You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@isis.apache.org by Dan Haywood <da...@haywood-associates.co.uk> on 2016/06/01 07:30:04 UTC
Re: Consolidation
Thanks for this feedback, Steve.
Obviously I'll take a look at ISIS-1132. Up until now that behaviour was
puzzling but not a blocker; but Boris raised the ticket with steps to
reproduce, so I'll take a look.
With respect to stabilization, we could perhaps put a 1.12.2 out, though
1.13.0 is quite close to release also. Unlike in 1.12.x where there were
lots of visible changes, the 1.13.0 is mostly internal, tidying up some of
the nastier kludges and simplifying/refactoring the codebase as I can. So
consolidation is the current name of the game.
Will report back on ISIS-1132 before too long, hopefully.
thx
Dan
On 31 May 2016 at 23:46, Stephen Cameron <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to suggest that the 1.12.1 release is not currently of production
> quality and that a decision should be made by the development team as to
> how to address that.
>
> Maybe there is a case for consolidation of 1.12 before release of 1.13 or
> else a recommendation to skip 1.12 and help with 1.13 release testing?
>
> There is a significant issue ISIS-1396 [1] that has been resolved in
> 1.13.0-SNAPSHOT, this is my primary concern. I was going to say to users
> just refresh the page to see the link titles, but I have discovered another
> known issue ISIS-1132 [2] that seems to me quite serious, where datetimes
> don't display correctly after updates.
>
> Also, I've now found a similar bug to 1132, where I created a mass-update
> action (after the edit mode discussion), but this doesn't work as some
> property values (strings not datetimes) are not updated correctly in the
> viewer. This is quite bizarre and I was sure I had an problem in my code,
> but I cannot find one. Updates require a database lookup, which may
> explain.
>
> Hoping this not taken as criticism.
>
> Steve
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1396
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1396>
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1132
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1132>
>
Re: Consolidation
Posted by Stephen Cameron <st...@gmail.com>.
That is good news thanks
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Dan Haywood <da...@haywood-associates.co.uk>
wrote:
> Quick update:
>
> I now have a fix for ISIS-1132, and ISIS-1396 was already fixed. So I'm
> going to cut a 1.12.2 release with these two fixes.
>
> Meantime, will keep 1.13.0-SNAPSHOT in development, with a view of a
> release to follow in the next week or two.
>
> Thx
> Dan
>
>
> On 1 June 2016 at 12:54, Stephen Cameron <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Dan, I'll try to assist in the testing of 1.13.0-SNAPSHOT where I
> > can.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Dan Haywood <
> dan@haywood-associates.co.uk>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for this feedback, Steve.
> > >
> > > Obviously I'll take a look at ISIS-1132. Up until now that behaviour
> was
> > > puzzling but not a blocker; but Boris raised the ticket with steps to
> > > reproduce, so I'll take a look.
> > >
> > > With respect to stabilization, we could perhaps put a 1.12.2 out,
> though
> > > 1.13.0 is quite close to release also. Unlike in 1.12.x where there
> were
> > > lots of visible changes, the 1.13.0 is mostly internal, tidying up some
> > of
> > > the nastier kludges and simplifying/refactoring the codebase as I can.
> > So
> > > consolidation is the current name of the game.
> > >
> > > Will report back on ISIS-1132 before too long, hopefully.
> > >
> > > thx
> > > Dan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 31 May 2016 at 23:46, Stephen Cameron <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I want to suggest that the 1.12.1 release is not currently of
> > production
> > > > quality and that a decision should be made by the development team as
> > to
> > > > how to address that.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe there is a case for consolidation of 1.12 before release of
> 1.13
> > or
> > > > else a recommendation to skip 1.12 and help with 1.13 release
> testing?
> > > >
> > > > There is a significant issue ISIS-1396 [1] that has been resolved in
> > > > 1.13.0-SNAPSHOT, this is my primary concern. I was going to say to
> > users
> > > > just refresh the page to see the link titles, but I have discovered
> > > another
> > > > known issue ISIS-1132 [2] that seems to me quite serious, where
> > datetimes
> > > > don't display correctly after updates.
> > > >
> > > > Also, I've now found a similar bug to 1132, where I created a
> > mass-update
> > > > action (after the edit mode discussion), but this doesn't work as
> some
> > > > property values (strings not datetimes) are not updated correctly in
> > the
> > > > viewer. This is quite bizarre and I was sure I had an problem in my
> > code,
> > > > but I cannot find one. Updates require a database lookup, which may
> > > > explain.
> > > >
> > > > Hoping this not taken as criticism.
