You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by "Boovaraghavan (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/07/11 12:10:34 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-3825) Exceptions in broker logs :- Transport
failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Channel was
inactive for too (>30000) long:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Boovaraghavan updated AMQ-3825:
-------------------------------
Attachment: activemq.xml
> Exceptions in broker logs :- Transport failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Channel was inactive for too (>30000) long:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-3825
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3825
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Broker, Connector
> Affects Versions: 5.5.1
> Reporter: Bhanu
> Attachments: activemq.xml
>
>
> Hi,
> I am seeing lot of InactivityIO exceptions in my broker logs:-
> activemq.log.2012-03-01:2012-03-01 18:56:49,519 | INFO | Transport failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Channel was inactive for too (>30000) long: /10.240.170.27:42813 | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport | InactivityMonitor Async Task: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker@8fe952[State = 0, empty queue]
> activemq.log.2012-03-01:2012-03-01 19:06:52,464 | INFO | Transport failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Channel was inactive for too (>30000) long: /10.253.127.196:62265 | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport | InactivityMonitor Async Task: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker@1501b4f[State = 0, empty queue]
> activemq.log.2012-03-01:2012-03-01 19:27:37,074 | INFO | Transport failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Channel was inactive for too (>30000) long: /149.77.160.18:52472 | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport | InactivityMonitor Async Task: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker@19e0323[State = 0, empty queue]
> activemq.log.2012-03-01:2012-03-01 23:33:51,632 | INFO | Transport failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Channel was inactive for too (>30000) long: /149.77.160.18:33558 | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport | InactivityMonitor Async Task: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker@168a9ba[State = 0, empty queue]
> activemq.log.2012-03-01:2012-03-01 23:33:56,975 | INFO | Transport failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Channel was inactive for too (>30000) long: /149.77.160.18:55158 | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport | InactivityMonitor Async Task: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker@116f46b[State = 0, empty queue]
> I am trying to reproduce this with the pooled connection factory but this is not consistently reproducible. Can somebody throw light on the exact cause of this. I don't want to use the inactivityMonitor property.
> Thanks,
> Bhanu
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira