You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@flink.apache.org by Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com> on 2021/04/25 03:32:47 UTC
when should `FlinkYarnSessionCli` be included for parsing CLI arguments?
Hi Experts,
I recently tried to run yarn-application mode on my yarn cluster, and I had
a problem related to configuring `execution.target`.
After reading the source code and doing some experiments, I found that
there should be some room of improvement for `FlinkYarnSessionCli` or
`AbstractYarnCli`.
My experiments are:
1. setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and
run `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job successfully.
1. `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
2. `GenericCLI` is active
2. setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and
run `flink
run-application -t yarn-application`: run job failed
1. failed due to `ClusterDeploymentException` [1]
2. `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
3. setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and
run `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
1. `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
2. `GenericCLI` is active
4. setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and
run `flink
run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
1. `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
From `AbstractYarnCli#isActive` [2] and `FlinkYarnSessionCli#isActive` [3],
`FlinkYarnSessionCli` will be active when `execution.target` is specified
with `yarn-per-job` or `yarn-session`.
According to the flink official document [4], I thought the 2nd experiment
should also work well, but it didn't.
> The --target will overwrite the execution.target
> <https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.12/deployment/config.html#execution-target> specified
> in the config/flink-config.yaml.
The root cause is that `FlinkYarnSessionCli` only overwrite the
`execution.target` with `yarn-session` or `yarn-per-job` [5], but no
`yarn-application`.
So, my question is
1. should we use `FlinkYarnSessionCli` in case 2?
2. if we should, how we can improve `FlinkYarnSessionCli` so that we can
overwrite `execution.target` via `--target`?
and one more improvement, the config description for `execution.target` [6]
should include `yarn-application` as well.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/YarnClusterDescriptor.java#L439-L447
[2]
https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/AbstractYarnCli.java#L54-L66
[3]
https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L373-L377
[4]
https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/deployment/cli.html#selecting-deployment-targets
[5]
https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L397-L413
[6]
https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/configuration/DeploymentOptions.java#L41-L46
best regards,
Re: when should `FlinkYarnSessionCli` be included for parsing CLI arguments?
Posted by Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com>.
Hi Till,
I have created the ticket to extend the description of `execution.targe`.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22476
best regards,
Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com> 於 2021年4月26日 週一 下午5:24寫道：
> Hi Till, Yangze,
>
> I think FLINK-15852 should solve my problem.
> It is my fault that my flink version is not 100% consistent with the
> community version, and FLINK-15852 is the one I missed.
> Thanks for your information.
>
> best regards,
>
> Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 於 2021年4月26日 週一 下午5:14寫道：
>
>> I think you are right that the `GenericCLI` should be the first choice.
>> From the top of my head I do not remember why FlinkYarnSessionCli is still
>> used. Maybe it is in order to support some Yarn specific cli option
>> parsing. I assume it is either an oversight or some parsing has not been
>> completely migrated to the GenericCLI.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Till
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:07 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Till,
>>>
>>> I agree that we need to resolve the issue by overriding the
>>> configuration before selecting the CustomCommandLines. However, IIUC,
>>> after FLINK-15852 the GenericCLI should always be the first choice.
>>> Could you help me to understand why the FlinkYarnSessionCli can be
>>> activated?
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Yangze Guo
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 4:48 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi Tony,
>>> >
>>> > I think you are right that Flink's cli does not behave super
>>> consistent at the moment. Case 2. should definitely work because `-t
>>> yarn-application` should overwrite what is defined in the Flink
>>> configuration. The problem seems to be that we don't resolve the
>>> configuration wrt the specified command line options before calling into
>>> `CustomCommandLine.isActive`. If we parsed first the command line
>>> configuration options which can overwrite flink-conf.yaml options and then
>>> replaced them, then the custom command lines (assuming that they use the
>>> Configuration as the ground truth) should behave consistently.
>>> >
>>> > For your questions:
>>> >
>>> > 1. I am not 100% sure. I think the FlinkYarnSessionCli wasn't used on
>>> purpose when introducing the yarn application mode.
>>> > 2. See answer 1.
>>> >
>>> > I think it is a good idea to extend the description of the config
>>> option `execution.target`. Do you want to create a ticket and a PR for it?
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Till
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:37 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi, Tony.
>>> >>
>>> >> What is the version of your flink-dist. AFAIK, this issue should be
>>> >> addressed in FLINK-15852[1]. Could you give the client log of case
>>> >> 2(set the log level to DEBUG would be better).
>>> >>
>>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15852
>>> >>
>>> >> Best,
>>> >> Yangze Guo
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:33 AM Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Hi Experts,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I recently tried to run yarn-application mode on my yarn cluster,
>>> and I had a problem related to configuring `execution.target`.
>>> >> > After reading the source code and doing some experiments, I found
>>> that there should be some room of improvement for `FlinkYarnSessionCli` or
>>> `AbstractYarnCli`.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > My experiments are:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and
>>> run `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job successfully.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
>>> >> > `GenericCLI` is active
>>> >> >
>>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run
>>> `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job failed
>>> >> >
>>> >> > failed due to `ClusterDeploymentException` [1]
>>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
>>> >> >
>>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and
>>> run `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
>>> >> > `GenericCLI` is active
>>> >> >
>>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run
>>> `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
>>> >> >
>>> >> > From `AbstractYarnCli#isActive` [2] and
>>> `FlinkYarnSessionCli#isActive` [3], `FlinkYarnSessionCli` will be active
>>> when `execution.target` is specified with `yarn-per-job` or `yarn-session`.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > According to the flink official document [4], I thought the 2nd
>>> experiment should also work well, but it didn't.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> The --target will overwrite the execution.target specified in the
>>> config/flink-config.yaml.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > The root cause is that `FlinkYarnSessionCli` only overwrite the
>>> `execution.target` with `yarn-session` or `yarn-per-job` [5], but no
>>> `yarn-application`.
>>> >> > So, my question is
>>> >> >
>>> >> > should we use `FlinkYarnSessionCli` in case 2?
>>> >> > if we should, how we can improve `FlinkYarnSessionCli` so that we
>>> can overwrite `execution.target` via `--target`?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > and one more improvement, the config description for
>>> `execution.target` [6] should include `yarn-application` as well.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > [1]
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/YarnClusterDescriptor.java#L439-L447
>>> >> > [2]
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/AbstractYarnCli.java#L54-L66
>>> >> > [3]
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L373-L377
>>> >> > [4]
>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/deployment/cli.html#selecting-deployment-targets
>>> >> > [5]
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L397-L413
>>> >> > [6]
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/configuration/DeploymentOptions.java#L41-L46
>>> >> >
>>> >> > best regards,
>>> >> >
>>>
>>
Re: when should `FlinkYarnSessionCli` be included for parsing CLI arguments?
