[RESULT][VOTE] Create repo for new deliverable: CLI

[Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>]

Vote passes with the following result:

[3] +1 brooklyn-cli (rmoss, mmkenna, aturli)
[0] +1 brooklyn-commons-cli ()
[7] +1 brooklyn-client (aheneveld, asage, hadrian, dlloyd, gmacartney, 
mzaccardo, cipi)
[0] -1 we do not need a separate repo

In fairness, I counted contributors votes as well, not just PMC, but any 
way you count, the result is the same.

I will open an issue with infra@ requesting a separate 'brookly-client' 
repo.

Thanks to all who expressed their thoughts and voted.

Hadrian


On 11/24/2015 08:59 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Brooklyners,
>
> Given the feedback on the [HEADS-UP] thread to David and Geoff's
> proposal, I move to starting a vote for the creation of a separate git
> repo: brooklyn-cli. Tthe vote is both for the creation of the repo, and
> its name. The name with the largest number of vote wins, unless strong
> objections will send us back to the drawing board. This vote is *not*
> for the name of the executable (br or bk).
>
> [+1] brooklyn-cli (create repo with this name: a heneveld proposal)
> [+1] brooklyn-commons-cli (create repo with this name: mzaccardo proposal)
> [-1] we do not need a separate repo
>
> Please cast your vote. The vote is open for 72+ hours.
>
> Cheers,
> Hadrian