Apache Board Report (June)

[Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com>]

I've created a stub at:

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2008

I haven't gone back through all of my e-mail for the past 3 months to
pick out the highlights yet, though.  Comments/additions appreciated.

Thanks!

/dev/mrg

Re: Apache Board Report (June)

[Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com>]

Sent.  Thanks!

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>
> On Jun 10, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>>
>> I wasn't sure about the mailing list part, so I put the ???? on it.
>> Should I just remove that section or state that activity is steady?
>
> +1
>
>> And where should it be sent when done?  (I've not actually sent one
>> before.)
>
> You can mail it to board at a.o, cc: Cayenne PMC list. I suggest you use
> your Apache email in the From to simplify life for the moderators.
>
> Cheers,
> Andrus
>
>
>

Re: Apache Board Report (June)

[Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>]

On Jun 10, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> I wasn't sure about the mailing list part, so I put the ???? on it.
> Should I just remove that section or state that activity is steady?

+1

> And where should it be sent when done?  (I've not actually sent one
> before.)

You can mail it to board at a.o, cc: Cayenne PMC list. I suggest you  
use your Apache email in the From to simplify life for the moderators.

Cheers,
Andrus

Re: Apache Board Report (June)

[Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com>]

I wasn't sure about the mailing list part, so I put the ???? on it.
Should I just remove that section or state that activity is steady?
And where should it be sent when done?  (I've not actually sent one
before.)

Thanks!


On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> Looks good to me.
>
> One nitpick - "Higher activity on the mailing list".
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cayenne-dev/
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cayenne-user/
>
> The lists are obviously active, but I don't think the activity is higher
> than before. User list activity is about the same. More dev list messages
> are likely explained by forwarding all Jira traffic to dev instead of just
> "new ticket" events as we did before.
>
> Andrus
>
> On Jun 10, 2008, at 1:58 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>>
>> No one has added any other feedback.  Is this what we should send to the
>> board?
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've created a stub at:
>>>
>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2008
>>>
>>> I haven't gone back through all of my e-mail for the past 3 months to
>>> pick out the highlights yet, though.  Comments/additions appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> /dev/mrg
>>>
>>
>
>

Re: Apache Board Report (June)

[Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>]

Looks good to me.

One nitpick - "Higher activity on the mailing list".

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cayenne-dev/
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cayenne-user/

The lists are obviously active, but I don't think the activity is  
higher than before. User list activity is about the same. More dev  
list messages are likely explained by forwarding all Jira traffic to  
dev instead of just "new ticket" events as we did before.

Andrus

On Jun 10, 2008, at 1:58 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> No one has added any other feedback.  Is this what we should send to  
> the board?
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>> I've created a stub at:
>>
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2008
>>
>> I haven't gone back through all of my e-mail for the past 3 months to
>> pick out the highlights yet, though.  Comments/additions appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> /dev/mrg
>>
>

Re: Apache Board Report (June)

[Tore Halset <ha...@pvv.ntnu.no>]

Hello.

I think it is fine.

  - Tore.

On 10. juni. 2008, at 12.58, Michael Gentry wrote:

> No one has added any other feedback.  Is this what we should send to  
> the board?
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>> I've created a stub at:
>>
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2008
>>
>> I haven't gone back through all of my e-mail for the past 3 months to
>> pick out the highlights yet, though.  Comments/additions appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> /dev/mrg
>>
>

Re: Apache Board Report (June)

[Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com>]

No one has added any other feedback.  Is this what we should send to the board?


On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've created a stub at:
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2008
>
> I haven't gone back through all of my e-mail for the past 3 months to
> pick out the highlights yet, though.  Comments/additions appreciated.
>
> Thanks!
>
> /dev/mrg
>