[RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!

Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
release relevant bits are the source release.

The RC builds can be found as always under
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds

An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
release can be found under
http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
should be verified by native speakers.

A related RAT scan can be found under
http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html

I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
(en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)

I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.

We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
those who are relevant for most of our users.


Juergen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Rainer Bielefeld <ra...@bielefeldundbuss.de>]

Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:

> well it was not planned and I just noticed it when preparing the RC. It
> is indeed not funny and the question is why we got some showstoppers so
> late where the code is in the snapshots since last year.

Hi,

one possible reason is that we have no reliable regressions information, 
see my posting "Re: 4.1. Regressions" 2014-03-30 20:00 on QA list.

Without reliable information I will not risk to replace my stable 
version by an RC, and there might be (regression) bugs what can not be 
observed with server installations, only with real installations - and 
intensive "real life" work with RC.

CU

Rainer

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

On 4/16/14 9:28 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 4/15/14 10:20 AM, Edwin Sharp wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014, at 17:45, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>
>>> I hope that nobody have a problem with the revision number ...666 and
>>> the build date April 1th ;-) I find it funny and you can expect a very
>>> hot version ...
>>>
>> With a fourth release candidate on the way, I don't find it funny.
>> Please no more problematic numbers and dates for our releases.
>>
> 
> well it was not planned and I just noticed it when preparing the RC. It
> is indeed not funny and the question is why we got some showstoppers so
> late where the code is in the snapshots since last year. We make a beta
> and received no critical feedback and when we start RC builds we receive
> one showstopper one after another. We shave to think how we can improve
> this in the future.

We should ... ;-)

> 
> Juergen
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com>]

Hi Jürgen, all

the question is why we got some showstoppers so

> late where the code is in the snapshots since last year. We make a beta
> and received no critical feedback and when we start RC builds we receive
> one showstopper one after another. We shave to think how we can  in the
> future.



I think you already answered your own question... The problem is that the
Beta installs to

> a different path... Actually for real testing it's worse than a
> daily/nigthly build.
>
 Sorry for the odd message. Gmail and tablet...


>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

On 4/15/14 10:20 AM, Edwin Sharp wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014, at 17:45, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> I hope that nobody have a problem with the revision number ...666 and
>> the build date April 1th ;-) I find it funny and you can expect a very
>> hot version ...
>>
> With a fourth release candidate on the way, I don't find it funny.
> Please no more problematic numbers and dates for our releases.
> 

well it was not planned and I just noticed it when preparing the RC. It
is indeed not funny and the question is why we got some showstoppers so
late where the code is in the snapshots since last year. We make a beta
and received no critical feedback and when we start RC builds we receive
one showstopper one after another. We shave to think how we can improve
this in the future.

Juergen



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Edwin Sharp <el...@mail-page.com>]

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014, at 17:45, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> 
> I hope that nobody have a problem with the revision number ...666 and
> the build date April 1th ;-) I find it funny and you can expect a very
> hot version ...
> 
With a fourth release candidate on the way, I don't find it funny.
Please no more problematic numbers and dates for our releases.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

["Marcus (OOo)" <ma...@wtnet.de>]

Am 04/02/2014 04:45 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
>
> I hope that nobody have a problem with the revision number ...666 and
> the build date April 1th ;-) I find it funny and you can expect a very
> hot version ...

What a mere chance. :-)

Marcus



> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
>>
>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
>> release relevant bits are the source release.
>>
>> The RC builds can be found as always under
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>>
>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
>> release can be found under
>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
>> should be verified by native speakers.
>>
>> A related RAT scan can be found under
>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
>>
>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
>>
>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
>>
>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
>>
>>
>> Juergen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

["Marcus (OOo)" <ma...@wtnet.de>]

Am 04/02/2014 04:45 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
>
> I hope that nobody have a problem with the revision number ...666 and
> the build date April 1th ;-) I find it funny and you can expect a very
> hot version ...

What a mere chance. :-)

Marcus



> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
>>
>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
>> release relevant bits are the source release.
>>
>> The RC builds can be found as always under
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>>
>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
>> release can be found under
>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
>> should be verified by native speakers.
>>
>> A related RAT scan can be found under
>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
>>
>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
>>
>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
>>
>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
>>
>>
>> Juergen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

["Marcus (OOo)" <ma...@wtnet.de>]

Am 04/02/2014 04:45 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
>
> I hope that nobody have a problem with the revision number ...666 and
> the build date April 1th ;-) I find it funny and you can expect a very
> hot version ...

What a mere chance. :-)

Marcus



> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
>>
>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
>> release relevant bits are the source release.
>>
>> The RC builds can be found as always under
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>>
>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
>> release can be found under
>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
>> should be verified by native speakers.
>>
>> A related RAT scan can be found under
>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
>>
>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
>>
>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
>>
>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
>>
>>
>> Juergen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: l10n-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: l10n-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

I hope that nobody have a problem with the revision number ...666 and
the build date April 1th ;-) I find it funny and you can expect a very
hot version ...


On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> 
> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
> release relevant bits are the source release.
> 
> The RC builds can be found as always under
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> 
> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
> release can be found under
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
> should be verified by native speakers.
> 
> A related RAT scan can be found under
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> 
> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> 
> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> 
> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> 
> 
> Juergen
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: l10n-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: l10n-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC - Showstoppers?

[Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <or...@googlemail.com>]

Hi,

On 06.04.2014 16:26, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
> <or...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 06.04.2014 09:06, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> we have a potential showstopper Issue 124607 - .odt with (Page-No) field
>>> in header/footer and comment for text range fails to open with "Read
>>> Error. Error reading file"
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124607>
>>>
>>
>> For me it is a show-stopper.
>>
>> I propose to prepare a new RC which includes a corresponding fix.
>> The fix is already in progress.
>>
>
> Hi Oliver,
>
> Could you say a few words about the defect.  Did it exist in the beta as well?
>

Yes, it is in the code since 2013-12-19

Best regards, Oliver.

> -Rob
>
>> Best regards, Oliver.
>>
>>
>>
>>> CU
>>>
>>> Rainer
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC - Showstoppers?

[Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>]

On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
<or...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 06.04.2014 09:06, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we have a potential showstopper Issue 124607 - .odt with (Page-No) field
>> in header/footer and comment for text range fails to open with "Read
>> Error. Error reading file"
>> <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124607>
>>
>
> For me it is a show-stopper.
>
> I propose to prepare a new RC which includes a corresponding fix.
> The fix is already in progress.
>

Hi Oliver,

Could you say a few words about the defect.  Did it exist in the beta as well?

-Rob

> Best regards, Oliver.
>
>
>
>> CU
>>
>> Rainer
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC - Showstoppers?

[Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <or...@googlemail.com>]

Hi,

On 06.04.2014 09:06, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have a potential showstopper Issue 124607 - .odt with (Page-No) field
> in header/footer and comment for text range fails to open with "Read
> Error. Error reading file"
> <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124607>
>

For me it is a show-stopper.

I propose to prepare a new RC which includes a corresponding fix.
The fix is already in progress.

Best regards, Oliver.


> CU
>
> Rainer
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC - Showstoppers?

[Rainer Bielefeld <ra...@bielefeldundbuss.de>]

Hi,

we have a potential showstopper Issue 124607 - .odt with (Page-No) field 
in header/footer and comment for text range fails to open with "Read 
Error. Error reading file"
<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124607>

CU

Rainer

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: l10n-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: l10n-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Herbert Duerr <hd...@apache.org>]

On 02.04.2014 17:12, imacat wrote:
> Traditional Chinese not found yet.  Should I wait for a while?

As Jürgen wrote, the Linux builds are still being uploaded. Languages 
starting with a-g are already available for 64bit Linux, other languages 
and 32bit Linux will follow in a couple of hours.

What's most important and what the vote is about is the source revision.

Herbert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Juergen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

Am Mittwoch, 2. April 2014 um 17:12 schrieb imacat:
> Traditional Chinese not found yet. Should I wait for a while?
>  
>  

you use Linux, correct? Yes please try  again later, as mentioned the Linux Upload is ongoing and because of the deb and rpm and 32 and 64 Bit version it takes longer ;-)  
>  
> On 2014/04/02 21:16, Jürgen Schmidt said:
> > Hi,
> >  
> > FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> >  
> > Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
> > We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
> > further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
> > based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
> > in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
> > Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
> > ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
> > release relevant bits are the source release.
> >  
> > The RC builds can be found as always under
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> >  
> > An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
> > release can be found under
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
> > I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
> > issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
> > should be verified by native speakers.
> >  
> > A related RAT scan can be found under
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> >  
> > I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
> > have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
> > only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
> > time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
> > functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
> > prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
> > as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
> > (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> >  
> > I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
> > Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
> > Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> >  
> > We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
> > were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
> > account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
> > issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
> > those who are relevant for most of our users.
> >  
> >  
> > Juergen
> >  
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> >  
>  
>  
>  
> --  
> Best regards,
> imacat ^_*' <im...@mail.imacat.idv.tw>
> PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc
>  
> <<Woman's Voice>> News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/
> Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/
> Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/
> OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/
> EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/
> Greenfoot Taiwan http://greenfoot.westart.tw/
>  
>  

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[imacat <im...@mail.imacat.idv.tw>]

Traditional Chinese not found yet.  Should I wait for a while?

On 2014/04/02 21:16, Jürgen Schmidt said:
> Hi,
> 
> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> 
> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
> release relevant bits are the source release.
> 
> The RC builds can be found as always under
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> 
> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
> release can be found under
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
> should be verified by native speakers.
> 
> A related RAT scan can be found under
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> 
> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> 
> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> 
> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> 
> 
> Juergen
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-- 
Best regards,
imacat ^_*' <im...@mail.imacat.idv.tw>
PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc

<<Woman's Voice>> News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/
Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/
Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/
OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/
EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/
Greenfoot Taiwan http://greenfoot.westart.tw/

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Andre Fischer <aw...@gmail.com>]

On 04.04.2014 09:13, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi all
>
> First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!

