You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shindig.apache.org by "John Hjelmstad (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/12/17 03:50:42 UTC
[jira] Created: (SHINDIG-1) Use java.net.URI rather than
java.net.URL
Use java.net.URI rather than java.net.URL
-----------------------------------------
Key: SHINDIG-1
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1
Project: Shindig
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: John Hjelmstad
Priority: Minor
Recommendation by lryan@google.com:
---
I noticed that the Shindig code is using java.net.URL which has some well
known performance issues in its 'equals' method. I think Shindig can happily
use java.net.URI instead and avoid those performance pitfalls and shield
consumers.
---
Seems reasonable to me; no dissent from shindig-dev@. Onward!
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SHINDIG-1) Use java.net.URI rather than
java.net.URL
Posted by "John Hjelmstad (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12552314 ]
John Hjelmstad commented on SHINDIG-1:
--------------------------------------
I have a CL that completes nearly all of this conversion (all except RemoteContentFetcher for the moment). ETA early this week.
> Use java.net.URI rather than java.net.URL
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: SHINDIG-1
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1
> Project: Shindig
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: John Hjelmstad
> Priority: Minor
>
> Recommendation by lryan@google.com:
> ---
> I noticed that the Shindig code is using java.net.URL which has some well
> known performance issues in its 'equals' method. I think Shindig can happily
> use java.net.URI instead and avoid those performance pitfalls and shield
> consumers.
> ---
> Seems reasonable to me; no dissent from shindig-dev@. Onward!
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Resolved: (SHINDIG-1) Use java.net.URI rather than
java.net.URL
Posted by "Paul Lindner (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Paul Lindner resolved SHINDIG-1.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
I did a scan through the source and didn't see any cases where URL objects were used in collections or where .equals calls are made. Marking resolved.
> Use java.net.URI rather than java.net.URL
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: SHINDIG-1
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1
> Project: Shindig
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: John Hjelmstad
> Priority: Minor
>
> Recommendation by lryan@google.com:
> ---
> I noticed that the Shindig code is using java.net.URL which has some well
> known performance issues in its 'equals' method. I think Shindig can happily
> use java.net.URI instead and avoid those performance pitfalls and shield
> consumers.
> ---
> Seems reasonable to me; no dissent from shindig-dev@. Onward!
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SHINDIG-1) Use java.net.URI rather than
java.net.URL
Posted by "Vincent Siveton (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12556718#action_12556718 ]
Vincent Siveton commented on SHINDIG-1:
---------------------------------------
Already fixed with r608302
> Use java.net.URI rather than java.net.URL
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: SHINDIG-1
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1
> Project: Shindig
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: John Hjelmstad
> Priority: Minor
>
> Recommendation by lryan@google.com:
> ---
> I noticed that the Shindig code is using java.net.URL which has some well
> known performance issues in its 'equals' method. I think Shindig can happily
> use java.net.URI instead and avoid those performance pitfalls and shield
> consumers.
> ---
> Seems reasonable to me; no dissent from shindig-dev@. Onward!
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.