Posted by Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com>.
Hi Till,
I have created the ticket to extend the description of `execution.targe`.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22476
best regards,
Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com> 於 2021年4月26日 週一 下午5:24寫道：
> Hi Till, Yangze,
>
> I think FLINK-15852 should solve my problem.
> It is my fault that my flink version is not 100% consistent with the
> community version, and FLINK-15852 is the one I missed.
> Thanks for your information.
>
> best regards,
>
> Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 於 2021年4月26日 週一 下午5:14寫道：
>
>> I think you are right that the `GenericCLI` should be the first choice.
>> From the top of my head I do not remember why FlinkYarnSessionCli is still
>> used. Maybe it is in order to support some Yarn specific cli option
>> parsing. I assume it is either an oversight or some parsing has not been
>> completely migrated to the GenericCLI.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Till
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:07 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Till,
>>>
>>> I agree that we need to resolve the issue by overriding the
>>> configuration before selecting the CustomCommandLines. However, IIUC,
>>> after FLINK-15852 the GenericCLI should always be the first choice.
>>> Could you help me to understand why the FlinkYarnSessionCli can be
>>> activated?
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Yangze Guo
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 4:48 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi Tony,
>>> >
>>> > I think you are right that Flink's cli does not behave super
>>> consistent at the moment. Case 2. should definitely work because `-t
>>> yarn-application` should overwrite what is defined in the Flink
>>> configuration. The problem seems to be that we don't resolve the
>>> configuration wrt the specified command line options before calling into
>>> `CustomCommandLine.isActive`. If we parsed first the command line
>>> configuration options which can overwrite flink-conf.yaml options and then
>>> replaced them, then the custom command lines (assuming that they use the
>>> Configuration as the ground truth) should behave consistently.
>>> >
>>> > For your questions:
>>> >
>>> > 1. I am not 100% sure. I think the FlinkYarnSessionCli wasn't used on
>>> purpose when introducing the yarn application mode.
>>> > 2. See answer 1.
>>> >
>>> > I think it is a good idea to extend the description of the config
>>> option `execution.target`. Do you want to create a ticket and a PR for it?
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Till
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:37 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi, Tony.
>>> >>
>>> >> What is the version of your flink-dist. AFAIK, this issue should be
>>> >> addressed in FLINK-15852[1]. Could you give the client log of case
>>> >> 2(set the log level to DEBUG would be better).
>>> >>
>>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15852
>>> >>
>>> >> Best,
>>> >> Yangze Guo
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:33 AM Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Hi Experts,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I recently tried to run yarn-application mode on my yarn cluster,
>>> and I had a problem related to configuring `execution.target`.
>>> >> > After reading the source code and doing some experiments, I found
>>> that there should be some room of improvement for `FlinkYarnSessionCli` or
>>> `AbstractYarnCli`.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > My experiments are:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and
>>> run `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job successfully.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
>>> >> > `GenericCLI` is active
>>> >> >
>>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run
>>> `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job failed
>>> >> >
>>> >> > failed due to `ClusterDeploymentException` [1]
>>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
>>> >> >
>>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and
>>> run `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
>>> >> > `GenericCLI` is active
>>> >> >
>>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run
>>> `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
>>> >> >
>>> >> > From `AbstractYarnCli#isActive` [2] and
>>> `FlinkYarnSessionCli#isActive` [3], `FlinkYarnSessionCli` will be active
>>> when `execution.target` is specified with `yarn-per-job` or `yarn-session`.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > According to the flink official document [4], I thought the 2nd
>>> experiment should also work well, but it didn't.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> The --target will overwrite the execution.target specified in the
>>> config/flink-config.yaml.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > The root cause is that `FlinkYarnSessionCli` only overwrite the
>>> `execution.target` with `yarn-session` or `yarn-per-job` [5], but no
>>> `yarn-application`.
>>> >> > So, my question is
>>> >> >
>>> >> > should we use `FlinkYarnSessionCli` in case 2?
>>> >> > if we should, how we can improve `FlinkYarnSessionCli` so that we
>>> can overwrite `execution.target` via `--target`?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > and one more improvement, the config description for
>>> `execution.target` [6] should include `yarn-application` as well.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > [1]
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/YarnClusterDescriptor.java#L439-L447
>>> >> > [2]
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/AbstractYarnCli.java#L54-L66
>>> >> > [3]
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L373-L377
>>> >> > [4]
>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/deployment/cli.html#selecting-deployment-targets
>>> >> > [5]
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L397-L413
>>> >> > [6]
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/configuration/DeploymentOptions.java#L41-L46
>>> >> >
>>> >> > best regards,
>>> >> >
>>>
>>
Re: when should `FlinkYarnSessionCli` be included for parsing CLI arguments?
Posted by Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com>.
Hi Till, Yangze,
I think FLINK-15852 should solve my problem.
It is my fault that my flink version is not 100% consistent with the
community version, and FLINK-15852 is the one I missed.
Thanks for your information.
best regards,
Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 於 2021年4月26日 週一 下午5:14寫道：
> I think you are right that the `GenericCLI` should be the first choice.
> From the top of my head I do not remember why FlinkYarnSessionCli is still
> used. Maybe it is in order to support some Yarn specific cli option
> parsing. I assume it is either an oversight or some parsing has not been
> completely migrated to the GenericCLI.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:07 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Till,
>>
>> I agree that we need to resolve the issue by overriding the
>> configuration before selecting the CustomCommandLines. However, IIUC,
>> after FLINK-15852 the GenericCLI should always be the first choice.
>> Could you help me to understand why the FlinkYarnSessionCli can be
>> activated?
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> Yangze Guo
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 4:48 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Tony,
>> >
>> > I think you are right that Flink's cli does not behave super consistent
>> at the moment. Case 2. should definitely work because `-t yarn-application`
>> should overwrite what is defined in the Flink configuration. The problem
>> seems to be that we don't resolve the configuration wrt the specified
>> command line options before calling into `CustomCommandLine.isActive`. If
>> we parsed first the command line configuration options which can overwrite
>> flink-conf.yaml options and then replaced them, then the custom command
>> lines (assuming that they use the Configuration as the ground truth) should
>> behave consistently.
>> >
>> > For your questions:
>> >
>> > 1. I am not 100% sure. I think the FlinkYarnSessionCli wasn't used on
>> purpose when introducing the yarn application mode.
>> > 2. See answer 1.
>> >
>> > I think it is a good idea to extend the description of the config
>> option `execution.target`. Do you want to create a ticket and a PR for it?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Till
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:37 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi, Tony.
>> >>
>> >> What is the version of your flink-dist. AFAIK, this issue should be
>> >> addressed in FLINK-15852[1]. Could you give the client log of case
>> >> 2(set the log level to DEBUG would be better).
