You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2006/01/09 17:01:34 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38200] New: - JK 1.x doesn't support full URLs in uriworkermap.properties
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38200>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38200
Summary: JK 1.x doesn't support full URLs in
uriworkermap.properties
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: Unknown
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows Server 2003
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: Native:JK
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: bjoern@syltonline.de
When JK2 was stopped, it was said that all major functions will be backported
to JK1.
We set up a huge environment (Clustered IIS and Clustered TCs) based on JK2.
But one of the major enhancements in JK2 for the IIS has been forgotten so we
can't join you lot on the JK1 - and I guess we are not the only ones.
In JK2, you could map an real URL in the URI-Mappings, including VHost-Name:
[URI:my.webname.de/tomcatapp/*]
...
In JK1, it still gives an error when you try a full URL:
my.webname.de/tomcatapp/*=wlb
because you explicitly forbid that in the JK:
if (*uri != '/') {
jk_log(l, JK_LOG_WARNING,
"Uri %s is invalid. Uri must start with /", uri);
JK_TRACE_EXIT(l);
return NULL;
}
Why is that? The JK2 had no problem doing that. We need that function because
we have some 40-60 VHOSTS on our Webservercluster, and we do not want global
Tomcat mappings - only for VHosts and contexts we name.
In the file the dev even say:
# The general syntax for this file is:
# [URL]=[Worker name]
but a URL is not possible to use, so it must be an error.
I know it is now possible to use a properties file for configuration and have
a config per VHost that way, but this would be a administration nightmare with
our webfarm size.
Please backport this feature / bugfix this issue soon.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38200] - JK 1.x doesn't support full URLs in uriworkermap.properties
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38200>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38200
rainer.jung@kippdata.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38200] - JK 1.x doesn't support full URLs in uriworkermap.properties
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38200>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38200
mturk@apache.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From mturk@apache.org 2006-01-09 17:25 -------
JK 1.2 already supports that for qute some time (forever).
Just prefix the URL with '/':
/my.webname.de/tomcatapp/*
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38200] - JK 1.x doesn't support full URLs in uriworkermap.properties
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38200>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38200
------- Additional Comments From jessh@ptc.com 2006-01-09 17:08 -------
I suspect that you should look to mod_proxy_ajp in Apache 2.2. Since it is out
I suspect work on mod_jk will be primarily "as needed" maintenance and bug fixing.
I could be wrong, of course.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38200] - JK 1.x doesn't support full URLs in uriworkermap.properties
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38200>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38200
rainer.jung@kippdata.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID |
------- Additional Comments From rainer.jung@kippdata.de 2008-01-01 16:00 -------
The feature has been added to the docs in the meantime, see
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/uriworkermap.html
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38200] - JK 1.x doesn't support full URLs in uriworkermap.properties
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38200>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38200
------- Additional Comments From bjoern@syltonline.de 2006-01-09 17:17 -------
I'd like to do that, but this bug referes to Microsoft IIS 6 like in
isapi_redirect.dll instead of apaches mod_*.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38200] - JK 1.x doesn't support full URLs in uriworkermap.properties
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38200>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38200
------- Additional Comments From bjoern@syltonline.de 2006-01-09 18:21 -------
@ Jess Holle:
> isapi_redirect.dll seems to be the stepchild no one wants.
yes, I got that feeling too. poor kid.
> Personally, I'd love it if my customers would just drop IIS and use
> Apache (which we bundle), but some of them are rather stubborn on
> this point...
well, Apache has advantages, IIS other. I work with both and IIS6 is realy was
better then the versions before. Hard to say which is better.
But we do professional IT services, so we serve whatever the paying customer
demands. If it's ASP or similar combined with Java, its IIS. If plain Java,
Apache & Tomcat is the way.
@ Mladen Turk:
Is that really so? Where is that documented? We searched for quite some time.
We spend many weeks developing and bugfixing the JK2 after it was discontinued
because we thought we couldn't use JK1. If that Syntax realy works as
expected, please add it to some docu and the sample "uriworkermap.properties".
That would surely help some people out there. Everyone who depends on doing
Microsoft stuff in ASP together with the power of Java in webapps need a IIS-
TomCat combination.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38200] - JK 1.x doesn't support full URLs in uriworkermap.properties
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38200>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38200
------- Additional Comments From jessh@ptc.com 2006-01-09 17:24 -------
Ah, I missed the "uriworkermap.properties" bit. Sorry.
isapi_redirect.dll seems to be the stepchild no one wants. There are those
(including me) that are very dependent on there being a high quality IIS/Tomcat
connector, but even amongst those in this boat no one has any love for IIS,
ISAPI, etc. Personally, I'd love it if my customers would just drop IIS and use
Apache (which we bundle), but some of them are rather stubborn on this point...
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org