RE: NLucene up to date ?

[lu...@gobstopper.demon.co.uk]

No additional classes have been created.
The functionality was simply implemented via new properties and method overloading, so original signatures remain intact.

As far as supporting future versions, I cannot say as I will no longer be using it at work.  Keeping the c# version in line with java would have to be done in my own time, so no guarantees.

Taking the 1.2b2 source I only brought in the fixes, enhancements, etc that affected how I was using Lucene.  I keep up with the nightly builds on a regular basis and update the c# source where appropriate, so any bugs should have been rectified.

Brendon

fckdp@ok.ru wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > From: lucene@gobstopper.demon.co.uk 
>  
> > I (we) have just successfully released a search engine using 
> > a c# implmentation of Lucene.  Code had to be brought up to 
> > date in line with recent java builds, and enhanced with 
> > additional features (eg field sorting, term position score 
> > factoring, etc).
> 
> Is it hard-code additional or new classes?
> Are you going to support new versions of lucene? 
> 
> Pasha
> 
> P.s nLucene is lucene 1.2 based with old bugs and not supported.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
>