You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ignite.apache.org by "Ivan Rakov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/03/21 12:01:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11591) Add info about lock candidates that
are ahead in queue to transaction timeout error message
Ivan Rakov created IGNITE-11591:
-----------------------------------
Summary: Add info about lock candidates that are ahead in queue to transaction timeout error message
Key: IGNITE-11591
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11591
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Ivan Rakov
Fix For: 2.8
If transaction is timed out due to lock acquisition failure, corresponding error will show up in server log on DHT node:
{code:java}
[2019-03-20 21:13:10,831][ERROR][grid-timeout-worker-#23%transactions.TxRollbackOnTimeoutTest0%][GridDhtColocatedCache] <test> Failed to acquire lock for request: GridNearLockRequest [topVer=AffinityTopologyVersion [topVer=4, minorTopVer=0], miniId=1, dhtVers=GridCacheVersion[] [null], subjId=651a30e1-45ac-4b35-86d2-028d1f81d8dc, taskNameHash=0, createTtl=-1, accessTtl=-1, flags=6, txLbl=null, filter=null, super=GridDistributedLockRequest [nodeId=651a30e1-45ac-4b35-86d2-028d1f81d8dc, nearXidVer=GridCacheVersion [topVer=164585585, order=1553105588524, nodeOrder=4], threadId=262, futId=5967e4c9961-d32ea2a6-1789-47d7-bdbf-aa66e6d8c35b, timeout=890, isInTx=true, isInvalidate=false, isRead=false, isolation=REPEATABLE_READ, retVals=[false], txSize=2, flags=0, keysCnt=1, super=GridDistributedBaseMessage [ver=GridCacheVersion [topVer=164585585, order=1553105588524, nodeOrder=4], committedVers=null, rolledbackVers=null, cnt=0, super=GridCacheIdMessage [cacheId=3556498]]]]
class org.apache.ignite.internal.transactions.IgniteTxTimeoutCheckedException: Failed to acquire lock within provided timeout for transaction [timeout=890, tx=GridDhtTxLocal[xid=f219e4c9961-00000000-09cf-6071-0000-000000000001, xidVersion=GridCacheVersion [topVer=164585585, order=1553105588527, nodeOrder=1], concurrency=PESSIMISTIC, isolation=REPEATABLE_READ, state=MARKED_ROLLBACK, invalidate=false, rollbackOnly=true, nodeId=c7dccddb-dee1-4499-94b1-038963500000, timeout=890, duration=891]]
at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.transactions.IgniteTxLocalAdapter$PostLockClosure1.apply(IgniteTxLocalAdapter.java:1766)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.transactions.IgniteTxLocalAdapter$PostLockClosure1.apply(IgniteTxLocalAdapter.java:1714)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridEmbeddedFuture$2.applyx(GridEmbeddedFuture.java:86)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridEmbeddedFuture$AsyncListener1.apply(GridEmbeddedFuture.java:292)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridEmbeddedFuture$AsyncListener1.apply(GridEmbeddedFuture.java:285)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.notifyListener(GridFutureAdapter.java:399)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.unblock(GridFutureAdapter.java:347)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.unblockAll(GridFutureAdapter.java:335)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.onDone(GridFutureAdapter.java:511)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheCompoundIdentityFuture.onDone(GridCacheCompoundIdentityFuture.java:56)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.future.GridFutureAdapter.onDone(GridFutureAdapter.java:490)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtLockFuture.onComplete(GridDhtLockFuture.java:793)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtLockFuture.access$900(GridDhtLockFuture.java:89)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtLockFuture$LockTimeoutObject.onTimeout(GridDhtLockFuture.java:1189)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.timeout.GridTimeoutProcessor$TimeoutWorker.body(GridTimeoutProcessor.java:234)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:120)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.j
{code}
It would be much more useful if this message also contained information about transaction that actually owns corresponding lock (or information about all transactions that are ahead in queue if there are several).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)