You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by mat <fo...@gmail.com> on 2007/12/07 16:21:02 UTC
Re: VMPIPE and IPC
Hi, can I config ExecutorFilter for VMPipe server?
On 11/26/07, Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 26, 2007 11:10 AM, mat <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The purpose of VM pipe is only for testing? I don't quite understand
> "the
> > performance will be much better, but not better
> > than the direct invocation."
>
> If you have direct access to the server business logic, you can call
> it directly rather than via vm-pipe.
>
> But, if your applications highly depends on MINA and they want to
> communicate with each other, you could use vm-pipe.
>
> Trustin
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
> --
> PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
>
Re: VMPIPE and IPC
Posted by mat <fo...@gmail.com>.
I feel deeply sorry to make you feel so uncomforable. MINA benefited me a
lot, however basically i am just
a naive USER of MINA(I only read tutorial, examples and make a server)
Sometimes I also feel sorry to myself since I can only be a user but not a
contributor due to lack of programming skill and no time to
read the all source code. However, I also tried to give some suggestions to
this maillist with my limited knowledge and tried to answer some questions.
Why I asked such a STUPID question because:
>From the example:
SocketAcceptorConfig cfg = new SocketAcceptorConfig();
cfg.getFilterChain().addLast("codec", new ProtocolCodecFilter(new
SumUpProtocolCodecFactory(true)));
acceptor.bind(new InetSocketAddress(SERVER_PORT), new
ServerSessionHandler(), cfg);
I thought that was the one way to configure a filter(need a
xxxAcceptorConfig). But i can't find a corresponding VMAcceptorConfig in
the API.
I will think more before I raise a question.
Thank you.
On 12/8/07, Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In 1.x:
>
> VmPipeAcceptor acceptor = ...;
> acceptor.getDefaultConfig().getFilterChain().addLast("executor", new
> ExecutorFilter(...));
>
> In 2.x:
>
> acceptor.getFilterChain().addLast("executor", new ExecutorFilter(...));
>
> Now here comes some rant...
>
> I am really sorry to say this to you, but how could you ask this kind
> of question considering that you already know how to add a filter to
> other transports such as socket? You have been participating in this
> mailing list for a long time and now you are behaving like you don't
> know nothing about how to add a filter. It's too trivial to answer
> and simply wastes other community members' time. Are you sure you
> really didn't know how to do that, or just didn't want to try a few
> lines of code by yourself but copy-and-paste?
>
> I don't want to discourage anyone in the mailing list, but I sometimes
> get really discouraged by this kind of post. Yes, myself really loves
> this project and I spend much more than so-called full-time for this
> project - every day and night literally. I hope you understand my
> feeling at this moment and what discourages the committers who spends
> enormous amount time for their little baby project.
>
> Trustin
>
> On Dec 8, 2007 12:44 AM, mat <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Can you tell me how? I can't find an example. Thanks.
> >
> >
> > On 12/7/07, Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes. Insert an ExecutorFilter to the filter chain like you did for
> > > other transports.
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > > Trustin
> > >
> > > On Dec 8, 2007 12:21 AM, mat <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi, can I config ExecutorFilter for VMPipe server?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 11/26/07, Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Nov 26, 2007 11:10 AM, mat <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > The purpose of VM pipe is only for testing? I don't quite
> understand
> > > > > "the
> > > > > > performance will be much better, but not better
> > > > > > than the direct invocation."
> > > > >
> > > > > If you have direct access to the server business logic, you can
> call
> > > > > it directly rather than via vm-pipe.
> > > > >
> > > > > But, if your applications highly depends on MINA and they want to
> > > > > communicate with each other, you could use vm-pipe.
> > > > >
> > > > > Trustin
> > > > > --
> > > > > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > > > > --
> > > > > http://gleamynode.net/
> > > > > --
> > > > > PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > > --
> > > http://gleamynode.net/
> > > --
> > > PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
> --
> PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
>
Re: VMPIPE and IPC
Posted by Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com>.
