You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@couchdb.apache.org by Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> on 2012/10/14 12:27:33 UTC
[REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Hey,
This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails.
(See subject prefix!)
I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages.
At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need to fix.
What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe iterate on it
a little?
And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package for this
release?
Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
Thanks!
--
NS
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Joan Touzet <jo...@atypical.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am unable to make today's meeting so I wanted to give a status update.
>
> I've resurrected my work on packaging CouchDB using WiX for Win32. I
> also have recently written new BigCouch wrappers for rpm and deb and am
> happy to help get these done up for CouchDB.
>
> What I'm looking for is an interested committer (dch? tilgovi?) who is
> willing to work with me to help get these patches landed on the tree. My
> goal specifically would be:
>
Happy to.
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>.
On 14 November 2012 19:34, Joan Touzet <jo...@atypical.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am unable to make today's meeting so I wanted to give a status update.
>
> I've resurrected my work on packaging CouchDB using WiX for Win32. I
> also have recently written new BigCouch wrappers for rpm and deb and am
> happy to help get these done up for CouchDB.
>
> What I'm looking for is an interested committer (dch? tilgovi?) who is
> willing to work with me to help get these patches landed on the tree. My
> goal specifically would be:
>
> 1. Get all of the bits necessary to build packages into the repo,
> possibly using downstream distro bits as a starting point for deb/rpm
>
> 2. Ensure that the bits work
>
> 3. Consult with our downstream distros for any changes they'd like to
> see in our repo directly
>
> 4. profit, etc.
>
> Noah, what is the hard cutoff date for changing the repo? Would there be
> any leeway to change only things that affect the build process/packaging
> instead of the code itself?
>
> -Joan
>
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 07:04:09PM +0000, Noah Slater wrote:
>> Hey guys! What's the current status of the build/packaging work? Would LOVE
>> to get some of this done for 1.3! <g>
>>
>> On 29 October 2012 17:58, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > i can probably help as well. rcouchx is using a simple makefile but that
>> > can be ported to autools imo
>> > On Oct 29, 2012 6:51 PM, "Noah Slater" <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Cooll, appreciate that! Hoping to get some of this sorted for 1.3, which
>> > is
>> > > largely dependant on me fixing up these docs. I think our biggest concern
>> > > right now is the OS X thing. I am not at all happy with it being on
>> > Github,
>> > > but over the moon it exists in the first place. If we could get some
>> > > movement on this, even if it's just a tiny bit, in the right direction,
>> > > then I would be overjoyed.
>> > >
>> > > On 29 October 2012 15:24, Joan Touzet <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Noah,
>> > > >
>> > > > I'm just climbing out of the hole at work today, so I'll be able to
>> > look
>> > > > at this tomorrow (Tuesday the 30th).
>> > > >
>> > > > -Joan
>> > > > ---
>> > > > Joan Touzet | joant@ieee.org | wohali@efnet
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On 28 October 2012 11:53, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Hey Hans,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> What changes do we need to make to get this into CouchDB proper? Do
>> > you
>> > > >> need any assistance?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Thanks!
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On 24 October 2012 23:25, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> Hi Noah,
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> At my side the required changes are not yet ready.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> - Hans
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On Oct 23, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> > Just following up on this. CCing Hans and Joan directly.
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> > On 14 October 2012 19:49, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >>> > Do you think we can get this AMI ready for the 1.3 release?
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> > @Hans, do you wanna take a look at what it would take to fold your
>> > > >>> work in? I'm sure Dave or myself can answer any questions you run in
>> > to.
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> > @Joan, how long would the MSI stuff take?
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <
>> > dch@jsonified.com
>> > >
>> > > >>> wrote:
>> > > >>> > On 14 October 2012 12:27, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >>> > > Hey,
>> > > >>> > >
>> > > >>> > > This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?"
>> > emails.
>> > > >>> > > (See subject prefix!)
>> > > >>> > >
>> > > >>> > > I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X
>> > packages.
>> > > >>> > >
>> > > >>> > > At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we
>> > need
>> > > >>> to fix.
>> > > >>> > > What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe
>> > > >>> iterate on it
>> > > >>> > > a little?
>> > > >>> > >
>> > > >>> > > And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package
>> > > >>> for this
>> > > >>> > > release?
>> > > >>> > >
>> > > >>> > > Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> > Anybody who wants to help here is welcome :-)
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> > I am mid updating the public AMI I use for test builds, to include
>> > an
>> > > >>> > R15B02 OTP instead of the R15B I have. That avoids the need for
>> > people
>> > > >>> > to spend ages getting a dev environment set up.
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> > @Wohali has some bits to make an MSI package, better than my hacky
>> > > >>> > attempts a year ago. That would be cool.
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> > I'm gonna revert to using a newer OpenSSL library if it works out
>> > in
>> > > >>> testing.
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> > Nothing else major comes to mind "down here".
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> > A+
>> > > >>> > Dave
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> > --
>> > > >>> > NS
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> > --
>> > > >>> > NS
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> --
>> > > >> NS
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > NS
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> NS
>
> --
> Joan Touzet | joant@atypical.net | wohali everywhere else
Woo!! I can't speak for the unix stuff (other than I'll be delighted
to help test it) but yup I am up for the windows world. Just point me
at it. And give me a day to re-read the WiX book.. Having an MSI as
the default package makes sense to me, and I will prepare a nuget
package this time around, it seems to be gaining ground:
http://chocolatey.org/, should be straightforward.
Personally I would prefer to roll 1.3.0 soon (timebound) and then give
a period for the new approaches to settle down before they go into git
master. Shipping MSI binaries based off 1.3.0 vs shipping a binary
made directly from 1.3.0 is largely semantics for end users.
If its not a big change and I've done my docs stuff (mea culpa) then
let's do it.
A+
Dave
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Joan Touzet <jo...@atypical.net>.
Hi all,
I am unable to make today's meeting so I wanted to give a status update.
