You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cayenne.apache.org by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> on 2013/07/07 19:31:11 UTC

[VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

A new set of artifacts with no Rat failures is here:

http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.2M1_2/
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-112/

Please cast your votes.

Andrus

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by John Huss <jo...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me.  Looks good.  Sorry about the missing licenses in my files.

I agree about addressing these things that were brought up for the next
milestone:

1. RELEASE-NOTES.txt seems to have lost all history before 3.2M1
2. UPGRADE.txt has nothing to suggest for 3.2




On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>wrote:

> A new set of artifacts with no Rat failures is here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.2M1_2/
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-112/
>
> Please cast your votes.
>
> Andrus
>

Re: Cayenne old releases removed from the mirrors... How to restore?

Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Fixed. Thanks!

On Jul 19, 2013, at 11:58 AM, Erdinc <ko...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> http://cayenne.apache.org/2013/07/cayenne-32m1-released.html
> 
> 
> I think title is wrong('Cayenne 3.1 Beta 2 Released')
>   
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Gavin McDonald <ga...@16degrees.com.au>
> To: dev@cayenne.apache.org 
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 11:40 AM
> Subject: RE: Cayenne old releases removed from the mirrors... How to restore?
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andrus@objectstyle.org]
>> Sent: Friday, 19 July 2013 4:05 AM
>> To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
>> Cc: gavin@16degrees.com.au
>> Subject: Re: Cayenne old releases removed from the mirrors... How to
>> restore?
>> 
>> Ok, on #asfinfra I was pointed to http://archive.apache.org/dist/cayenne/
>> 
>> I guess we are good :)
>> 
> 
> That's right yep, just keep one release for each version (if more than one)
> in the svn dist location, as each new
> release occurs, svn rm the old one, which will always be available from the
> archives area.
> 
> Gav...
> 
>> Andrus
>> 
>> On Jul 18, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hey Gavin,
>>> 
>>> thanks for kicking out our new release process. What I didn't realize
> though
>> is the new mechanism completely deletes all our prior releases from the
>> mirrors. We are left with 3.2M1 only:
>>> 
>>> http://www.us.apache.org/dist/cayenne/
>>> 
>>> Not even people.apache.org:/www/www.apache.org/dist/cayenne has
>> them.
>>> 
>>> Any ideas how do we restore the archives? Otherwise we are in *serious*
>> trouble.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andrus
>>>

Re: Cayenne old releases removed from the mirrors... How to restore?

Posted by Erdinc <ko...@yahoo.com>.
http://cayenne.apache.org/2013/07/cayenne-32m1-released.html


I think title is wrong('Cayenne 3.1 Beta 2 Released')
  


________________________________
 From: Gavin McDonald <ga...@16degrees.com.au>
To: dev@cayenne.apache.org 
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 11:40 AM
Subject: RE: Cayenne old releases removed from the mirrors... How to restore?
 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andrus@objectstyle.org]
> Sent: Friday, 19 July 2013 4:05 AM
> To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
> Cc: gavin@16degrees.com.au
> Subject: Re: Cayenne old releases removed from the mirrors... How to
> restore?
> 
> Ok, on #asfinfra I was pointed to http://archive.apache.org/dist/cayenne/
> 
> I guess we are good :)
> 

That's right yep, just keep one release for each version (if more than one)
in the svn dist location, as each new
release occurs, svn rm the old one, which will always be available from the
archives area.

Gav...

> Andrus
> 
> On Jul 18, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hey Gavin,
> >
> > thanks for kicking out our new release process. What I didn't realize
though
> is the new mechanism completely deletes all our prior releases from the
> mirrors. We are left with 3.2M1 only:
> >
> > http://www.us.apache.org/dist/cayenne/
> >
> > Not even people.apache.org:/www/www.apache.org/dist/cayenne has
> them.
> >
> > Any ideas how do we restore the archives? Otherwise we are in *serious*
> trouble.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andrus
> >
> >

RE: Cayenne old releases removed from the mirrors... How to restore?

Posted by Gavin McDonald <ga...@16degrees.com.au>.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andrus@objectstyle.org]
> Sent: Friday, 19 July 2013 4:05 AM
> To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
> Cc: gavin@16degrees.com.au
> Subject: Re: Cayenne old releases removed from the mirrors... How to
> restore?
> 
> Ok, on #asfinfra I was pointed to http://archive.apache.org/dist/cayenne/
> 
> I guess we are good :)
> 

That's right yep, just keep one release for each version (if more than one)
in the svn dist location, as each new
release occurs, svn rm the old one, which will always be available from the
archives area.

Gav...

> Andrus
> 
> On Jul 18, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hey Gavin,
> >
> > thanks for kicking out our new release process. What I didn't realize
though
> is the new mechanism completely deletes all our prior releases from the
> mirrors. We are left with 3.2M1 only:
> >
> > http://www.us.apache.org/dist/cayenne/
> >
> > Not even people.apache.org:/www/www.apache.org/dist/cayenne has
> them.
> >
> > Any ideas how do we restore the archives? Otherwise we are in *serious*
> trouble.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andrus
> >
> >

Re: Cayenne old releases removed from the mirrors... How to restore?

Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Ok, on #asfinfra I was pointed to http://archive.apache.org/dist/cayenne/ 

I guess we are good :)

Andrus

On Jul 18, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:

> Hey Gavin,
> 
> thanks for kicking out our new release process. What I didn't realize though is the new mechanism completely deletes all our prior releases from the mirrors. We are left with 3.2M1 only:
> 
> http://www.us.apache.org/dist/cayenne/
> 
> Not even people.apache.org:/www/www.apache.org/dist/cayenne has them.
> 
> Any ideas how do we restore the archives? Otherwise we are in *serious* trouble.
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrus
> 
>

Cayenne old releases removed from the mirrors... How to restore?

Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Hey Gavin,

thanks for kicking out our new release process. What I didn't realize though is the new mechanism completely deletes all our prior releases from the mirrors. We are left with 3.2M1 only:

http://www.us.apache.org/dist/cayenne/

Not even people.apache.org:/www/www.apache.org/dist/cayenne has them.

Any ideas how do we restore the archives? Otherwise we are in *serious* trouble.

Thanks,
Andrus

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Yeah, I think no Java 6 may be the cause here:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14806709/application-is-using-java-6-from-apple-instead-of-java-7-from-oracle-on-mac-os-x

For now IMO we should declare Java 7 OS X Modeler support as "coming soon", release M1 and then research our options.

Andrus

On Jul 14, 2013, at 10:51 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:

> BTW, Mike, do you have both Java 6 & 7, or just 7? E.g. here is what I have on my machine:
> 
> ~: /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.7
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
> 
> ~: /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.6
> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
> 
> ~: java -version
> java version "1.7.0_25"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)
> 
> (and the Modeler somehow still picks Java 6)
> 
> Andrus
> 
> On Jul 14, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> 
>> I suspect OS X already cached some information associated with this particular download on your machine. 
>> 
>> Not sure how we get out of a bind with the release vote here? Maybe you take the release "src" assembly (which is from the ASF perspective is the only thing that matters in a release; of course the end users may have a different opinion :)), build an OS X assembly from it locally, and test the Modeler based on your build? Not ideal, bit without having a clue as to the nature of the Modeler failures not sure what else we can do.
>> 
>> Andrus
>> 
>> 
>> On Jul 14, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>>> I've rebooted, downloaded using different browsers, and tried Ari's
>>> trick of docking the modeler/etc, but still no luck running it from
>>> the distribution copy (the one I built locally runs).  I suppose it
>>> could just be my system and if so, I'll be neutral on the release.  My
>>> system is up-to-date:
>>> 
>>> [11:05:18] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> java -version
>>> java version "1.7.0_25"
>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)
>>> 
>>> And I'm on 10.8.4, just like Andrus.
>>> 
>>> mrg
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org> wrote:
>>>> Yes, I see the same random behaviour with another of my projects. Only on
>>>> OSX and there is no discernable pattern. A workstation will fail in just
>>>> that way. But then you can drag the app to the Dock and run it from there
>>>> just fine. After you do that, the original app might then be double
>>>> clickable again.
>>>> 
>>>> I am pretty sure this is just a runtime OSX/Java oddity and nothing to do
>>>> with the build itself being broken. We have seen it happen less often since
>>>> our machines moved to Java 7.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Ari
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 14/07/13 1:48am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I recall one of my colleagues ran into a similar unexplainable behavior
>>>>> with a newly downloaded Modeler about a year ago. That was a version of
>>>>> Cayenne that was current back then. We went through a bunch of random
>>>>> motions - reboots, re-downloads, and eventually it worked. Also couldn't
>>>>> figure out the cause… I attribute it to some OS X bug.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Andrus
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 6:13 PM, John Huss <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Both worked for me as well.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Saturday, July 13, 2013, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This is very odd. I just downloaded a fresh copy via FireFox, and it
>>>>>>> opens
>>>>>>> just fine on my laptop (after expected warnings about opening downloaded
>>>>>>> software for the first time). Also both from mounted image and from
>>>>>>> Desktop. I have OS X 10.8.4.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Michael Gentry
>>>>>>> <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> FWIW, I just built the OS X assembly and it runs fine (HD and DMG),
>>>>>>>> but the downloaded version didn't for some reason.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Michael Gentry
>>>>>>>> <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -1
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> MD5 for OS X DMG is correct, but Cayenne Modeler fails to launch from
>>>>>>>>> both the mounted disk image and the HD (copied from the disk image)
>>>>>>>>> with the following alert:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> “CayenneModeler.app” is damaged and can’t be opened. You should move
>>>>>>>>> it to the Trash.
>>>>>>>>> Safari downloaded this file today at 9:37 AM from people.apache.org.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The console didn't provide anything useful when canceling the alert:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 7/13/13 9:50:23.601 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[342]:
>>>>>>>>> ([0x0-0x35c35c].CayenneModeler[6610]) Exited: Killed: 9
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I'm on Mountain Lion with the latest Java release.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>>> <ari@maniatis.org<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/07/13 9:04am, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors you
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> must
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>>>>>> your approved release to the above release area.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6537
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> -------------------------->
>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
>

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>.
Yep, and a +1 from me.

