You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to docs@httpd.apache.org by Werner Schalk <we...@gmx.de> on 2002/08/09 09:41:08 UTC

filename-to-filename hook

Hello,
 
I have already asked the people of
the users mailing list but nobody
did answer my question so I gonna
ask it here:
 
In the docs is written that it is
not needed to add the [PT] option
to a RewriteRule, when passing it
through another module because
apache2 now supports a filename-to-filename
hook. How can I enable it?
 
See http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewritemap,
there is written:
For Apache hackers
If the current Apache API had a filename-to-filename hook additionally 
to the URI-to-filename hook then we wouldn't need this flag! But 
without such a hook this flag is the only solution. The Apache Group 
has discussed this problem and will add such a hook in Apache version 
2.0.

In my opinion this hook was never added, or?
Maybe it should be deleted from the docs? 

Bye and thanks,
Werner.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org


Re: filename-to-filename hook

Posted by Daniel Lopez <da...@rawbyte.com>.
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 09:41:08AM +0200, Werner Schalk wrote:
> Hello,
>  
> I have already asked the people of
> the users mailing list but nobody
> did answer my question so I gonna
> ask it here:

Er... Ryan Bloom already answered your question in users@
That feature is not implemented in 2.0


> In the docs is written that it is
> not needed to add the [PT] option
> to a RewriteRule, when passing it
> through another module because
> apache2 now supports a filename-to-filename
> hook. How can I enable it?
>  
> See http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewritemap,
> there is written:
> For Apache hackers
> If the current Apache API had a filename-to-filename hook additionally 
> to the URI-to-filename hook then we wouldn't need this flag! But 
> without such a hook this flag is the only solution. The Apache Group 
> has discussed this problem and will add such a hook in Apache version 
> 2.0.
> 
> In my opinion this hook was never added, or?
> Maybe it should be deleted from the docs? 
> 
> Bye and thanks,
> Werner.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org

-- 
Teach Yourself Apache 2 -- http://apacheworld.org/ty24/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org