I've resurrected my work on packaging CouchDB using WiX for Win32. I
also have recently written new BigCouch wrappers for rpm and deb and am
happy to help get these done up for CouchDB.
What I'm looking for is an interested committer (dch? tilgovi?) who is
willing to work with me to help get these patches landed on the tree. My
goal specifically would be:
1. Get all of the bits necessary to build packages into the repo,
possibly using downstream distro bits as a starting point for deb/rpm
2. Ensure that the bits work
3. Consult with our downstream distros for any changes they'd like to
see in our repo directly
4. profit, etc.
Noah, what is the hard cutoff date for changing the repo? Would there be
any leeway to change only things that affect the build process/packaging
instead of the code itself?
-Joan
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 07:04:09PM +0000, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hey guys! What's the current status of the build/packaging work? Would LOVE
> to get some of this done for 1.3! <g>
>
> On 29 October 2012 17:58, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > i can probably help as well. rcouchx is using a simple makefile but that
> > can be ported to autools imo
> > On Oct 29, 2012 6:51 PM, "Noah Slater" <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Cooll, appreciate that! Hoping to get some of this sorted for 1.3, which
> > is
> > > largely dependant on me fixing up these docs. I think our biggest concern
> > > right now is the OS X thing. I am not at all happy with it being on
> > Github,
> > > but over the moon it exists in the first place. If we could get some
> > > movement on this, even if it's just a tiny bit, in the right direction,
> > > then I would be overjoyed.
> > >
> > > On 29 October 2012 15:24, Joan Touzet <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Noah,
> > > >
> > > > I'm just climbing out of the hole at work today, so I'll be able to
> > look
> > > > at this tomorrow (Tuesday the 30th).
> > > >
> > > > -Joan
> > > > ---
> > > > Joan Touzet | joant@ieee.org | wohali@efnet
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 28 October 2012 11:53, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hey Hans,
> > > >>
> > > >> What changes do we need to make to get this into CouchDB proper? Do
> > you
> > > >> need any assistance?
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks!
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 24 October 2012 23:25, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi Noah,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> At my side the required changes are not yet ready.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> - Hans
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Oct 23, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> > Just following up on this. CCing Hans and Joan directly.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > On 14 October 2012 19:49, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >>> > Do you think we can get this AMI ready for the 1.3 release?
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > @Hans, do you wanna take a look at what it would take to fold your
> > > >>> work in? I'm sure Dave or myself can answer any questions you run in
> > to.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > @Joan, how long would the MSI stuff take?
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <
> > dch@jsonified.com
> > >
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>> > On 14 October 2012 12:27, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >>> > > Hey,
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?"
> > emails.
> > > >>> > > (See subject prefix!)
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X
> > packages.
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we
> > need
> > > >>> to fix.
> > > >>> > > What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe
> > > >>> iterate on it
> > > >>> > > a little?
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package
> > > >>> for this
> > > >>> > > release?
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Anybody who wants to help here is welcome :-)
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > I am mid updating the public AMI I use for test builds, to include
> > an
> > > >>> > R15B02 OTP instead of the R15B I have. That avoids the need for
> > people
> > > >>> > to spend ages getting a dev environment set up.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > @Wohali has some bits to make an MSI package, better than my hacky
> > > >>> > attempts a year ago. That would be cool.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > I'm gonna revert to using a newer OpenSSL library if it works out
> > in
> > > >>> testing.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Nothing else major comes to mind "down here".
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > A+
> > > >>> > Dave
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > --
> > > >>> > NS
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > --
> > > >>> > NS
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> NS
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > NS
> >
>
>
>
> --
> NS
--
Joan Touzet | joant@atypical.net | wohali everywhere else
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>.
On 18 November 2012 18:28, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The OS X launcher is now ready for 1.3. I have fixed the branding issues:
>
> - name and title of the app is now "Apache CouchDB"
> - About box is fixed and show a link to the sources
> - About box title is "Apache CouchDB"
>
> I did a test build on the CouchDB 1.3 branch which runs ok with one minor prob.
> The couchdb binary does not recognize the COUCHDB_ADDITIONAL_CONFIG_FILE parameter
> anymore which is used by the couchdbx launcher.
Hans, that's fantastic.!
We were missing #161181, I added it to 1.3.x and master.
Can you try again and let me know if anything else is mssing?
A+
Dave
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de>.
Hi,
The OS X launcher is now ready for 1.3. I have fixed the branding issues:
- name and title of the app is now "Apache CouchDB"
- About box is fixed and show a link to the sources
- About box title is "Apache CouchDB"
I did a test build on the CouchDB 1.3 branch which runs ok with one minor prob.
The couchdb binary does not recognize the COUCHDB_ADDITIONAL_CONFIG_FILE parameter
anymore which is used by the couchdbx launcher.
Ver 1.2 bin/couchdb:
_load_config () {
_add_config_file "$DEFAULT_CONFIG_FILE"
_add_config_dir "$DEFAULT_CONFIG_DIR"
_add_config_file "$LOCAL_CONFIG_FILE"
_add_config_dir "$LOCAL_CONFIG_DIR"
if [ "$COUCHDB_ADDITIONAL_CONFIG_FILE" != '' ]
then
_add_config_file "$COUCHDB_ADDITIONAL_CONFIG_FILE"
fi
}
Ver 1.3 bin/couchdb:
_load_config () {
_add_config_file "$DEFAULT_CONFIG_FILE"
_add_config_dir "$DEFAULT_CONFIG_DIR"
_add_config_file "$LOCAL_CONFIG_FILE"
_add_config_dir "$LOCAL_CONFIG_DIR"
}
- Hans
On Nov 3, 2012, at 8:04 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey guys! What's the current status of the build/packaging work? Would LOVE
> to get some of this done for 1.3! <g>
>
> On 29 October 2012 17:58, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> i can probably help as well. rcouchx is using a simple makefile but that
>> can be ported to autools imo
>> On Oct 29, 2012 6:51 PM, "Noah Slater" <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Cooll, appreciate that! Hoping to get some of this sorted for 1.3, which
>> is
>>> largely dependant on me fixing up these docs. I think our biggest concern
>>> right now is the OS X thing. I am not at all happy with it being on
>> Github,
>>> but over the moon it exists in the first place. If we could get some
>>> movement on this, even if it's just a tiny bit, in the right direction,
>>> then I would be overjoyed.