Thanks, you're welcome.

> I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
>
> Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two
> startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
>
> In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> 4.1.0.
>
> I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for users.

This is exactly the kind of feedback that I was looking for.

>
> I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.

Please do so.

Thanks again,
Andre

>
> Regards,
> Pedro
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>]

Same symptom. And the shortcut named "OpenOffice 4.0.1" is still on the
desktop. But these old version stuffs can be removed manually.


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Pedro,
>
> Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the
> same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> > patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> > never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!
> >
> > I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> > 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
> >
> > Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> > quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two
> > startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
> >
> > In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> > 4.1.0.
> >
> > I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for
> users.
> >
> > I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on
> > en_US.
> > >
> > > From testing perspective:
> > > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
> > > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical
> scenarios
> > > on all language packages
> > > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > No problem found.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> > jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote
> > will
> > > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> > > > >> packages
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> > > > patches
> > > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an
> > 4.3.
> > > > The
> > > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> > > overseen a
> > > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and
> > > have
> > > > to
> > > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more
> careful.
> > > They
> > > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a
> > potential
> > > > 4.2
> > > > >> or
> > > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> > > > >> installed
> > > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for
> now
> > > ;-)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> > confusion.
> > > > Stay
> > > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> > > testing
> > > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain
> the
> > > > >> same values as before.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Juergen
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Juergen
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Juergen
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >>>> Hi,
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO
> 4.1
> > > > >> release.
> > > > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to
> fix
> > > some
> > > > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to
> propose a
> > > > >> first RC
> > > > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a
> > lot
> > > of
> > > > >> time
> > > > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The
> > MacOS
> > > > and
> > > > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload
> is
> > > > still
> > > > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience
> and
> > > the
> > > > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going
> > > into
> > > > >> this
> > > > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> > > .
> > > > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the
> > > fixed
> > > > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> > > updates/fixes
> > > > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> > > > languages
> > > > >> we
> > > > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for
> > > private
> > > > >> use
> > > > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's
> > the
> > > > >> first
> > > > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have
> to
> > > test
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install
> sets
> > > are
> > > > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in
> > the
> > > > >> future
> > > > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded
> > AOO
> > > > >> 4.0.1
> > > > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run
> > > until
> > > > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
> > > > >> careful.
> > > > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers
> > > because
> > > > >> they
> > > > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should
> > take
> > > > into
> > > > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to
> > fix
> > > > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers
> > and
> > > on
> > > > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Juergen
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve Yin
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Steve Yin
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Yu Zhen
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
>



-- 
Best Regards,

Steve Yin

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com>]

Dear Pedro and Edwin

Thank you both for all your information provided. I just send a proposal to
update current installation guide when fix bug 124599.

http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html

On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Edwin Sharp <el...@mail-page.com> wrote:

> Dear Pedro
> Please check existing issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124599
> If not representing your observations, best you personally submit new
> issue according:
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/HowToFileIssue
> Regards,
> Edwin
>
> On Sun, Apr 6, 2014, at 0:01, Pedro Lino wrote:
> > Hi Yuzhen, all
> >
> > Sorry for the delay but I was doing some more testing.
> >
> > Here are my findings:
> >
> > There is no problem updating from 4.0.0 to 4.0.1
> > The Startup Group, the desktop icon and the Add/Remove list are updated
> as
> > expected.
> >
> > The problem only occurs when updating from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0 and from 4.0.1
> to
> > 4.1.0
> > There are 3 items that fail: there are 2 startup groups, there are 2
> > desktop icons and there are two entries in the Add/Remove Programs list.
> >
> > Updating from 4.0.1 to 4.1.0 using the MS patch is a little better: there
> > is only one entry in the Add/Remove Programs list after updating (the
> 4.1.0
> > as expected). However there are still 2 desktop icons and 2 startup
> groups
> > (in this case the patch fails to set the OO icon as the group icon while
> > the full installer succeeds)
> >
> > How do you want me to report all these in bugzilla? Or can you (or
> someone
> > in QA) add it to bugzilla and add me to CC so that I confirm it (and add
> > screenshots if needed)?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Pedro,
> > >
> > > Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has
> the
> > > same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all
> > > >
> > > > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> > > > patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I
> would
> > > > never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO
> developers!
> > > >
> > > > I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> > > > 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
> > > >
> > > > Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> > > > quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with
> two
> > > > startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
> > > >
> > > > In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on
> the
> > > > 4.1.0.
> > > >
> > > > I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for
> > > users.
> > > >
> > > > I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Pedro
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package
> on
> > > > en_US.
> > > > >
> > > > > From testing perspective:
> > > > > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and
> ongoing
> > > > > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > > > > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical
> > > scenarios
> > > > > on all language packages
> > > > > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > > > > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <steve.yin.aoo@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > No problem found.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <
> steve.yin.aoo@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> > > > jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the
> vote
> > > > will
> > > > > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the
> install
> > > > > > >> packages
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for
> future
> > > > > > patches
> > > > > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to
> an
> > > > 4.3.
> > > > > > The
> > > > > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> > > > > overseen a
> > > > > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for
> now and
> > > > > have
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more
> > > careful.
> > > > > They
> > > > > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a
> > > > potential
> > > > > > 4.2
> > > > > > >> or
> > > > > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets
> can't be
> > > > > > >> installed
> > > > > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want
> for
> > > now
> > > > > ;-)
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> > > > confusion.
> > > > > > Stay
> > > > > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all
> happy
> > > > > testing
> > > > > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will
> contain
> > > the
> > > > > > >> same values as before.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Juergen
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Juergen
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> Juergen
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>> Hi,
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming
> AOO
> > > 4.1
> > > > > > >> release.
> > > > > > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had
> to
> > > fix
> > > > > some
> > > > > > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to
> > > propose a
> > > > > > >> first RC
> > > > > > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We
> spend a
> > > > lot
> > > > > of
> > > > > > >> time
> > > > > > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing.
> The
> > > > MacOS
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux
> upload
> > > is
> > > > > > still
> > > > > > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for
> convenience
> > > and
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks
> going
> > > > > into
> > > > > > >> this
> > > > > > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > >
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> > > > > .
> > > > > > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of
> the
> > > > > fixed
> > > > > > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> > > > > updates/fixes
> > > > > > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > >
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for
> the
> > > > > > languages
> > > > > > >> we
> > > > > > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended
> for
> > > > > private
> > > > > > >> use
> > > > > > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release.
> It's
> > > > the
> > > > > > >> first
> > > > > > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we
> have
> > > to
> > > > > test
> > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install
> > > sets
> > > > > are
> > > > > > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release
> patches in
> > > > the
> > > > > > >> future
> > > > > > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have
> upgraded
> > > > AOO
> > > > > > >> 4.0.1
> > > > > > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let
> it run
> > > > > until
> > > > > > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the
> bits
> > > > > > >> careful.
> > > > > > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested
> showstoppers
> > > > > because
> > > > > > >> they
> > > > > > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we
> should
> > > > take
> > > > > > into
> > > > > > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project
> able to
> > > > fix
> > > > > > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously
> showstoppers
> > > > and
> > > > > on
> > > > > > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> Juergen
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Steve Yin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Steve Yin
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Yu Zhen
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Yu Zhen
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Yu Zhen

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Edwin Sharp <el...@mail-page.com>]

Dear Pedro
Please check existing issue: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124599
If not representing your observations, best you personally submit new issue according:
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/HowToFileIssue
Regards,
Edwin

On Sun, Apr 6, 2014, at 0:01, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Yuzhen, all
> 
> Sorry for the delay but I was doing some more testing.
> 
> Here are my findings:
> 
> There is no problem updating from 4.0.0 to 4.0.1
> The Startup Group, the desktop icon and the Add/Remove list are updated as
> expected.
> 
> The problem only occurs when updating from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0 and from 4.0.1 to
> 4.1.0
> There are 3 items that fail: there are 2 startup groups, there are 2
> desktop icons and there are two entries in the Add/Remove Programs list.
> 
> Updating from 4.0.1 to 4.1.0 using the MS patch is a little better: there
> is only one entry in the Add/Remove Programs list after updating (the 4.1.0
> as expected). However there are still 2 desktop icons and 2 startup groups
> (in this case the patch fails to set the OO icon as the group icon while
> the full installer succeeds)
> 
> How do you want me to report all these in bugzilla? Or can you (or someone
> in QA) add it to bugzilla and add me to CC so that I confirm it (and add
> screenshots if needed)?
> 
> Regards,
> Pedro
> 
> 
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Pedro,
> >
> > Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the
> > same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> > > patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> > > never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!
> > >
> > > I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> > > 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
> > >
> > > Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> > > quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two
> > > startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
> > >
> > > In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> > > 4.1.0.
> > >
> > > I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for
> > users.
> > >
> > > I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Pedro
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on
> > > en_US.
> > > >
> > > > From testing perspective:
> > > > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
> > > > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > > > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical
> > scenarios
> > > > on all language packages
> > > > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > > > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > No problem found.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> > > jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote
> > > will
> > > > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> > > > > >> packages
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> > > > > patches
> > > > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an
> > > 4.3.
> > > > > The
> > > > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> > > > overseen a
> > > > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and
> > > > have
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more
> > careful.
> > > > They
> > > > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a
> > > potential
> > > > > 4.2
> > > > > >> or
> > > > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> > > > > >> installed
> > > > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for
> > now
> > > > ;-)
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> > > confusion.
> > > > > Stay
> > > > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> > > > testing
> > > > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain
> > the
> > > > > >> same values as before.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Juergen
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Juergen
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> Juergen
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>> Hi,
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO
> > 4.1
> > > > > >> release.
> > > > > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to
> > fix
> > > > some
> > > > > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to
> > propose a
> > > > > >> first RC
> > > > > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a
> > > lot
> > > > of
> > > > > >> time
> > > > > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The
> > > MacOS
> > > > > and
> > > > > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload
> > is
> > > > > still
> > > > > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience
> > and
> > > > the
> > > > > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going
> > > > into
> > > > > >> this
> > > > > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> > > > .
> > > > > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the
> > > > fixed
> > > > > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> > > > updates/fixes
> > > > > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> > > > > languages
> > > > > >> we
> > > > > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for
> > > > private
> > > > > >> use
> > > > > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's
> > > the
> > > > > >> first
> > > > > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have
> > to
> > > > test
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install
> > sets
> > > > are
> > > > > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in
> > > the
> > > > > >> future
> > > > > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded
> > > AOO
> > > > > >> 4.0.1
> > > > > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run
> > > > until
> > > > > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
> > > > > >> careful.
> > > > > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers
> > > > because
> > > > > >> they
> > > > > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should
> > > take
> > > > > into
> > > > > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to
> > > fix
> > > > > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers
> > > and
> > > > on
> > > > > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> Juergen
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Steve Yin
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve Yin
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Yu Zhen
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Yu Zhen
> >

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com>]

Hi Yuzhen, all

Sorry for the delay but I was doing some more testing.

