Log crunching/stats

[Ben Laurie <be...@algroup.co.uk>]

What are people using for log crunching and stats these days (that is
reasonably fast)?

Cheers,

Ben.

-- 
Ben Laurie            |Phone: +44 (181) 735 0686|Apache Group member
Freelance Consultant  |Fax:   +44 (181) 735 0689|http://www.apache.org
and Technical Director|Email: ben@algroup.co.uk |Apache-SSL author
A.L. Digital Ltd,     |http://www.algroup.co.uk/Apache-SSL
London, England.      |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache

Re: Log crunching/stats

[Christof Damian <da...@mediaconsult.com>]

Ben Laurie wrote:
> 
> What are people using for log crunching and stats these days (that is
> reasonably fast)?

I use http-analyze, it has nice graphics and is pretty fast.

Before I used mkstats, but it uses much to much memory for large sites.

analog is very fast, but I like the nice graphics of http-analyze more.

and I have one perl script of my own, which gives nice statistics
including gfx for the marketing people, including:

- visits 
- page views 
- enter/exit/single pages & top paths
- time per visit 
(robot are excluded)

because I do it without cookies, most of this information might be
highly inaccurate, but the marketing people don't seem to care.

damian
-- 
Christof Damian
damian@mediaconsult.com / damian@krass.com

Re: Log crunching/stats

[Rob Hartill <ro...@imdb.com>]

On Wed, 29 Oct 1997, Ben Laurie wrote:

> What are people using for log crunching and stats these days (that is
> reasonably fast)?

Analog

We haven't compared it with anything else; it gets the job done and
is reasonably fast.

--
Rob Hartill                              Internet Movie Database (Ltd)
http://www.moviedatabase.com/   .. a site for sore eyes.