>>>
>>> On 29 October 2012 15:24, Joan Touzet <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Noah,
>>>>
>>>> I'm just climbing out of the hole at work today, so I'll be able to
>> look
>>>> at this tomorrow (Tuesday the 30th).
>>>>
>>>> -Joan
>>>> ---
>>>> Joan Touzet | joant@ieee.org | wohali@efnet
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 28 October 2012 11:53, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey Hans,
>>>>>
>>>>> What changes do we need to make to get this into CouchDB proper? Do
>> you
>>>>> need any assistance?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 24 October 2012 23:25, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Noah,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At my side the required changes are not yet ready.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Hans
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 23, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just following up on this. CCing Hans and Joan directly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 14 October 2012 19:49, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Do you think we can get this AMI ready for the 1.3 release?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @Hans, do you wanna take a look at what it would take to fold your
>>>>>> work in? I'm sure Dave or myself can answer any questions you run in
>> to.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @Joan, how long would the MSI stuff take?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <
>> dch@jsonified.com
>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 14 October 2012 12:27, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hey,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?"
>> emails.
>>>>>>>> (See subject prefix!)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X
>> packages.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we
>> need
>>>>>> to fix.
>>>>>>>> What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe
>>>>>> iterate on it
>>>>>>>> a little?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package
>>>>>> for this
>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anybody who wants to help here is welcome :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am mid updating the public AMI I use for test builds, to include
>> an
>>>>>>> R15B02 OTP instead of the R15B I have. That avoids the need for
>> people
>>>>>>> to spend ages getting a dev environment set up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @Wohali has some bits to make an MSI package, better than my hacky
>>>>>>> attempts a year ago. That would be cool.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm gonna revert to using a newer OpenSSL library if it works out
>> in
>>>>>> testing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nothing else major comes to mind "down here".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A+
>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> NS
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> NS
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> NS
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> NS
>>
>
>
>
> --
> NS
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
Hey guys! What's the current status of the build/packaging work? Would LOVE
to get some of this done for 1.3! <g>
On 29 October 2012 17:58, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i can probably help as well. rcouchx is using a simple makefile but that
> can be ported to autools imo
> On Oct 29, 2012 6:51 PM, "Noah Slater" <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Cooll, appreciate that! Hoping to get some of this sorted for 1.3, which
> is
> > largely dependant on me fixing up these docs. I think our biggest concern
> > right now is the OS X thing. I am not at all happy with it being on
> Github,
> > but over the moon it exists in the first place. If we could get some
> > movement on this, even if it's just a tiny bit, in the right direction,
> > then I would be overjoyed.
> >
> > On 29 October 2012 15:24, Joan Touzet <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Noah,
> > >
> > > I'm just climbing out of the hole at work today, so I'll be able to
> look
> > > at this tomorrow (Tuesday the 30th).
> > >
> > > -Joan
> > > ---
> > > Joan Touzet | joant@ieee.org | wohali@efnet
> > >
> > >
> > > On 28 October 2012 11:53, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hey Hans,
> > >>
> > >> What changes do we need to make to get this into CouchDB proper? Do
> you
> > >> need any assistance?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 24 October 2012 23:25, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Noah,
> > >>>
> > >>> At my side the required changes are not yet ready.
> > >>>
> > >>> - Hans
> > >>>
> > >>> On Oct 23, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > Just following up on this. CCing Hans and Joan directly.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On 14 October 2012 19:49, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>
> wrote:
> > >>> > Do you think we can get this AMI ready for the 1.3 release?
> > >>> >
> > >>> > @Hans, do you wanna take a look at what it would take to fold your
> > >>> work in? I'm sure Dave or myself can answer any questions you run in
> to.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > @Joan, how long would the MSI stuff take?
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <
> dch@jsonified.com
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> > On 14 October 2012 12:27, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>
> wrote:
> > >>> > > Hey,
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?"
> emails.
> > >>> > > (See subject prefix!)
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X
> packages.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we
> need
> > >>> to fix.
> > >>> > > What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe
> > >>> iterate on it
> > >>> > > a little?
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package
> > >>> for this
> > >>> > > release?
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Anybody who wants to help here is welcome :-)
> > >>> >
> > >>> > I am mid updating the public AMI I use for test builds, to include
> an
> > >>> > R15B02 OTP instead of the R15B I have. That avoids the need for
> people
> > >>> > to spend ages getting a dev environment set up.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > @Wohali has some bits to make an MSI package, better than my hacky
> > >>> > attempts a year ago. That would be cool.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > I'm gonna revert to using a newer OpenSSL library if it works out
> in
> > >>> testing.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Nothing else major comes to mind "down here".
> > >>> >
> > >>> > A+
> > >>> > Dave
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > --
> > >>> > NS
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > --
> > >>> > NS
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> NS
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > NS
>
--
NS
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>.
i can probably help as well. rcouchx is using a simple makefile but that
can be ported to autools imo
On Oct 29, 2012 6:51 PM, "Noah Slater" <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Cooll, appreciate that! Hoping to get some of this sorted for 1.3, which
is
> largely dependant on me fixing up these docs. I think our biggest concern
> right now is the OS X thing. I am not at all happy with it being on
Github,
> but over the moon it exists in the first place. If we could get some
> movement on this, even if it's just a tiny bit, in the right direction,
> then I would be overjoyed.
