cxfrs improvment

[Tapdur <ta...@gmail.com>]

hi the comunity

i have a question on the cxf improvment, why do we need to provide a bean
service to put an Exchange message to a camel route ? as we only need on
reception of http request to put a message with the headers and the body to
a camel route ? 

is it a 2.2.0 feature ? if already in the trunk how wich is the generic
consumer component ?

Thx
Bruno
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/cxfrs-improvment-tp27493187p27493187.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: cxfrs improvment

[Willem Jiang <wi...@gmail.com>]

If you just want t generic consumer which can deal with the Http 
request, you can take a look at camel-jetty[1] component or 
camel-restlet[2].

[1]http://camel.apache.org/jetty.html
[2]http://camel.apache.org/restlet.html

Willem

Tapdur wrote:
> hi the comunity
> 
> i have a question on the cxf improvment, why do we need to provide a bean
> service to put an Exchange message to a camel route ? as we only need on
> reception of http request to put a message with the headers and the body to
> a camel route ? 
> 
> is it a 2.2.0 feature ? if already in the trunk how wich is the generic
> consumer component ?
> 
> Thx
> Bruno