You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org by Herbert Roitblat <he...@orcatec.com> on 2010/05/21 06:21:48 UTC
Test failures
I'm trying to set up PyLucene on Ubuntu 10.04 with Python 2.6.2. I
managed to get it to build, but the test revealed some errors. Are they
significant? Do they need some adjustment to run under Python 2.6 or
Ubuntu 10.04?
Thanks,
Herb
CompoundTime : 0:00:00.763478
Multi-file Time : 0:00:00.818167
FAIL testTiming
(lia.indexing.CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest.CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest
self.assert_(cTiming > mTiming)
Assertion Error
DistanceSorting Test
Sorted by: <custom: "Location":
org.apache.pylucene.search.PythonSortComparatorSource@4f9a32e0>
Los Betos @ (9,6) -> 4.12310562562
Cafe Poca @ (5,9) -> 5.09901951359
Nico's Taco Shop @ (3,8) -> 7.28010988928
make: *** [test] Error 123
Re: Test failures
Posted by Herbert Roitblat <he...@orcatec.com>.
Thanks. That makes me feel better.
Herb
On 5/21/2010 11:13 AM, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 May 2010, herb@orcatec.com wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Andi.
>> Here is a piece of the test output. Maybe I'm misreading the
>> separations
>> between tests. I re-ran the tests.
>
> Yes, that looks like the CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest.py failure.
> The DistanceSortingTest.py that immediately follows ends with OK, just
> before the next test.
>
> Andi..
>
>>
>> Ran 1 test in 0.035s
>>
>> OK
>> /usr/bin/python
>> samples/LuceneInAction/CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest.py
>> Compound Time : 0:00:00.686435
>> Multi-file Time: 0:00:00.826449
>> F
>> ======================================================================
>> FAIL: testTiming
>> (lia.indexing.CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest.CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File
>> "/home/herb/pylucene-2.9.2-1/samples/LuceneInAction/lia/indexing/CompoundVersusM
>>
>> ultiFileIndexTest.py", line 61, in testTiming
>> self.assert_(cTiming > mTiming)
>> AssertionError
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Ran 1 test in 1.516s
>>
>> FAILED (failures=1)
>> /usr/bin/python samples/LuceneInAction/DistanceSortingTest.py
>> Sorted by: <custom:"location":
>> org.apache.pylucene.search.PythonSortComparatorSource@4a53fb57>
>> Los Betos @ (9,6) -> 4.12310562562
>> Cafe Poca Cosa @ (5,9) -> 5.09901951359
>> Nico's Taco Shop @ (3,8) -> 7.28010988928
>> ..
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Ran 2 tests in 0.086s
>>
>> OK
>> /usr/bin/python samples/LuceneInAction/DocumentDeleteTest.py
>> ......
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Ran 6 tests in 1.068s
>>
>> OK
>>
>>
> ??
>>
> ??
>> On May 21, 2010 at 5:37 PM Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 21 May 2010, Herbert Roitblat wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks, Andi.
>>>> The distance test did say that it failed.
>>>
>>> The test output you sent for the distance test doesn't seem to imply
>>> that it
>>> failed:
>>> >> DistanceSorting Test
>>> >> Sorted by: <custom: "Location":
>>> >> org.apache.pylucene.search.PythonSortComparatorSource@4f9a32e0>
>>> >> Los Betos @ (9,6) -> 4.12310562562
>>> >> Cafe Poca @ (5,9) -> 5.09901951359
>>> >> Nico's Taco Shop @ (3,8) -> 7.28010988928
>>>
>>> I could be missing something but the output looks correct, the
>>> restaurants
>>> are sorted in increasing distance.
>>>
>>> The final "make: *** [test] Error 123" you got just indicates that
>>> not all
>>> tests passed. Each individual test reports its own failure details
>>> at the
>>> time of running unless something else is seriously wrong just as core
>>> dumping.
>>>
>>> Andi..
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andi Vajda" <va...@apache.org>
>>>> To: <py...@lucene.apache.org>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 11:12 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: Test failures
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 20, 2010, at 21:21, Herbert Roitblat <he...@orcatec.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm trying to set up PyLucene on Ubuntu 10.04 with Python 2.6.2. I
>>>>>> managed to get it to build, but the test revealed some errors.
>>>>>> Are they
>>>>>> significant? Do they need some adjustment to run under Python
>>>>>> 2.6 or
>>>>>> Ubuntu 10.04?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Herb
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CompoundTime : 0:00:00.763478
>>>>>> Multi-file Time : 0:00:00.818167
>>>>>> FAIL testTiming
>>>>>> (lia.indexing.CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest.CompoundVersusMultiFileInde
>>>>>>
>>>>>> xTest
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> self.assert_(cTiming > mTiming)
>>>>>> Assertion Error
>>>>>
>>>>> That test is known to fail at times since it is expected for the
>>>>> multi file
>>>>> test to win, yet the timings are so close that any disturbance on the
>>>>> machine can slow the test down and skew the timing. The failure is
>>>>> ignorable. Running the test again usually passes it too.