In 1.x:
VmPipeAcceptor acceptor = ...;
acceptor.getDefaultConfig().getFilterChain().addLast("executor", new
ExecutorFilter(...));
In 2.x:
acceptor.getFilterChain().addLast("executor", new ExecutorFilter(...));
Now here comes some rant...
I am really sorry to say this to you, but how could you ask this kind
of question considering that you already know how to add a filter to
other transports such as socket? You have been participating in this
mailing list for a long time and now you are behaving like you don't
know nothing about how to add a filter. It's too trivial to answer
and simply wastes other community members' time. Are you sure you
really didn't know how to do that, or just didn't want to try a few
lines of code by yourself but copy-and-paste?
I don't want to discourage anyone in the mailing list, but I sometimes
get really discouraged by this kind of post. Yes, myself really loves
this project and I spend much more than so-called full-time for this
project - every day and night literally. I hope you understand my
feeling at this moment and what discourages the committers who spends
enormous amount time for their little baby project.
Trustin
On Dec 8, 2007 12:44 AM, mat <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can you tell me how? I can't find an example. Thanks.
>
>
> On 12/7/07, Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes. Insert an ExecutorFilter to the filter chain like you did for
> > other transports.
> >
> > HTH,
> > Trustin
> >
> > On Dec 8, 2007 12:21 AM, mat <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi, can I config ExecutorFilter for VMPipe server?
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/26/07, Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 26, 2007 11:10 AM, mat <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > The purpose of VM pipe is only for testing? I don't quite understand
> > > > "the
> > > > > performance will be much better, but not better
> > > > > than the direct invocation."
> > > >
> > > > If you have direct access to the server business logic, you can call
> > > > it directly rather than via vm-pipe.
> > > >
> > > > But, if your applications highly depends on MINA and they want to
> > > > communicate with each other, you could use vm-pipe.
> > > >
> > > > Trustin
> > > > --
> > > > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > > > --
> > > > http://gleamynode.net/
> > > > --
> > > > PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > --
> > http://gleamynode.net/
> > --
> > PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
> >
>
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
Re: VMPIPE and IPC
Posted by mat <fo...@gmail.com>.
Can you tell me how? I can't find an example. Thanks.
On 12/7/07, Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes. Insert an ExecutorFilter to the filter chain like you did for
> other transports.
>
> HTH,
> Trustin
>
> On Dec 8, 2007 12:21 AM, mat <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi, can I config ExecutorFilter for VMPipe server?
> >
> >
> > On 11/26/07, Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Nov 26, 2007 11:10 AM, mat <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > The purpose of VM pipe is only for testing? I don't quite understand
> > > "the
> > > > performance will be much better, but not better
> > > > than the direct invocation."
> > >
> > > If you have direct access to the server business logic, you can call
> > > it directly rather than via vm-pipe.
> > >
> > > But, if your applications highly depends on MINA and they want to
> > > communicate with each other, you could use vm-pipe.
> > >
> > > Trustin
> > > --
> > > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > > --
> > > http://gleamynode.net/
> > > --
> > > PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
> --
> PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
>
Re: VMPIPE and IPC
Posted by Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com>.
Yes. Insert an ExecutorFilter to the filter chain like you did for
other transports.
HTH,
Trustin
On Dec 8, 2007 12:21 AM, mat <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, can I config ExecutorFilter for VMPipe server?
>
>
> On 11/26/07, Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 26, 2007 11:10 AM, mat <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > The purpose of VM pipe is only for testing? I don't quite understand
> > "the
> > > performance will be much better, but not better
> > > than the direct invocation."
> >
> > If you have direct access to the server business logic, you can call
> > it directly rather than via vm-pipe.
> >
> > But, if your applications highly depends on MINA and they want to
> > communicate with each other, you could use vm-pipe.
> >
> > Trustin
> > --
> > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > --
> > http://gleamynode.net/
> > --
> > PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
> >
>
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6