>> >>
>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15852
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >> Yangze Guo
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:33 AM Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi Experts,
>> >> >
>> >> > I recently tried to run yarn-application mode on my yarn cluster,
>> and I had a problem related to configuring `execution.target`.
>> >> > After reading the source code and doing some experiments, I found
>> that there should be some room of improvement for `FlinkYarnSessionCli` or
>> `AbstractYarnCli`.
>> >> >
>> >> > My experiments are:
>> >> >
>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and
>> run `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job successfully.
>> >> >
>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
>> >> > `GenericCLI` is active
>> >> >
>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run
>> `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job failed
>> >> >
>> >> > failed due to `ClusterDeploymentException` [1]
>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
>> >> >
>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and
>> run `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
>> >> >
>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
>> >> > `GenericCLI` is active
>> >> >
>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run
>> `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
>> >> >
>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
>> >> >
>> >> > From `AbstractYarnCli#isActive` [2] and
>> `FlinkYarnSessionCli#isActive` [3], `FlinkYarnSessionCli` will be active
>> when `execution.target` is specified with `yarn-per-job` or `yarn-session`.
>> >> >
>> >> > According to the flink official document [4], I thought the 2nd
>> experiment should also work well, but it didn't.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The --target will overwrite the execution.target specified in the
>> config/flink-config.yaml.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > The root cause is that `FlinkYarnSessionCli` only overwrite the
>> `execution.target` with `yarn-session` or `yarn-per-job` [5], but no
>> `yarn-application`.
>> >> > So, my question is
>> >> >
>> >> > should we use `FlinkYarnSessionCli` in case 2?
>> >> > if we should, how we can improve `FlinkYarnSessionCli` so that we
>> can overwrite `execution.target` via `--target`?
>> >> >
>> >> > and one more improvement, the config description for
>> `execution.target` [6] should include `yarn-application` as well.
>> >> >
>> >> > [1]
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/YarnClusterDescriptor.java#L439-L447
>> >> > [2]
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/AbstractYarnCli.java#L54-L66
>> >> > [3]
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L373-L377
>> >> > [4]
>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/deployment/cli.html#selecting-deployment-targets
>> >> > [5]
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L397-L413
>> >> > [6]
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/configuration/DeploymentOptions.java#L41-L46
>> >> >
>> >> > best regards,
>> >> >
>>
>
Re: when should `FlinkYarnSessionCli` be included for parsing CLI arguments?
Posted by Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com>.
If the GenericCLI is selected, then the execution.target should have
been overwritten to "yarn-application" in GenericCLI#toConfiguration.
It is odd that why the GenericCLI#isActive return false as the
execution.target is defined in both flink-conf and command line.
Best,
Yangze Guo
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 5:14 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I think you are right that the `GenericCLI` should be the first choice. From the top of my head I do not remember why FlinkYarnSessionCli is still used. Maybe it is in order to support some Yarn specific cli option parsing. I assume it is either an oversight or some parsing has not been completely migrated to the GenericCLI.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:07 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Till,
>>
>> I agree that we need to resolve the issue by overriding the
>> configuration before selecting the CustomCommandLines. However, IIUC,
>> after FLINK-15852 the GenericCLI should always be the first choice.
>> Could you help me to understand why the FlinkYarnSessionCli can be
>> activated?
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> Yangze Guo
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 4:48 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Tony,
>> >
>> > I think you are right that Flink's cli does not behave super consistent at the moment. Case 2. should definitely work because `-t yarn-application` should overwrite what is defined in the Flink configuration. The problem seems to be that we don't resolve the configuration wrt the specified command line options before calling into `CustomCommandLine.isActive`. If we parsed first the command line configuration options which can overwrite flink-conf.yaml options and then replaced them, then the custom command lines (assuming that they use the Configuration as the ground truth) should behave consistently.
>> >
>> > For your questions:
>> >
>> > 1. I am not 100% sure. I think the FlinkYarnSessionCli wasn't used on purpose when introducing the yarn application mode.
>> > 2. See answer 1.
>> >
>> > I think it is a good idea to extend the description of the config option `execution.target`. Do you want to create a ticket and a PR for it?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Till
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:37 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi, Tony.
>> >>
>> >> What is the version of your flink-dist. AFAIK, this issue should be
>> >> addressed in FLINK-15852[1]. Could you give the client log of case
>> >> 2(set the log level to DEBUG would be better).
>> >>
>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15852
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >> Yangze Guo
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:33 AM Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi Experts,
>> >> >
>> >> > I recently tried to run yarn-application mode on my yarn cluster, and I had a problem related to configuring `execution.target`.
>> >> > After reading the source code and doing some experiments, I found that there should be some room of improvement for `FlinkYarnSessionCli` or `AbstractYarnCli`.
>> >> >
>> >> > My experiments are:
>> >> >
>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job successfully.
>> >> >
>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
>> >> > `GenericCLI` is active
>> >> >
>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job failed
>> >> >
>> >> > failed due to `ClusterDeploymentException` [1]
>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
>> >> >
>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
>> >> >
>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
>> >> > `GenericCLI` is active
>> >> >
>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
>> >> >
>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
>> >> >
>> >> > From `AbstractYarnCli#isActive` [2] and `FlinkYarnSessionCli#isActive` [3], `FlinkYarnSessionCli` will be active when `execution.target` is specified with `yarn-per-job` or `yarn-session`.
>> >> >
>> >> > According to the flink official document [4], I thought the 2nd experiment should also work well, but it didn't.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The --target will overwrite the execution.target specified in the config/flink-config.yaml.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > The root cause is that `FlinkYarnSessionCli` only overwrite the `execution.target` with `yarn-session` or `yarn-per-job` [5], but no `yarn-application`.
>> >> > So, my question is
>> >> >
>> >> > should we use `FlinkYarnSessionCli` in case 2?
>> >> > if we should, how we can improve `FlinkYarnSessionCli` so that we can overwrite `execution.target` via `--target`?
>> >> >
>> >> > and one more improvement, the config description for `execution.target` [6] should include `yarn-application` as well.
>> >> >
>> >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/YarnClusterDescriptor.java#L439-L447
>> >> > [2] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/AbstractYarnCli.java#L54-L66
>> >> > [3] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L373-L377
>> >> > [4] https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/deployment/cli.html#selecting-deployment-targets
>> >> > [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L397-L413
>> >> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/configuration/DeploymentOptions.java#L41-L46
>> >> >
>> >> > best regards,
>> >> >
Re: when should `FlinkYarnSessionCli` be included for parsing CLI arguments?
Posted by Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com>.
Hi Till, Yangze,
I think FLINK-15852 should solve my problem.
It is my fault that my flink version is not 100% consistent with the
community version, and FLINK-15852 is the one I missed.
