You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Doug Cutting <cu...@lucene.com> on 2003/04/09 19:03:32 UTC
1.3 release
Are there reasons not to make a 1.3 final release? Are there any bugs
in 1.3RC1 that are so serious that 1.3 final should be delayed?
Doug
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: 1.3 release
Posted by Lee Mallabone <le...@grantadesign.com>.
Hi,
Back in April everyone seemed satisfied that 1.3rc1 was at least as stable as 1.2.
Given that there don't seem to have been any major additions since then, is it expected to release 1.3 final soon?
If not, could anyone comment on whether I'd be better off using 1.3rc1 or the latest cvs version?
Regards,
Lee.
Re: 1.3 release
Posted by Lee Mallabone <le...@grantadesign.com>.
Hi,
Back in April everyone seemed satisfied that 1.3rc1 was at least as stable as 1.2.
Given that there don't seem to have been any major additions since then, is it expected to release 1.3 final soon?
If not, could anyone comment on whether I'd be better off using 1.3rc1 or the latest cvs version?
Regards,
Lee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: 1.3 release
Posted by Scott Ganyo <sc...@etapestry.com>.
Sorry, yes. I didn't mean to -1 the release. My comment was that I
*would have liked* to see this in this release. There is no reason to
things up for this, though. I'm +1 on releasing what we have.
Scott
Doug Cutting wrote:
> Scott Ganyo wrote:
>
>> I really would have liked to see this in the release as well. We use
>> Lucene heavily in a server and have found that collection of
>> Lucene-created garbage is perhaps our biggest performance challenge.
>> Whatever happened to this patch? It was discussed for a while back
>> in February, but it just kind of got dropped after that...
>
>
> I just re-read this thread, and a complete, correct version of this
> was never submitted. I think there was a problem with the version
> that Dmitry submitted, and he never submitted a version that fixed it.
>
> Let's not hold up the release for things we hope might be in Lucene
> someday. Rather let's try to get what's already been implemented and
> tested out into more folks hands. We've had far too few releases. If
> an important improvement or feature is added then we can always make
> another release. It's not that hard. So the question is, are there
> serious bugs in 1.3RC1 that were not in 1.2? If not, if it is a clear
> improvement over 1.2, then we should release it, no?
>
> Doug
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: 1.3 release
Posted by Doug Cutting <cu...@lucene.com>.
Scott Ganyo wrote:
> I really would have liked to see this in the release as well. We use
> Lucene heavily in a server and have found that collection of
> Lucene-created garbage is perhaps our biggest performance challenge.
> Whatever happened to this patch? It was discussed for a while back in
> February, but it just kind of got dropped after that...
I just re-read this thread, and a complete, correct version of this was
never submitted. I think there was a problem with the version that
Dmitry submitted, and he never submitted a version that fixed it.
Let's not hold up the release for things we hope might be in Lucene
someday. Rather let's try to get what's already been implemented and
tested out into more folks hands. We've had far too few releases. If
an important improvement or feature is added then we can always make
another release. It's not that hard. So the question is, are there
serious bugs in 1.3RC1 that were not in 1.2? If not, if it is a clear
improvement over 1.2, then we should release it, no?
Doug
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: 1.3 release
Posted by Scott Ganyo <sc...@etapestry.com>.
I really would have liked to see this in the release as well. We use
Lucene heavily in a server and have found that collection of
Lucene-created garbage is perhaps our biggest performance challenge.
Whatever happened to this patch? It was discussed for a while back in
February, but it just kind of got dropped after that...
Scott
Julien Nioche wrote:
>Maybe we could include the modification on SegmentTermEnum proposed by
>Dmitry Serebrennikov?
>It really reduces creation of temporary Term objects.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Doug Cutting" <cu...@lucene.com>
>To: "Lucene Developers List" <lu...@jakarta.apache.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 7:03 PM
>Subject: 1.3 release
>
>
>
>
>>Are there reasons not to make a 1.3 final release? Are there any bugs
>>in 1.3RC1 that are so serious that 1.3 final should be delayed?
>>
>>Doug
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: 1.3 release
Posted by Doug Cutting <cu...@lucene.com>.
Eric Isakson wrote:
> If you guys agree that this is an approach we should take, I'd be
> willing to take the time in the next day or two to add the todo items
> and other responses to this thread to bugzilla and change the link in
> xdocs/stylesheets/project.xml to a link to [ ... ]
I like this approach. Please make the changes you propose. It would be
good to make better use of Bugzilla.
Thanks,
Doug
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: 1.3 release
Posted by Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@yahoo.com>.
Not in 1.3 I'd say.
But Eric's suggestion of moving todo.xml items to Bugzilla sounds very
good to me, so if we do that we will easily keep track of that task for
post 1.3 release.
Otis
--- Julien Nioche <Ju...@lingway.com> wrote:
> Maybe we could include the modification on SegmentTermEnum proposed
> by
> Dmitry Serebrennikov?
> It really reduces creation of temporary Term objects.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Doug Cutting" <cu...@lucene.com>
> To: "Lucene Developers List" <lu...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 7:03 PM
> Subject: 1.3 release
>
>
> > Are there reasons not to make a 1.3 final release? Are there any
> bugs
> > in 1.3RC1 that are so serious that 1.3 final should be delayed?
> >
> > Doug
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: 1.3 release
Posted by Julien Nioche <Ju...@lingway.com>.
Maybe we could include the modification on SegmentTermEnum proposed by
Dmitry Serebrennikov?
It really reduces creation of temporary Term objects.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Cutting" <cu...@lucene.com>
To: "Lucene Developers List" <lu...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 7:03 PM
Subject: 1.3 release
> Are there reasons not to make a 1.3 final release? Are there any bugs
> in 1.3RC1 that are so serious that 1.3 final should be delayed?
>
> Doug
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: 1.3 release
Posted by Che Dong <ch...@hotmail.com>.
Hi Cutting:
How about add Asia language support in StandardTokenizer?
I notice the lucene was used in Jive and Eclipse, but because lack of Asia laugage support the Chinese can't search in these applications.
Do you have time review the bigram based CJKTokenizer and sigram based StandardTokenizer patch in these few days?
Thank you.
Regards
Che, Dong
http://www.chedong.com/tech/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Cutting" <cu...@lucene.com>
To: "Lucene Developers List" <lu...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 1:03 AM
Subject: 1.3 release
> Are there reasons not to make a 1.3 final release? Are there any bugs
> in 1.3RC1 that are so serious that 1.3 final should be delayed?
>
> Doug
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
Re: 1.3 release
Posted by Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@yahoo.com>.
I don't think there are any serious problems with 1.3RC1.
Otis
--- Doug Cutting <cu...@lucene.com> wrote:
> Are there reasons not to make a 1.3 final release? Are there any
> bugs
> in 1.3RC1 that are so serious that 1.3 final should be delayed?
>
> Doug
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: 1.3 release
Posted by Per Böckman <pe...@enea.se>.
Hi,
Will something like snowball-analyzers.jar be included in the 1.3 final
release as discussed previously in this list?
Regards,
Per
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Cutting [mailto:cutting@lucene.com]
> Sent: den 9 april 2003 19:04
> To: Lucene Developers List
> Subject: 1.3 release
>
>
> Are there reasons not to make a 1.3 final release? Are there
> any bugs
> in 1.3RC1 that are so serious that 1.3 final should be delayed?
>
> Doug
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org