[jira] [Commented] (UIMA-2290) start maven values with Apache UIMA instead of just UIMA

["Richard Eckart de Castilho (JIRA)" <de...@uima.apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15459527#comment-15459527 ] 

Richard Eckart de Castilho commented on UIMA-2290:
--------------------------------------------------

* UIMAJ-SDK: ok
* UIMA-AS: ok
* uimaFIT: ok
* DUCC: need to check
* Sandbox: need to check
* Addons: need to check
* Ruta: need to check
* uimacpp: need to check


> start maven <name> values with Apache UIMA instead of just UIMA
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-2290
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2290
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: addons, C++ Framework, ruta, Sandbox
>            Reporter: Marshall Schor
>            Assignee: Marshall Schor
>            Priority: Trivial
>
> Branding guidelines say the "first use" of a name in websites / documentation of various kinds should use Apache XXX.  Page http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#naming says 'The first and most prominent reference to a project or product on each page must use the "Apache Foo" form of its name. Other references may use either "Apache Foo" or "Foo" as appropriate for the subject matter.'
> It is probably a grey area of whether or not the <name> element constitutes a "first and most prominent reference". However, the <name> element by default is picked up in the NOTICE file and used to create the appropriate Notice, so this weighs in favor of having this be the Apache UIMA form.  
> Therefore, in all projects defining their own <name> element starting with just UIMA, change this to Apache UIMA.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)