>>>>>
>>>>>> DistanceSorting Test
>>>>>> Sorted by: <custom: "Location":
>>>>>> org.apache.pylucene.search.PythonSortComparatorSource@4f9a32e0>
>>>>>> Los Betos @ (9,6) -> 4.12310562562
>>>>>> Cafe Poca @ (5,9) -> 5.09901951359
>>>>>> Nico's Taco Shop @ (3,8) -> 7.28010988928
>>>>>
>>>>> This test didn't fail, did it ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Andi..
>>>>>
>>>>>> make: *** [test] Error 123
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
Re: Test failures
Posted by Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org>.
On Fri, 21 May 2010, herb@orcatec.com wrote:
> Thanks, Andi.
> Here is a piece of the test output. Maybe I'm misreading the separations
> between tests. I re-ran the tests.
Yes, that looks like the CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest.py failure.
The DistanceSortingTest.py that immediately follows ends with OK, just
before the next test.
Andi..
>
> Ran 1 test in 0.035s
>
> OK
> /usr/bin/python samples/LuceneInAction/CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest.py
> Compound Time : 0:00:00.686435
> Multi-file Time: 0:00:00.826449
> F
> ======================================================================
> FAIL: testTiming
> (lia.indexing.CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest.CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File
> "/home/herb/pylucene-2.9.2-1/samples/LuceneInAction/lia/indexing/CompoundVersusM
> ultiFileIndexTest.py", line 61, in testTiming
> self.assert_(cTiming > mTiming)
> AssertionError
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ran 1 test in 1.516s
>
> FAILED (failures=1)
> /usr/bin/python samples/LuceneInAction/DistanceSortingTest.py
> Sorted by: <custom:"location":
> org.apache.pylucene.search.PythonSortComparatorSource@4a53fb57>
> Los Betos @ (9,6) -> 4.12310562562
> Cafe Poca Cosa @ (5,9) -> 5.09901951359
> Nico's Taco Shop @ (3,8) -> 7.28010988928
> ..
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ran 2 tests in 0.086s
>
> OK
> /usr/bin/python samples/LuceneInAction/DocumentDeleteTest.py
> ......
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ran 6 tests in 1.068s
>
> OK
>
>
??
>
??
> On May 21, 2010 at 5:37 PM Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Fri, 21 May 2010, Herbert Roitblat wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, Andi.
>>> The distance test did say that it failed.
>>
>> The test output you sent for the distance test doesn't seem to imply that it
>> failed:
>> >> DistanceSorting Test
>> >> Sorted by: <custom: "Location":
>> >> org.apache.pylucene.search.PythonSortComparatorSource@4f9a32e0>
>> >> Los Betos @ (9,6) -> 4.12310562562
>> >> Cafe Poca @ (5,9) -> 5.09901951359
>> >> Nico's Taco Shop @ (3,8) -> 7.28010988928
>>
>> I could be missing something but the output looks correct, the restaurants
>> are sorted in increasing distance.
>>
>> The final "make: *** [test] Error 123" you got just indicates that not all
>> tests passed. Each individual test reports its own failure details at the
>> time of running unless something else is seriously wrong just as core
>> dumping.
>>
>> Andi..
>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andi Vajda" <va...@apache.org>
>>> To: <py...@lucene.apache.org>
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 11:12 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Test failures
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On May 20, 2010, at 21:21, Herbert Roitblat <he...@orcatec.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm trying to set up PyLucene on Ubuntu 10.04 with Python 2.6.2. I
>>>>> managed to get it to build, but the test revealed some errors. Are they
>>>>> significant? Do they need some adjustment to run under Python 2.6 or
>>>>> Ubuntu 10.04?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Herb
>>>>>
>>>>> CompoundTime : 0:00:00.763478
>>>>> Multi-file Time : 0:00:00.818167
>>>>> FAIL testTiming
>>>>> (lia.indexing.CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest.CompoundVersusMultiFileInde
>>>>> xTest
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> self.assert_(cTiming > mTiming)
>>>>> Assertion Error
>>>>
>>>> That test is known to fail at times since it is expected for the multi file
>>>> test to win, yet the timings are so close that any disturbance on the
>>>> machine can slow the test down and skew the timing. The failure is
>>>> ignorable. Running the test again usually passes it too.
