You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Jeff Breidenbach <je...@jab.org> on 2005/01/29 04:54:33 UTC
lucene source tarball bugs
Slightly more blatent is this problem which is still
present in the Lucene 1.4.3 source tarball.
http://www.mail-archive.com/lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg09083.html
On Jan 28, 2005, at 6:50 PM, Robert Engels wrote:
> The source 1.4-final builds available for download, have a 'version'
> entry
> in the build.xml of 1.5-rc1-dev?
>
> Is it really the 1.4 final codebase?
Yes, and this issue has come up a few times in the past. The version
number is adjusted on purpose (though its worth rethinking this
rationale from time to time) so that a build on your machine is
obviously _not_ the official binary release provided from the Apache
mirrors. Sure, its just a filename, but at least its an indicator that
you have a homegrown build.
Erik
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: lucene source tarball bugs
Posted by Daniel Naber <da...@t-online.de>.
On Saturday 29 January 2005 04:54, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> Slightly more blatent is this problem which is still
> present in the Lucene 1.4.3 source tarball.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg09083.html
That doesn't affect people who just call "ant dist" because that won't call
javacc, as the generated java files are already part of the source. So
there won't be a new release just for this one-line bugfix.
Regards
Daniel
--
http://www.danielnaber.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org