You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Ian Holsman <Ia...@cnet.com> on 2001/04/25 22:27:47 UTC

FW: Packaging of apache 2.0


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nalin Dahyabhai [mailto:nalin@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 1:31 PM
> To: Ian Holsman
> Cc: Jean-Michel Dault; Mark Cox
> Subject: Re: Packaging of apache 2.0
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:34:30AM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
> > I thought you 2 might be interested in the following 
> conversation about how apache2.0 is going to 
> > be distributed.
> > 
> > the crux of the discussion is if we split out some of the 
> 'big' modules (proxy & rewrite in particular)
> > and have seperate trees, which may be either distrubted in 
> one package (the current method) or in seperate
> > tar balls (like mod_perl)
> > 
> > Here's a link to thread.
> > 
> http://www.apachelabs.org/apache-mbox/200104.mbox/%3c004101c0c
> 91d$0ccc15f0$95c0b0d0@roweclan.net%3e
> 
> Thanks for the heads-up.  If the modules were to be distributed
> separately, I expect that we'd either bundle them together as a single
> unit when building the server itself (for the sake of convenience), or
> build the modules separately using apxs.
> 
> Currently we use both methods, depending on the module, but that's a
> result of numerous decisions which have been made on a 
> per-module basis.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Nalin
>