>
> On 29 October 2012 15:24, Joan Touzet <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Noah,
> >
> > I'm just climbing out of the hole at work today, so I'll be able to look
> > at this tomorrow (Tuesday the 30th).
> >
> > -Joan
> > ---
> > Joan Touzet | joant@ieee.org | wohali@efnet
> >
> >
> > On 28 October 2012 11:53, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hey Hans,
> >>
> >> What changes do we need to make to get this into CouchDB proper? Do you
> >> need any assistance?
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >> On 24 October 2012 23:25, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Noah,
> >>>
> >>> At my side the required changes are not yet ready.
> >>>
> >>> - Hans
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 23, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Just following up on this. CCing Hans and Joan directly.
> >>> >
> >>> > On 14 October 2012 19:49, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> >>> > Do you think we can get this AMI ready for the 1.3 release?
> >>> >
> >>> > @Hans, do you wanna take a look at what it would take to fold your
> >>> work in? I'm sure Dave or myself can answer any questions you run in
to.
> >>> >
> >>> > @Joan, how long would the MSI stuff take?
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dch@jsonified.com
>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > On 14 October 2012 12:27, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> >>> > > Hey,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?"
emails.
> >>> > > (See subject prefix!)
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X
packages.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need
> >>> to fix.
> >>> > > What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe
> >>> iterate on it
> >>> > > a little?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package
> >>> for this
> >>> > > release?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
> >>> >
> >>> > Anybody who wants to help here is welcome :-)
> >>> >
> >>> > I am mid updating the public AMI I use for test builds, to include
an
> >>> > R15B02 OTP instead of the R15B I have. That avoids the need for
people
> >>> > to spend ages getting a dev environment set up.
> >>> >
> >>> > @Wohali has some bits to make an MSI package, better than my hacky
> >>> > attempts a year ago. That would be cool.
> >>> >
> >>> > I'm gonna revert to using a newer OpenSSL library if it works out in
> >>> testing.
> >>> >
> >>> > Nothing else major comes to mind "down here".
> >>> >
> >>> > A+
> >>> > Dave
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > NS
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > NS
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> NS
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> NS
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
Cooll, appreciate that! Hoping to get some of this sorted for 1.3, which is
largely dependant on me fixing up these docs. I think our biggest concern
right now is the OS X thing. I am not at all happy with it being on Github,
but over the moon it exists in the first place. If we could get some
movement on this, even if it's just a tiny bit, in the right direction,
then I would be overjoyed.
On 29 October 2012 15:24, Joan Touzet <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Noah,
>
> I'm just climbing out of the hole at work today, so I'll be able to look
> at this tomorrow (Tuesday the 30th).
>
> -Joan
> ---
> Joan Touzet | joant@ieee.org | wohali@efnet
>
>
> On 28 October 2012 11:53, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hey Hans,
>>
>> What changes do we need to make to get this into CouchDB proper? Do you
>> need any assistance?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> On 24 October 2012 23:25, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Noah,
>>>
>>> At my side the required changes are not yet ready.
>>>
>>> - Hans
>>>
>>> On Oct 23, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Just following up on this. CCing Hans and Joan directly.
>>> >
>>> > On 14 October 2012 19:49, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>>> > Do you think we can get this AMI ready for the 1.3 release?
>>> >
>>> > @Hans, do you wanna take a look at what it would take to fold your
>>> work in? I'm sure Dave or myself can answer any questions you run in to.
>>> >
>>> > @Joan, how long would the MSI stuff take?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > On 14 October 2012 12:27, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>>> > > Hey,
>>> > >
>>> > > This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails.
>>> > > (See subject prefix!)
>>> > >
>>> > > I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages.
>>> > >
>>> > > At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need
>>> to fix.
>>> > > What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe
>>> iterate on it
>>> > > a little?
>>> > >
>>> > > And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package
>>> for this
>>> > > release?
>>> > >
>>> > > Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
>>> >
>>> > Anybody who wants to help here is welcome :-)
>>> >
>>> > I am mid updating the public AMI I use for test builds, to include an
>>> > R15B02 OTP instead of the R15B I have. That avoids the need for people
>>> > to spend ages getting a dev environment set up.
>>> >
>>> > @Wohali has some bits to make an MSI package, better than my hacky
>>> > attempts a year ago. That would be cool.
>>> >
>>> > I'm gonna revert to using a newer OpenSSL library if it works out in
>>> testing.
>>> >
>>> > Nothing else major comes to mind "down here".
>>> >
>>> > A+
>>> > Dave
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > NS
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > NS
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> NS
>>
>
>
--
NS
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Joan Touzet <wo...@gmail.com>.
Hi Noah,
I'm just climbing out of the hole at work today, so I'll be able to look at
this tomorrow (Tuesday the 30th).
-Joan
---
Joan Touzet | joant@ieee.org | wohali@efnet
On 28 October 2012 11:53, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey Hans,
>
> What changes do we need to make to get this into CouchDB proper? Do you
> need any assistance?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On 24 October 2012 23:25, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Noah,
>>
>> At my side the required changes are not yet ready.
>>
>> - Hans
>>
>> On Oct 23, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Just following up on this. CCing Hans and Joan directly.
>> >
>> > On 14 October 2012 19:49, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>> > Do you think we can get this AMI ready for the 1.3 release?
>> >
>> > @Hans, do you wanna take a look at what it would take to fold your work
>> in? I'm sure Dave or myself can answer any questions you run in to.
>> >
>> > @Joan, how long would the MSI stuff take?
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On 14 October 2012 12:27, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>> > > Hey,
>> > >
>> > > This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails.
>> > > (See subject prefix!)
>> > >
>> > > I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages.
>> > >
>> > > At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need to
>> fix.
>> > > What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe iterate
>> on it
>> > > a little?
>> > >
>> > > And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package for
>> this
>> > > release?
