You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Martijn Visser <ma...@apache.org> on 2022/12/16 17:22:07 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Update Flink's Scala 2.12 support from 2.12.7 to 2.12.16
Hi all,
I'm bumping this old vote thread once more.
If we want to add Java 17 support at some point, we will need to update our Scala 2.12 version (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25000). As explained before in the discussion thread, that means that we would break binary & savepoint compatibility for Flink's Scala users.
Best regards,
Martijn
On 2022/06/11 13:39:54 Konstantin Knauf wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Am Fr., 10. Juni 2022 um 18:20 Uhr schrieb Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com>:
>
> > +1 non-binding
> >
> > for that we can't always block at 2.12.7. but we should let users know
> > about this binary incompatibility if execute this update.
> > btw, the configuration
> > of scala-maven-plugin may need to update to match target-8, target-11 jvm
> > format.
> >
> >
> > Martijn Visser <ma...@apache.org>于2022年6月10日 周五18:32写道：
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > As previously discussed [1] I would like to open a vote thread for
> > updating
> > > Flink from Scala 2.12.7 to Scala 2.12.16 and accept that there will be a
> > > binary incompatibility when this upgrade is executed.
> > >
> > > For this vote, I'm following the FLIP criteria since I think that best
> > fits
> > > with this proposal. That means that the vote will be open for at least 72
> > > hours unless there is an objection or not enough votes. Any committer can
> > > provide a binding vote.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Martijn Visser
> > > https://twitter.com/MartijnVisser82
> > > https://github.com/MartijnVisser
> > >
> > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/9ft0tbhj45fplt5j3gtb7jzbt4tdr6rh
> > >
> > --
> > Best,
> > Ran Tao
> >
>
>
> --
> https://twitter.com/snntrable
> https://github.com/knaufk
>
Re: [VOTE] Update Flink's Scala 2.12 support from 2.12.7 to 2.12.16
Posted by ConradJam <ja...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
Sergey Nuyanzin <sn...@gmail.com> 于2022年12月18日周日 15:42写道：
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 1:06 PM David Anderson <da...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 12:22 PM Martijn Visser <
> martijnvisser@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'm bumping this old vote thread once more.
> > >
> > > If we want to add Java 17 support at some point, we will need to update
> > > our Scala 2.12 version (see
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25000). As explained
> before
> > > in the discussion thread, that means that we would break binary &
> > savepoint
> > > compatibility for Flink's Scala users.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Martijn
> > >
> > > On 2022/06/11 13:39:54 Konstantin Knauf wrote:
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > Am Fr., 10. Juni 2022 um 18:20 Uhr schrieb Ran Tao <
> > > chucheng.tr@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 non-binding
> > > > >
> > > > > for that we can't always block at 2.12.7. but we should let users
> > know
> > > > > about this binary incompatibility if execute this update.
> > > > > btw, the configuration
> > > > > of scala-maven-plugin may need to update to match target-8,
> target-11
> > > jvm
> > > > > format.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Martijn Visser <ma...@apache.org>于2022年6月10日 周五18:32写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As previously discussed [1] I would like to open a vote thread
> for
> > > > > updating
> > > > > > Flink from Scala 2.12.7 to Scala 2.12.16 and accept that there
> will
> > > be a
> > > > > > binary incompatibility when this upgrade is executed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For this vote, I'm following the FLIP criteria since I think that
> > > best
> > > > > fits
> > > > > > with this proposal. That means that the vote will be open for at
> > > least 72
> > > > > > hours unless there is an objection or not enough votes. Any
> > > committer can
> > > > > > provide a binding vote.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martijn Visser
> > > > > > https://twitter.com/MartijnVisser82
> > > > > > https://github.com/MartijnVisser
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/9ft0tbhj45fplt5j3gtb7jzbt4tdr6rh
> > > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Ran Tao
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > https://twitter.com/snntrable
> > > > https://github.com/knaufk
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Sergey
>
Re: [VOTE] Update Flink's Scala 2.12 support from 2.12.7 to 2.12.16
Posted by Sergey Nuyanzin <sn...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 1:06 PM David Anderson <da...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 12:22 PM Martijn Visser <ma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm bumping this old vote thread once more.
> >
> > If we want to add Java 17 support at some point, we will need to update
> > our Scala 2.12 version (see
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25000). As explained before
> > in the discussion thread, that means that we would break binary &
> savepoint
> > compatibility for Flink's Scala users.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On 2022/06/11 13:39:54 Konstantin Knauf wrote:
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Am Fr., 10. Juni 2022 um 18:20 Uhr schrieb Ran Tao <
> > chucheng.tr@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > +1 non-binding
> > > >
> > > > for that we can't always block at 2.12.7. but we should let users
> know
> > > > about this binary incompatibility if execute this update.
> > > > btw, the configuration
> > > > of scala-maven-plugin may need to update to match target-8, target-11
> > jvm
> > > > format.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Martijn Visser <ma...@apache.org>于2022年6月10日 周五18:32写道：
> > > >
> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > > As previously discussed [1] I would like to open a vote thread for
> > > > updating
> > > > > Flink from Scala 2.12.7 to Scala 2.12.16 and accept that there will
> > be a
> > > > > binary incompatibility when this upgrade is executed.
> > > > >
> > > > > For this vote, I'm following the FLIP criteria since I think that
> > best
> > > > fits
> > > > > with this proposal. That means that the vote will be open for at
> > least 72
> > > > > hours unless there is an objection or not enough votes. Any
> > committer can
> > > > > provide a binding vote.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martijn Visser
> > > > > https://twitter.com/MartijnVisser82
> > > > > https://github.com/MartijnVisser
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/9ft0tbhj45fplt5j3gtb7jzbt4tdr6rh
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best,
> > > > Ran Tao
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > https://twitter.com/snntrable
> > > https://github.com/knaufk
> > >
> >
>
--
Best regards,
Sergey
Re: [VOTE] Update Flink's Scala 2.12 support from 2.12.7 to 2.12.16
Posted by David Anderson <da...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 12:22 PM Martijn Visser <ma...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm bumping this old vote thread once more.
>
> If we want to add Java 17 support at some point, we will need to update
> our Scala 2.12 version (see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25000). As explained before
> in the discussion thread, that means that we would break binary & savepoint
> compatibility for Flink's Scala users.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Martijn
>
> On 2022/06/11 13:39:54 Konstantin Knauf wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Am Fr., 10. Juni 2022 um 18:20 Uhr schrieb Ran Tao <
> chucheng.tr@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > +1 non-binding
> > >
> > > for that we can't always block at 2.12.7. but we should let users know
> > > about this binary incompatibility if execute this update.
> > > btw, the configuration
> > > of scala-maven-plugin may need to update to match target-8, target-11
> jvm
> > > format.
> > >
> > >
> > > Martijn Visser <ma...@apache.org>于2022年6月10日 周五18:32写道：
> > >
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > As previously discussed [1] I would like to open a vote thread for
> > > updating
> > > > Flink from Scala 2.12.7 to Scala 2.12.16 and accept that there will
> be a
> > > > binary incompatibility when this upgrade is executed.
> > > >
> > > > For this vote, I'm following the FLIP criteria since I think that
> best
> > > fits
> > > > with this proposal. That means that the vote will be open for at
> least 72
> > > > hours unless there is an objection or not enough votes. Any
> committer can
> > > > provide a binding vote.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martijn Visser
> > > > https://twitter.com/MartijnVisser82
> > > > https://github.com/MartijnVisser
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/9ft0tbhj45fplt5j3gtb7jzbt4tdr6rh
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Best,
> > > Ran Tao
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > https://twitter.com/snntrable
> > https://github.com/knaufk
> >
>