You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@onami.apache.org by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> on 2012/12/01 00:11:26 UTC
Re: Which java version are we going to use?
since java version can be set, or overridden, in each module, I don't
see advantages on supporting, by default, a more recent JVM version
than the one Guice requires.
components have he freedom to override java version according to their needs.
or not? :)
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Daniel Manzke
<da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I don't really need any 1.7 feature, but it would be nice like
> AutoCloseable, Multi-Catch and so on, but I can live with it.
> I like the idea of Simo, but for me 1.5 is a little bit too hard, due to
> the fact that it isn't supported anymore.
>
> I would set it the parent to 1.6, but could also live with 1.5. No problem
> so far. :)
>
>
> Bye,
> Daniel
>
>
> 2012/11/30 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>
>
>> 1.6 looks good.
>> Which 1.7 features do you need ?
>>
>> 2012/11/30 Daniel Manzke <da...@googlemail.com>:
>> > Hey guys,
>> >
>> > still fighting to import the projects I'm would like to know, which java
>> > version are we planning to use?
>> > For me 1.7 would fit.
>> >
>> >
>> > Bye,
>> > Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Olivier Lamy
>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Viele Grüße/Best Regards
>
> Daniel Manzke
Re: Which java version are we going to use?
Posted by Daniel Manzke <da...@googlemail.com>.
ok, so let's go and take simos way. my aim was to start a discussion.
worked. ;)
2012/12/1 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>
> 2012/12/1 Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>:
> > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Simone Tripodi
> > <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> since java version can be set, or overridden, in each module, I don't
> >> see advantages on supporting, by default, a more recent JVM version
> >> than the one Guice requires.
> >
> > Makes sense.
>
> +1 too. each module can choice.
>
> >
> >>
> >> components have he freedom to override java version according to their
> needs.
> >>
> >> or not? :)
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> >> http://www.99soft.org/
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Daniel Manzke
> >> <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>> I don't really need any 1.7 feature, but it would be nice like
> >>> AutoCloseable, Multi-Catch and so on, but I can live with it.
> >>> I like the idea of Simo, but for me 1.5 is a little bit too hard, due
> to
> >>> the fact that it isn't supported anymore.
> >>>
> >>> I would set it the parent to 1.6, but could also live with 1.5. No
> problem
> >>> so far. :)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Bye,
> >>> Daniel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2012/11/30 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>
> >>>
> >>>> 1.6 looks good.
> >>>> Which 1.7 features do you need ?
> >>>>
> >>>> 2012/11/30 Daniel Manzke <da...@googlemail.com>:
> >>>> > Hey guys,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > still fighting to import the projects I'm would like to know, which
> java
> >>>> > version are we planning to use?
> >>>> > For me 1.7 would fit.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Bye,
> >>>> > Daniel
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Olivier Lamy
> >>>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
> >>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Viele Grüße/Best Regards
> >>>
> >>> Daniel Manzke
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.grobmeier.de
> > https://www.timeandbill.de
>
>
>
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>
--
Viele Grüße/Best Regards
Daniel Manzke
Re: Which java version are we going to use?
Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
2012/12/1 Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Simone Tripodi
> <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>> since java version can be set, or overridden, in each module, I don't
>> see advantages on supporting, by default, a more recent JVM version
>> than the one Guice requires.
>
> Makes sense.
+1 too. each module can choice.
>
>>
>> components have he freedom to override java version according to their needs.
>>
>> or not? :)
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Daniel Manzke
>> <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> I don't really need any 1.7 feature, but it would be nice like
>>> AutoCloseable, Multi-Catch and so on, but I can live with it.
>>> I like the idea of Simo, but for me 1.5 is a little bit too hard, due to
>>> the fact that it isn't supported anymore.
>>>
>>> I would set it the parent to 1.6, but could also live with 1.5. No problem
>>> so far. :)
>>>
>>>
>>> Bye,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> 2012/11/30 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>
>>>
>>>> 1.6 looks good.
>>>> Which 1.7 features do you need ?
>>>>
>>>> 2012/11/30 Daniel Manzke <da...@googlemail.com>:
>>>> > Hey guys,
>>>> >
>>>> > still fighting to import the projects I'm would like to know, which java
>>>> > version are we planning to use?
>>>> > For me 1.7 would fit.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Bye,
>>>> > Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Olivier Lamy
>>>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
>>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Viele Grüße/Best Regards
>>>
>>> Daniel Manzke
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> https://www.timeandbill.de
--
Olivier Lamy
Talend: http://coders.talend.com
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
Re: Which java version are we going to use?
Posted by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Simone Tripodi
<si...@apache.org> wrote:
> since java version can be set, or overridden, in each module, I don't
> see advantages on supporting, by default, a more recent JVM version
> than the one Guice requires.
Makes sense.
>
> components have he freedom to override java version according to their needs.
>
> or not? :)
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Daniel Manzke
> <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> I don't really need any 1.7 feature, but it would be nice like
>> AutoCloseable, Multi-Catch and so on, but I can live with it.
>> I like the idea of Simo, but for me 1.5 is a little bit too hard, due to
>> the fact that it isn't supported anymore.
>>
>> I would set it the parent to 1.6, but could also live with 1.5. No problem
>> so far. :)
>>
>>
>> Bye,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> 2012/11/30 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>
>>
>>> 1.6 looks good.
>>> Which 1.7 features do you need ?
>>>
>>> 2012/11/30 Daniel Manzke <da...@googlemail.com>:
>>> > Hey guys,
>>> >
>>> > still fighting to import the projects I'm would like to know, which java
>>> > version are we planning to use?
>>> > For me 1.7 would fit.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Bye,
>>> > Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Olivier Lamy
>>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Viele Grüße/Best Regards
>>
>> Daniel Manzke
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de