Ari


On 15/07/13 11:28pm, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> Oops.   Just realized I never cast my vote.
>
> Source provided: check
> checksums match: check
> signatures match: check
> Source builds: check
> appropriately licensed: checked by rat
>
> +1
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>> OK, a +1 from me (I'm assuming my Mac is just having a Java glitch).
>>
>> BTW, I built Cayenne Modeler from the source download using Java 6 and
>> 7 and both ran fine.  It is just the DMG version that trolls me.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> mrg
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>>> PS. I can just skip the OS X stuff and do the rest of the evaluation.
>>>
>>> Probably at this point this is the best option :-/
>>>
>>> On Jul 15, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> [07:47:10] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> /usr/libexec/java_home -V
>>>> Matching Java Virtual Machines (4):
>>>>     1.7.0_25, x86_64: "Java SE 7"
>>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>>     1.7.0_07, x86_64: "Java SE 7"
>>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_07.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>>     1.6.0_51-b11-456, x86_64: "Java SE 6"
>>>> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>>     1.6.0_51-b11-456, i386: "Java SE 6"
>>>> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>>
>>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>>
>>>> [07:47:22] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> /usr/libexec/java_home
>>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>>
>>>> Cayenne Modeler *does* run, just not the one distributed in the DMG.
>>>> I built CM from the source distribution using "/usr/bin/mvn clean
>>>> install -Passembly,mac" and it runs fine, so I don't think it is an
>>>> issue with choosing the Java version.
>>>>
>>>> mrg
>>>>
>>>> PS. I can just skip the OS X stuff and do the rest of the evaluation.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>>>> BTW, Mike, do you have both Java 6 & 7, or just 7? E.g. here is what I have on my machine:
>>>>>
>>>>> ~: /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.7
>>>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>>>
>>>>> ~: /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.6
>>>>> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>>>
>>>>> ~: java -version
>>>>> java version "1.7.0_25"
>>>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
>>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)
>>>>>
>>>>> (and the Modeler somehow still picks Java 6)
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 14, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I suspect OS X already cached some information associated with this particular download on your machine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not sure how we get out of a bind with the release vote here? Maybe you take the release "src" assembly (which is from the ASF perspective is the only thing that matters in a release; of course the end users may have a different opinion :)), build an OS X assembly from it locally, and test the Modeler based on your build? Not ideal, bit without having a clue as to the nature of the Modeler failures not sure what else we can do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 14, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> I've rebooted, downloaded using different browsers, and tried Ari's
>>>>>>> trick of docking the modeler/etc, but still no luck running it from
>>>>>>> the distribution copy (the one I built locally runs).  I suppose it
>>>>>>> could just be my system and if so, I'll be neutral on the release.  My
>>>>>>> system is up-to-date:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [11:05:18] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> java -version
>>>>>>> java version "1.7.0_25"
>>>>>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
>>>>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And I'm on 10.8.4, just like Andrus.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Yes, I see the same random behaviour with another of my projects. Only on
>>>>>>>> OSX and there is no discernable pattern. A workstation will fail in just
>>>>>>>> that way. But then you can drag the app to the Dock and run it from there
>>>>>>>> just fine. After you do that, the original app might then be double
>>>>>>>> clickable again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am pretty sure this is just a runtime OSX/Java oddity and nothing to do
>>>>>>>> with the build itself being broken. We have seen it happen less often since
>>>>>>>> our machines moved to Java 7.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 14/07/13 1:48am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I recall one of my colleagues ran into a similar unexplainable behavior
>>>>>>>>> with a newly downloaded Modeler about a year ago. That was a version of
>>>>>>>>> Cayenne that was current back then. We went through a bunch of random
>>>>>>>>> motions - reboots, re-downloads, and eventually it worked. Also couldn't
>>>>>>>>> figure out the cause… I attribute it to some OS X bug.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 6:13 PM, John Huss <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Both worked for me as well.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, July 13, 2013, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This is very odd. I just downloaded a fresh copy via FireFox, and it
>>>>>>>>>>> opens
>>>>>>>>>>> just fine on my laptop (after expected warnings about opening downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>> software for the first time). Also both from mounted image and from
>>>>>>>>>>> Desktop. I have OS X 10.8.4.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Michael Gentry
>>>>>>>>>>> <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> FWIW, I just built the OS X assembly and it runs fine (HD and DMG),
>>>>>>>>>>>> but the downloaded version didn't for some reason.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Michael Gentry
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> MD5 for OS X DMG is correct, but Cayenne Modeler fails to launch from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> both the mounted disk image and the HD (copied from the disk image)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the following alert:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> “CayenneModeler.app” is damaged and can’t be opened. You should move
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to the Trash.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Safari downloaded this file today at 9:37 AM from people.apache.org.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The console didn't provide anything useful when canceling the alert:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7/13/13 9:50:23.601 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[342]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ([0x0-0x35c35c].CayenneModeler[6610]) Exited: Killed: 9
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm on Mountain Lion with the latest Java release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ari@maniatis.org<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/07/13 9:04am, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors you
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> must
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your approved release to the above release area.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6537
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>

-- 
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
I did the same tests as Mike, plus compared the built JARs vs the
distributed JARs, and tested the modeler a bit.