Here are my findings:

There is no problem updating from 4.0.0 to 4.0.1
The Startup Group, the desktop icon and the Add/Remove list are updated as
expected.

The problem only occurs when updating from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0 and from 4.0.1 to
4.1.0
There are 3 items that fail: there are 2 startup groups, there are 2
desktop icons and there are two entries in the Add/Remove Programs list.

Updating from 4.0.1 to 4.1.0 using the MS patch is a little better: there
is only one entry in the Add/Remove Programs list after updating (the 4.1.0
as expected). However there are still 2 desktop icons and 2 startup groups
(in this case the patch fails to set the OO icon as the group icon while
the full installer succeeds)

How do you want me to report all these in bugzilla? Or can you (or someone
in QA) add it to bugzilla and add me to CC so that I confirm it (and add
screenshots if needed)?

Regards,
Pedro


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Pedro,
>
> Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the
> same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> > patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> > never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!
> >
> > I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> > 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
> >
> > Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> > quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two
> > startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
> >
> > In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> > 4.1.0.
> >
> > I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for
> users.
> >
> > I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on
> > en_US.
> > >
> > > From testing perspective:
> > > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
> > > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical
> scenarios
> > > on all language packages
> > > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > No problem found.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> > jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote
> > will
> > > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> > > > >> packages
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> > > > patches
> > > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an
> > 4.3.
> > > > The
> > > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> > > overseen a
> > > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and
> > > have
> > > > to
> > > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more
> careful.
> > > They
> > > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a
> > potential
> > > > 4.2
> > > > >> or
> > > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> > > > >> installed
> > > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for
> now
> > > ;-)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> > confusion.
> > > > Stay
> > > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> > > testing
> > > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain
> the
> > > > >> same values as before.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Juergen
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Juergen
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Juergen
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >>>> Hi,
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO
> 4.1
> > > > >> release.
> > > > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to
> fix
> > > some
> > > > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to
> propose a
> > > > >> first RC
> > > > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a
> > lot
> > > of
> > > > >> time
> > > > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The
> > MacOS
> > > > and
> > > > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload
> is
> > > > still
> > > > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience
> and
> > > the
> > > > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going
> > > into
> > > > >> this
> > > > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> > > .
> > > > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the
> > > fixed
> > > > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> > > updates/fixes
> > > > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> > > > languages
> > > > >> we
> > > > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for
> > > private
> > > > >> use
> > > > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's
> > the
> > > > >> first
> > > > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have
> to
> > > test
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install
> sets
> > > are
> > > > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in
> > the
> > > > >> future
> > > > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded
> > AOO
> > > > >> 4.0.1
> > > > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run
> > > until
> > > > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
> > > > >> careful.
> > > > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers
> > > because
> > > > >> they
> > > > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should
> > take
> > > > into
> > > > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to
> > fix
> > > > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers
> > and
> > > on
> > > > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Juergen
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve Yin
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Steve Yin
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Yu Zhen
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
>

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com>]

Hi Pedro,

I mean the full installation package

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Yuzhen
>
> Is there a patch to update 4.0.0 to 4.0.1?
> Or do you mean with the full installer?
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Pedro,
> >
> > Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the
> > same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> > > patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> > > never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!
> > >
> > > I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> > > 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
> > >
> > > Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> > > quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with
> two
> > > startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
> > >
> > > In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> > > 4.1.0.
> > >
> > > I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for
> > users.
> > >
> > > I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Pedro
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on
> > > en_US.
> > > >
> > > > From testing perspective:
> > > > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and
> ongoing
> > > > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > > > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical
> > scenarios
> > > > on all language packages
> > > > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > > > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > No problem found.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <steve.yin.aoo@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> > > jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote
> > > will
> > > > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the
> install
> > > > > >> packages
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for
> future
> > > > > patches
> > > > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an
> > > 4.3.
> > > > > The
> > > > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> > > > overseen a
> > > > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now
> and
> > > > have
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more
> > careful.
> > > > They
> > > > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a
> > > potential
> > > > > 4.2
> > > > > >> or
> > > > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't
> be
> > > > > >> installed
> > > > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for
> > now
> > > > ;-)
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> > > confusion.
> > > > > Stay
> > > > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> > > > testing
> > > > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain
> > the
> > > > > >> same values as before.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Juergen
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Juergen
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> Juergen
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>> Hi,
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO
> > 4.1
> > > > > >> release.
> > > > > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to
> > fix
> > > > some
> > > > > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to
> > propose a
> > > > > >> first RC
> > > > > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend
> a
> > > lot
> > > > of
> > > > > >> time
> > > > > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The
> > > MacOS
> > > > > and
> > > > > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload
> > is
> > > > > still
> > > > > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience
> > and
> > > > the
> > > > > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks
> going
> > > > into
> > > > > >> this
> > > > > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> > > > .
> > > > > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of
> the
> > > > fixed
> > > > > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> > > > updates/fixes
> > > > > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> > > > > languages
> > > > > >> we
> > > > > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for
> > > > private
> > > > > >> use
> > > > > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release.
> It's
> > > the
> > > > > >> first
> > > > > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have
> > to
> > > > test
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install
> > sets
> > > > are
> > > > > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches
> in
> > > the
> > > > > >> future
> > > > > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have
> upgraded
> > > AOO
> > > > > >> 4.0.1
> > > > > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it
> run
> > > > until
> > > > > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the
> bits
> > > > > >> careful.
> > > > > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers
> > > > because
> > > > > >> they
> > > > > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should
> > > take
> > > > > into
> > > > > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able
> to
> > > fix
> > > > > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously
> showstoppers
> > > and
> > > > on
> > > > > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> Juergen
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Steve Yin
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve Yin
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Yu Zhen
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Yu Zhen
> >
>



-- 
Regards,
Yu Zhen

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com>]

Hi Pedro,

I mean the full installation package

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Yuzhen
>
> Is there a patch to update 4.0.0 to 4.0.1?
> Or do you mean with the full installer?
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Pedro,
> >
> > Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the
> > same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> > > patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> > > never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!
> > >
> > > I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> > > 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
> > >
> > > Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> > > quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with
> two
> > > startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
> > >
> > > In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> > > 4.1.0.
> > >
> > > I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for
> > users.
> > >
> > > I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Pedro
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on
> > > en_US.
> > > >
> > > > From testing perspective:
> > > > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and
> ongoing
> > > > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > > > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical
> > scenarios
> > > > on all language packages
> > > > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > > > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > No problem found.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <steve.yin.aoo@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> > > jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote
> > > will
> > > > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the
> install
> > > > > >> packages
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for
> future
> > > > > patches
> > > > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an
> > > 4.3.
> > > > > The
> > > > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> > > > overseen a
> > > > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now
> and
> > > > have
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more
> > careful.
> > > > They
> > > > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a
> > > potential
> > > > > 4.2
> > > > > >> or
> > > > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't
> be
> > > > > >> installed
> > > > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for
> > now
> > > > ;-)
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> > > confusion.
> > > > > Stay
> > > > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> > > > testing
> > > > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain
> > the
> > > > > >> same values as before.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Juergen
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Juergen
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> Juergen
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>> Hi,
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO
> > 4.1
> > > > > >> release.
> > > > > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to
> > fix
> > > > some
> > > > > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to
> > propose a
> > > > > >> first RC
> > > > > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend
> a
> > > lot
> > > > of
> > > > > >> time
> > > > > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The
> > > MacOS
> > > > > and
> > > > > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload
> > is
> > > > > still
> > > > > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience
> > and
> > > > the
> > > > > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks
> going
> > > > into
> > > > > >> this
> > > > > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> > > > .
> > > > > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of
> the
> > > > fixed
> > > > > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> > > > updates/fixes
> > > > > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> > > > > languages
> > > > > >> we
> > > > > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for
> > > > private
> > > > > >> use
> > > > > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release.
> It's
> > > the
> > > > > >> first
> > > > > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have
> > to
> > > > test
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install
> > sets
> > > > are
> > > > > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches
> in
> > > the
> > > > > >> future
> > > > > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have
> upgraded
> > > AOO
> > > > > >> 4.0.1
> > > > > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it
> run
> > > > until
> > > > > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the
> bits
> > > > > >> careful.
> > > > > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers
> > > > because
> > > > > >> they
> > > > > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should
> > > take
> > > > > into
> > > > > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able
> to
> > > fix
> > > > > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously
> showstoppers
> > > and
> > > > on
> > > > > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> Juergen
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Steve Yin
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve Yin
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Yu Zhen
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Yu Zhen
> >
>



-- 
Regards,
Yu Zhen

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com>]