Thanks for your information.
best regards,
Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 於 2021年4月26日 週一 下午5:14寫道：
> I think you are right that the `GenericCLI` should be the first choice.
> From the top of my head I do not remember why FlinkYarnSessionCli is still
> used. Maybe it is in order to support some Yarn specific cli option
> parsing. I assume it is either an oversight or some parsing has not been
> completely migrated to the GenericCLI.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:07 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Till,
>>
>> I agree that we need to resolve the issue by overriding the
>> configuration before selecting the CustomCommandLines. However, IIUC,
>> after FLINK-15852 the GenericCLI should always be the first choice.
>> Could you help me to understand why the FlinkYarnSessionCli can be
>> activated?
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> Yangze Guo
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 4:48 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Tony,
>> >
>> > I think you are right that Flink's cli does not behave super consistent
>> at the moment. Case 2. should definitely work because `-t yarn-application`
>> should overwrite what is defined in the Flink configuration. The problem
>> seems to be that we don't resolve the configuration wrt the specified
>> command line options before calling into `CustomCommandLine.isActive`. If
>> we parsed first the command line configuration options which can overwrite
>> flink-conf.yaml options and then replaced them, then the custom command
>> lines (assuming that they use the Configuration as the ground truth) should
>> behave consistently.
>> >
>> > For your questions:
>> >
>> > 1. I am not 100% sure. I think the FlinkYarnSessionCli wasn't used on
>> purpose when introducing the yarn application mode.
>> > 2. See answer 1.
>> >
>> > I think it is a good idea to extend the description of the config
>> option `execution.target`. Do you want to create a ticket and a PR for it?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Till
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:37 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi, Tony.
>> >>
>> >> What is the version of your flink-dist. AFAIK, this issue should be
>> >> addressed in FLINK-15852[1]. Could you give the client log of case
>> >> 2(set the log level to DEBUG would be better).
>> >>
>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15852
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >> Yangze Guo
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:33 AM Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi Experts,
>> >> >
>> >> > I recently tried to run yarn-application mode on my yarn cluster,
>> and I had a problem related to configuring `execution.target`.
>> >> > After reading the source code and doing some experiments, I found
>> that there should be some room of improvement for `FlinkYarnSessionCli` or
>> `AbstractYarnCli`.
>> >> >
>> >> > My experiments are:
>> >> >
>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and
>> run `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job successfully.
>> >> >
>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
>> >> > `GenericCLI` is active
>> >> >
>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run
>> `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job failed
>> >> >
>> >> > failed due to `ClusterDeploymentException` [1]
>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
>> >> >
>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and
>> run `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
>> >> >
>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
>> >> > `GenericCLI` is active
>> >> >
>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run
>> `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
>> >> >
>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
>> >> >
>> >> > From `AbstractYarnCli#isActive` [2] and
>> `FlinkYarnSessionCli#isActive` [3], `FlinkYarnSessionCli` will be active
>> when `execution.target` is specified with `yarn-per-job` or `yarn-session`.
>> >> >
>> >> > According to the flink official document [4], I thought the 2nd
>> experiment should also work well, but it didn't.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The --target will overwrite the execution.target specified in the
>> config/flink-config.yaml.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > The root cause is that `FlinkYarnSessionCli` only overwrite the
>> `execution.target` with `yarn-session` or `yarn-per-job` [5], but no
>> `yarn-application`.
>> >> > So, my question is
>> >> >
>> >> > should we use `FlinkYarnSessionCli` in case 2?
>> >> > if we should, how we can improve `FlinkYarnSessionCli` so that we
>> can overwrite `execution.target` via `--target`?
>> >> >
>> >> > and one more improvement, the config description for
>> `execution.target` [6] should include `yarn-application` as well.
>> >> >
>> >> > [1]
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/YarnClusterDescriptor.java#L439-L447
>> >> > [2]
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/AbstractYarnCli.java#L54-L66
>> >> > [3]
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L373-L377
>> >> > [4]
>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/deployment/cli.html#selecting-deployment-targets
>> >> > [5]
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L397-L413
>> >> > [6]
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/configuration/DeploymentOptions.java#L41-L46
>> >> >
>> >> > best regards,
>> >> >
>>
>
Re: when should `FlinkYarnSessionCli` be included for parsing CLI arguments?
Posted by Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com>.
If the GenericCLI is selected, then the execution.target should have
been overwritten to "yarn-application" in GenericCLI#toConfiguration.
It is odd that why the GenericCLI#isActive return false as the
execution.target is defined in both flink-conf and command line.
Best,
Yangze Guo
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 5:14 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I think you are right that the `GenericCLI` should be the first choice. From the top of my head I do not remember why FlinkYarnSessionCli is still used. Maybe it is in order to support some Yarn specific cli option parsing. I assume it is either an oversight or some parsing has not been completely migrated to the GenericCLI.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:07 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Till,
>>
>> I agree that we need to resolve the issue by overriding the
>> configuration before selecting the CustomCommandLines. However, IIUC,
>> after FLINK-15852 the GenericCLI should always be the first choice.
>> Could you help me to understand why the FlinkYarnSessionCli can be
>> activated?
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> Yangze Guo
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 4:48 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Tony,
>> >
>> > I think you are right that Flink's cli does not behave super consistent at the moment. Case 2. should definitely work because `-t yarn-application` should overwrite what is defined in the Flink configuration. The problem seems to be that we don't resolve the configuration wrt the specified command line options before calling into `CustomCommandLine.isActive`. If we parsed first the command line configuration options which can overwrite flink-conf.yaml options and then replaced them, then the custom command lines (assuming that they use the Configuration as the ground truth) should behave consistently.
>> >
>> > For your questions:
>> >
>> > 1. I am not 100% sure. I think the FlinkYarnSessionCli wasn't used on purpose when introducing the yarn application mode.
>> > 2. See answer 1.
>> >
>> > I think it is a good idea to extend the description of the config option `execution.target`. Do you want to create a ticket and a PR for it?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Till
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:37 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi, Tony.
>> >>
>> >> What is the version of your flink-dist. AFAIK, this issue should be
>> >> addressed in FLINK-15852[1]. Could you give the client log of case
>> >> 2(set the log level to DEBUG would be better).
>> >>
>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15852
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >> Yangze Guo
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:33 AM Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi Experts,
>> >> >
>> >> > I recently tried to run yarn-application mode on my yarn cluster, and I had a problem related to configuring `execution.target`.
>> >> > After reading the source code and doing some experiments, I found that there should be some room of improvement for `FlinkYarnSessionCli` or `AbstractYarnCli`.
>> >> >
>> >> > My experiments are:
>> >> >
>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job successfully.