>> > >
>> > > Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
>> >
>> > Anybody who wants to help here is welcome :-)
>> >
>> > I am mid updating the public AMI I use for test builds, to include an
>> > R15B02 OTP instead of the R15B I have. That avoids the need for people
>> > to spend ages getting a dev environment set up.
>> >
>> > @Wohali has some bits to make an MSI package, better than my hacky
>> > attempts a year ago. That would be cool.
>> >
>> > I'm gonna revert to using a newer OpenSSL library if it works out in
>> testing.
>> >
>> > Nothing else major comes to mind "down here".
>> >
>> > A+
>> > Dave
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > NS
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > NS
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> NS
>
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
Hey Hans,
What changes do we need to make to get this into CouchDB proper? Do you
need any assistance?
Thanks!
On 24 October 2012 23:25, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
> Hi Noah,
>
> At my side the required changes are not yet ready.
>
> - Hans
>
> On Oct 23, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Just following up on this. CCing Hans and Joan directly.
> >
> > On 14 October 2012 19:49, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> > Do you think we can get this AMI ready for the 1.3 release?
> >
> > @Hans, do you wanna take a look at what it would take to fold your work
> in? I'm sure Dave or myself can answer any questions you run in to.
> >
> > @Joan, how long would the MSI stuff take?
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>
> wrote:
> > On 14 October 2012 12:27, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails.
> > > (See subject prefix!)
> > >
> > > I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages.
> > >
> > > At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need to
> fix.
> > > What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe iterate
> on it
> > > a little?
> > >
> > > And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package for
> this
> > > release?
> > >
> > > Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
> >
> > Anybody who wants to help here is welcome :-)
> >
> > I am mid updating the public AMI I use for test builds, to include an
> > R15B02 OTP instead of the R15B I have. That avoids the need for people
> > to spend ages getting a dev environment set up.
> >
> > @Wohali has some bits to make an MSI package, better than my hacky
> > attempts a year ago. That would be cool.
> >
> > I'm gonna revert to using a newer OpenSSL library if it works out in
> testing.
> >
> > Nothing else major comes to mind "down here".
> >
> > A+
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > NS
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > NS
>
>
--
NS
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de>.
Hi Noah,
At my side the required changes are not yet ready.
- Hans
On Oct 23, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> Just following up on this. CCing Hans and Joan directly.
>
> On 14 October 2012 19:49, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> Do you think we can get this AMI ready for the 1.3 release?
>
> @Hans, do you wanna take a look at what it would take to fold your work in? I'm sure Dave or myself can answer any questions you run in to.
>
> @Joan, how long would the MSI stuff take?
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
> On 14 October 2012 12:27, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails.
> > (See subject prefix!)
> >
> > I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages.
> >
> > At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need to fix.
> > What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe iterate on it
> > a little?
> >
> > And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package for this
> > release?
> >
> > Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
>
> Anybody who wants to help here is welcome :-)
>
> I am mid updating the public AMI I use for test builds, to include an
> R15B02 OTP instead of the R15B I have. That avoids the need for people
> to spend ages getting a dev environment set up.
>
> @Wohali has some bits to make an MSI package, better than my hacky
> attempts a year ago. That would be cool.
>
> I'm gonna revert to using a newer OpenSSL library if it works out in testing.
>
> Nothing else major comes to mind "down here".
>
> A+
> Dave
>
>
>
> --
> NS
>
>
>
> --
> NS
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
Just following up on this. CCing Hans and Joan directly.
On 14 October 2012 19:49, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> Do you think we can get this AMI ready for the 1.3 release?
>
> @Hans, do you wanna take a look at what it would take to fold your work
> in? I'm sure Dave or myself can answer any questions you run in to.
>
> @Joan, how long would the MSI stuff take?
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>wrote:
>
>> On 14 October 2012 12:27, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>> > Hey,
>> >
>> > This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails.
>> > (See subject prefix!)
>> >
>> > I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages.
>> >
>> > At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need to
>> fix.
>> > What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe iterate
>> on it
>> > a little?
>> >
>> > And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package for
>> this
>> > release?
>> >
>> > Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
>>
>> Anybody who wants to help here is welcome :-)
>>
>> I am mid updating the public AMI I use for test builds, to include an
>> R15B02 OTP instead of the R15B I have. That avoids the need for people
>> to spend ages getting a dev environment set up.
>>
>> @Wohali has some bits to make an MSI package, better than my hacky
>> attempts a year ago. That would be cool.
>>
>> I'm gonna revert to using a newer OpenSSL library if it works out in
>> testing.
>>
>> Nothing else major comes to mind "down here".
>>
>> A+
>> Dave
>>
>
>
>
> --
> NS
>
--
NS
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>.
Do you think we can get this AMI ready for the 1.3 release?
@Hans, do you wanna take a look at what it would take to fold your work in?
I'm sure Dave or myself can answer any questions you run in to.
@Joan, how long would the MSI stuff take?
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
> On 14 October 2012 12:27, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails.
> > (See subject prefix!)
> >
> > I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages.
> >
> > At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need to
> fix.
> > What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe iterate on
> it
> > a little?
> >
> > And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package for
> this
> > release?
> >
> > Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
>
> Anybody who wants to help here is welcome :-)
>
> I am mid updating the public AMI I use for test builds, to include an
> R15B02 OTP instead of the R15B I have. That avoids the need for people
> to spend ages getting a dev environment set up.
>
> @Wohali has some bits to make an MSI package, better than my hacky
> attempts a year ago. That would be cool.
>
> I'm gonna revert to using a newer OpenSSL library if it works out in
> testing.
>
> Nothing else major comes to mind "down here".
>
> A+
> Dave
>
--
NS
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>.
On 14 October 2012 12:27, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails.
> (See subject prefix!)
>
> I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages.
>
> At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need to fix.
> What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe iterate on it
> a little?
>
> And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package for this
> release?