>>>>
>>>>> DistanceSorting Test
>>>>> Sorted by: <custom: "Location":
>>>>> org.apache.pylucene.search.PythonSortComparatorSource@4f9a32e0>
>>>>> Los Betos @ (9,6) -> 4.12310562562
>>>>> Cafe Poca @ (5,9) -> 5.09901951359
>>>>> Nico's Taco Shop @ (3,8) -> 7.28010988928
>>>>
>>>> This test didn't fail, did it ?
>>>>
>>>> Andi..
>>>>
>>>>> make: *** [test] Error 123
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
Re: Test failures
Posted by "herb@orcatec.com" <he...@orcatec.com>.
Thanks, Andi.
Here is a piece of the test output. Maybe I'm misreading the separations
between tests. I re-ran the tests.
Ran 1 test in 0.035s
OK
/usr/bin/python samples/LuceneInAction/CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest.py
Compound Time : 0:00:00.686435
Multi-file Time: 0:00:00.826449
F
======================================================================
FAIL: testTiming
(lia.indexing.CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest.CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/home/herb/pylucene-2.9.2-1/samples/LuceneInAction/lia/indexing/CompoundVersusM
ultiFileIndexTest.py", line 61, in testTiming
self.assert_(cTiming > mTiming)
AssertionError
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 1.516s
FAILED (failures=1)
/usr/bin/python samples/LuceneInAction/DistanceSortingTest.py
Sorted by: <custom:"location":
org.apache.pylucene.search.PythonSortComparatorSource@4a53fb57>
Los Betos @ (9,6) -> 4.12310562562
Cafe Poca Cosa @ (5,9) -> 5.09901951359
Nico's Taco Shop @ (3,8) -> 7.28010988928
..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 2 tests in 0.086s
OK
/usr/bin/python samples/LuceneInAction/DocumentDeleteTest.py
......
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 6 tests in 1.068s
OK
On May 21, 2010 at 5:37 PM Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 May 2010, Herbert Roitblat wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Andi.
> > The distance test did say that it failed.
>
> The test output you sent for the distance test doesn't seem to imply that it
> failed:
> >> DistanceSorting Test
> >> Sorted by: <custom: "Location":
> >> org.apache.pylucene.search.PythonSortComparatorSource@4f9a32e0>
> >> Los Betos @ (9,6) -> 4.12310562562
> >> Cafe Poca @ (5,9) -> 5.09901951359
> >> Nico's Taco Shop @ (3,8) -> 7.28010988928
>
> I could be missing something but the output looks correct, the restaurants
> are sorted in increasing distance.
>
> The final "make: *** [test] Error 123" you got just indicates that not all
> tests passed. Each individual test reports its own failure details at the
> time of running unless something else is seriously wrong just as core
> dumping.
>
> Andi..
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andi Vajda" <va...@apache.org>
> > To: <py...@lucene.apache.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 11:12 PM
> > Subject: Re: Test failures
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On May 20, 2010, at 21:21, Herbert Roitblat <he...@orcatec.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm trying to set up PyLucene on Ubuntu 10.04 with Python 2.6.2. I
> >>> managed to get it to build, but the test revealed some errors. Are they
> >>> significant? Do they need some adjustment to run under Python 2.6 or
> >>> Ubuntu 10.04?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Herb
> >>>
> >>> CompoundTime : 0:00:00.763478
> >>> Multi-file Time : 0:00:00.818167
> >>> FAIL testTiming
> >>> (lia.indexing.CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest.CompoundVersusMultiFileInde
> >>> xTest
> >>
> >>
> >>> self.assert_(cTiming > mTiming)
> >>> Assertion Error
> >>
> >> That test is known to fail at times since it is expected for the multi file
> >> test to win, yet the timings are so close that any disturbance on the
> >> machine can slow the test down and skew the timing. The failure is
> >> ignorable. Running the test again usually passes it too.
> >>
> >>> DistanceSorting Test
> >>> Sorted by: <custom: "Location":
> >>> org.apache.pylucene.search.PythonSortComparatorSource@4f9a32e0>
> >>> Los Betos @ (9,6) -> 4.12310562562
> >>> Cafe Poca @ (5,9) -> 5.09901951359
> >>> Nico's Taco Shop @ (3,8) -> 7.28010988928
> >>
> >> This test didn't fail, did it ?
> >>
> >> Andi..
> >>
> >>> make: *** [test] Error 123
> >>>
> >>
> >
Re: Test failures
Posted by Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org>.
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Herbert Roitblat wrote:
> Thanks, Andi.
> The distance test did say that it failed.
The test output you sent for the distance test doesn't seem to imply that it
failed:
>> DistanceSorting Test
>> Sorted by: <custom: "Location":
>> org.apache.pylucene.search.PythonSortComparatorSource@4f9a32e0>
>> Los Betos @ (9,6) -> 4.12310562562
>> Cafe Poca @ (5,9) -> 5.09901951359
>> Nico's Taco Shop @ (3,8) -> 7.28010988928
I could be missing something but the output looks correct, the restaurants
are sorted in increasing distance.