>> >> >
>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
>> >> > `GenericCLI` is active
>> >> >
>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job failed
>> >> >
>> >> > failed due to `ClusterDeploymentException` [1]
>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
>> >> >
>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
>> >> >
>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
>> >> > `GenericCLI` is active
>> >> >
>> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
>> >> >
>> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
>> >> >
>> >> > From `AbstractYarnCli#isActive` [2] and `FlinkYarnSessionCli#isActive` [3], `FlinkYarnSessionCli` will be active when `execution.target` is specified with `yarn-per-job` or `yarn-session`.
>> >> >
>> >> > According to the flink official document [4], I thought the 2nd experiment should also work well, but it didn't.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The --target will overwrite the execution.target specified in the config/flink-config.yaml.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > The root cause is that `FlinkYarnSessionCli` only overwrite the `execution.target` with `yarn-session` or `yarn-per-job` [5], but no `yarn-application`.
>> >> > So, my question is
>> >> >
>> >> > should we use `FlinkYarnSessionCli` in case 2?
>> >> > if we should, how we can improve `FlinkYarnSessionCli` so that we can overwrite `execution.target` via `--target`?
>> >> >
>> >> > and one more improvement, the config description for `execution.target` [6] should include `yarn-application` as well.
>> >> >
>> >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/YarnClusterDescriptor.java#L439-L447
>> >> > [2] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/AbstractYarnCli.java#L54-L66
>> >> > [3] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L373-L377
>> >> > [4] https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/deployment/cli.html#selecting-deployment-targets
>> >> > [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L397-L413
>> >> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/configuration/DeploymentOptions.java#L41-L46
>> >> >
>> >> > best regards,
>> >> >
Re: when should `FlinkYarnSessionCli` be included for parsing CLI arguments?
Posted by Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>.
I think you are right that the `GenericCLI` should be the first choice.
From the top of my head I do not remember why FlinkYarnSessionCli is still
used. Maybe it is in order to support some Yarn specific cli option
parsing. I assume it is either an oversight or some parsing has not been
completely migrated to the GenericCLI.
Cheers,
Till
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:07 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Till,
>
> I agree that we need to resolve the issue by overriding the
> configuration before selecting the CustomCommandLines. However, IIUC,
> after FLINK-15852 the GenericCLI should always be the first choice.
> Could you help me to understand why the FlinkYarnSessionCli can be
> activated?
>
>
> Best,
> Yangze Guo
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 4:48 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tony,
> >
> > I think you are right that Flink's cli does not behave super consistent
> at the moment. Case 2. should definitely work because `-t yarn-application`
> should overwrite what is defined in the Flink configuration. The problem
> seems to be that we don't resolve the configuration wrt the specified
> command line options before calling into `CustomCommandLine.isActive`. If
> we parsed first the command line configuration options which can overwrite
> flink-conf.yaml options and then replaced them, then the custom command
> lines (assuming that they use the Configuration as the ground truth) should
> behave consistently.
> >
> > For your questions:
> >
> > 1. I am not 100% sure. I think the FlinkYarnSessionCli wasn't used on
> purpose when introducing the yarn application mode.
> > 2. See answer 1.
> >
> > I think it is a good idea to extend the description of the config option
> `execution.target`. Do you want to create a ticket and a PR for it?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Till
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:37 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi, Tony.
> >>
> >> What is the version of your flink-dist. AFAIK, this issue should be
> >> addressed in FLINK-15852[1]. Could you give the client log of case
> >> 2(set the log level to DEBUG would be better).
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15852
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Yangze Guo
> >>
> >> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:33 AM Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi Experts,
> >> >
> >> > I recently tried to run yarn-application mode on my yarn cluster, and
> I had a problem related to configuring `execution.target`.
> >> > After reading the source code and doing some experiments, I found
> that there should be some room of improvement for `FlinkYarnSessionCli` or
> `AbstractYarnCli`.
> >> >
> >> > My experiments are:
> >> >
> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and
> run `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job successfully.
> >> >
> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
> >> > `GenericCLI` is active
> >> >
> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run
> `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job failed
> >> >
> >> > failed due to `ClusterDeploymentException` [1]
> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
> >> >
> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and
> run `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
> >> >
> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
> >> > `GenericCLI` is active
> >> >
> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run
> `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
> >> >
> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
> >> >
> >> > From `AbstractYarnCli#isActive` [2] and
> `FlinkYarnSessionCli#isActive` [3], `FlinkYarnSessionCli` will be active
> when `execution.target` is specified with `yarn-per-job` or `yarn-session`.
> >> >
> >> > According to the flink official document [4], I thought the 2nd
> experiment should also work well, but it didn't.
> >> >>
> >> >> The --target will overwrite the execution.target specified in the
> config/flink-config.yaml.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The root cause is that `FlinkYarnSessionCli` only overwrite the
> `execution.target` with `yarn-session` or `yarn-per-job` [5], but no
> `yarn-application`.
> >> > So, my question is
> >> >
> >> > should we use `FlinkYarnSessionCli` in case 2?
> >> > if we should, how we can improve `FlinkYarnSessionCli` so that we can
> overwrite `execution.target` via `--target`?
> >> >
> >> > and one more improvement, the config description for
> `execution.target` [6] should include `yarn-application` as well.
> >> >
> >> > [1]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/YarnClusterDescriptor.java#L439-L447
> >> > [2]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/AbstractYarnCli.java#L54-L66
> >> > [3]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L373-L377
> >> > [4]
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/deployment/cli.html#selecting-deployment-targets
> >> > [5]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L397-L413
> >> > [6]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/configuration/DeploymentOptions.java#L41-L46
> >> >
> >> > best regards,
> >> >
>
Re: when should `FlinkYarnSessionCli` be included for parsing CLI arguments?
Posted by Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>.
I think you are right that the `GenericCLI` should be the first choice.
From the top of my head I do not remember why FlinkYarnSessionCli is still
used. Maybe it is in order to support some Yarn specific cli option
parsing. I assume it is either an oversight or some parsing has not been
completely migrated to the GenericCLI.
Cheers,
Till
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:07 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Till,
>
> I agree that we need to resolve the issue by overriding the
> configuration before selecting the CustomCommandLines. However, IIUC,
> after FLINK-15852 the GenericCLI should always be the first choice.
> Could you help me to understand why the FlinkYarnSessionCli can be
> activated?
>
>
> Best,
> Yangze Guo
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 4:48 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tony,
> >
> > I think you are right that Flink's cli does not behave super consistent
> at the moment. Case 2. should definitely work because `-t yarn-application`
> should overwrite what is defined in the Flink configuration. The problem
> seems to be that we don't resolve the configuration wrt the specified
> command line options before calling into `CustomCommandLine.isActive`. If
> we parsed first the command line configuration options which can overwrite
> flink-conf.yaml options and then replaced them, then the custom command
> lines (assuming that they use the Configuration as the ground truth) should
> behave consistently.
