You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@cxf.apache.org by "Christian Connert (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/11/04 09:05:32 UTC
[jira] Closed: (CXF-2518) UltimateReceiverMustUnderstandInterceptor
in wrong phase?
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Christian Connert closed CXF-2518.
----------------------------------
Resolution: Invalid
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the information. I'll find a way to work around this problem.
Christian
> UltimateReceiverMustUnderstandInterceptor in wrong phase?
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-2518
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2518
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Soap Binding
> Environment:
> « Hide
> System:
> 2.6.28-15-generic #52-Ubuntu SMP Wed Sep 9 10:48:52 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> Java:
> java version "1.6.0_16"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_16-b01)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.2-b01, mixed mode)
> Apache CXF 2.2.3 (not in version list)
> Reporter: Christian Connert
>
> Hi,
> The MustUnderstandInterceptor adds the UltimateReceiverMustUnderstandInterceptor if some headers without a role are part of the soap header.
> The problem is that the UltimateReceiverMustUnderstandInterceptor is appended at the invoke phase and thus the exception is triggered after the invocation.
> At least in the servicemix-cxf-bc component (which has it's own invoker) this leads to strange behaviour.
> I think it should be appended at the pre_invoke phase.
> Christian
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.