Thanks,

mrg

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oops.   Just realized I never cast my vote.
>
> Source provided: check
> checksums match: check
> signatures match: check
> Source builds: check
> appropriately licensed: checked by rat
>
> +1
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>> OK, a +1 from me (I'm assuming my Mac is just having a Java glitch).
>>
>> BTW, I built Cayenne Modeler from the source download using Java 6 and
>> 7 and both ran fine.  It is just the DMG version that trolls me.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> mrg
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>>> PS. I can just skip the OS X stuff and do the rest of the evaluation.
>>>
>>> Probably at this point this is the best option :-/
>>>
>>> On Jul 15, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> [07:47:10] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> /usr/libexec/java_home -V
>>>> Matching Java Virtual Machines (4):
>>>>    1.7.0_25, x86_64: "Java SE 7"
>>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>>    1.7.0_07, x86_64: "Java SE 7"
>>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_07.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>>    1.6.0_51-b11-456, x86_64: "Java SE 6"
>>>> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>>    1.6.0_51-b11-456, i386: "Java SE 6"
>>>> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>>
>>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>>
>>>> [07:47:22] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> /usr/libexec/java_home
>>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>>
>>>> Cayenne Modeler *does* run, just not the one distributed in the DMG.
>>>> I built CM from the source distribution using "/usr/bin/mvn clean
>>>> install -Passembly,mac" and it runs fine, so I don't think it is an
>>>> issue with choosing the Java version.
>>>>
>>>> mrg
>>>>
>>>> PS. I can just skip the OS X stuff and do the rest of the evaluation.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>>>> BTW, Mike, do you have both Java 6 & 7, or just 7? E.g. here is what I have on my machine:
>>>>>
>>>>> ~: /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.7
>>>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>>>
>>>>> ~: /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.6
>>>>> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>>>
>>>>> ~: java -version
>>>>> java version "1.7.0_25"
>>>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
>>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)
>>>>>
>>>>> (and the Modeler somehow still picks Java 6)
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 14, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I suspect OS X already cached some information associated with this particular download on your machine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not sure how we get out of a bind with the release vote here? Maybe you take the release "src" assembly (which is from the ASF perspective is the only thing that matters in a release; of course the end users may have a different opinion :)), build an OS X assembly from it locally, and test the Modeler based on your build? Not ideal, bit without having a clue as to the nature of the Modeler failures not sure what else we can do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 14, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> I've rebooted, downloaded using different browsers, and tried Ari's
>>>>>>> trick of docking the modeler/etc, but still no luck running it from
>>>>>>> the distribution copy (the one I built locally runs).  I suppose it
>>>>>>> could just be my system and if so, I'll be neutral on the release.  My
>>>>>>> system is up-to-date:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [11:05:18] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> java -version
>>>>>>> java version "1.7.0_25"
>>>>>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
>>>>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And I'm on 10.8.4, just like Andrus.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Yes, I see the same random behaviour with another of my projects. Only on
>>>>>>>> OSX and there is no discernable pattern. A workstation will fail in just
>>>>>>>> that way. But then you can drag the app to the Dock and run it from there
>>>>>>>> just fine. After you do that, the original app might then be double
>>>>>>>> clickable again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am pretty sure this is just a runtime OSX/Java oddity and nothing to do
>>>>>>>> with the build itself being broken. We have seen it happen less often since
>>>>>>>> our machines moved to Java 7.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 14/07/13 1:48am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I recall one of my colleagues ran into a similar unexplainable behavior
>>>>>>>>> with a newly downloaded Modeler about a year ago. That was a version of
>>>>>>>>> Cayenne that was current back then. We went through a bunch of random
>>>>>>>>> motions - reboots, re-downloads, and eventually it worked. Also couldn't
>>>>>>>>> figure out the cause… I attribute it to some OS X bug.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 6:13 PM, John Huss <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Both worked for me as well.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, July 13, 2013, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This is very odd. I just downloaded a fresh copy via FireFox, and it
>>>>>>>>>>> opens
>>>>>>>>>>> just fine on my laptop (after expected warnings about opening downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>> software for the first time). Also both from mounted image and from
>>>>>>>>>>> Desktop. I have OS X 10.8.4.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Michael Gentry
>>>>>>>>>>> <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> FWIW, I just built the OS X assembly and it runs fine (HD and DMG),
>>>>>>>>>>>> but the downloaded version didn't for some reason.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Michael Gentry
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> MD5 for OS X DMG is correct, but Cayenne Modeler fails to launch from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> both the mounted disk image and the HD (copied from the disk image)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the following alert:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> “CayenneModeler.app” is damaged and can’t be opened. You should move
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to the Trash.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Safari downloaded this file today at 9:37 AM from people.apache.org.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The console didn't provide anything useful when canceling the alert:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7/13/13 9:50:23.601 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[342]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ([0x0-0x35c35c].CayenneModeler[6610]) Exited: Killed: 9
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm on Mountain Lion with the latest Java release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ari@maniatis.org<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/07/13 9:04am, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors you
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> must
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your approved release to the above release area.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6537
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>.
Oops.   Just realized I never cast my vote.

Source provided: check
checksums match: check
signatures match: check
Source builds: check
appropriately licensed: checked by rat