> >
> > For your questions:
> >
> > 1. I am not 100% sure. I think the FlinkYarnSessionCli wasn't used on
> purpose when introducing the yarn application mode.
> > 2. See answer 1.
> >
> > I think it is a good idea to extend the description of the config option
> `execution.target`. Do you want to create a ticket and a PR for it?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Till
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:37 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi, Tony.
> >>
> >> What is the version of your flink-dist. AFAIK, this issue should be
> >> addressed in FLINK-15852[1]. Could you give the client log of case
> >> 2(set the log level to DEBUG would be better).
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15852
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Yangze Guo
> >>
> >> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:33 AM Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi Experts,
> >> >
> >> > I recently tried to run yarn-application mode on my yarn cluster, and
> I had a problem related to configuring `execution.target`.
> >> > After reading the source code and doing some experiments, I found
> that there should be some room of improvement for `FlinkYarnSessionCli` or
> `AbstractYarnCli`.
> >> >
> >> > My experiments are:
> >> >
> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and
> run `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job successfully.
> >> >
> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
> >> > `GenericCLI` is active
> >> >
> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run
> `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job failed
> >> >
> >> > failed due to `ClusterDeploymentException` [1]
> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
> >> >
> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and
> run `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
> >> >
> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
> >> > `GenericCLI` is active
> >> >
> >> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run
> `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
> >> >
> >> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
> >> >
> >> > From `AbstractYarnCli#isActive` [2] and
> `FlinkYarnSessionCli#isActive` [3], `FlinkYarnSessionCli` will be active
> when `execution.target` is specified with `yarn-per-job` or `yarn-session`.
> >> >
> >> > According to the flink official document [4], I thought the 2nd
> experiment should also work well, but it didn't.
> >> >>
> >> >> The --target will overwrite the execution.target specified in the
> config/flink-config.yaml.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The root cause is that `FlinkYarnSessionCli` only overwrite the
> `execution.target` with `yarn-session` or `yarn-per-job` [5], but no
> `yarn-application`.
> >> > So, my question is
> >> >
> >> > should we use `FlinkYarnSessionCli` in case 2?
> >> > if we should, how we can improve `FlinkYarnSessionCli` so that we can
> overwrite `execution.target` via `--target`?
> >> >
> >> > and one more improvement, the config description for
> `execution.target` [6] should include `yarn-application` as well.
> >> >
> >> > [1]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/YarnClusterDescriptor.java#L439-L447
> >> > [2]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/AbstractYarnCli.java#L54-L66
> >> > [3]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L373-L377
> >> > [4]
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/deployment/cli.html#selecting-deployment-targets
> >> > [5]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L397-L413
> >> > [6]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/configuration/DeploymentOptions.java#L41-L46
> >> >
> >> > best regards,
> >> >
>
Re: when should `FlinkYarnSessionCli` be included for parsing CLI arguments?
Posted by Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Till,
I agree that we need to resolve the issue by overriding the
configuration before selecting the CustomCommandLines. However, IIUC,
after FLINK-15852 the GenericCLI should always be the first choice.
Could you help me to understand why the FlinkYarnSessionCli can be
activated?
Best,
Yangze Guo
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 4:48 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> I think you are right that Flink's cli does not behave super consistent at the moment. Case 2. should definitely work because `-t yarn-application` should overwrite what is defined in the Flink configuration. The problem seems to be that we don't resolve the configuration wrt the specified command line options before calling into `CustomCommandLine.isActive`. If we parsed first the command line configuration options which can overwrite flink-conf.yaml options and then replaced them, then the custom command lines (assuming that they use the Configuration as the ground truth) should behave consistently.
>
> For your questions:
>
> 1. I am not 100% sure. I think the FlinkYarnSessionCli wasn't used on purpose when introducing the yarn application mode.
> 2. See answer 1.
>
> I think it is a good idea to extend the description of the config option `execution.target`. Do you want to create a ticket and a PR for it?
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:37 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Tony.
>>
>> What is the version of your flink-dist. AFAIK, this issue should be
>> addressed in FLINK-15852[1]. Could you give the client log of case
>> 2(set the log level to DEBUG would be better).
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15852
>>
>> Best,
>> Yangze Guo
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:33 AM Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Experts,
>> >
>> > I recently tried to run yarn-application mode on my yarn cluster, and I had a problem related to configuring `execution.target`.
>> > After reading the source code and doing some experiments, I found that there should be some room of improvement for `FlinkYarnSessionCli` or `AbstractYarnCli`.
>> >
>> > My experiments are:
>> >
>> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job successfully.
>> >
>> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
>> > `GenericCLI` is active
>> >
>> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job failed
>> >
>> > failed due to `ClusterDeploymentException` [1]
>> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
>> >
>> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
>> >
>> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
>> > `GenericCLI` is active
>> >
>> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
>> >
>> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
>> >
>> > From `AbstractYarnCli#isActive` [2] and `FlinkYarnSessionCli#isActive` [3], `FlinkYarnSessionCli` will be active when `execution.target` is specified with `yarn-per-job` or `yarn-session`.
>> >
>> > According to the flink official document [4], I thought the 2nd experiment should also work well, but it didn't.
>> >>
>> >> The --target will overwrite the execution.target specified in the config/flink-config.yaml.
>> >
>> >
>> > The root cause is that `FlinkYarnSessionCli` only overwrite the `execution.target` with `yarn-session` or `yarn-per-job` [5], but no `yarn-application`.
>> > So, my question is
>> >
>> > should we use `FlinkYarnSessionCli` in case 2?
>> > if we should, how we can improve `FlinkYarnSessionCli` so that we can overwrite `execution.target` via `--target`?
>> >
>> > and one more improvement, the config description for `execution.target` [6] should include `yarn-application` as well.
>> >
>> > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/YarnClusterDescriptor.java#L439-L447
>> > [2] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/AbstractYarnCli.java#L54-L66
>> > [3] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L373-L377
>> > [4] https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/deployment/cli.html#selecting-deployment-targets
>> > [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L397-L413
>> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/configuration/DeploymentOptions.java#L41-L46
>> >
>> > best regards,
>> >
Re: when should `FlinkYarnSessionCli` be included for parsing CLI arguments?
Posted by Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Till,
I agree that we need to resolve the issue by overriding the
configuration before selecting the CustomCommandLines. However, IIUC,
after FLINK-15852 the GenericCLI should always be the first choice.
Could you help me to understand why the FlinkYarnSessionCli can be
activated?