>
> Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
Anybody who wants to help here is welcome :-)
I am mid updating the public AMI I use for test builds, to include an
R15B02 OTP instead of the R15B I have. That avoids the need for people
to spend ages getting a dev environment set up.
@Wohali has some bits to make an MSI package, better than my hacky
attempts a year ago. That would be cool.
I'm gonna revert to using a newer OpenSSL library if it works out in testing.
Nothing else major comes to mind "down here".
A+
Dave
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>.
I am hoping Dave can chip in here with his experience getting the Windows
build integrated.
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@php.net> wrote:
> Thanks Hans!
>
> I think Noah is also interested in getting the whole build tools/scripts
> imported so it doesn't live outside of Apache CouchDB anymore.
>
> Can you comment on what would be needed there?
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
> On 14.10.2012, at 17:19, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Noah
> >
> >> Did you get any feedback on the build that we can incorporate for 1.3?
> >
> > Yes, Benoit mentioned a few things which need to be fixed:
> >
> > "
> > On Jun 18, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> >> I have some problems with the current binary linked on the homepage.
> >> Not with the binary by itself which works but with the branding.
> >>
> >> 1. Titte in about is "CouchDB Server" I don't know what it's means. If
> >> linked on the homepage, it should be "Apache CouchDB" imo and nothing
> >> else. Other than that we should just link it on the wiki.
> >> 2. Copyright. imo we should only have the apache copyright for
> >> anything "official". How these copyrights will work if we include the
> >> osx build in the sources btw ?
> >> 3. Since the source code isn't in the apache couchdb repository, a
> >> link to the OSX sources should be provided in the ABOUT. It's not
> >> required by the aoache 2 license, but generally we expect to find the
> >> sources in the repository when it comes from an apache project?
> >>
> >> Anyway both can be fixed when the sources will be included in the repo
> >> (Is the process started) ?
> >
> > "
> >
> > 1. -> Change Title to "Apache CouchDB"
> > 2. -> should be no problem
> > 3. -> Add link to sources in the about box
> >
> >> What would it take to get your build in to the official repos?
> >
> > The build is basically a wrapper around the standard CouchDB disk
> layout. The additional wrapper code could be merged into a sub-folder of
> the repository called for instance "couchdbx-app".
> >
> > How is this done for the Windows build?
> >
> >> If you can prepare patches, I am more than happy to review, and apply
> them.
> >
> > I will update the code to include 1., 2. and 3.
> >
> > - Hans
> >
> >
> > On Oct 14, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> >
> >> Hans,
> >>
> >> Great news!
> >>
> >> Did you get any feedback on the build that we can incorporate for 1.3?
> >>
> >> What would it take to get your build in to the official repos?
> >>
> >> If you can prepare patches, I am more than happy to review, and apply
> them.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Noah,
> >>>
> >>> I have done the OS X build and I am there to upgrade it to 1.3.
> >>>
> >>> - Hans
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 14, 2012, at 12:27 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hey,
> >>>>
> >>>> This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails.
> >>>> (See subject prefix!)
> >>>>
> >>>> I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages.
> >>>>
> >>>> At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need to
> >>> fix.
> >>>> What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe iterate
> on
> >>> it
> >>>> a little?
> >>>>
> >>>> And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package for
> >>> this
> >>>> release?
> >>>>
> >>>> Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> NS
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> NS
> >
>
--
NS
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@php.net>.
Thanks Hans!
I think Noah is also interested in getting the whole build tools/scripts imported so it doesn't live outside of Apache CouchDB anymore.
Can you comment on what would be needed there?
Cheers
Jan
--
On 14.10.2012, at 17:19, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
> Hi, Noah
>
>> Did you get any feedback on the build that we can incorporate for 1.3?
>
> Yes, Benoit mentioned a few things which need to be fixed:
>
> "
> On Jun 18, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>> I have some problems with the current binary linked on the homepage.
>> Not with the binary by itself which works but with the branding.
>>
>> 1. Titte in about is "CouchDB Server" I don't know what it's means. If
>> linked on the homepage, it should be "Apache CouchDB" imo and nothing
>> else. Other than that we should just link it on the wiki.
>> 2. Copyright. imo we should only have the apache copyright for
>> anything "official". How these copyrights will work if we include the
>> osx build in the sources btw ?
>> 3. Since the source code isn't in the apache couchdb repository, a
>> link to the OSX sources should be provided in the ABOUT. It's not
>> required by the aoache 2 license, but generally we expect to find the
>> sources in the repository when it comes from an apache project?
>>
>> Anyway both can be fixed when the sources will be included in the repo
>> (Is the process started) ?
>
> "
>
> 1. -> Change Title to "Apache CouchDB"
> 2. -> should be no problem
> 3. -> Add link to sources in the about box
>
>> What would it take to get your build in to the official repos?
>
> The build is basically a wrapper around the standard CouchDB disk layout. The additional wrapper code could be merged into a sub-folder of the repository called for instance "couchdbx-app".
>
> How is this done for the Windows build?
>
>> If you can prepare patches, I am more than happy to review, and apply them.
>
> I will update the code to include 1., 2. and 3.
>
> - Hans
>
>
> On Oct 14, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
>> Hans,
>>
>> Great news!
>>
>> Did you get any feedback on the build that we can incorporate for 1.3?
>>
>> What would it take to get your build in to the official repos?
>>
>> If you can prepare patches, I am more than happy to review, and apply them.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Noah,
>>>
>>> I have done the OS X build and I am there to upgrade it to 1.3.
>>>
>>> - Hans
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 14, 2012, at 12:27 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey,
>>>>
>>>> This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails.
>>>> (See subject prefix!)
>>>>
>>>> I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages.
>>>>
>>>> At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need to
>>> fix.
>>>> What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe iterate on
>>> it
>>>> a little?
>>>>
>>>> And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package for
>>> this
>>>> release?
