You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@geronimo.apache.org by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net> on 2008/04/24 13:47:15 UTC

[DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release - RC2

This is a discussion thread for issues related to the Geronimo Server 
2.1.1 release candidate (rc2) currently up for vote.

Please vote.

Joe

Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release - RC2

Posted by Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Hernan Cunico <hc...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 8:32 PM, Hernan Cunico <hcunico@gmail.com<mailto:
>> hcunico@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>    A user reported yesterday some issues starting the server due to
>>    some port conflicts and he started to use the
>>    config-substitutions.properties to workaround this issue.
>>
>>    I had the same port conflict problem caused by a different
>>    application but instead of just changing the COSNamingPort I changed
>>    the PortOffset instead.
>>
>>    If I change only the PortOffset I can start the server just fine but
>>    fail to deploy apps. I thought PortOffset alone would do the trick
>>
>> If you are using the deploy tool, you will have to use a port number which
>> is 1099+portOffset.
>>
>>
> ahhh, elementary Watson! ;-)

;-)

++Vamsi

>
>
> Cheers!
> Hernan
>
>
>>
>>
>>    Do I have to do something else after changing the PortOffset?
>>    Cheers!
>>    Hernan
>>
>>
>>    Joe Bohn wrote:
>>
>>        This is a discussion thread for issues related to the Geronimo
>>        Server 2.1.1 release candidate (rc2) currently up for vote.
>>
>>        Please vote.
>>
>>        Joe
>>
>>
>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release - RC2

Posted by Hernan Cunico <hc...@gmail.com>.

Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 8:32 PM, Hernan Cunico <hcunico@gmail.com 
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     A user reported yesterday some issues starting the server due to
>     some port conflicts and he started to use the
>     config-substitutions.properties to workaround this issue.
> 
>     I had the same port conflict problem caused by a different
>     application but instead of just changing the COSNamingPort I changed
>     the PortOffset instead.
> 
>     If I change only the PortOffset I can start the server just fine but
>     fail to deploy apps. I thought PortOffset alone would do the trick
> 
> If you are using the deploy tool, you will have to use a port number 
> which is 1099+portOffset.
> 

ahhh, elementary Watson! ;-)

Cheers!
Hernan
>  
> 
> 
> 
>     Do I have to do something else after changing the PortOffset?
>     Cheers!
>     Hernan
> 
> 
>     Joe Bohn wrote:
> 
>         This is a discussion thread for issues related to the Geronimo
>         Server 2.1.1 release candidate (rc2) currently up for vote.
> 
>         Please vote.
> 
>         Joe
> 
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release - RC2

Posted by Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 8:32 PM, Hernan Cunico <hc...@gmail.com> wrote:

> A user reported yesterday some issues starting the server due to some port
> conflicts and he started to use the config-substitutions.properties to
> workaround this issue.
>
> I had the same port conflict problem caused by a different application but
> instead of just changing the COSNamingPort I changed the PortOffset instead.
>
> If I change only the PortOffset I can start the server just fine but fail
> to deploy apps. I thought PortOffset alone would do the trick

If you are using the deploy tool, you will have to use a port number which
is 1099+portOffset.



>
>
> Do I have to do something else after changing the PortOffset?
> Cheers!
> Hernan
>
>
> Joe Bohn wrote:
>
>> This is a discussion thread for issues related to the Geronimo Server
>> 2.1.1 release candidate (rc2) currently up for vote.
>>
>> Please vote.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release - RC2

Posted by Hernan Cunico <hc...@gmail.com>.
A user reported yesterday some issues starting the server due to some port conflicts and he started to use the config-substitutions.properties to workaround this issue.

I had the same port conflict problem caused by a different application but instead of just changing the COSNamingPort I changed the PortOffset instead.

If I change only the PortOffset I can start the server just fine but fail to deploy apps. I thought PortOffset alone would do the trick

Do I have to do something else after changing the PortOffset? 

Cheers!
Hernan

Joe Bohn wrote:
> This is a discussion thread for issues related to the Geronimo Server 
> 2.1.1 release candidate (rc2) currently up for vote.
> 
> Please vote.
> 
> Joe
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release - RC2

Posted by Hernan Cunico <hc...@gmail.com>.
A user reported yesterday some issues starting the server due to some port conflicts and he started to use the config-substitutions.properties to workaround this issue.

I had the same port conflict problem caused by a different application but instead of just changing the COSNamingPort I changed the PortOffset instead.

If I change only the PortOffset I can start the server just fine but fail to deploy apps. I thought PortOffset alone would do the trick

Do I have to do something else after changing the PortOffset? 

Cheers!
Hernan

Joe Bohn wrote:
> This is a discussion thread for issues related to the Geronimo Server 
> 2.1.1 release candidate (rc2) currently up for vote.
> 
> Please vote.
> 
> Joe
>