+1


On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
> OK, a +1 from me (I'm assuming my Mac is just having a Java glitch).
>
> BTW, I built Cayenne Modeler from the source download using Java 6 and
> 7 and both ran fine.  It is just the DMG version that trolls me.
>
> Thanks,
>
> mrg
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>> PS. I can just skip the OS X stuff and do the rest of the evaluation.
>>
>> Probably at this point this is the best option :-/
>>
>> On Jul 15, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>>
>>> [07:47:10] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> /usr/libexec/java_home -V
>>> Matching Java Virtual Machines (4):
>>>    1.7.0_25, x86_64: "Java SE 7"
>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>    1.7.0_07, x86_64: "Java SE 7"
>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_07.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>    1.6.0_51-b11-456, x86_64: "Java SE 6"
>>> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>    1.6.0_51-b11-456, i386: "Java SE 6"
>>> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>
>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>
>>> [07:47:22] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> /usr/libexec/java_home
>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>
>>> Cayenne Modeler *does* run, just not the one distributed in the DMG.
>>> I built CM from the source distribution using "/usr/bin/mvn clean
>>> install -Passembly,mac" and it runs fine, so I don't think it is an
>>> issue with choosing the Java version.
>>>
>>> mrg
>>>
>>> PS. I can just skip the OS X stuff and do the rest of the evaluation.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>>> BTW, Mike, do you have both Java 6 & 7, or just 7? E.g. here is what I have on my machine:
>>>>
>>>> ~: /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.7
>>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>>
>>>> ~: /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.6
>>>> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>>
>>>> ~: java -version
>>>> java version "1.7.0_25"
>>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)
>>>>
>>>> (and the Modeler somehow still picks Java 6)
>>>>
>>>> Andrus
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 14, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I suspect OS X already cached some information associated with this particular download on your machine.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not sure how we get out of a bind with the release vote here? Maybe you take the release "src" assembly (which is from the ASF perspective is the only thing that matters in a release; of course the end users may have a different opinion :)), build an OS X assembly from it locally, and test the Modeler based on your build? Not ideal, bit without having a clue as to the nature of the Modeler failures not sure what else we can do.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 14, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>>>>>> I've rebooted, downloaded using different browsers, and tried Ari's
>>>>>> trick of docking the modeler/etc, but still no luck running it from
>>>>>> the distribution copy (the one I built locally runs).  I suppose it
>>>>>> could just be my system and if so, I'll be neutral on the release.  My
>>>>>> system is up-to-date:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [11:05:18] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> java -version
>>>>>> java version "1.7.0_25"
>>>>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
>>>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And I'm on 10.8.4, just like Andrus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> Yes, I see the same random behaviour with another of my projects. Only on
>>>>>>> OSX and there is no discernable pattern. A workstation will fail in just
>>>>>>> that way. But then you can drag the app to the Dock and run it from there
>>>>>>> just fine. After you do that, the original app might then be double
>>>>>>> clickable again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am pretty sure this is just a runtime OSX/Java oddity and nothing to do
>>>>>>> with the build itself being broken. We have seen it happen less often since
>>>>>>> our machines moved to Java 7.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 14/07/13 1:48am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I recall one of my colleagues ran into a similar unexplainable behavior
>>>>>>>> with a newly downloaded Modeler about a year ago. That was a version of
>>>>>>>> Cayenne that was current back then. We went through a bunch of random
>>>>>>>> motions - reboots, re-downloads, and eventually it worked. Also couldn't
>>>>>>>> figure out the cause… I attribute it to some OS X bug.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 6:13 PM, John Huss <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Both worked for me as well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, July 13, 2013, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is very odd. I just downloaded a fresh copy via FireFox, and it
>>>>>>>>>> opens
>>>>>>>>>> just fine on my laptop (after expected warnings about opening downloaded
>>>>>>>>>> software for the first time). Also both from mounted image and from
>>>>>>>>>> Desktop. I have OS X 10.8.4.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Michael Gentry
>>>>>>>>>> <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> FWIW, I just built the OS X assembly and it runs fine (HD and DMG),
>>>>>>>>>>> but the downloaded version didn't for some reason.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Michael Gentry
>>>>>>>>>>> <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -1
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> MD5 for OS X DMG is correct, but Cayenne Modeler fails to launch from
>>>>>>>>>>>> both the mounted disk image and the HD (copied from the disk image)
>>>>>>>>>>>> with the following alert:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> “CayenneModeler.app” is damaged and can’t be opened. You should move
>>>>>>>>>>>> it to the Trash.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Safari downloaded this file today at 9:37 AM from people.apache.org.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The console didn't provide anything useful when canceling the alert:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 7/13/13 9:50:23.601 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[342]:
>>>>>>>>>>>> ([0x0-0x35c35c].CayenneModeler[6610]) Exited: Killed: 9
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm on Mountain Lion with the latest Java release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>>>>>> <ari@maniatis.org<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/07/13 9:04am, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors you
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> must
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your approved release to the above release area.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6537
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
OK, a +1 from me (I'm assuming my Mac is just having a Java glitch).

BTW, I built Cayenne Modeler from the source download using Java 6 and
7 and both ran fine.  It is just the DMG version that trolls me.

