You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> on 2019/05/28 08:48:28 UTC
[VOTE] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)
Hi,
Here is a vote on a release of Apache Jena 3.12.0.
This is the first proposed release candidate.
The deadline for the vote is Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC
==== Release changes:
The main feature of this release is the new GeoSPARQL and Fuseki
GeoSPARQL modules.
The new NOTICE file for the combined binary for fuseki+geosparql is:
https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd/jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-geosparql/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE
Other JIRA:
https://s.apache.org/jena-3.12.0-jira
== Updates
JENA-1711 : Upgrade Jackson dependency to 2.9.9 (CVE-2019-12086)
==== Release Vote
Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
Please download and test the proposed release.
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1031
Proposed dist/ area:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/
Keys:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
Git commit (browser URL):
https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/d4beb7d9
Git Commit Hash:
d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd
Git Commit Tag:
jena-3.12.0
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
This vote will be open until at least
Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC
If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
for you, please email within the schedule above with an expected time
and we can extend the vote period.
Thanks,
Andy
Checking needed:
+ are the GPG signatures fine?
+ are the checksums correct?
+ is there a source archive?
+ can the source archive really be built?
(NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
+ is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
(both source and binary artifacts)?
+ does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
+ have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
+ does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
The vote passes with +1 from Andy, Adam and Bruno
Thanks all,
Andy
On 28/05/2019 09:48, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a vote on a release of Apache Jena 3.12.0.
> This is the first proposed release candidate.
>
> The deadline for the vote is Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC
Re: [] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
Thanks!
On 01/06/2019 13:13, ajs6f wrote:
> I was able to check the sigs, checksums, and that the source distribution builds and works.
>
> Assuming that our NOTICE is up-to-date with the new contributions (it looks to be, but I didn't follow the discussion of the new geospatial component), I can vote:
>
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> +1
>
> ajs6f
>
>> On Jun 1, 2019, at 6:37 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi - would 2+ people from the PMC be able to check and vote please?
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> On 28/05/2019 09:48, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Here is a vote on a release of Apache Jena 3.12.0.
>>> This is the first proposed release candidate.
>>> The deadline for the vote is Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC
>>> ==== Release changes:
>>> The main feature of this release is the new GeoSPARQL and Fuseki GeoSPARQL modules.
>>> The new NOTICE file for the combined binary for fuseki+geosparql is:
>>> https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd/jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-geosparql/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE Other JIRA:
>>> https://s.apache.org/jena-3.12.0-jira
>>> == Updates
>>> JENA-1711 : Upgrade Jackson dependency to 2.9.9 (CVE-2019-12086)
>>> ==== Release Vote
>>> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
>>> Please download and test the proposed release.
>>> Staging repository:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1031
>>> Proposed dist/ area:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/
>>> Keys:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>>> Git commit (browser URL):
>>> https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/d4beb7d9
>>> Git Commit Hash:
>>> d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd
>>> Git Commit Tag:
>>> jena-3.12.0
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>> This vote will be open until at least
>>> Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC
>>> If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
>>> for you, please email within the schedule above with an expected time
>>> and we can extend the vote period.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andy
>>> Checking needed:
>>> + are the GPG signatures fine?
>>> + are the checksums correct?
>>> + is there a source archive?
>>> + can the source archive really be built?
>>> (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
>>> + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
>>> (both source and binary artifacts)?
>>> + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
>>> + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
>>> if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
>>> + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>
Re: [] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)
Posted by ajs6f <aj...@apache.org>.
I was able to check the sigs, checksums, and that the source distribution builds and works.
Assuming that our NOTICE is up-to-date with the new contributions (it looks to be, but I didn't follow the discussion of the new geospatial component), I can vote:
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
+1
ajs6f
> On Jun 1, 2019, at 6:37 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi - would 2+ people from the PMC be able to check and vote please?
>
> Andy
>
> On 28/05/2019 09:48, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Here is a vote on a release of Apache Jena 3.12.0.
>> This is the first proposed release candidate.