>>>>
>>>> Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> NS
>>
>>
>> --
>> NS
>
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
Thanks Hans!
I think Noah is also interested in getting the whole build tools/scripts imported so it doesn't live outside of Apache CouchDB anymore.
Can you comment on what would be needed there?
Cheers
Jan
--
On 14.10.2012, at 17:19, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
> Hi, Noah
>
>> Did you get any feedback on the build that we can incorporate for 1.3?
>
> Yes, Benoit mentioned a few things which need to be fixed:
>
> "
> On Jun 18, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>> I have some problems with the current binary linked on the homepage.
>> Not with the binary by itself which works but with the branding.
>>
>> 1. Titte in about is "CouchDB Server" I don't know what it's means. If
>> linked on the homepage, it should be "Apache CouchDB" imo and nothing
>> else. Other than that we should just link it on the wiki.
>> 2. Copyright. imo we should only have the apache copyright for
>> anything "official". How these copyrights will work if we include the
>> osx build in the sources btw ?
>> 3. Since the source code isn't in the apache couchdb repository, a
>> link to the OSX sources should be provided in the ABOUT. It's not
>> required by the aoache 2 license, but generally we expect to find the
>> sources in the repository when it comes from an apache project?
>>
>> Anyway both can be fixed when the sources will be included in the repo
>> (Is the process started) ?
>
> "
>
> 1. -> Change Title to "Apache CouchDB"
> 2. -> should be no problem
> 3. -> Add link to sources in the about box
>
>> What would it take to get your build in to the official repos?
>
> The build is basically a wrapper around the standard CouchDB disk layout. The additional wrapper code could be merged into a sub-folder of the repository called for instance "couchdbx-app".
>
> How is this done for the Windows build?
>
>> If you can prepare patches, I am more than happy to review, and apply them.
>
> I will update the code to include 1., 2. and 3.
>
> - Hans
>
>
> On Oct 14, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
>> Hans,
>>
>> Great news!
>>
>> Did you get any feedback on the build that we can incorporate for 1.3?
>>
>> What would it take to get your build in to the official repos?
>>
>> If you can prepare patches, I am more than happy to review, and apply them.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Noah,
>>>
>>> I have done the OS X build and I am there to upgrade it to 1.3.
>>>
>>> - Hans
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 14, 2012, at 12:27 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey,
>>>>
>>>> This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails.
>>>> (See subject prefix!)
>>>>
>>>> I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages.
>>>>
>>>> At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need to
>>> fix.
>>>> What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe iterate on
>>> it
>>>> a little?
>>>>
>>>> And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package for
>>> this
>>>> release?
>>>>
>>>> Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> NS
>>
>>
>> --
>> NS
>
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>.
Dave,
I more meant, perhaps you have some guidance on how we can roll this OS X
stuff into master? You're the only one here who's embedded a 3rd party
build system into our build system. YO DAWG.
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
> On 14 October 2012 17:19, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
> > Hi, Noah
> >
> >> Did you get any feedback on the build that we can incorporate for 1.3?
> >
> > Yes, Benoit mentioned a few things which need to be fixed:
> >
> > "
> > On Jun 18, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> >> I have some problems with the current binary linked on the homepage.
> >> Not with the binary by itself which works but with the branding.
> >>
> >> 1. Titte in about is "CouchDB Server" I don't know what it's means. If
> >> linked on the homepage, it should be "Apache CouchDB" imo and nothing
> >> else. Other than that we should just link it on the wiki.
> >> 2. Copyright. imo we should only have the apache copyright for
> >> anything "official". How these copyrights will work if we include the
> >> osx build in the sources btw ?
> >> 3. Since the source code isn't in the apache couchdb repository, a
> >> link to the OSX sources should be provided in the ABOUT. It's not
> >> required by the aoache 2 license, but generally we expect to find the
> >> sources in the repository when it comes from an apache project?
> >>
> >> Anyway both can be fixed when the sources will be included in the repo
> >> (Is the process started) ?
> >
> > "
> >
> > 1. -> Change Title to "Apache CouchDB"
> > 2. -> should be no problem
> > 3. -> Add link to sources in the about box
> >
> >> What would it take to get your build in to the official repos?
> >
> > The build is basically a wrapper around the standard CouchDB disk
> layout. The additional wrapper code could be merged into a sub-folder of
> the repository called for instance "couchdbx-app".
> >
> > How is this done for the Windows build?
> >
> >> If you can prepare patches, I am more than happy to review, and apply
> them.
> >
> > I will update the code to include 1., 2. and 3.
> >
> > - Hans
> >
> >
> > On Oct 14, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> >
> >> Hans,
> >>
> >> Great news!
> >>
> >> Did you get any feedback on the build that we can incorporate for 1.3?
> >>
> >> What would it take to get your build in to the official repos?
> >>
> >> If you can prepare patches, I am more than happy to review, and apply
> them.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Noah,
> >>>
> >>> I have done the OS X build and I am there to upgrade it to 1.3.
> >>>
> >>> - Hans
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 14, 2012, at 12:27 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hey,
> >>>>
> >>>> This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails.
> >>>> (See subject prefix!)
> >>>>
> >>>> I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages.
> >>>>
> >>>> At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need to
> >>> fix.
> >>>> What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe iterate
> on
> >>> it
> >>>> a little?
> >>>>
> >>>> And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package for
> >>> this
> >>>> release?
> >>>>
> >>>> Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> NS
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> NS
> >
>
> Hi Hans,
>
> You'll need to add the equivalent of `brew install autoconf-archive`
> for osx now for build support, Noah cleaned up some dead wood. Other
> docs-related stuff will require some more work I think, around sphinx
> etc. Not sure how that would be accommodated.
>
> A+
> Dave
>
--
NS
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>.
On 14 October 2012 17:19, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
> Hi, Noah
>
>> Did you get any feedback on the build that we can incorporate for 1.3?
