You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by co...@apache.org on 2007/11/16 14:31:31 UTC
svn commit: r595658 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

Author: covener
Date: Fri Nov 16 05:31:30 2007
New Revision: 595658

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=595658&view=rev
Log:
promote, assuage

Modified:
    httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=595658&r1=595657&r2=595658&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Fri Nov 16 05:31:30 2007
@@ -84,6 +84,18 @@
          http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=591488 
      +1: covener, rpluem, rederpj
 
+   * mod_ldap: Don't return references into shared memory to the caller, 
+     as these may expire at any time because callers don't hold
+     a cache lock
+         http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=591499
+         http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=593919 
+     +1: covener, rpluem, rederpj
+     rederpj: Though it should never be a problem (famous last words), should
+              there be some sort of verification of i vs. k? (since you
+              allocate based on k and copy based on i)
+     covener: attrs/vals are defined as being the same length and null terminated,
+              we just need to count the length of one to allocate the other
+
 PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
   [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]
 
@@ -246,15 +258,6 @@
          Trunk version of patch works
       +1: rpluem, trawick
 
-   * mod_ldap: Don't return references into shared memory to the caller, 
-     as these may expire at any time because callers don't hold
-     a cache lock
-         http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=591499
-         http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=593919 
-     +1: covener, rpluem, rederpj
-     rederpj: Though it should never be a problem (famous last words), should
-              there be some sort of verification of i vs. k? (since you
-              allocate based on k and copy based on i)
 
    * mod_ssl: Don't use the pconf pool for allocating memory pointed by
      a local static variable. PR 43865.