[VOTE] Guice a.k.a DI Replacement

[Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org>]

Hi all,

as stated before ( See email thread "Container/DI")  I would like to
change the current way the DI is used in JAMES. I would like to start
a VOTE to see if others agree with using Guice for all DI stuff in the
future.
So here we go:

[ ] +1 Move to Guice for DI
[ ] +0 I don't care to much
[ ] -1 No please don't use Guice

Thx,
Norman

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Guice a.k.a DI Replacement

[Eric MacAdie <er...@MacAdie.net>]

[X] +1 Move to Guice for DI
[ ] +0 I don't care to much
[ ] -1 No please don't use Guice

Eric MacAdie

Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as stated before ( See email thread "Container/DI")  I would like to
> change the current way the DI is used in JAMES. I would like to start
> a VOTE to see if others agree with using Guice for all DI stuff in the
> future.
> So here we go:
>   



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Guice a.k.a DI Replacement

[Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org>]

[ x ] +1 Move to Guice for DI

Bye,
Norman

2009/8/14 Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org>:
> Hi all,
>
> as stated before ( See email thread "Container/DI")  I would like to
> change the current way the DI is used in JAMES. I would like to start
> a VOTE to see if others agree with using Guice for all DI stuff in the
> future.
> So here we go:
>
> [ ] +1 Move to Guice for DI
> [ ] +0 I don't care to much
> [ ] -1 No please don't use Guice
>
> Thx,
> Norman
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Guice a.k.a DI Replacement

[Bernd Fondermann <bf...@brainlounge.de>]

Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> as stated before ( See email thread "Container/DI")  I would like to
> change the current way the DI is used in JAMES. I would like to start
> a VOTE to see if others agree with using Guice for all DI stuff in the
> future.
> So here we go:
> 
[X] +1 Move to Guice for DI

 Bernd

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Guice a.k.a DI Replacement

[Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org>]

Right,

btw do you already have some idea about how this will work ? I saw you
already created the sandbox :)

Bye,
Norman

2009/8/17 Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com>:
> IMO it's not possible to bind future decisions by a past vote. at any
> time, any committer can force a vote by -1'ing a particular code
> change. so, any decision to use guice only really happens when the
> code is committed without a -1. similarly, this vote does not mean
> that committers in the future can't use some other injector or
> container a try: what matters is whether the particular code changes
> are -1'd or not.
>
> FWIW providing that there are developers willing to port james to
> guice, i'm happy for them to give it a try. if it works then i'd be
> happy to see trunk move to it.
>
> - robert
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Norman Maurer<no...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> as stated before ( See email thread "Container/DI")  I would like to
>> change the current way the DI is used in JAMES. I would like to start
>> a VOTE to see if others agree with using Guice for all DI stuff in the
>> future.
>> So here we go:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Move to Guice for DI
>> [ ] +0 I don't care to much
>> [ ] -1 No please don't use Guice
>>
>> Thx,
>> Norman
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Guice a.k.a DI Replacement

[Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com>]

IMO it's not possible to bind future decisions by a past vote. at any
time, any committer can force a vote by -1'ing a particular code
change. so, any decision to use guice only really happens when the
code is committed without a -1. similarly, this vote does not mean
that committers in the future can't use some other injector or
container a try: what matters is whether the particular code changes
are -1'd or not.

FWIW providing that there are developers willing to port james to
guice, i'm happy for them to give it a try. if it works then i'd be
happy to see trunk move to it.

- robert

On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Norman Maurer<no...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as stated before ( See email thread "Container/DI")  I would like to
> change the current way the DI is used in JAMES. I would like to start
> a VOTE to see if others agree with using Guice for all DI stuff in the
> future.
> So here we go:
>
> [ ] +1 Move to Guice for DI
> [ ] +0 I don't care to much
> [ ] -1 No please don't use Guice
>
> Thx,
> Norman
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org