>
> Yes, Benoit mentioned a few things which need to be fixed:
>
> "
> On Jun 18, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>> I have some problems with the current binary linked on the homepage.
>> Not with the binary by itself which works but with the branding.
>>
>> 1. Titte in about is "CouchDB Server" I don't know what it's means. If
>> linked on the homepage, it should be "Apache CouchDB" imo and nothing
>> else. Other than that we should just link it on the wiki.
>> 2. Copyright. imo we should only have the apache copyright for
>> anything "official". How these copyrights will work if we include the
>> osx build in the sources btw ?
>> 3. Since the source code isn't in the apache couchdb repository, a
>> link to the OSX sources should be provided in the ABOUT. It's not
>> required by the aoache 2 license, but generally we expect to find the
>> sources in the repository when it comes from an apache project?
>>
>> Anyway both can be fixed when the sources will be included in the repo
>> (Is the process started) ?
>
> "
>
> 1. -> Change Title to "Apache CouchDB"
> 2. -> should be no problem
> 3. -> Add link to sources in the about box
>
>> What would it take to get your build in to the official repos?
>
> The build is basically a wrapper around the standard CouchDB disk layout. The additional wrapper code could be merged into a sub-folder of the repository called for instance "couchdbx-app".
>
> How is this done for the Windows build?
>
>> If you can prepare patches, I am more than happy to review, and apply them.
>
> I will update the code to include 1., 2. and 3.
>
> - Hans
>
>
> On Oct 14, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
>> Hans,
>>
>> Great news!
>>
>> Did you get any feedback on the build that we can incorporate for 1.3?
>>
>> What would it take to get your build in to the official repos?
>>
>> If you can prepare patches, I am more than happy to review, and apply them.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Noah,
>>>
>>> I have done the OS X build and I am there to upgrade it to 1.3.
>>>
>>> - Hans
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 14, 2012, at 12:27 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey,
>>>>
>>>> This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails.
>>>> (See subject prefix!)
>>>>
>>>> I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages.
>>>>
>>>> At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need to
>>> fix.
>>>> What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe iterate on
>>> it
>>>> a little?
>>>>
>>>> And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package for
>>> this
>>>> release?
>>>>
>>>> Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> NS
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> NS
>
Hi Hans,
You'll need to add the equivalent of `brew install autoconf-archive`
for osx now for build support, Noah cleaned up some dead wood. Other
docs-related stuff will require some more work I think, around sphinx
etc. Not sure how that would be accommodated.
A+
Dave
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de>.
Hi, Noah
> Did you get any feedback on the build that we can incorporate for 1.3?
Yes, Benoit mentioned a few things which need to be fixed:
"
On Jun 18, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> I have some problems with the current binary linked on the homepage.
> Not with the binary by itself which works but with the branding.
>
> 1. Titte in about is "CouchDB Server" I don't know what it's means. If
> linked on the homepage, it should be "Apache CouchDB" imo and nothing
> else. Other than that we should just link it on the wiki.
> 2. Copyright. imo we should only have the apache copyright for
> anything "official". How these copyrights will work if we include the
> osx build in the sources btw ?
> 3. Since the source code isn't in the apache couchdb repository, a
> link to the OSX sources should be provided in the ABOUT. It's not
> required by the aoache 2 license, but generally we expect to find the
> sources in the repository when it comes from an apache project?
>
> Anyway both can be fixed when the sources will be included in the repo
> (Is the process started) ?
"
1. -> Change Title to "Apache CouchDB"
2. -> should be no problem
3. -> Add link to sources in the about box
> What would it take to get your build in to the official repos?
The build is basically a wrapper around the standard CouchDB disk layout. The additional wrapper code could be merged into a sub-folder of the repository called for instance "couchdbx-app".
How is this done for the Windows build?
> If you can prepare patches, I am more than happy to review, and apply them.
I will update the code to include 1., 2. and 3.
- Hans
On Oct 14, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hans,
>
> Great news!
>
> Did you get any feedback on the build that we can incorporate for 1.3?
>
> What would it take to get your build in to the official repos?
>
> If you can prepare patches, I am more than happy to review, and apply them.
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Noah,
>>
>> I have done the OS X build and I am there to upgrade it to 1.3.
>>
>> - Hans
>>
>>
>> On Oct 14, 2012, at 12:27 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails.
>>> (See subject prefix!)
>>>
>>> I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages.
>>>
>>> At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need to
>> fix.
>>> What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe iterate on
>> it
>>> a little?
>>>
>>> And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package for
>> this
>>> release?
>>>
>>> Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> --
>>> NS
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> NS
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>.
Hans,
Great news!
Did you get any feedback on the build that we can incorporate for 1.3?
What would it take to get your build in to the official repos?
If you can prepare patches, I am more than happy to review, and apply them.
Thanks,
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
> Hi Noah,
>
> I have done the OS X build and I am there to upgrade it to 1.3.
>
> - Hans
>
>
> On Oct 14, 2012, at 12:27 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> > Hey,
> >
> > This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails.
> > (See subject prefix!)
> >
> > I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages.
> >
> > At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need to
> fix.
> > What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe iterate on
> it
> > a little?
> >
> > And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package for
> this
> > release?
> >
> > Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > NS
>
>
--
NS
Re: [REL1.3.0] CouchDB Windows / OS X packages (Progress?)
Posted by Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de>.
Hi Noah,
I have done the OS X build and I am there to upgrade it to 1.3.
- Hans
On Oct 14, 2012, at 12:27 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hey,
>
> This is the first of several "What's up with releasing 1.3?" emails.
> (See subject prefix!)
>
> I wanted to start a discussion around our Windows and OS X packages.
>
> At the moment, our OS X package is hosted on Github, which we need to fix.
> What can we do to get this package into the source, and maybe iterate on it
> a little?
>
> And are there any improvements we can make to our Windows package for this
> release?
>
> Any volunteers to head up these efforts?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> NS