You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Tomás Fernández Löbbe (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/03/06 23:21:40 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8396) Investigate DimensionalValues to
replace NumericField types
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Tomás Fernández Löbbe updated SOLR-8396:
----------------------------------------
Attachment: SOLR-8396.patch
Here is another iteration of the patch. Still mostly a copy of TrieFields.
* Updated to current master.
* I separated the tests and added some more.
* Added initial implementation for range query.
* Added stored field to be able to return the values (not sure yet if there is a better way for this)
Still only for int fields
> Investigate DimensionalValues to replace NumericField types
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-8396
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8396
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Attachments: SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch
>
>
> In LUCENE-6917, [~mikemccand] mentioned that DimensionalValues are better than NumericFields in most respects. We should explore the benefits of using it in Solr and hence, if appropriate, switch over to using them.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org