You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2002/04/07 03:57:37 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7805] New: - Methods with Protected instead of Public scope

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7805>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7805

Methods with Protected instead of Public scope

           Summary: Methods with Protected instead of Public scope
           Product: Struts
           Version: 1.1 Beta 1
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Major
          Priority: Other
         Component: Controller
        AssignedTo: struts-dev@jakarta.apache.org
        ReportedBy: chuckcavaness@attbi.com


Shouldn't the methods such as execute() in the ExceptionHandler be public 
instead of protected? If I extend the RequestProcessor and override the 
processExceptions method, I get a compile error because my RequestProcessor is 
in a different package (and it should be) than org.apache.struts.action.

Notice that the process() method in RequestProcessor is public so that if you 
extend the ActionServlet in a different package, you can still call the process 
method because it's public.

Chuck

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>