Thanks,

mrg


On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>> PS. I can just skip the OS X stuff and do the rest of the evaluation.
>
> Probably at this point this is the best option :-/
>
> On Jul 15, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>
>> [07:47:10] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> /usr/libexec/java_home -V
>> Matching Java Virtual Machines (4):
>>    1.7.0_25, x86_64: "Java SE 7"
>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
>>    1.7.0_07, x86_64: "Java SE 7"
>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_07.jdk/Contents/Home
>>    1.6.0_51-b11-456, x86_64: "Java SE 6"
>> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
>>    1.6.0_51-b11-456, i386: "Java SE 6"
>> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
>>
>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
>>
>> [07:47:22] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> /usr/libexec/java_home
>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
>>
>> Cayenne Modeler *does* run, just not the one distributed in the DMG.
>> I built CM from the source distribution using "/usr/bin/mvn clean
>> install -Passembly,mac" and it runs fine, so I don't think it is an
>> issue with choosing the Java version.
>>
>> mrg
>>
>> PS. I can just skip the OS X stuff and do the rest of the evaluation.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>> BTW, Mike, do you have both Java 6 & 7, or just 7? E.g. here is what I have on my machine:
>>>
>>> ~: /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.7
>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>
>>> ~: /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.6
>>> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
>>>
>>> ~: java -version
>>> java version "1.7.0_25"
>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)
>>>
>>> (and the Modeler somehow still picks Java 6)
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>> On Jul 14, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I suspect OS X already cached some information associated with this particular download on your machine.
>>>>
>>>> Not sure how we get out of a bind with the release vote here? Maybe you take the release "src" assembly (which is from the ASF perspective is the only thing that matters in a release; of course the end users may have a different opinion :)), build an OS X assembly from it locally, and test the Modeler based on your build? Not ideal, bit without having a clue as to the nature of the Modeler failures not sure what else we can do.
>>>>
>>>> Andrus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 14, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>>>>> I've rebooted, downloaded using different browsers, and tried Ari's
>>>>> trick of docking the modeler/etc, but still no luck running it from
>>>>> the distribution copy (the one I built locally runs).  I suppose it
>>>>> could just be my system and if so, I'll be neutral on the release.  My
>>>>> system is up-to-date:
>>>>>
>>>>> [11:05:18] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> java -version
>>>>> java version "1.7.0_25"
>>>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
>>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)
>>>>>
>>>>> And I'm on 10.8.4, just like Andrus.
>>>>>
>>>>> mrg
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Yes, I see the same random behaviour with another of my projects. Only on
>>>>>> OSX and there is no discernable pattern. A workstation will fail in just
>>>>>> that way. But then you can drag the app to the Dock and run it from there
>>>>>> just fine. After you do that, the original app might then be double
>>>>>> clickable again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am pretty sure this is just a runtime OSX/Java oddity and nothing to do
>>>>>> with the build itself being broken. We have seen it happen less often since
>>>>>> our machines moved to Java 7.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 14/07/13 1:48am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I recall one of my colleagues ran into a similar unexplainable behavior
>>>>>>> with a newly downloaded Modeler about a year ago. That was a version of
>>>>>>> Cayenne that was current back then. We went through a bunch of random
>>>>>>> motions - reboots, re-downloads, and eventually it worked. Also couldn't
>>>>>>> figure out the cause… I attribute it to some OS X bug.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 6:13 PM, John Huss <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Both worked for me as well.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Saturday, July 13, 2013, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is very odd. I just downloaded a fresh copy via FireFox, and it
>>>>>>>>> opens
>>>>>>>>> just fine on my laptop (after expected warnings about opening downloaded
>>>>>>>>> software for the first time). Also both from mounted image and from
>>>>>>>>> Desktop. I have OS X 10.8.4.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Michael Gentry
>>>>>>>>> <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> FWIW, I just built the OS X assembly and it runs fine (HD and DMG),
>>>>>>>>>> but the downloaded version didn't for some reason.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Michael Gentry
>>>>>>>>>> <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> MD5 for OS X DMG is correct, but Cayenne Modeler fails to launch from
>>>>>>>>>>> both the mounted disk image and the HD (copied from the disk image)
>>>>>>>>>>> with the following alert:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> “CayenneModeler.app” is damaged and can’t be opened. You should move
>>>>>>>>>>> it to the Trash.
>>>>>>>>>>> Safari downloaded this file today at 9:37 AM from people.apache.org.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The console didn't provide anything useful when canceling the alert:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 7/13/13 9:50:23.601 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[342]:
>>>>>>>>>>> ([0x0-0x35c35c].CayenneModeler[6610]) Exited: Killed: 9
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm on Mountain Lion with the latest Java release.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>>>>> <ari@maniatis.org<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/07/13 9:04am, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors you
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> must
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your approved release to the above release area.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6537
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
> PS. I can just skip the OS X stuff and do the rest of the evaluation.

Probably at this point this is the best option :-/

On Jul 15, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:

