Issue 2101 not fully resolved

[Stefano Spinucci <vi...@yahoo.it>]

Hi,
I'm Stefano Spinucci, and the issue 2101 was opened
after a message I sent on @dev list
(http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2004-10/1018.shtml).

Months passed, the issue was marked as resolved, I
upgraded today svn to 1.1.4 (on windows 2000), I
messed a bit with my repo and i discovered that... the
issue was not (completely) resolved.

To let the error show, simply add two lines to the
reproduction recipe (taken from the issue 2101):

svnadmin create repo
svn co file://`pwd`/repo wc
svn mkdir wc/foo
touch wc/foo/bar
svn add wc/foo/bar
svn ci -m "" wc
svn rm wc/foo/bar
svn ci -m "" wc
svn cp wc/foo wc/foo2
svn ci -m "" wc

** added actions (on windows 2000) **
del wc/foo2
svn up


And only now the deleted file (bar) 'll reappear in
foo2.


PS
I forced the deletion of foo2 because in the wc 'foo2'
was empty, but browsing the repo on the web 'foo2'
contained already 'bar'.


bye

---
Stefano Spinucci
Italy


		
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: Issue 2101 not fully resolved

[Philip Martin <ph...@codematters.co.uk>]

Stefano Spinucci <vi...@yahoo.it> writes:

> I'm Stefano Spinucci, and the issue 2101 was opened
> after a message I sent on @dev list
> (http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2004-10/1018.shtml).
>
> Months passed, the issue was marked as resolved, I
> upgraded today svn to 1.1.4 (on windows 2000), I

The fix has not been ported to the 1.1.x branch, but it should be
fixed in 1.2.

-- 
Philip Martin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: Issue 2101 not fully resolved

[Daniel Patterson <da...@danpat.net>]

Stefano Spinucci wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm Stefano Spinucci, and the issue 2101 was opened
> after a message I sent on @dev list
> (http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2004-10/1018.shtml).
> 
> Months passed, the issue was marked as resolved, I
> upgraded today svn to 1.1.4 (on windows 2000), I
> messed a bit with my repo and i discovered that... the
> issue was not (completely) resolved.
> 
> To let the error show, simply add two lines to the
> reproduction recipe (taken from the issue 2101):
> 
> svnadmin create repo
> svn co file://`pwd`/repo wc
> svn mkdir wc/foo
> touch wc/foo/bar
> svn add wc/foo/bar
> svn ci -m "" wc
> svn rm wc/foo/bar
> svn ci -m "" wc
> svn cp wc/foo wc/foo2
> svn ci -m "" wc
> 
> ** added actions (on windows 2000) **
> del wc/foo2
> svn up
> 
> 
> And only now the deleted file (bar) 'll reappear in
> foo2.


   I *think* that this behaviour is expected.  It's
   because yo haven't done an "svn up" in between each
   commit, so the resvision of wc/foo hasn't been updated
   since you first created wc/foo/bar.

   Let's annotate your recipe:

 > svnadmin create repo
 > svn co file://`pwd`/repo wc
 > svn mkdir wc/foo
 > touch wc/foo/bar
 > svn add wc/foo/bar
 > svn ci -m "" wc             [wc, wc/foo and wc/bar are @ r1]
 > svn rm wc/foo/bar
 > svn ci -m "" wc             [wc, wc/foo are still @ r1]
 > svn cp wc/foo wc/foo2       [you copy wc/foo@r1 to wc/foo2]
 > svn ci -m "" wc

   So you're copying wc/foo@r1 to wc/foo2, creating r3.  wc/foo@r1
   still contained wc/foo/bar.

   Although the behaviour is maybe not what you're expecting,
   it's explainable.  You could correct this by doing an "svn up"
   between each commit.

daniel


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org