Best,
Yangze Guo
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 4:48 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> I think you are right that Flink's cli does not behave super consistent at the moment. Case 2. should definitely work because `-t yarn-application` should overwrite what is defined in the Flink configuration. The problem seems to be that we don't resolve the configuration wrt the specified command line options before calling into `CustomCommandLine.isActive`. If we parsed first the command line configuration options which can overwrite flink-conf.yaml options and then replaced them, then the custom command lines (assuming that they use the Configuration as the ground truth) should behave consistently.
>
> For your questions:
>
> 1. I am not 100% sure. I think the FlinkYarnSessionCli wasn't used on purpose when introducing the yarn application mode.
> 2. See answer 1.
>
> I think it is a good idea to extend the description of the config option `execution.target`. Do you want to create a ticket and a PR for it?
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:37 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Tony.
>>
>> What is the version of your flink-dist. AFAIK, this issue should be
>> addressed in FLINK-15852[1]. Could you give the client log of case
>> 2(set the log level to DEBUG would be better).
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15852
>>
>> Best,
>> Yangze Guo
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:33 AM Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Experts,
>> >
>> > I recently tried to run yarn-application mode on my yarn cluster, and I had a problem related to configuring `execution.target`.
>> > After reading the source code and doing some experiments, I found that there should be some room of improvement for `FlinkYarnSessionCli` or `AbstractYarnCli`.
>> >
>> > My experiments are:
>> >
>> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job successfully.
>> >
>> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
>> > `GenericCLI` is active
>> >
>> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job failed
>> >
>> > failed due to `ClusterDeploymentException` [1]
>> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
>> >
>> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
>> >
>> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
>> > `GenericCLI` is active
>> >
>> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
>> >
>> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
>> >
>> > From `AbstractYarnCli#isActive` [2] and `FlinkYarnSessionCli#isActive` [3], `FlinkYarnSessionCli` will be active when `execution.target` is specified with `yarn-per-job` or `yarn-session`.
>> >
>> > According to the flink official document [4], I thought the 2nd experiment should also work well, but it didn't.
>> >>
>> >> The --target will overwrite the execution.target specified in the config/flink-config.yaml.
>> >
>> >
>> > The root cause is that `FlinkYarnSessionCli` only overwrite the `execution.target` with `yarn-session` or `yarn-per-job` [5], but no `yarn-application`.
>> > So, my question is
>> >
>> > should we use `FlinkYarnSessionCli` in case 2?
>> > if we should, how we can improve `FlinkYarnSessionCli` so that we can overwrite `execution.target` via `--target`?
>> >
>> > and one more improvement, the config description for `execution.target` [6] should include `yarn-application` as well.
>> >
>> > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/YarnClusterDescriptor.java#L439-L447
>> > [2] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/AbstractYarnCli.java#L54-L66
>> > [3] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L373-L377
>> > [4] https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/deployment/cli.html#selecting-deployment-targets
>> > [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L397-L413
>> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/configuration/DeploymentOptions.java#L41-L46
>> >
>> > best regards,
>> >
Re: when should `FlinkYarnSessionCli` be included for parsing CLI arguments?
Posted by Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>.
Hi Tony,
I think you are right that Flink's cli does not behave super consistent at
the moment. Case 2. should definitely work because `-t yarn-application`
should overwrite what is defined in the Flink configuration. The problem
seems to be that we don't resolve the configuration wrt the specified
command line options before calling into `CustomCommandLine.isActive`. If
we parsed first the command line configuration options which can overwrite
flink-conf.yaml options and then replaced them, then the custom command
lines (assuming that they use the Configuration as the ground truth) should
behave consistently.
For your questions:
1. I am not 100% sure. I think the FlinkYarnSessionCli wasn't used on
purpose when introducing the yarn application mode.
2. See answer 1.
I think it is a good idea to extend the description of the config option
`execution.target`. Do you want to create a ticket and a PR for it?
Cheers,
Till
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:37 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Tony.
>
> What is the version of your flink-dist. AFAIK, this issue should be
> addressed in FLINK-15852[1]. Could you give the client log of case
> 2(set the log level to DEBUG would be better).
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15852
>
> Best,
> Yangze Guo
>
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:33 AM Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Experts,
> >
> > I recently tried to run yarn-application mode on my yarn cluster, and I
> had a problem related to configuring `execution.target`.
> > After reading the source code and doing some experiments, I found that
> there should be some room of improvement for `FlinkYarnSessionCli` or
> `AbstractYarnCli`.
> >
> > My experiments are:
> >
> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and run
> `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job successfully.
> >
> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
> > `GenericCLI` is active
> >
> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run
> `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job failed
> >
> > failed due to `ClusterDeploymentException` [1]
> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
> >
> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and run
> `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
> >
> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
> > `GenericCLI` is active
> >
> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run
> `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
> >
> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
> >
> > From `AbstractYarnCli#isActive` [2] and `FlinkYarnSessionCli#isActive`
> [3], `FlinkYarnSessionCli` will be active when `execution.target` is
> specified with `yarn-per-job` or `yarn-session`.
> >
> > According to the flink official document [4], I thought the 2nd
> experiment should also work well, but it didn't.
> >>
> >> The --target will overwrite the execution.target specified in the
> config/flink-config.yaml.
> >
> >
> > The root cause is that `FlinkYarnSessionCli` only overwrite the
> `execution.target` with `yarn-session` or `yarn-per-job` [5], but no
> `yarn-application`.
> > So, my question is
> >
> > should we use `FlinkYarnSessionCli` in case 2?
> > if we should, how we can improve `FlinkYarnSessionCli` so that we can
> overwrite `execution.target` via `--target`?
> >
> > and one more improvement, the config description for `execution.target`
> [6] should include `yarn-application` as well.
> >
> > [1]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/YarnClusterDescriptor.java#L439-L447
> > [2]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/AbstractYarnCli.java#L54-L66
> > [3]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L373-L377
> > [4]
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/deployment/cli.html#selecting-deployment-targets
> > [5]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L397-L413
> > [6]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/configuration/DeploymentOptions.java#L41-L46
> >
> > best regards,
> >
>
Re: when should `FlinkYarnSessionCli` be included for parsing CLI arguments?
Posted by Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>.
Hi Tony,
I think you are right that Flink's cli does not behave super consistent at
the moment. Case 2. should definitely work because `-t yarn-application`
should overwrite what is defined in the Flink configuration. The problem
seems to be that we don't resolve the configuration wrt the specified
command line options before calling into `CustomCommandLine.isActive`. If
we parsed first the command line configuration options which can overwrite
flink-conf.yaml options and then replaced them, then the custom command
lines (assuming that they use the Configuration as the ground truth) should
behave consistently.
For your questions:
1. I am not 100% sure. I think the FlinkYarnSessionCli wasn't used on
purpose when introducing the yarn application mode.