The final "make: *** [test] Error 123" you got just indicates that not all
tests passed. Each individual test reports its own failure details at the
time of running unless something else is seriously wrong just as core
dumping.
Andi..
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andi Vajda" <va...@apache.org>
> To: <py...@lucene.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 11:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Test failures
>
>
>>
>> On May 20, 2010, at 21:21, Herbert Roitblat <he...@orcatec.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm trying to set up PyLucene on Ubuntu 10.04 with Python 2.6.2. I
>>> managed to get it to build, but the test revealed some errors. Are they
>>> significant? Do they need some adjustment to run under Python 2.6 or
>>> Ubuntu 10.04?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Herb
>>>
>>> CompoundTime : 0:00:00.763478
>>> Multi-file Time : 0:00:00.818167
>>> FAIL testTiming
>>> (lia.indexing.CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest.CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest
>>
>>
>>> self.assert_(cTiming > mTiming)
>>> Assertion Error
>>
>> That test is known to fail at times since it is expected for the multi file
>> test to win, yet the timings are so close that any disturbance on the
>> machine can slow the test down and skew the timing. The failure is
>> ignorable. Running the test again usually passes it too.
>>
>>> DistanceSorting Test
>>> Sorted by: <custom: "Location":
>>> org.apache.pylucene.search.PythonSortComparatorSource@4f9a32e0>
>>> Los Betos @ (9,6) -> 4.12310562562
>>> Cafe Poca @ (5,9) -> 5.09901951359
>>> Nico's Taco Shop @ (3,8) -> 7.28010988928
>>
>> This test didn't fail, did it ?
>>
>> Andi..
>>
>>> make: *** [test] Error 123
>>>
>>
>
Re: Test failures
Posted by Herbert Roitblat <he...@orcatec.com>.
Thanks, Andi.
The distance test did say that it failed.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andi Vajda" <va...@apache.org>
To: <py...@lucene.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 11:12 PM
Subject: Re: Test failures
>
> On May 20, 2010, at 21:21, Herbert Roitblat <he...@orcatec.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to set up PyLucene on Ubuntu 10.04 with Python 2.6.2. I
>> managed to get it to build, but the test revealed some errors. Are they
>> significant? Do they need some adjustment to run under Python 2.6 or
>> Ubuntu 10.04?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Herb
>>
>> CompoundTime : 0:00:00.763478
>> Multi-file Time : 0:00:00.818167
>> FAIL testTiming
>> (lia.indexing.CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest.CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest
>
>
>> self.assert_(cTiming > mTiming)
>> Assertion Error
>
> That test is known to fail at times since it is expected for the multi
> file test to win, yet the timings are so close that any disturbance on
> the machine can slow the test down and skew the timing. The failure is
> ignorable. Running the test again usually passes it too.
>
>> DistanceSorting Test
>> Sorted by: <custom: "Location":
>> org.apache.pylucene.search.PythonSortComparatorSource@4f9a32e0>
>> Los Betos @ (9,6) -> 4.12310562562
>> Cafe Poca @ (5,9) -> 5.09901951359
>> Nico's Taco Shop @ (3,8) -> 7.28010988928
>
> This test didn't fail, did it ?
>
> Andi..
>
>> make: *** [test] Error 123
>>
>
Re: Test failures
Posted by Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org>.
On May 20, 2010, at 21:21, Herbert Roitblat <he...@orcatec.com> wrote:
> I'm trying to set up PyLucene on Ubuntu 10.04 with Python 2.6.2. I
> managed to get it to build, but the test revealed some errors. Are
> they significant? Do they need some adjustment to run under Python
> 2.6 or Ubuntu 10.04?
>
> Thanks,
> Herb
>
> CompoundTime : 0:00:00.763478
> Multi-file Time : 0:00:00.818167
> FAIL testTiming
> (lia.indexing.CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest.CompoundVersusMultiFileIndexTest
> self.assert_(cTiming > mTiming)
> Assertion Error
That test is known to fail at times since it is expected for the multi
file test to win, yet the timings are so close that any disturbance on
the machine can slow the test down and skew the timing. The failure is
ignorable. Running the test again usually passes it too.
> DistanceSorting Test
> Sorted by: <custom: "Location":
> org.apache.pylucene.search.PythonSortComparatorSource@4f9a32e0>
> Los Betos @ (9,6) -> 4.12310562562
> Cafe Poca @ (5,9) -> 5.09901951359
> Nico's Taco Shop @ (3,8) -> 7.28010988928
This test didn't fail, did it ?
Andi..
> make: *** [test] Error 123
>