Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec jar

[Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>]

Hi folks!

The VOTE did pass with the following:

+1: Jean-Louis Monteiro (nb), Reinhard Sandtner (nb), Romain Manni-Bucau, John Ament (nb), Guillaume Nodet, Mark Struberg

No -1 nor 0 (Guillaume changed his vote from 0 to +1).

There was also an important discussion regarding OSGi improvements which we should tackle across various other specs as well.

I'll gonna continue with the release steps.

txs 2 all who voted!

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 27.06.2017 um 11:16 schrieb Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing our geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec jar in version 1.0
> This is the API for CDI-2.0. The artifact does pass the CDI TCK and is binary compatible with the official artifact (signature comparison passed).
> 
> The staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1034/
> 
> The source release and binary is here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1034/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec/1.0/
> 
> Please VOTE:
> 
> [+1] yeah, let's ship it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] nope, because ${showstopper}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h
> 
> Here is my own +1
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>