2. See answer 1.
I think it is a good idea to extend the description of the config option
`execution.target`. Do you want to create a ticket and a PR for it?
Cheers,
Till
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:37 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Tony.
>
> What is the version of your flink-dist. AFAIK, this issue should be
> addressed in FLINK-15852[1]. Could you give the client log of case
> 2(set the log level to DEBUG would be better).
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15852
>
> Best,
> Yangze Guo
>
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:33 AM Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Experts,
> >
> > I recently tried to run yarn-application mode on my yarn cluster, and I
> had a problem related to configuring `execution.target`.
> > After reading the source code and doing some experiments, I found that
> there should be some room of improvement for `FlinkYarnSessionCli` or
> `AbstractYarnCli`.
> >
> > My experiments are:
> >
> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and run
> `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job successfully.
> >
> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
> > `GenericCLI` is active
> >
> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run
> `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job failed
> >
> > failed due to `ClusterDeploymentException` [1]
> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
> >
> > setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and run
> `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
> >
> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
> > `GenericCLI` is active
> >
> > setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run
> `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
> >
> > `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
> >
> > From `AbstractYarnCli#isActive` [2] and `FlinkYarnSessionCli#isActive`
> [3], `FlinkYarnSessionCli` will be active when `execution.target` is
> specified with `yarn-per-job` or `yarn-session`.
> >
> > According to the flink official document [4], I thought the 2nd
> experiment should also work well, but it didn't.
> >>
> >> The --target will overwrite the execution.target specified in the
> config/flink-config.yaml.
> >
> >
> > The root cause is that `FlinkYarnSessionCli` only overwrite the
> `execution.target` with `yarn-session` or `yarn-per-job` [5], but no
> `yarn-application`.
> > So, my question is
> >
> > should we use `FlinkYarnSessionCli` in case 2?
> > if we should, how we can improve `FlinkYarnSessionCli` so that we can
> overwrite `execution.target` via `--target`?
> >
> > and one more improvement, the config description for `execution.target`
> [6] should include `yarn-application` as well.
> >
> > [1]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/YarnClusterDescriptor.java#L439-L447
> > [2]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/AbstractYarnCli.java#L54-L66
> > [3]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L373-L377
> > [4]
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/deployment/cli.html#selecting-deployment-targets
> > [5]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L397-L413
> > [6]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/configuration/DeploymentOptions.java#L41-L46
> >
> > best regards,
> >
>
Re: when should `FlinkYarnSessionCli` be included for parsing CLI arguments?
Posted by Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Tony.
What is the version of your flink-dist. AFAIK, this issue should be
addressed in FLINK-15852[1]. Could you give the client log of case
2(set the log level to DEBUG would be better).
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15852
Best,
Yangze Guo
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:33 AM Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Experts,
>
> I recently tried to run yarn-application mode on my yarn cluster, and I had a problem related to configuring `execution.target`.
> After reading the source code and doing some experiments, I found that there should be some room of improvement for `FlinkYarnSessionCli` or `AbstractYarnCli`.
>
> My experiments are:
>
> setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job successfully.
>
> `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
> `GenericCLI` is active
>
> setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job failed
>
> failed due to `ClusterDeploymentException` [1]
> `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
>
> setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
>
> `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
> `GenericCLI` is active
>
> setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
>
> `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
>
> From `AbstractYarnCli#isActive` [2] and `FlinkYarnSessionCli#isActive` [3], `FlinkYarnSessionCli` will be active when `execution.target` is specified with `yarn-per-job` or `yarn-session`.
>
> According to the flink official document [4], I thought the 2nd experiment should also work well, but it didn't.
>>
>> The --target will overwrite the execution.target specified in the config/flink-config.yaml.
>
>
> The root cause is that `FlinkYarnSessionCli` only overwrite the `execution.target` with `yarn-session` or `yarn-per-job` [5], but no `yarn-application`.
> So, my question is
>
> should we use `FlinkYarnSessionCli` in case 2?
> if we should, how we can improve `FlinkYarnSessionCli` so that we can overwrite `execution.target` via `--target`?
>
> and one more improvement, the config description for `execution.target` [6] should include `yarn-application` as well.
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/YarnClusterDescriptor.java#L439-L447
> [2] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/AbstractYarnCli.java#L54-L66
> [3] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L373-L377
> [4] https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/deployment/cli.html#selecting-deployment-targets
> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L397-L413
> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/configuration/DeploymentOptions.java#L41-L46
>
> best regards,
>
Re: when should `FlinkYarnSessionCli` be included for parsing CLI arguments?
Posted by Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Tony.
What is the version of your flink-dist. AFAIK, this issue should be
addressed in FLINK-15852[1]. Could you give the client log of case
2(set the log level to DEBUG would be better).
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15852
Best,
Yangze Guo
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 11:33 AM Tony Wei <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Experts,
>
> I recently tried to run yarn-application mode on my yarn cluster, and I had a problem related to configuring `execution.target`.
> After reading the source code and doing some experiments, I found that there should be some room of improvement for `FlinkYarnSessionCli` or `AbstractYarnCli`.
>
> My experiments are:
>
> setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job successfully.
>
> `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
> `GenericCLI` is active
>
> setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run-application -t yarn-application`: run job failed
>
> failed due to `ClusterDeploymentException` [1]
> `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
>
> setting `execution.target: yarn-application` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
>
> `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is not active
> `GenericCLI` is active
>
> setting `execution.target: yarn-per-job` in flink-conf.yaml and run `flink run -t yarn-per-job`: run job successfully.
>
> `FlinkYarnSessionCli` is active
>
> From `AbstractYarnCli#isActive` [2] and `FlinkYarnSessionCli#isActive` [3], `FlinkYarnSessionCli` will be active when `execution.target` is specified with `yarn-per-job` or `yarn-session`.
>
> According to the flink official document [4], I thought the 2nd experiment should also work well, but it didn't.
>>
>> The --target will overwrite the execution.target specified in the config/flink-config.yaml.
>
>
> The root cause is that `FlinkYarnSessionCli` only overwrite the `execution.target` with `yarn-session` or `yarn-per-job` [5], but no `yarn-application`.
> So, my question is
>
> should we use `FlinkYarnSessionCli` in case 2?
> if we should, how we can improve `FlinkYarnSessionCli` so that we can overwrite `execution.target` via `--target`?
>
> and one more improvement, the config description for `execution.target` [6] should include `yarn-application` as well.
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/YarnClusterDescriptor.java#L439-L447
> [2] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/AbstractYarnCli.java#L54-L66
> [3] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L373-L377
> [4] https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/deployment/cli.html#selecting-deployment-targets
> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/cli/FlinkYarnSessionCli.java#L397-L413
> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/configuration/DeploymentOptions.java#L41-L46
>
> best regards,
>