> > > >
> > > > Steve
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1396
> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1396>
> > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1132
> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1132>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Consolidation
Posted by Dan Haywood <da...@haywood-associates.co.uk>.
Quick update:
I now have a fix for ISIS-1132, and ISIS-1396 was already fixed. So I'm
going to cut a 1.12.2 release with these two fixes.
Meantime, will keep 1.13.0-SNAPSHOT in development, with a view of a
release to follow in the next week or two.
Thx
Dan
On 1 June 2016 at 12:54, Stephen Cameron <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Dan, I'll try to assist in the testing of 1.13.0-SNAPSHOT where I
> can.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Dan Haywood <da...@haywood-associates.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for this feedback, Steve.
> >
> > Obviously I'll take a look at ISIS-1132. Up until now that behaviour was
> > puzzling but not a blocker; but Boris raised the ticket with steps to
> > reproduce, so I'll take a look.
> >
> > With respect to stabilization, we could perhaps put a 1.12.2 out, though
> > 1.13.0 is quite close to release also. Unlike in 1.12.x where there were
> > lots of visible changes, the 1.13.0 is mostly internal, tidying up some
> of
> > the nastier kludges and simplifying/refactoring the codebase as I can.
> So
> > consolidation is the current name of the game.
> >
> > Will report back on ISIS-1132 before too long, hopefully.
> >
> > thx
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 31 May 2016 at 23:46, Stephen Cameron <st...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I want to suggest that the 1.12.1 release is not currently of
> production
> > > quality and that a decision should be made by the development team as
> to
> > > how to address that.
> > >
> > > Maybe there is a case for consolidation of 1.12 before release of 1.13
> or
> > > else a recommendation to skip 1.12 and help with 1.13 release testing?
> > >
> > > There is a significant issue ISIS-1396 [1] that has been resolved in
> > > 1.13.0-SNAPSHOT, this is my primary concern. I was going to say to
> users
> > > just refresh the page to see the link titles, but I have discovered
> > another
> > > known issue ISIS-1132 [2] that seems to me quite serious, where
> datetimes
> > > don't display correctly after updates.
> > >
> > > Also, I've now found a similar bug to 1132, where I created a
> mass-update
> > > action (after the edit mode discussion), but this doesn't work as some
> > > property values (strings not datetimes) are not updated correctly in
> the
> > > viewer. This is quite bizarre and I was sure I had an problem in my
> code,
> > > but I cannot find one. Updates require a database lookup, which may
> > > explain.
> > >
> > > Hoping this not taken as criticism.
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1396
> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1396>
> > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1132
> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1132>
> > >
> >
>
Re: Consolidation
Posted by Stephen Cameron <st...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Dan, I'll try to assist in the testing of 1.13.0-SNAPSHOT where I
can.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Dan Haywood <da...@haywood-associates.co.uk>
wrote:
> Thanks for this feedback, Steve.
>
> Obviously I'll take a look at ISIS-1132. Up until now that behaviour was
> puzzling but not a blocker; but Boris raised the ticket with steps to
> reproduce, so I'll take a look.
>
> With respect to stabilization, we could perhaps put a 1.12.2 out, though
> 1.13.0 is quite close to release also. Unlike in 1.12.x where there were
> lots of visible changes, the 1.13.0 is mostly internal, tidying up some of
> the nastier kludges and simplifying/refactoring the codebase as I can. So
> consolidation is the current name of the game.
>
> Will report back on ISIS-1132 before too long, hopefully.
>
> thx
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>
> On 31 May 2016 at 23:46, Stephen Cameron <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to suggest that the 1.12.1 release is not currently of production
> > quality and that a decision should be made by the development team as to
> > how to address that.
> >
> > Maybe there is a case for consolidation of 1.12 before release of 1.13 or
> > else a recommendation to skip 1.12 and help with 1.13 release testing?
> >
> > There is a significant issue ISIS-1396 [1] that has been resolved in
> > 1.13.0-SNAPSHOT, this is my primary concern. I was going to say to users
> > just refresh the page to see the link titles, but I have discovered
> another
> > known issue ISIS-1132 [2] that seems to me quite serious, where datetimes
> > don't display correctly after updates.
> >
> > Also, I've now found a similar bug to 1132, where I created a mass-update
> > action (after the edit mode discussion), but this doesn't work as some
> > property values (strings not datetimes) are not updated correctly in the
> > viewer. This is quite bizarre and I was sure I had an problem in my code,
> > but I cannot find one. Updates require a database lookup, which may
> > explain.
> >
> > Hoping this not taken as criticism.
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1396
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1396>
> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1132
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1132>
> >
>