You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ozone.apache.org by "Attila Doroszlai (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/05/17 09:55:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-6758) Ozone bucket Info doesn’t print bucket layout for linked buckets
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17538074#comment-17538074 ]
Attila Doroszlai commented on HDDS-6758:
----------------------------------------
[~sadanand_shenoy], bucket links should not have any layout. They are just pointers.
> Ozone bucket Info doesn’t print bucket layout for linked buckets
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDDS-6758
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6758
> Project: Apache Ozone
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Sadanand Shenoy
> Priority: Major
>
> The ozone sh bucket info command doesn’t print info about the bucket type.
> {code:java}
> [root@repdst-1 ~]# ozone sh bucket link /vol1/buck1 /s3v/linkedbuck1
> 22/05/17 07:56:24 INFO rpc.RpcClient: Creating Bucket: s3v/linkedbuck1, with root as owner and Versioning false and Storage Type set to DISK and Encryption set to false
> [root@repdst-1 ~]# ozone sh bucket info /s3v/linkedbuck1
> {
> "volumeName" : "s3v",
> "bucketName" : "linkedbuck1",
> "sourceVolume" : "vol1",
> "sourceBucket" : "buck1",
> "creationTime" : "2022-05-17T07:56:24.059Z",
> "modificationTime" : "2022-05-17T07:56:24.059Z"
> }
> [root@repdst-1 ~]# {code}
> Now that we have bucket types , what is the default type when a linked bucket is created ?
> Looking at the code it looks like the client would not set the bucket layout in bucket args. This would mean the bucket type would be according to the default server defined bucket type.
> {code:java}
> BucketArgs.Builder bb = new BucketArgs.Builder()
> .setStorageType(StorageType.DEFAULT)
> .setVersioning(false)
> .setSourceVolume(source.getVolumeName())
> .setSourceBucket(source.getBucketName()); {code}
> This would make it possible to link OBS to FSO and vice-versa. Should this be allowed?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@ozone.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@ozone.apache.org