>> The deadline for the vote is Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC
>> ==== Release changes:
>> The main feature of this release is the new GeoSPARQL and Fuseki GeoSPARQL modules.
>> The new NOTICE file for the combined binary for fuseki+geosparql is:
>> https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd/jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-geosparql/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE Other JIRA:
>> https://s.apache.org/jena-3.12.0-jira
>> == Updates
>> JENA-1711 : Upgrade Jackson dependency to 2.9.9 (CVE-2019-12086)
>> ==== Release Vote
>> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
>> Please download and test the proposed release.
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1031
>> Proposed dist/ area:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/
>> Keys:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>> Git commit (browser URL):
>> https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/d4beb7d9
>> Git Commit Hash:
>> d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd
>> Git Commit Tag:
>> jena-3.12.0
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>> This vote will be open until at least
>> Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC
>> If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
>> for you, please email within the schedule above with an expected time
>> and we can extend the vote period.
>> Thanks,
>> Andy
>> Checking needed:
>> + are the GPG signatures fine?
>> + are the checksums correct?
>> + is there a source archive?
>> + can the source archive really be built?
>> (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
>> + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
>> (both source and binary artifacts)?
>> + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
>> + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
>> if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
>> + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
Re: [] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
Hi - would 2+ people from the PMC be able to check and vote please?
Andy
On 28/05/2019 09:48, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a vote on a release of Apache Jena 3.12.0.
> This is the first proposed release candidate.
>
> The deadline for the vote is Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC
>
> ==== Release changes:
>
> The main feature of this release is the new GeoSPARQL and Fuseki
> GeoSPARQL modules.
>
> The new NOTICE file for the combined binary for fuseki+geosparql is:
>
> https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd/jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-geosparql/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE
>
>
> Other JIRA:
> https://s.apache.org/jena-3.12.0-jira
>
> == Updates
>
> JENA-1711 : Upgrade Jackson dependency to 2.9.9 (CVE-2019-12086)
>
> ==== Release Vote
>
> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
> Please download and test the proposed release.
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1031
>
> Proposed dist/ area:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/
>
> Keys:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>
> Git commit (browser URL):
> https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/d4beb7d9
>
> Git Commit Hash:
> d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd
>
> Git Commit Tag:
> jena-3.12.0
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> This vote will be open until at least
>
> Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC
>
> If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
> for you, please email within the schedule above with an expected time
> and we can extend the vote period.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy
>
> Checking needed:
>
> + are the GPG signatures fine?
> + are the checksums correct?
> + is there a source archive?
>
> + can the source archive really be built?
> (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
> + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
> (both source and binary artifacts)?
> + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
> + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
> if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
> + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
Re: [] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 01/06/2019 13:34, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:
>
>
> [x] +1 Approve the release
Thank you!
>
> * only minor note is the source contains pom.xml.versionsBackup, which I believe is not necessary, though harmless?
Yes, harmless.
I've removed them all from my release area copy of jena now and they are
not in git. Must be left over from having to reset the version for Jena
3.11.0 RC2.
Andy
Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)
Posted by "Bruno P. Kinoshita" <ki...@apache.org>.
[x] +1 Approve the release
* only minor note is the source contains pom.xml.versionsBackup, which I believe is not necessary, though harmless?
Build from commit hash passing on
Apache Maven 3.5.4 (1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe; 2018-06-18T06:33:14+12:00)
Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.5.4
Java version: 1.8.0_212, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre
Default locale: en_NZ, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "linux", version: "4.15.0-50-generic", arch: "amd64", family: "unix"
with `mvn clean install -Pdev`.
+ are the GPG signatures fine?
Looks good to me (checked dist area)
+ are the checksums correct?
Looks good to me (checked dist area)
+ is there a source archive?
Dist area contains source. Checked a few artefacts on Maven staging. All good.
+ can the source archive really be built?
(NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
Tested dist source, `mvn clean install -Pdev`.
+ is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
(both source and binary artifacts)?
Checked a few in the source from commit hash, and from dist area.
+ does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
I think so (was lurking in some recent discussion, found nothing that I could tell was missing)
+ have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
Not sure, sorry. Missed recent conversation about licenses regarding changes in this release.
+ does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
Yup!
Cheers
Bruno
On Tuesday, 28 May 2019, 8:48:41 pm NZST, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi,
Here is a vote on a release of Apache Jena 3.12.0.
This is the first proposed release candidate.
The deadline for the vote is Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC
==== Release changes:
The main feature of this release is the new GeoSPARQL and Fuseki
GeoSPARQL modules.
The new NOTICE file for the combined binary for fuseki+geosparql is:
https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd/jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-geosparql/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE
Other JIRA:
https://s.apache.org/jena-3.12.0-jira
== Updates
JENA-1711 : Upgrade Jackson dependency to 2.9.9 (CVE-2019-12086)
==== Release Vote
Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
Please download and test the proposed release.
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1031
Proposed dist/ area:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/
Keys:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
Git commit (browser URL):
https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/d4beb7d9
Git Commit Hash:
d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd
Git Commit Tag:
jena-3.12.0
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
This vote will be open until at least
Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC
If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
for you, please email within the schedule above with an expected time
and we can extend the vote period.
Thanks,
Andy
Checking needed:
+ are the GPG signatures fine?
+ are the checksums correct?
+ is there a source archive?
+ can the source archive really be built?
(NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
+ is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
(both source and binary artifacts)?
+ does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
+ have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
+ does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
Re: [] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)
Posted by ajs6f <aj...@apache.org>.
No, I missed something-- I didn't see that the evaluation test question was unresolved, my mistake.
ajs6f
> On May 28, 2019, at 9:14 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 28/05/2019 13:00, Marco Neumann wrote:
>> median function not going to be in this release?
>
> I see an outstanding request for evaluation tests on the PR. Did I miss something?
>
> This release is a direct follow-on to 3.11 when we got 3.11 out close to schedule leaving GeoSPARQL to follow as soon as it was ready.
>
> Andy
>
>
>> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:25 AM Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>>
Re: [] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 28/05/2019 13:00, Marco Neumann wrote:
> median function not going to be in this release?
I see an outstanding request for evaluation tests on the PR. Did I miss
something?
This release is a direct follow-on to 3.11 when we got 3.11 out close to
schedule leaving GeoSPARQL to follow as soon as it was ready.
Andy
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:25 AM Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)
Posted by Marco Neumann <ma...@gmail.com>.
OK sounds good, my next stats package will be released as a property
functions package I believe and not as part of ARQ. I will make changes to
the logging configuration tomorrow.
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 1:33 PM ajs6f <aj...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm afraid not. Honestly, I didn't realize that Andy was going to start
> releasing so quickly. Time flies!
>
> I've got a last request for you to stop using System.out.println to log,
> but other than that it looks like you've responded to all the comments, so
> thank you! We should be able to merge very soon.
>
> ajs6f
>
>
> > On May 28, 2019, at 8:00 AM, Marco Neumann <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > median function not going to be in this release?
> >
> > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:25 AM Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >>> Please vote to approve this release:
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >>> [ ] 0 Don't care
> >>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Marco Neumann
> > KONA
>
>
--
---
Marco Neumann
KONA
Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)
Posted by ajs6f <aj...@apache.org>.
I'm afraid not. Honestly, I didn't realize that Andy was going to start releasing so quickly. Time flies!
I've got a last request for you to stop using System.out.println to log, but other than that it looks like you've responded to all the comments, so thank you! We should be able to merge very soon.
ajs6f
> On May 28, 2019, at 8:00 AM, Marco Neumann <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> median function not going to be in this release?
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:25 AM Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
> ---
> Marco Neumann
> KONA
Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)
Posted by Marco Neumann <ma...@gmail.com>.
median function not going to be in this release?
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:25 AM Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] 0 Don't care
> > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
--
---
Marco Neumann
KONA
Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
+1
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...