> [07:47:10] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> /usr/libexec/java_home -V
> Matching Java Virtual Machines (4):
>    1.7.0_25, x86_64: "Java SE 7"
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
>    1.7.0_07, x86_64: "Java SE 7"
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_07.jdk/Contents/Home
>    1.6.0_51-b11-456, x86_64: "Java SE 6"
> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
>    1.6.0_51-b11-456, i386: "Java SE 6"
> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
> 
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
> 
> [07:47:22] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> /usr/libexec/java_home
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
> 
> Cayenne Modeler *does* run, just not the one distributed in the DMG.
> I built CM from the source distribution using "/usr/bin/mvn clean
> install -Passembly,mac" and it runs fine, so I don't think it is an
> issue with choosing the Java version.
> 
> mrg
> 
> PS. I can just skip the OS X stuff and do the rest of the evaluation.
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>> BTW, Mike, do you have both Java 6 & 7, or just 7? E.g. here is what I have on my machine:
>> 
>> ~: /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.7
>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
>> 
>> ~: /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.6
>> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
>> 
>> ~: java -version
>> java version "1.7.0_25"
>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)
>> 
>> (and the Modeler somehow still picks Java 6)
>> 
>> Andrus
>> 
>> On Jul 14, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> I suspect OS X already cached some information associated with this particular download on your machine.
>>> 
>>> Not sure how we get out of a bind with the release vote here? Maybe you take the release "src" assembly (which is from the ASF perspective is the only thing that matters in a release; of course the end users may have a different opinion :)), build an OS X assembly from it locally, and test the Modeler based on your build? Not ideal, bit without having a clue as to the nature of the Modeler failures not sure what else we can do.
>>> 
>>> Andrus
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jul 14, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>>>> I've rebooted, downloaded using different browsers, and tried Ari's
>>>> trick of docking the modeler/etc, but still no luck running it from
>>>> the distribution copy (the one I built locally runs).  I suppose it
>>>> could just be my system and if so, I'll be neutral on the release.  My
>>>> system is up-to-date:
>>>> 
>>>> [11:05:18] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> java -version
>>>> java version "1.7.0_25"
>>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)
>>>> 
>>>> And I'm on 10.8.4, just like Andrus.
>>>> 
>>>> mrg
>>>> 
>>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org> wrote:
>>>>> Yes, I see the same random behaviour with another of my projects. Only on
>>>>> OSX and there is no discernable pattern. A workstation will fail in just
>>>>> that way. But then you can drag the app to the Dock and run it from there
>>>>> just fine. After you do that, the original app might then be double
>>>>> clickable again.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am pretty sure this is just a runtime OSX/Java oddity and nothing to do
>>>>> with the build itself being broken. We have seen it happen less often since
>>>>> our machines moved to Java 7.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ari
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 14/07/13 1:48am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I recall one of my colleagues ran into a similar unexplainable behavior
>>>>>> with a newly downloaded Modeler about a year ago. That was a version of
>>>>>> Cayenne that was current back then. We went through a bunch of random
>>>>>> motions - reboots, re-downloads, and eventually it worked. Also couldn't
>>>>>> figure out the cause… I attribute it to some OS X bug.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 6:13 PM, John Huss <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Both worked for me as well.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Saturday, July 13, 2013, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> This is very odd. I just downloaded a fresh copy via FireFox, and it
>>>>>>>> opens
>>>>>>>> just fine on my laptop (after expected warnings about opening downloaded
>>>>>>>> software for the first time). Also both from mounted image and from
>>>>>>>> Desktop. I have OS X 10.8.4.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Michael Gentry
>>>>>>>> <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> FWIW, I just built the OS X assembly and it runs fine (HD and DMG),
>>>>>>>>> but the downloaded version didn't for some reason.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Michael Gentry
>>>>>>>>> <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> -1
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> MD5 for OS X DMG is correct, but Cayenne Modeler fails to launch from
>>>>>>>>>> both the mounted disk image and the HD (copied from the disk image)
>>>>>>>>>> with the following alert:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> “CayenneModeler.app” is damaged and can’t be opened. You should move
>>>>>>>>>> it to the Trash.
>>>>>>>>>> Safari downloaded this file today at 9:37 AM from people.apache.org.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The console didn't provide anything useful when canceling the alert:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 7/13/13 9:50:23.601 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[342]:
>>>>>>>>>> ([0x0-0x35c35c].CayenneModeler[6610]) Exited: Killed: 9
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I'm on Mountain Lion with the latest Java release.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>>>> <ari@maniatis.org<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/07/13 9:04am, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors you
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> must
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>>>>>>> your approved release to the above release area.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6537
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
[07:47:10] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> /usr/libexec/java_home -V
Matching Java Virtual Machines (4):
    1.7.0_25, x86_64: "Java SE 7"
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
    1.7.0_07, x86_64: "Java SE 7"
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_07.jdk/Contents/Home
    1.6.0_51-b11-456, x86_64: "Java SE 6"
/System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
    1.6.0_51-b11-456, i386: "Java SE 6"
/System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home

/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home

[07:47:22] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> /usr/libexec/java_home
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home

Cayenne Modeler *does* run, just not the one distributed in the DMG.
I built CM from the source distribution using "/usr/bin/mvn clean
install -Passembly,mac" and it runs fine, so I don't think it is an
issue with choosing the Java version.

mrg

PS. I can just skip the OS X stuff and do the rest of the evaluation.


