You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hama.apache.org by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org> on 2011/10/17 08:45:48 UTC
[Share] "Infrastructures and Bounds for Distributed Entity Resolution"
http://qdb2011.dia.uniroma3.it/participants/program/p11-SIDLO.pdf
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
Re: [Share] "Infrastructures and Bounds for Distributed Entity Resolution"
Posted by Thomas Jungblut <th...@googlemail.com>.
That was just a joke ;D
I think we should just abstract our use of zookeeper and make it easy to
implement new services. That's all.
Nobody is forced to use it.
Do you still want to implement your own syncServer?
As far as I can see, I already did :p
2011/10/18 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> Hey thomas,
>
> As you know, they used 0.3 version and chiahung's double barrier patch
> is commited to TRUNK version, not 0.3.
>
> Do you still want to implement your own syncServer?
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Thomas Jungblut
> <th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I've heard the barrier synchronization was the greatest "barrier" to
> >> scaling their solution with HAMA.
> >
> >
> > Oh really? I can swear someone told me yesterday that ZooKeeper is
> fine?;))
> >
> > If you're interested, you could ask for the HAMA patch that did the
> tricks
> >> ;-)
> >
> >
> > Sure, I think it is quite sad that they did not share their researched
> > problems with us.
> >
> > 2011/10/17 Miklós Erdélyi <er...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> The paper was prepared by the group that I also worked with before. As
> >> I've heard the barrier synchronization was the greatest "barrier" to
> >> scaling their solution with HAMA. They had to also overcome memory
> >> problems with message buffering.
> >> If you're interested, you could ask for the HAMA patch that did the
> tricks
> >> ;-)
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> looks like my university (Roma Tre) was deeply involved there, will
> try
> >> to
> >> >> have some other feedback personally :)
> >> >
> >> > Haha, don't abandon us what they say, tommaso. Just kidding. It would
> >> > be really nice if we could get feedback from them. :)
> >> >
> >> > P.S., The paper is published at QDB workshop at VLDB'11.
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> >> > <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> looks like my university (Roma Tre) was deeply involved there, will
> try
> >> to
> >> >> have some other feedback personally :)
> >> >> Tommaso
> >> >>
> >> >> 2011/10/17 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> >> >>
> >> >>> http://qdb2011.dia.uniroma3.it/participants/program/p11-SIDLO.pdf
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> >> >>> @eddieyoon
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> >> > @eddieyoon
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Jungblut
> > Berlin <th...@gmail.com>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>
--
Thomas Jungblut
Berlin <th...@gmail.com>
Re: [Share] "Infrastructures and Bounds for Distributed Entity Resolution"
Posted by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>.
Hey thomas,
As you know, they used 0.3 version and chiahung's double barrier patch
is commited to TRUNK version, not 0.3.
Do you still want to implement your own syncServer?
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Thomas Jungblut
<th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've heard the barrier synchronization was the greatest "barrier" to
>> scaling their solution with HAMA.
>
>
> Oh really? I can swear someone told me yesterday that ZooKeeper is fine?;))
>
> If you're interested, you could ask for the HAMA patch that did the tricks
>> ;-)
>
>
> Sure, I think it is quite sad that they did not share their researched
> problems with us.
>
> 2011/10/17 Miklós Erdélyi <er...@gmail.com>
>
>> The paper was prepared by the group that I also worked with before. As
>> I've heard the barrier synchronization was the greatest "barrier" to
>> scaling their solution with HAMA. They had to also overcome memory
>> problems with message buffering.
