You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/05/11 00:06:07 UTC

[jira] [Created] (DERBY-6566) Simplify handling of untyped nulls in CASE and NULLIF expressions

Knut Anders Hatlen created DERBY-6566:
-----------------------------------------

             Summary: Simplify handling of untyped nulls in CASE and NULLIF expressions
                 Key: DERBY-6566
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6566
             Project: Derby
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: SQL
    Affects Versions: 11.0.0.0
            Reporter: Knut Anders Hatlen
            Assignee: Knut Anders Hatlen
            Priority: Minor


The parser translates both CASE and NULLIF expressions into ConditionalNodes, but it represents untyped NULLs differently in the two cases.

In a CASE expression, any branch that is an untyped NULL, is translated into an UntypedNullConstantNode that's wrapped in a CastNode that casts the value to CHAR(1). The CastNode is replaced with a cast to the correct type during the bind phase.

A NULLIF expression is turned into a CASE expression that has a THEN NULL clause. The parser simply creates an UntypedNullConstantNode for that clause, without wrapping it in a CastNode. A CastNode is instead added during the bind phase.

This slight difference in how NULLs are represented by the parser in the two cases, means that ConditionalNode needs to handle the two cases differently during the bind phase. It would be better if the parser generated NULLs in the same way for the two cases, so that ConditionalNode didn't need to know if it was generated for a CASE expression or a NULLIF expression.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)