Hi Pedro,

I mean the full installation package

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Yuzhen
>
> Is there a patch to update 4.0.0 to 4.0.1?
> Or do you mean with the full installer?
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Pedro,
> >
> > Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the
> > same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> > > patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> > > never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!
> > >
> > > I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> > > 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
> > >
> > > Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> > > quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with
> two
> > > startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
> > >
> > > In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> > > 4.1.0.
> > >
> > > I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for
> > users.
> > >
> > > I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Pedro
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on
> > > en_US.
> > > >
> > > > From testing perspective:
> > > > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and
> ongoing
> > > > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > > > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical
> > scenarios
> > > > on all language packages
> > > > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > > > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > No problem found.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <steve.yin.aoo@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> > > jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote
> > > will
> > > > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the
> install
> > > > > >> packages
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for
> future
> > > > > patches
> > > > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an
> > > 4.3.
> > > > > The
> > > > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> > > > overseen a
> > > > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now
> and
> > > > have
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more
> > careful.
> > > > They
> > > > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a
> > > potential
> > > > > 4.2
> > > > > >> or
> > > > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't
> be
> > > > > >> installed
> > > > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for
> > now
> > > > ;-)
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> > > confusion.
> > > > > Stay
> > > > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> > > > testing
> > > > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain
> > the
> > > > > >> same values as before.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Juergen
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Juergen
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> Juergen
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>> Hi,
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO
> > 4.1
> > > > > >> release.
> > > > > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to
> > fix
> > > > some
> > > > > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to
> > propose a
> > > > > >> first RC
> > > > > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend
> a
> > > lot
> > > > of
> > > > > >> time
> > > > > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The
> > > MacOS
> > > > > and
> > > > > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload
> > is
> > > > > still
> > > > > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience
> > and
> > > > the
> > > > > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks
> going
> > > > into
> > > > > >> this
> > > > > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> > > > .
> > > > > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of
> the
> > > > fixed
> > > > > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> > > > updates/fixes
> > > > > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> > > > > languages
> > > > > >> we
> > > > > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for
> > > > private
> > > > > >> use
> > > > > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release.
> It's
> > > the
> > > > > >> first
> > > > > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have
> > to
> > > > test
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install
> > sets
> > > > are
> > > > > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches
> in
> > > the
> > > > > >> future
> > > > > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have
> upgraded
> > > AOO
> > > > > >> 4.0.1
> > > > > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it
> run
> > > > until
> > > > > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the
> bits
> > > > > >> careful.
> > > > > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers
> > > > because
> > > > > >> they
> > > > > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should
> > > take
> > > > > into
> > > > > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able
> to
> > > fix
> > > > > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously
> showstoppers
> > > and
> > > > on
> > > > > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> Juergen
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Steve Yin
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve Yin
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Yu Zhen
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Yu Zhen
> >
>



-- 
Regards,
Yu Zhen

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com>]

Hi Yuzhen

Is there a patch to update 4.0.0 to 4.0.1?
Or do you mean with the full installer?


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Pedro,
>
> Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the
> same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> > patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> > never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!
> >
> > I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> > 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
> >
> > Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> > quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two
> > startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
> >
> > In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> > 4.1.0.
> >
> > I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for
> users.
> >
> > I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on
> > en_US.
> > >
> > > From testing perspective:
> > > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
> > > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical
> scenarios
> > > on all language packages
> > > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > No problem found.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> > jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote
> > will
> > > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> > > > >> packages
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> > > > patches
> > > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an
> > 4.3.
> > > > The
> > > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> > > overseen a
> > > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and
> > > have
> > > > to
> > > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more
> careful.
> > > They
> > > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a
> > potential
> > > > 4.2
> > > > >> or
> > > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> > > > >> installed
> > > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for
> now
> > > ;-)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> > confusion.
> > > > Stay
> > > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> > > testing
> > > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain
> the
> > > > >> same values as before.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Juergen
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Juergen
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Juergen
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >>>> Hi,
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO
> 4.1
> > > > >> release.
> > > > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to
> fix
> > > some
> > > > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to
> propose a
> > > > >> first RC
> > > > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a
> > lot
> > > of
> > > > >> time
> > > > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The
> > MacOS
> > > > and
> > > > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload
> is
> > > > still
> > > > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience
> and
> > > the
> > > > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going
> > > into
> > > > >> this
> > > > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> > > .
> > > > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the
> > > fixed
> > > > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> > > updates/fixes
> > > > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> > > > languages
> > > > >> we
> > > > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for
> > > private
> > > > >> use
> > > > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's
> > the
> > > > >> first
> > > > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have
> to
> > > test
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install
> sets
> > > are
> > > > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in
> > the
> > > > >> future
> > > > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded
> > AOO
> > > > >> 4.0.1
> > > > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run
> > > until
> > > > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
> > > > >> careful.
> > > > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers
> > > because
> > > > >> they
> > > > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should
> > take
> > > > into
> > > > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to
> > fix
> > > > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers
> > and
> > > on
> > > > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Juergen
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve Yin
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Steve Yin
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Yu Zhen
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
>

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com>]

Hi Yuzhen

Is there a patch to update 4.0.0 to 4.0.1?
Or do you mean with the full installer?


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Pedro,
>
> Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the
> same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> > patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> > never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!
> >
> > I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> > 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
> >
> > Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> > quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two
> > startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
> >
> > In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> > 4.1.0.
> >
> > I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for
> users.
> >
> > I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on
> > en_US.
> > >
> > > From testing perspective:
> > > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
> > > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical
> scenarios
> > > on all language packages
> > > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > No problem found.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> > jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote
> > will
> > > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> > > > >> packages
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> > > > patches
> > > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an
> > 4.3.
> > > > The
> > > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> > > overseen a
> > > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and
> > > have
> > > > to
> > > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more
> careful.
> > > They
> > > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a
> > potential
> > > > 4.2
> > > > >> or
> > > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> > > > >> installed
> > > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for
> now
> > > ;-)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> > confusion.
> > > > Stay
> > > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> > > testing
> > > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain
> the
> > > > >> same values as before.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Juergen
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Juergen
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Juergen
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >>>> Hi,
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO
> 4.1
> > > > >> release.
> > > > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to
> fix
> > > some
> > > > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to
> propose a
> > > > >> first RC
> > > > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a
> > lot
> > > of
> > > > >> time
> > > > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The
> > MacOS
> > > > and
> > > > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload
> is
> > > > still
> > > > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience
> and
> > > the
> > > > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going
> > > into
> > > > >> this
> > > > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> > > .
> > > > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the
> > > fixed
> > > > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> > > updates/fixes
> > > > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> > > > languages
> > > > >> we
> > > > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for
> > > private
> > > > >> use
> > > > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's
> > the
> > > > >> first
> > > > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have
> to
> > > test
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install
> sets
> > > are
> > > > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in
> > the
> > > > >> future
> > > > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded
> > AOO
> > > > >> 4.0.1
> > > > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run
> > > until
> > > > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
> > > > >> careful.
> > > > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers
> > > because
> > > > >> they
> > > > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should
> > take
> > > > into
> > > > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to
> > fix
> > > > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers
> > and
> > > on
> > > > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Juergen
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve Yin
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Steve Yin
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Yu Zhen
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
>

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com>]

Hi Yuzhen

Is there a patch to update 4.0.0 to 4.0.1?
Or do you mean with the full installer?


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Pedro,
>
> Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the
> same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> > patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> > never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!
> >
> > I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> > 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
> >
> > Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> > quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two
> > startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
> >
> > In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> > 4.1.0.
> >
> > I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for
> users.
> >
> > I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on
> > en_US.
> > >
> > > From testing perspective:
> > > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
> > > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical
> scenarios
> > > on all language packages
> > > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > No problem found.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> > jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote
> > will
> > > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> > > > >> packages
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> > > > patches
> > > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an
> > 4.3.
> > > > The
> > > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> > > overseen a
> > > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and
> > > have
> > > > to
> > > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more
> careful.
> > > They
> > > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a
> > potential
> > > > 4.2
> > > > >> or
> > > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> > > > >> installed
> > > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for
> now
> > > ;-)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> > confusion.
> > > > Stay
> > > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> > > testing
> > > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain
> the
> > > > >> same values as before.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Juergen
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Juergen
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Juergen
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >>>> Hi,
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO
> 4.1
> > > > >> release.
> > > > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to
> fix
> > > some
> > > > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to
> propose a
> > > > >> first RC
> > > > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a
> > lot
> > > of
> > > > >> time
> > > > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The
> > MacOS
> > > > and
> > > > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload
> is
> > > > still
> > > > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience
> and
> > > the
> > > > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going
> > > into
> > > > >> this
> > > > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> > > .
> > > > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the
> > > fixed
> > > > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> > > updates/fixes
> > > > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> > > > languages
> > > > >> we
> > > > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for
> > > private
> > > > >> use
> > > > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's
> > the
> > > > >> first
> > > > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have
> to
> > > test
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install
> sets
> > > are
> > > > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in
> > the
> > > > >> future
> > > > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded
> > AOO
> > > > >> 4.0.1
> > > > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run
> > > until
> > > > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
> > > > >> careful.
> > > > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers
> > > because
> > > > >> they
> > > > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should
> > take
> > > > into
> > > > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to
> > fix
> > > > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers
> > and
> > > on
> > > > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Juergen
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve Yin
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Steve Yin
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Yu Zhen
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
>

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com>]

Hi Yuzhen, all

Sorry for the delay but I was doing some more testing.

Here are my findings:

There is no problem updating from 4.0.0 to 4.0.1
The Startup Group, the desktop icon and the Add/Remove list are updated as
expected.

The problem only occurs when updating from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0 and from 4.0.1 to
4.1.0
There are 3 items that fail: there are 2 startup groups, there are 2
desktop icons and there are two entries in the Add/Remove Programs list.

