב 01 פברואר 2016 15:32
> *To:* user@geode.incubator.apache.org
> *Subject:* RE: Geode vs Gemfire?
>
>
>
> It is not exactly the same as 8.2 but that was the starting point.
>
> --
> Mike Stolz
> Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager
> Mobile: 631-835-4771
>
> On Jan 31, 2016 9:08 AM, "Dor Ben Dov" <do...@amdocs.com> wrote:
>
> Andrew,
>
>
>
> The current github version is paralleled to GemFire 8.2 ?
>
>
>
> Dor
>
>
>
> *From:* Eric Pederson [mailto:ericacm@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* יום ו 29 ינואר 2016 02:36
> *To:* user@geode.incubator.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Geode vs Gemfire?
>
>
>
> Geode is going to have continuous query? That's great!
>
> On Thursday, January 28, 2016, Gregory Chase <gc...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> I'm happy to take a stab here, wearing my Pivotal hat.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Andrew Munn <an...@nmedia.net> wrote:
>
> What are the benefits of installing Geode vs Gemfire? What does Gemfire
> include that Geode does not?
>
>
>
> As soon as Apache Geode makes its release, which is coming soon, it will
> have much of what GemFire provides. Once the most recent code for WAN and
> continuous query are incorporated, Apache Geode will map even closer to
> GemFire.
>
>
>
> What's different is that Apache Geode is only supported here, in the
> forums. Releases will come on the schedule they come, and fixes will be
> incorporated, transparently, when they are completed in their own timeframe.
>
>
>
> With GemFire, you will have commercial support, which gives you the right
> to raise an SLA to get fixes and assistance. If, for example, you report a
> critical bug in GemFire, you will be issued a fix in a timely fashion.
> This fix, if it involves Apache Geode code, will eventually be contributed
> to the open source code, and incorporated as The Apache Way process allows.
>
>
>
> As time goes on, its likely that Apache Geode will spawn new features that
> GemFire will not adopt.
>
>
>
> As time goes on, its likely that GemFire will be more firmly meshed into
> Pivotal ecosystem components such as CloudFoundry, Spring, Greenplum, and
> other relevant technologies. The code for these integrate solutions will
> likely not be incorporated into Apache Geode.
>
>
>
> I hope this helps a bit.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Greg Chase
>
>
>
> Director of Big Data Communities
>
> http://www.pivotal.io/big-data
>
>
>
> Pivotal Software
>
> http://www.pivotal.io/
>
>
>
> 650-215-0477
>
> @GregChase
>
> Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
> This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
> confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at
> http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp
>
>
RE: Geode vs Gemfire?
Posted by Dor Ben Dov <do...@amdocs.com>.
Can you say what are the big differences if any?
From: Michael Stolz [mailto:mstolz@pivotal.io]
Sent: יום ב 01 פברואר 2016 15:32
To: user@geode.incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Geode vs Gemfire?
It is not exactly the same as 8.2 but that was the starting point.
--
Mike Stolz
Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager
Mobile: 631-835-4771
On Jan 31, 2016 9:08 AM, "Dor Ben Dov" <do...@amdocs.com>> wrote:
Andrew,
The current github version is paralleled to GemFire 8.2 ?
Dor
From: Eric Pederson [mailto:ericacm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>]
Sent: יום ו 29 ינואר 2016 02:36
To: user@geode.incubator.apache.org<ma...@geode.incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Geode vs Gemfire?
Geode is going to have continuous query? That's great!
On Thursday, January 28, 2016, Gregory Chase <gc...@pivotal.io>> wrote:
I'm happy to take a stab here, wearing my Pivotal hat.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Andrew Munn <an...@nmedia.net>> wrote:
What are the benefits of installing Geode vs Gemfire? What does Gemfire
include that Geode does not?
As soon as Apache Geode makes its release, which is coming soon, it will have much of what GemFire provides. Once the most recent code for WAN and continuous query are incorporated, Apache Geode will map even closer to GemFire.
What's different is that Apache Geode is only supported here, in the forums. Releases will come on the schedule they come, and fixes will be incorporated, transparently, when they are completed in their own timeframe.
With GemFire, you will have commercial support, which gives you the right to raise an SLA to get fixes and assistance. If, for example, you report a critical bug in GemFire, you will be issued a fix in a timely fashion. This fix, if it involves Apache Geode code, will eventually be contributed to the open source code, and incorporated as The Apache Way process allows.
As time goes on, its likely that Apache Geode will spawn new features that GemFire will not adopt.
As time goes on, its likely that GemFire will be more firmly meshed into Pivotal ecosystem components such as CloudFoundry, Spring, Greenplum, and other relevant technologies. The code for these integrate solutions will likely not be incorporated into Apache Geode.
I hope this helps a bit.
Thanks
--
Greg Chase
Director of Big Data Communities
http://www.pivotal.io/big-data
Pivotal Software
http://www.pivotal.io/
650-215-0477<tel:650-215-0477>
@GregChase
Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp