You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Jeff Breidenbach <je...@jab.org> on 2005/01/29 04:54:33 UTC

lucene source tarball bugs

Slightly more blatent is this problem which is still
present in the Lucene 1.4.3 source tarball.  

http://www.mail-archive.com/lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg09083.html


On Jan 28, 2005, at 6:50 PM, Robert Engels wrote:
> The source 1.4-final builds available for download, have a 'version'
> entry
> in the build.xml of 1.5-rc1-dev?
>
> Is it really the 1.4 final codebase?

Yes, and this issue has come up a few times in the past.  The version
number is adjusted on purpose (though its worth rethinking this
rationale from time to time) so that a build on your machine is
obviously _not_ the official binary release provided from the Apache
mirrors.  Sure, its just a filename, but at least its an indicator that
you have a homegrown build.

       Erik

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: lucene source tarball bugs

Posted by Daniel Naber <da...@t-online.de>.
On Saturday 29 January 2005 04:54, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:

> Slightly more blatent is this problem which is still
> present in the Lucene 1.4.3 source tarball.  
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg09083.html

That doesn't affect people who just call "ant dist" because that won't call 
javacc, as the generated java files are already part of the source. So 
there won't be a new release just for this one-line bugfix.

Regards
 Daniel

-- 
http://www.danielnaber.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org