Updating from 4.0.1 to 4.1.0 using the MS patch is a little better: there
is only one entry in the Add/Remove Programs list after updating (the 4.1.0
as expected). However there are still 2 desktop icons and 2 startup groups
(in this case the patch fails to set the OO icon as the group icon while
the full installer succeeds)

How do you want me to report all these in bugzilla? Or can you (or someone
in QA) add it to bugzilla and add me to CC so that I confirm it (and add
screenshots if needed)?

Regards,
Pedro


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Pedro,
>
> Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the
> same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> > patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> > never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!
> >
> > I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> > 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
> >
> > Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> > quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two
> > startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
> >
> > In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> > 4.1.0.
> >
> > I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for
> users.
> >
> > I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on
> > en_US.
> > >
> > > From testing perspective:
> > > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
> > > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical
> scenarios
> > > on all language packages
> > > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > No problem found.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> > jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote
> > will
> > > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> > > > >> packages
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> > > > patches
> > > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an
> > 4.3.
> > > > The
> > > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> > > overseen a
> > > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and
> > > have
> > > > to
> > > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more
> careful.
> > > They
> > > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a
> > potential
> > > > 4.2
> > > > >> or
> > > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> > > > >> installed
> > > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for
> now
> > > ;-)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> > confusion.
> > > > Stay
> > > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> > > testing
> > > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain
> the
> > > > >> same values as before.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Juergen
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Juergen
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Juergen
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >>>> Hi,
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO
> 4.1
> > > > >> release.
> > > > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to
> fix
> > > some
> > > > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to
> propose a
> > > > >> first RC
> > > > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a
> > lot
> > > of
> > > > >> time
> > > > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The
> > MacOS
> > > > and
> > > > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload
> is
> > > > still
> > > > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience
> and
> > > the
> > > > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going
> > > into
> > > > >> this
> > > > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> > > .
> > > > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the
> > > fixed
> > > > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> > > updates/fixes
> > > > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> > > > languages
> > > > >> we
> > > > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for
> > > private
> > > > >> use
> > > > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's
> > the
> > > > >> first
> > > > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have
> to
> > > test
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install
> sets
> > > are
> > > > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in
> > the
> > > > >> future
> > > > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded
> > AOO
> > > > >> 4.0.1
> > > > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run
> > > until
> > > > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
> > > > >> careful.
> > > > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers
> > > because
> > > > >> they
> > > > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should
> > take
> > > > into
> > > > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to
> > fix
> > > > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers
> > and
> > > on
> > > > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Juergen
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve Yin
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Steve Yin
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Yu Zhen
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
>

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>]

Same symptom. And the shortcut named "OpenOffice 4.0.1" is still on the
desktop. But these old version stuffs can be removed manually.


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Pedro,
>
> Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the
> same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> > patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> > never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!
> >
> > I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> > 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
> >
> > Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> > quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two
> > startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
> >
> > In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> > 4.1.0.
> >
> > I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for
> users.
> >
> > I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on
> > en_US.
> > >
> > > From testing perspective:
> > > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
> > > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical
> scenarios
> > > on all language packages
> > > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > No problem found.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> > jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote
> > will
> > > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> > > > >> packages
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> > > > patches
> > > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an
> > 4.3.
> > > > The
> > > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> > > overseen a
> > > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and
> > > have
> > > > to
> > > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more
> careful.
> > > They
> > > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a
> > potential
> > > > 4.2
> > > > >> or
> > > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> > > > >> installed
> > > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for
> now
> > > ;-)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> > confusion.
> > > > Stay
> > > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> > > testing
> > > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain
> the
> > > > >> same values as before.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Juergen
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Juergen
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Juergen
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >>>> Hi,
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO
> 4.1
> > > > >> release.
> > > > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to
> fix
> > > some
> > > > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to
> propose a
> > > > >> first RC
> > > > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a
> > lot
> > > of
> > > > >> time
> > > > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The
> > MacOS
> > > > and
> > > > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload
> is
> > > > still
> > > > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience
> and
> > > the
> > > > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going
> > > into
> > > > >> this
> > > > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> > > .
> > > > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the
> > > fixed
> > > > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> > > updates/fixes
> > > > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> > > > languages
> > > > >> we
> > > > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for
> > > private
> > > > >> use
> > > > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's
> > the
> > > > >> first
> > > > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have
> to
> > > test
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install
> sets
> > > are
> > > > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in
> > the
> > > > >> future
> > > > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded
> > AOO
> > > > >> 4.0.1
> > > > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run
> > > until
> > > > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
> > > > >> careful.
> > > > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers
> > > because
> > > > >> they
> > > > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should
> > take
> > > > into
> > > > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to
> > fix
> > > > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers
> > and
> > > on
> > > > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Juergen
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve Yin
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Steve Yin
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Yu Zhen
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
>



-- 
Best Regards,

Steve Yin

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>]

Same symptom. And the shortcut named "OpenOffice 4.0.1" is still on the
desktop. But these old version stuffs can be removed manually.


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Pedro,
>
> Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the
> same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> > patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> > never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!
> >
> > I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> > 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
> >
> > Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> > quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two
> > startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
> >
> > In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> > 4.1.0.
> >
> > I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for
> users.
> >
> > I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on
> > en_US.
> > >
> > > From testing perspective:
> > > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
> > > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical
> scenarios
> > > on all language packages
> > > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > No problem found.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> > jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote
> > will
> > > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> > > > >> packages
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> > > > patches
> > > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an
> > 4.3.
> > > > The
> > > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> > > overseen a
> > > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and
> > > have
> > > > to
> > > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more
> careful.
> > > They
> > > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a
> > potential
> > > > 4.2
> > > > >> or
> > > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> > > > >> installed
> > > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for
> now
> > > ;-)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> > confusion.
> > > > Stay
> > > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> > > testing
> > > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain
> the
> > > > >> same values as before.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Juergen
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Juergen
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Juergen
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >>>> Hi,
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO
> 4.1
> > > > >> release.
> > > > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to
> fix
> > > some
> > > > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to
> propose a
> > > > >> first RC
> > > > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a
> > lot
> > > of
> > > > >> time
> > > > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The
> > MacOS
> > > > and
> > > > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload
> is
> > > > still
> > > > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience
> and
> > > the
> > > > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going
> > > into
> > > > >> this
> > > > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> > > .
> > > > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the
> > > fixed
> > > > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> > > updates/fixes
> > > > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> > > > languages
> > > > >> we
> > > > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for
> > > private
> > > > >> use
> > > > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's
> > the
> > > > >> first
> > > > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have
> to
> > > test
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install
> sets
> > > are
> > > > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in
> > the
> > > > >> future
> > > > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded
> > AOO
> > > > >> 4.0.1
> > > > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run
> > > until
> > > > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
> > > > >> careful.
> > > > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers
> > > because
> > > > >> they
> > > > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should
> > take
> > > > into
> > > > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to
> > fix
> > > > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers
> > and
> > > on
> > > > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Juergen
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve Yin
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Steve Yin
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Yu Zhen
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
>



-- 
Best Regards,

Steve Yin

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com>]

Hi Yuzhen, all

Sorry for the delay but I was doing some more testing.

Here are my findings:

There is no problem updating from 4.0.0 to 4.0.1
The Startup Group, the desktop icon and the Add/Remove list are updated as
expected.

The problem only occurs when updating from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0 and from 4.0.1 to
4.1.0
There are 3 items that fail: there are 2 startup groups, there are 2
desktop icons and there are two entries in the Add/Remove Programs list.

Updating from 4.0.1 to 4.1.0 using the MS patch is a little better: there
is only one entry in the Add/Remove Programs list after updating (the 4.1.0
as expected). However there are still 2 desktop icons and 2 startup groups
(in this case the patch fails to set the OO icon as the group icon while
the full installer succeeds)

How do you want me to report all these in bugzilla? Or can you (or someone
in QA) add it to bugzilla and add me to CC so that I confirm it (and add
screenshots if needed)?

Regards,
Pedro


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Pedro,
>
> Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the
> same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> > patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> > never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!
> >
> > I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> > 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
> >
> > Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> > quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two
> > startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
> >
> > In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> > 4.1.0.
> >
> > I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for
> users.
> >
> > I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on
> > en_US.
> > >
> > > From testing perspective:
> > > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
> > > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical
> scenarios
> > > on all language packages
> > > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > No problem found.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> > jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote
> > will
> > > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> > > > >> packages
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> > > > patches
> > > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an
> > 4.3.
> > > > The
> > > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> > > overseen a
> > > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and
> > > have
> > > > to
> > > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more
> careful.
> > > They
> > > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a
> > potential
> > > > 4.2
> > > > >> or
> > > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> > > > >> installed
> > > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for
> now
> > > ;-)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> > confusion.
> > > > Stay
> > > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> > > testing
> > > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain
> the
> > > > >> same values as before.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Juergen
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Juergen
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Juergen
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >> >>>> Hi,
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO
> 4.1
> > > > >> release.
> > > > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to
> fix
> > > some
> > > > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to
> propose a
> > > > >> first RC
> > > > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a
> > lot
> > > of
> > > > >> time
> > > > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The
> > MacOS
> > > > and
> > > > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload
> is
> > > > still
> > > > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience
> and
> > > the
> > > > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going
> > > into
> > > > >> this
> > > > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> > > .
> > > > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the
> > > fixed
> > > > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> > > updates/fixes
> > > > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> > > > languages
> > > > >> we
> > > > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for
> > > private
> > > > >> use
> > > > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's
> > the
> > > > >> first
> > > > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have
> to
> > > test
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install
> sets
> > > are
> > > > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in
> > the
> > > > >> future
> > > > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded
> > AOO
> > > > >> 4.0.1
> > > > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run
> > > until
> > > > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
> > > > >> careful.
> > > > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers
> > > because
> > > > >> they
> > > > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should
> > take
> > > > into
> > > > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to
> > fix
> > > > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers
> > and
> > > on
> > > > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Juergen
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve Yin
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Steve Yin
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Yu Zhen
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
>

