You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jira@kafka.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/09/20 21:11:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-5911) Avoid creation of extra Map for futures in KafkaAdminClient

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16173830#comment-16173830 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on KAFKA-5911:
---------------------------------------

GitHub user tedyu opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3925

    KAFKA-5911 Avoid creation of extra Map for futures in KafkaAdminClient

    This reduces creation of garbage while keeping thread safety untouched.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/tedyu/kafka trunk

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3925.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #3925
    
----
commit b53379ed9a327b2c195dffc4c5d537fb0a0ace13
Author: tedyu <yu...@gmail.com>
Date:   2017-09-20T21:09:21Z

    KAFKA-5911 Avoid creation of extra Map for futures in KafkaAdminClient

----


> Avoid creation of extra Map for futures in KafkaAdminClient
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-5911
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5911
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ted Yu
>         Attachments: 5911.v1.txt
>
>
> In various methods from KafkaAdminClient, there is extra Map created when constructing XXResult instance.
> e.g.
> {code}
>         return new DescribeReplicaLogDirResult(new HashMap<TopicPartitionReplica, KafkaFuture<ReplicaLogDirInfo>>(futures));
> {code}
> Prior to returning, futures Map is already filled.
> Calling get() and values() does not involve the internals of HashMap when we consider thread-safety.
> The extra Map doesn't need to be created.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)