>> If you're interested, you could ask for the HAMA patch that did the tricks
>> ;-)
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >> looks like my university (Roma Tre) was deeply involved there, will try
>> to
>> >> have some other feedback personally :)
>> >
>> > Haha, don't abandon us what they say, tommaso. Just kidding. It would
>> > be really nice if we could get feedback from them. :)
>> >
>> > P.S., The paper is published at QDB workshop at VLDB'11.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Tommaso Teofili
>> > <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> looks like my university (Roma Tre) was deeply involved there, will try
>> to
>> >> have some other feedback personally :)
>> >> Tommaso
>> >>
>> >> 2011/10/17 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
>> >>
>> >>> http://qdb2011.dia.uniroma3.it/participants/program/p11-SIDLO.pdf
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> >>> @eddieyoon
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> > @eddieyoon
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Jungblut
> Berlin <th...@gmail.com>
>
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
Re: [Share] "Infrastructures and Bounds for Distributed Entity Resolution"
Posted by Thomas Jungblut <th...@googlemail.com>.
>
> I've heard the barrier synchronization was the greatest "barrier" to
> scaling their solution with HAMA.
Oh really? I can swear someone told me yesterday that ZooKeeper is fine?;))
If you're interested, you could ask for the HAMA patch that did the tricks
> ;-)
Sure, I think it is quite sad that they did not share their researched
problems with us.
2011/10/17 Miklós Erdélyi <er...@gmail.com>
> The paper was prepared by the group that I also worked with before. As
> I've heard the barrier synchronization was the greatest "barrier" to
> scaling their solution with HAMA. They had to also overcome memory
> problems with message buffering.
> If you're interested, you could ask for the HAMA patch that did the tricks
> ;-)
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> looks like my university (Roma Tre) was deeply involved there, will try
> to
> >> have some other feedback personally :)
> >
> > Haha, don't abandon us what they say, tommaso. Just kidding. It would
> > be really nice if we could get feedback from them. :)
> >
> > P.S., The paper is published at QDB workshop at VLDB'11.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> > <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> looks like my university (Roma Tre) was deeply involved there, will try
> to
> >> have some other feedback personally :)
> >> Tommaso
> >>
> >> 2011/10/17 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> >>
> >>> http://qdb2011.dia.uniroma3.it/participants/program/p11-SIDLO.pdf
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> >>> @eddieyoon
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> > @eddieyoon
> >
>
--
Thomas Jungblut
Berlin <th...@gmail.com>
Re: [Share] "Infrastructures and Bounds for Distributed Entity Resolution"
Posted by Miklós Erdélyi <er...@gmail.com>.
The paper was prepared by the group that I also worked with before. As
I've heard the barrier synchronization was the greatest "barrier" to
scaling their solution with HAMA. They had to also overcome memory
problems with message buffering.
If you're interested, you could ask for the HAMA patch that did the tricks ;-)
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org> wrote:
>> looks like my university (Roma Tre) was deeply involved there, will try to
>> have some other feedback personally :)
>
> Haha, don't abandon us what they say, tommaso. Just kidding. It would
> be really nice if we could get feedback from them. :)
>
> P.S., The paper is published at QDB workshop at VLDB'11.
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> looks like my university (Roma Tre) was deeply involved there, will try to
>> have some other feedback personally :)
>> Tommaso
>>
>> 2011/10/17 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
>>
>>> http://qdb2011.dia.uniroma3.it/participants/program/p11-SIDLO.pdf
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>> @eddieyoon
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>
Re: [Share] "Infrastructures and Bounds for Distributed Entity Resolution"
Posted by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>.
> looks like my university (Roma Tre) was deeply involved there, will try to
> have some other feedback personally :)
Haha, don't abandon us what they say, tommaso. Just kidding. It would
be really nice if we could get feedback from them. :)
P.S., The paper is published at QDB workshop at VLDB'11.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Tommaso Teofili
<to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> looks like my university (Roma Tre) was deeply involved there, will try to
> have some other feedback personally :)
> Tommaso
>
> 2011/10/17 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
>
>> http://qdb2011.dia.uniroma3.it/participants/program/p11-SIDLO.pdf
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> @eddieyoon
>>
>
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
Re: [Share] "Infrastructures and Bounds for Distributed Entity Resolution"
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
looks like my university (Roma Tre) was deeply involved there, will try to
have some other feedback personally :)
Tommaso
2011/10/17 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> http://qdb2011.dia.uniroma3.it/participants/program/p11-SIDLO.pdf
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>