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com>]

Hi Pedro,

Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the
same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!
>
> I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
>
> Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two
> startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
>
> In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> 4.1.0.
>
> I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for users.
>
> I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
>
> Regards,
> Pedro
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on
> en_US.
> >
> > From testing perspective:
> > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
> > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical scenarios
> > on all language packages
> > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > No problem found.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote
> will
> > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> > > >> packages
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> > > patches
> > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an
> 4.3.
> > > The
> > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> > overseen a
> > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and
> > have
> > > to
> > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful.
> > They
> > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a
> potential
> > > 4.2
> > > >> or
> > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> > > >> installed
> > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now
> > ;-)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> confusion.
> > > Stay
> > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > >>
> > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> > testing
> > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > >>
> > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the
> > > >> same values as before.
> > > >>
> > > >> Juergen
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Juergen
> > > >> >
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Juergen
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > >> >>>> Hi,
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1
> > > >> release.
> > > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix
> > some
> > > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a
> > > >> first RC
> > > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a
> lot
> > of
> > > >> time
> > > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The
> MacOS
> > > and
> > > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is
> > > still
> > > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and
> > the
> > > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going
> > into
> > > >> this
> > > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> > .
> > > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the
> > fixed
> > > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> > updates/fixes
> > > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> > > languages
> > > >> we
> > > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for
> > private
> > > >> use
> > > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's
> the
> > > >> first
> > > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to
> > test
> > > >> the
> > > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets
> > are
> > > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in
> the
> > > >> future
> > > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded
> AOO
> > > >> 4.0.1
> > > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run
> > until
> > > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
> > > >> careful.
> > > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers
> > because
> > > >> they
> > > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should
> take
> > > into
> > > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to
> fix
> > > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers
> and
> > on
> > > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> Juergen
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Steve Yin
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > > Steve Yin
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Yu Zhen
> >
>



-- 
Regards,
Yu Zhen

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com>]

Hi Pedro,

Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the
same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!
>
> I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
>
> Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two
> startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
>
> In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> 4.1.0.
>
> I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for users.
>
> I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
>
> Regards,
> Pedro
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on
> en_US.
> >
> > From testing perspective:
> > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
> > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical scenarios
> > on all language packages
> > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > No problem found.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote
> will
> > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> > > >> packages
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> > > patches
> > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an
> 4.3.
> > > The
> > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> > overseen a
> > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and
> > have
> > > to
> > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful.
> > They
> > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a
> potential
> > > 4.2
> > > >> or
> > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> > > >> installed
> > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now
> > ;-)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> confusion.
> > > Stay
> > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > >>
> > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> > testing
> > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > >>
> > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the
> > > >> same values as before.
> > > >>
> > > >> Juergen
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Juergen
> > > >> >
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Juergen
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > >> >>>> Hi,
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1
> > > >> release.
> > > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix
> > some
> > > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a
> > > >> first RC
> > > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a
> lot
> > of
> > > >> time
> > > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The
> MacOS
> > > and
> > > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is
> > > still
> > > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and
> > the
> > > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going
> > into
> > > >> this
> > > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> > .
> > > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the
> > fixed
> > > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> > updates/fixes
> > > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> > > languages
> > > >> we
> > > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for
> > private
> > > >> use
> > > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's
> the
> > > >> first
> > > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to
> > test
> > > >> the
> > > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets
> > are
> > > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in
> the
> > > >> future
> > > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded
> AOO
> > > >> 4.0.1
> > > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run
> > until
> > > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
> > > >> careful.
> > > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers
> > because
> > > >> they
> > > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should
> take
> > > into
> > > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to
> fix
> > > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers
> and
> > on
> > > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> Juergen
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Steve Yin
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > > Steve Yin
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Yu Zhen
> >
>



-- 
Regards,
Yu Zhen

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com>]

Hi Pedro,

Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the
same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!
>
> I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
>
> Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two
> startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
>
> In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> 4.1.0.
>
> I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for users.
>
> I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
>
> Regards,
> Pedro
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on
> en_US.
> >
> > From testing perspective:
> > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
> > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical scenarios
> > on all language packages
> > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > No problem found.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote
> will
> > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> > > >> packages
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> > > patches
> > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an
> 4.3.
> > > The
> > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> > overseen a
> > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and
> > have
> > > to
> > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful.
> > They
> > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a
> potential
> > > 4.2
> > > >> or
> > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> > > >> installed
> > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now
> > ;-)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> confusion.
> > > Stay
> > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > >>
> > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> > testing
> > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > >>
> > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the
> > > >> same values as before.
> > > >>
> > > >> Juergen
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Juergen
> > > >> >
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Juergen
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > >> >>>> Hi,
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1
> > > >> release.
> > > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix
> > some
> > > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a
> > > >> first RC
> > > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a
> lot
> > of
> > > >> time
> > > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The
> MacOS
> > > and
> > > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is
> > > still
> > > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and
> > the
> > > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going
> > into
> > > >> this
> > > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> > .
> > > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the
> > fixed
> > > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> > updates/fixes
> > > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> > > languages
> > > >> we
> > > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for
> > private
> > > >> use
> > > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's
> the
> > > >> first
> > > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to
> > test
> > > >> the
> > > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets
> > are
> > > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in
> the
> > > >> future
> > > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded
> AOO
> > > >> 4.0.1
> > > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run
> > until
> > > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
> > > >> careful.
> > > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers
> > because
> > > >> they
> > > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should
> take
> > > into
> > > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to
> fix
> > > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers
> and
> > on
> > > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> Juergen
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Steve Yin
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > > Steve Yin
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Yu Zhen
> >
>



-- 
Regards,
Yu Zhen

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com>]

Hi all

First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!

I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.

Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two
startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.

In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
4.1.0.

I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for users.

I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.

Regards,
Pedro


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on en_US.
>
> From testing perspective:
> 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
> tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical scenarios
> on all language packages
> - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > No problem found.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
> > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> > >> packages
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> > patches
> > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3.
> > The
> > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> overseen a
> > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and
> have
> > to
> > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful.
> They
> > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential
> > 4.2
> > >> or
> > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> > >> installed
> > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now
> ;-)
> > >> >
> > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion.
> > Stay
> > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > >>
> > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> testing
> > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > >>
> > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the
> > >> same values as before.
> > >>
> > >> Juergen
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > Juergen
> > >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Juergen
> > >> >>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Juergen
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > >> >>>> Hi,
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1
> > >> release.
> > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix
> some
> > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a
> > >> first RC
> > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot
> of
> > >> time
> > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS
> > and
> > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is
> > still
> > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and
> the
> > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > >> >>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going
> into
> > >> this
> > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > >> >>>>
> > >>
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> .
> > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the
> fixed
> > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> updates/fixes
> > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > >> >>>>
> > >>
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> > languages
> > >> we
> > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for
> private
> > >> use
> > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the
> > >> first
> > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to
> test
> > >> the
> > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets
> are
> > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the
> > >> future
> > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO
> > >> 4.0.1
> > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run
> until
> > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
> > >> careful.
> > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers
> because
> > >> they
> > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take
> > into
> > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
> > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and
> on
> > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Juergen
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > > Steve Yin
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Steve Yin
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
>

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com>]

Hi all

First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!

I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.

Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two
startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.

In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
4.1.0.

I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for users.

I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.

Regards,
Pedro


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on en_US.
>
> From testing perspective:
> 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
> tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical scenarios
> on all language packages
> - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > No problem found.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
> > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> > >> packages
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> > patches
> > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3.
> > The
> > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> overseen a
> > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and
> have
> > to
> > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful.
> They
> > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential
> > 4.2
> > >> or
> > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> > >> installed
> > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now
> ;-)
> > >> >
> > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion.
> > Stay
> > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > >>
> > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> testing
> > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > >>
> > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the
> > >> same values as before.
> > >>
> > >> Juergen
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > Juergen
> > >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Juergen
> > >> >>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Juergen
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > >> >>>> Hi,
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1
> > >> release.
> > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix
> some
> > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a
> > >> first RC
> > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot
> of
> > >> time
> > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS
> > and
> > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is
> > still
> > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and
> the
> > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > >> >>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going
> into
> > >> this
> > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > >> >>>>
> > >>
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> .
> > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the
> fixed
> > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> updates/fixes
> > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > >> >>>>
> > >>
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> > languages
> > >> we
> > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for
> private
> > >> use
> > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the
> > >> first
> > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to
> test
> > >> the
> > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets
> are
> > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the
> > >> future
> > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO
> > >> 4.0.1
> > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run
> until
> > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
> > >> careful.
> > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers
> because
> > >> they
> > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take
> > into
> > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
> > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and
> on
> > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Juergen
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > > Steve Yin
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Steve Yin
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
>

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Pedro Lino <pe...@gmail.com>]

Hi all

First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!

I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.

Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two
startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.

In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
4.1.0.

I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for users.

I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.

Regards,
Pedro


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on en_US.
>
> From testing perspective:
> 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
> tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical scenarios
> on all language packages
> - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > No problem found.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
> > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> > >> packages
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> > patches
> > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3.
> > The
> > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have
> overseen a
> > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and
> have
> > to
> > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful.
> They
> > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential
> > 4.2
> > >> or
> > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> > >> installed
> > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now
> ;-)
> > >> >
> > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion.
> > Stay
> > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > >>
> > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> testing
> > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > >>
> > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the
> > >> same values as before.
> > >>
> > >> Juergen
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > Juergen
> > >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Juergen
> > >> >>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Juergen
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > >> >>>> Hi,
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1
> > >> release.
> > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix
> some
> > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a
> > >> first RC
> > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot
> of
> > >> time
> > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS
> > and
> > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is
> > still
> > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and
> the
> > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > >> >>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going
> into
> > >> this
> > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > >> >>>>
> > >>
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> .
> > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the
> fixed
> > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> updates/fixes
> > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > >> >>>>
> > >>
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> > languages
> > >> we
> > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for
> private
> > >> use
> > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the
> > >> first
> > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to
> test
> > >> the
> > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets
> are
> > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the
> > >> future
> > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO
> > >> 4.0.1
> > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run
> until
> > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
> > >> careful.
> > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers
> because
> > >> they
> > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take
> > into
> > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
> > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and
> on
> > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Juergen
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > > Steve Yin
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Steve Yin
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
>

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com>]

Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on en_US.

>From testing perspective:
1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical scenarios
on all language packages
- Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1



On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com> wrote:

> No problem found.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischmidt@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
> >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> >> packages
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> patches
> >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3.
> The
> >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
> >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have
> to
> >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
> >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential
> 4.2
> >> or
> >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> >> >>
> >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> >> installed
> >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-)
> >> >
> >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion.
> Stay
> >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> >>
> >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy testing
> >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> >>
> >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the
> >> same values as before.
> >>
> >> Juergen
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Juergen
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Juergen
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Juergen
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> >>>> Hi,
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1
> >> release.
> >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
> >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a
> >> first RC
> >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of
> >> time
> >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS
> and
> >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is
> still
> >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
> >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> >> >>>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into
> >> this
> >> >>>> release can be found under
> >> >>>>
> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
> >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
> >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
> >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> >> >>>>
> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> languages
> >> we
> >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private
> >> use
> >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the
> >> first
> >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test
> >> the
> >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
> >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the
> >> future
> >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO
> >> 4.0.1
> >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
> >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
> >> careful.
> >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because
> >> they
> >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take
> into
> >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
> >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
> >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Juergen
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Steve Yin
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Steve Yin
>



-- 
Regards,
Yu Zhen

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com>]

Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on en_US.

>From testing perspective:
1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical scenarios
on all language packages
- Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1



On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com> wrote:

> No problem found.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischmidt@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
> >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> >> packages
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> patches
> >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3.
> The
> >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
> >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have
> to
> >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
> >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential
> 4.2
> >> or
> >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> >> >>
> >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> >> installed
> >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-)
> >> >
> >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion.
> Stay
> >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> >>
> >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy testing
> >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> >>
> >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the
> >> same values as before.
> >>
> >> Juergen
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Juergen
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Juergen
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Juergen
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> >>>> Hi,
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1
> >> release.
> >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
> >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a
> >> first RC
> >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of
> >> time
> >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS
> and
> >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is
> still
> >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
> >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> >> >>>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into
> >> this
> >> >>>> release can be found under
> >> >>>>
> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
> >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
> >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
> >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> >> >>>>
> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> languages
> >> we
> >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private
> >> use
> >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the
> >> first
> >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test
> >> the
> >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
> >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the
> >> future
> >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO
> >> 4.0.1
> >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
> >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
> >> careful.
> >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because
> >> they
> >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take
> into
> >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
> >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
> >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Juergen
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Steve Yin
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Steve Yin
>



-- 
Regards,
Yu Zhen

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Yuzhen Fan <fa...@gmail.com>]

Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on en_US.

>From testing perspective:
1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical scenarios
on all language packages
- Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1



On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com> wrote:

> No problem found.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischmidt@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
> >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
> >> packages
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future
> patches
> >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3.
> The
> >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
> >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have
> to
> >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
> >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential
> 4.2
> >> or
> >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> >> >>
> >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
> >> installed
> >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-)
> >> >
> >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion.
> Stay
> >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> >>
> >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy testing
> >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> >>
> >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the
> >> same values as before.
> >>
> >> Juergen
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Juergen
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Juergen
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Juergen
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> >>>> Hi,
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1
> >> release.
> >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
> >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a
> >> first RC
> >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of
> >> time
> >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS
> and
> >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is
> still
> >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
> >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> >> >>>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into
> >> this
> >> >>>> release can be found under
> >> >>>>
> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
> >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
> >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
> >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> >> >>>>
> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the
> languages
> >> we
> >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private
> >> use
> >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the
> >> first
> >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test
> >> the
> >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
> >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the
> >> future
> >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO
> >> 4.0.1
> >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
> >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
> >> careful.
> >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because
> >> they
> >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take
> into
> >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
> >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
> >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Juergen
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Steve Yin
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Steve Yin
>



-- 
Regards,
Yu Zhen

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>]

No problem found.


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
>> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
>> packages
>> >>>
>> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches
>> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The
>> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
>> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to
>> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
>> >>>
>> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
>> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2
>> or
>> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
>> >>
>> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
>> installed
>> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-)
>> >
>> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion. Stay
>> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
>>
>> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy testing
>> and voting and will be back on Monday.
>>
>> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the
>> same values as before.
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Juergen
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Juergen
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> Juergen
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> >>>> Hi,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1
>> release.
>> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
>> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a
>> first RC
>> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of
>> time
>> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
>> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
>> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
>> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
>> >>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>> >>>>
>> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into
>> this
>> >>>> release can be found under
>> >>>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
>> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
>> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
>> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
>> >>>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages
>> we
>> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private
>> use
>> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the
>> first
>> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test
>> the
>> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
>> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the
>> future
>> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO
>> 4.0.1
>> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
>> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
>> careful.
>> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because
>> they
>> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
>> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
>> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
>> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Juergen
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Steve Yin
>



-- 
Best Regards,

Steve Yin

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>]

No problem found.


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
>> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
>> packages
>> >>>
>> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches
>> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The
>> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
>> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to
>> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
>> >>>
>> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
>> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2
>> or
>> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
>> >>
>> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
>> installed
>> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-)
>> >
>> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion. Stay
>> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
>>
>> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy testing
>> and voting and will be back on Monday.
>>
>> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the
>> same values as before.
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Juergen
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Juergen
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> Juergen
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> >>>> Hi,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1
>> release.
>> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
>> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a
>> first RC
>> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of
>> time
>> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
>> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
>> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
>> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
>> >>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>> >>>>
>> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into
>> this
>> >>>> release can be found under
>> >>>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
>> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
>> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
>> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
>> >>>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages
>> we
>> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private
>> use
>> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the
>> first
>> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test
>> the
>> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
>> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the
>> future
>> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO
>> 4.0.1
>> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
>> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
>> careful.
>> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because
>> they
>> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
>> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
>> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
>> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Juergen
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Steve Yin
>



-- 
Best Regards,

Steve Yin

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>]

No problem found.


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
>> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install
>> packages
>> >>>
>> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches
>> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The
>> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
>> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to
>> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
>> >>>
>> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
>> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2
>> or
>> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
>> >>
>> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be
>> installed
>> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-)
>> >
>> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion. Stay
>> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
>>
>> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy testing
>> and voting and will be back on Monday.
>>
>> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the
>> same values as before.
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Juergen
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Juergen
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> Juergen
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> >>>> Hi,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1
>> release.
>> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
>> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a
>> first RC
>> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of
>> time
>> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
>> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
>> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
>> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
>> >>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>> >>>>
>> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into
>> this
>> >>>> release can be found under
>> >>>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
>> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
>> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
>> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
>> >>>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages
>> we
>> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private
>> use
>> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the
>> first
>> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test
>> the
>> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
>> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the
>> future
>> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO
>> 4.0.1
>> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
>> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits
>> careful.
>> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because
>> they
>> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
>> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
>> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
>> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Juergen
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Steve Yin
>



-- 
Best Regards,

Steve Yin

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>]

It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages
> >>>
> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches
> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The
> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to
> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> >>>
> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2
> or
> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> >>
> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be installed
> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-)
> >
> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion. Stay
> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
>
> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy testing
> and voting and will be back on Monday.
>
> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the
> same values as before.
>
> Juergen
>
>
> >
> > Juergen
> >
> >>
> >> Juergen
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Juergen
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> >>>>
> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1
> release.
> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first
> RC
> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of
> time
> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> >>>>
> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> >>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> >>>>
> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into
> this
> >>>> release can be found under
> >>>>
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> >>>>
> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> >>>>
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> >>>>
> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages
> we
> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test
> the
> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the
> future
> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> >>>>
> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> >>>>
> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because
> they
> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Juergen
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Best Regards,

Steve Yin

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>]

It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages
> >>>
> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches
> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The
> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to
> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> >>>
> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2
> or
> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> >>
> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be installed
> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-)
> >
> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion. Stay
> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
>
> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy testing
> and voting and will be back on Monday.
>
> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the
> same values as before.
>
> Juergen
>
>
> >
> > Juergen
> >
> >>
> >> Juergen
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Juergen
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> >>>>
> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1
> release.
> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first
> RC
> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of
> time
> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> >>>>
> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> >>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> >>>>
> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into
> this
> >>>> release can be found under
> >>>>
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> >>>>
> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> >>>>
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> >>>>
> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages
> we
> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test
> the
> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the
> future
> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> >>>>
> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> >>>>
> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because
> they
> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Juergen
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Best Regards,

Steve Yin

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Steve Yin <st...@gmail.com>]

It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages
> >>>
> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches
> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The
> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to
> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> >>>
> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2
> or
> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> >>
> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be installed
> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-)
> >
> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion. Stay
> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
>
> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy testing
> and voting and will be back on Monday.
>
> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the
> same values as before.
>
> Juergen
>
>
> >
> > Juergen
> >
> >>
> >> Juergen
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Juergen
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> >>>>
> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1
> release.
> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first
> RC
> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of
> time
> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> >>>>
> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> >>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> >>>>
> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into
> this
> >>>> release can be found under
> >>>>
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> >>>>
> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> >>>>
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> >>>>
> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages
> we
> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test
> the
> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the
> future
> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> >>>>
> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> >>>>
> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because
> they
> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Juergen
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Best Regards,

Steve Yin

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
>>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages
>>>
>>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches
>>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The
>>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
>>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to
>>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
>>>
>>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
>>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2 or
>>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
>>
>> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be installed
>> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-)
> 
> I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion. Stay
> tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.

Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy testing
and voting and will be back on Monday.

We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the
same values as before.

Juergen


> 
> Juergen
> 
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>>>
>>> Juergen
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
>>>>
>>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
>>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
>>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
>>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
>>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
>>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
>>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
>>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
>>>>
>>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>>>>
>>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
>>>> release can be found under
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
>>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
>>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
>>>> should be verified by native speakers.
>>>>
>>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
>>>>
>>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
>>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
>>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
>>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
>>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
>>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
>>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
>>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
>>>>
>>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
>>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
>>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
>>>>
>>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
>>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
>>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
>>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
>>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Juergen
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
>>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages
>>>
>>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches
>>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The
>>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
>>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to
>>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
>>>
>>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
>>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2 or
>>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
>>
>> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be installed
>> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-)
> 
> I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion. Stay
> tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.

Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy testing
and voting and will be back on Monday.

We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the
same values as before.

Juergen


> 
> Juergen
> 
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>>>
>>> Juergen
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
>>>>
>>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
>>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
>>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
>>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
>>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
>>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
>>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
>>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
>>>>
>>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>>>>
>>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
>>>> release can be found under
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
>>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
>>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
>>>> should be verified by native speakers.
>>>>
>>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
>>>>
>>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
>>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
>>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
>>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
>>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
>>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
>>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
>>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
>>>>
>>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
>>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
>>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
>>>>
>>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
>>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
>>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
>>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
>>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Juergen
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
>>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages
>>>
>>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches
>>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The
>>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
>>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to
>>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
>>>
>>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
>>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2 or
>>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
>>
>> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be installed
>> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-)
> 
> I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion. Stay
> tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.

Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy testing
and voting and will be back on Monday.

We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the
same values as before.

Juergen


> 
> Juergen
> 
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>>>
>>> Juergen
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
>>>>
>>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
>>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
>>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
>>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
>>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
>>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
>>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
>>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
>>>>
>>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>>>>
>>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
>>>> release can be found under
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
>>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
>>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
>>>> should be verified by native speakers.
>>>>
>>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
>>>>
>>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
>>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
>>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
>>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
>>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
>>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
>>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
>>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
>>>>
>>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
>>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
>>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
>>>>
>>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
>>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
>>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
>>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
>>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Juergen
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: l10n-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: l10n-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages
>>
>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches
>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The
>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to
>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
>>
>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2 or
>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> 
> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be installed
> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-)

I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion. Stay
tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.

Juergen

> 
> Juergen
> 
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>>
>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
>>>
>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
>>>
>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>>>
>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
>>> release can be found under
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
>>> should be verified by native speakers.
>>>
>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
>>>
>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
>>>
>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
>>>
>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
>>>
>>>
>>> Juergen
>>>
>>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages
>>
>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches
>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The
>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to
>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
>>
>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2 or
>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> 
> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be installed
> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-)

I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion. Stay
tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.

Juergen

> 
> Juergen
> 
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>>
>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
>>>
>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
>>>
>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>>>
>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
>>> release can be found under
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
>>> should be verified by native speakers.
>>>
>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
>>>
>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
>>>
>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
>>>
>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
>>>
>>>
>>> Juergen
>>>
>>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages
>>
>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches
>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The
>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to
>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
>>
>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2 or
>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> 
> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be installed
> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-)

I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion. Stay
tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.

Juergen

> 
> Juergen
> 
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>>
>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
>>>
>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
>>>
>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>>>
>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
>>> release can be found under
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
>>> should be verified by native speakers.
>>>
>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
>>>
>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
>>>
>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
>>>
>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
>>>
>>>
>>> Juergen
>>>
>>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: l10n-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: l10n-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages
> 
> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches
> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The
> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to
> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> 
> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2 or
> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.

The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be installed
over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-)

Juergen

> 
> Juergen
> 
> 
> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
>>
>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
>> release relevant bits are the source release.
>>
>> The RC builds can be found as always under
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>>
>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
>> release can be found under
>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
>> should be verified by native speakers.
>>
>> A related RAT scan can be found under
>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
>>
>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
>>
>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
>>
>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
>>
>>
>> Juergen
>>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages
> 
> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches
> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The
> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to
> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> 
> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2 or
> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.

The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be installed
over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-)

Juergen

> 
> Juergen
> 
> 
> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
>>
>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
>> release relevant bits are the source release.
>>
>> The RC builds can be found as always under
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>>
>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
>> release can be found under
>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
>> should be verified by native speakers.
>>
>> A related RAT scan can be found under
>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
>>
>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
>>
>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
>>
>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
>>
>>
>> Juergen
>>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages
> 
> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches
> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The
> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to
> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> 
> That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2 or
> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.

The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be installed
over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-)

Juergen

> 
> Juergen
> 
> 
> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
>>
>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
>> release relevant bits are the source release.
>>
>> The RC builds can be found as always under
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>>
>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
>> release can be found under
>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
>> should be verified by native speakers.
>>
>> A related RAT scan can be found under
>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
>>
>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
>>
>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
>>
>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
>>
>>
>> Juergen
>>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: l10n-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: l10n-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages

I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches
that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The
whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to
test the patch mechanism a little bit more.

That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2 or
4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.

Juergen


On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> 
> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
> release relevant bits are the source release.
> 
> The RC builds can be found as always under
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> 
> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
> release can be found under
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
> should be verified by native speakers.
> 
> A related RAT scan can be found under
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> 
> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> 
> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> 
> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> 
> 
> Juergen
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: l10n-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: l10n-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages

I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches
that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The
whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to
test the patch mechanism a little bit more.

That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2 or
4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.

Juergen


On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> 
> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
> release relevant bits are the source release.
> 
> The RC builds can be found as always under
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> 
> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
> release can be found under
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
> should be verified by native speakers.
> 
> A related RAT scan can be found under
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> 
> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> 
> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> 
> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> 
> 
> Juergen
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

["Marcus (OOo)" <ma...@wtnet.de>]

Am 04/02/2014 03:16 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.

OK, as the bar for accepted showstoppers is now getting very high, I'll 
disable the public Beta download before the wekeend - if nobody objects.

Marcus

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

On 4/3/14 5:02 PM, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
> 
> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
>> On 4/3/14 4:42 PM, Regina Henschel wrote:
>>> Hi Jürgen,
>>>
>>> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
>>>>
>>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
>>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
>>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a
>>>> first RC
>>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of
>>>> time
>>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
>>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
>>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
>>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
>>>>
>>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> The links to the source do no work, those in section
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotSource
>>>
>>>
>>
>> you are correct, now it should work.
>>
> 
> The links to the source are OK now, but
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> still fails.

But that is because the people server is down or has problems

Juergen


> 
> Kind regards
> Regina
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Regina Henschel <rb...@t-online.de>]

Hi Jürgen,

Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
> On 4/3/14 4:42 PM, Regina Henschel wrote:
>> Hi Jürgen,
>>
>> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
>>>
>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
>>>
>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>>>
>>
>> The links to the source do no work, those in section
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotSource
>>
>
> you are correct, now it should work.
>

The links to the source are OK now, but
http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
still fails.

Kind regards
Regina


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

On 4/3/14 4:42 PM, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
> 
> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
>>
>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
>> release relevant bits are the source release.
>>
>> The RC builds can be found as always under
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
>>
> 
> The links to the source do no work, those in section
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotSource
> 

you are correct, now it should work.

Thanks

Juergen


> 
> 
> Kind regards
> Regina
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Regina Henschel <rb...@t-online.de>]

Hi Jürgen,

Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
>
> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
> release relevant bits are the source release.
>
> The RC builds can be found as always under
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds

The links to the source do no work, those in section
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotSource


Kind regards
Regina

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC - Showstoppers?

[Rainer Bielefeld <ra...@bielefeldundbuss.de>]

Hi,

we have a potential showstopper Issue 124607 - .odt with (Page-No) field 
in header/footer and comment for text range fails to open with "Read 
Error. Error reading file"
<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124607>

CU

Rainer

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

I hope that nobody have a problem with the revision number ...666 and
the build date April 1th ;-) I find it funny and you can expect a very
hot version ...


On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> 
> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
> release relevant bits are the source release.
> 
> The RC builds can be found as always under
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> 
> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
> release can be found under
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
> should be verified by native speakers.
> 
> A related RAT scan can be found under
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> 
> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> 
> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> 
> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> 
> 
> Juergen
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: qa-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC - Showstoppers?

[Rainer Bielefeld <ra...@bielefeldundbuss.de>]

Hi,

we have a potential showstopper Issue 124607 - .odt with (Page-No) field 
in header/footer and comment for text range fails to open with "Read 
Error. Error reading file"
<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124607>

CU

Rainer

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will
continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages

I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches
that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The
whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a
small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to
test the patch mechanism a little bit more.

That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They
work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2 or
4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.

Juergen


On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> 
> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
> release relevant bits are the source release.
> 
> The RC builds can be found as always under
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> 
> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
> release can be found under
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
> should be verified by native speakers.
> 
> A related RAT scan can be found under
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> 
> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> 
> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> 
> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> 
> 
> Juergen
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

[Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>]

I hope that nobody have a problem with the revision number ...666 and
the build date April 1th ;-) I find it funny and you can expect a very
hot version ...


On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> 
> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release.
> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some
> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC
> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time
> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and
> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still
> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the
> release relevant bits are the source release.
> 
> The RC builds can be found as always under
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> 
> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this
> release can be found under
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html.
> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed
> issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes
> should be verified by native speakers.
> 
> A related RAT scan can be found under
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> 
> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we
> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first
> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the
> functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are
> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future
> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1
> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-)
> 
> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until
> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful.
> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> 
> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they
> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into
> account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix
> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on
> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> 
> 
> Juergen
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org