On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> BTW, Mike, do you have both Java 6 & 7, or just 7? E.g. here is what I have on my machine:
>
> ~: /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.7
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
>
> ~: /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.6
> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
>
> ~: java -version
> java version "1.7.0_25"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)
>
> (and the Modeler somehow still picks Java 6)
>
> Andrus
>
> On Jul 14, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>
>> I suspect OS X already cached some information associated with this particular download on your machine.
>>
>> Not sure how we get out of a bind with the release vote here? Maybe you take the release "src" assembly (which is from the ASF perspective is the only thing that matters in a release; of course the end users may have a different opinion :)), build an OS X assembly from it locally, and test the Modeler based on your build? Not ideal, bit without having a clue as to the nature of the Modeler failures not sure what else we can do.
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>> On Jul 14, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>>> I've rebooted, downloaded using different browsers, and tried Ari's
>>> trick of docking the modeler/etc, but still no luck running it from
>>> the distribution copy (the one I built locally runs).  I suppose it
>>> could just be my system and if so, I'll be neutral on the release.  My
>>> system is up-to-date:
>>>
>>> [11:05:18] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> java -version
>>> java version "1.7.0_25"
>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)
>>>
>>> And I'm on 10.8.4, just like Andrus.
>>>
>>> mrg
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org> wrote:
>>>> Yes, I see the same random behaviour with another of my projects. Only on
>>>> OSX and there is no discernable pattern. A workstation will fail in just
>>>> that way. But then you can drag the app to the Dock and run it from there
>>>> just fine. After you do that, the original app might then be double
>>>> clickable again.
>>>>
>>>> I am pretty sure this is just a runtime OSX/Java oddity and nothing to do
>>>> with the build itself being broken. We have seen it happen less often since
>>>> our machines moved to Java 7.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ari
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 14/07/13 1:48am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I recall one of my colleagues ran into a similar unexplainable behavior
>>>>> with a newly downloaded Modeler about a year ago. That was a version of
>>>>> Cayenne that was current back then. We went through a bunch of random
>>>>> motions - reboots, re-downloads, and eventually it worked. Also couldn't
>>>>> figure out the cause… I attribute it to some OS X bug.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 6:13 PM, John Huss <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Both worked for me as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, July 13, 2013, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is very odd. I just downloaded a fresh copy via FireFox, and it
>>>>>>> opens
>>>>>>> just fine on my laptop (after expected warnings about opening downloaded
>>>>>>> software for the first time). Also both from mounted image and from
>>>>>>> Desktop. I have OS X 10.8.4.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Michael Gentry
>>>>>>> <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> FWIW, I just built the OS X assembly and it runs fine (HD and DMG),
>>>>>>>> but the downloaded version didn't for some reason.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Michael Gentry
>>>>>>>> <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> MD5 for OS X DMG is correct, but Cayenne Modeler fails to launch from
>>>>>>>>> both the mounted disk image and the HD (copied from the disk image)
>>>>>>>>> with the following alert:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> “CayenneModeler.app” is damaged and can’t be opened. You should move
>>>>>>>>> it to the Trash.
>>>>>>>>> Safari downloaded this file today at 9:37 AM from people.apache.org.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The console didn't provide anything useful when canceling the alert:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 7/13/13 9:50:23.601 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[342]:
>>>>>>>>> ([0x0-0x35c35c].CayenneModeler[6610]) Exited: Killed: 9
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm on Mountain Lion with the latest Java release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>>> <ari@maniatis.org<javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/07/13 9:04am, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors you
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> must
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>>>>>> your approved release to the above release area.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6537
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -------------------------->
>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
BTW, Mike, do you have both Java 6 & 7, or just 7? E.g. here is what I have on my machine:

~: /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.7
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home

~: /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.6
/System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home

~: java -version
java version "1.7.0_25"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)

(and the Modeler somehow still picks Java 6)

Andrus

On Jul 14, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:

> I suspect OS X already cached some information associated with this particular download on your machine. 
> 
> Not sure how we get out of a bind with the release vote here? Maybe you take the release "src" assembly (which is from the ASF perspective is the only thing that matters in a release; of course the end users may have a different opinion :)), build an OS X assembly from it locally, and test the Modeler based on your build? Not ideal, bit without having a clue as to the nature of the Modeler failures not sure what else we can do.
> 
> Andrus
> 
> 
> On Jul 14, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>> I've rebooted, downloaded using different browsers, and tried Ari's
>> trick of docking the modeler/etc, but still no luck running it from
>> the distribution copy (the one I built locally runs).  I suppose it
>> could just be my system and if so, I'll be neutral on the release.  My
>> system is up-to-date:
>> 
>> [11:05:18] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> java -version
>> java version "1.7.0_25"
>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)
>> 
>> And I'm on 10.8.4, just like Andrus.
>> 
>> mrg
>> 
>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org> wrote:
>>> Yes, I see the same random behaviour with another of my projects. Only on
>>> OSX and there is no discernable pattern. A workstation will fail in just
>>> that way. But then you can drag the app to the Dock and run it from there
>>> just fine. After you do that, the original app might then be double
>>> clickable again.
>>> 
>>> I am pretty sure this is just a runtime OSX/Java oddity and nothing to do
>>> with the build itself being broken. We have seen it happen less often since
>>> our machines moved to Java 7.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Ari
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 14/07/13 1:48am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I recall one of my colleagues ran into a similar unexplainable behavior
>>>> with a newly downloaded Modeler about a year ago. That was a version of
>>>> Cayenne that was current back then. We went through a bunch of random
>>>> motions - reboots, re-downloads, and eventually it worked. Also couldn't
>>>> figure out the cause… I attribute it to some OS X bug.
>>>> 
>>>> Andrus
>>>> 
>>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 6:13 PM, John Huss <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Both worked for me as well.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Saturday, July 13, 2013, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is very odd. I just downloaded a fresh copy via FireFox, and it
>>>>>> opens
>>>>>> just fine on my laptop (after expected warnings about opening downloaded
>>>>>> software for the first time). Also both from mounted image and from
>>>>>> Desktop. I have OS X 10.8.4.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Michael Gentry
>>>>>> <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> FWIW, I just built the OS X assembly and it runs fine (HD and DMG),
>>>>>>> but the downloaded version didn't for some reason.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Michael Gentry
>>>>>>> <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> MD5 for OS X DMG is correct, but Cayenne Modeler fails to launch from
>>>>>>>> both the mounted disk image and the HD (copied from the disk image)
>>>>>>>> with the following alert:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> “CayenneModeler.app” is damaged and can’t be opened. You should move
>>>>>>>> it to the Trash.
>>>>>>>> Safari downloaded this file today at 9:37 AM from people.apache.org.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The console didn't provide anything useful when canceling the alert:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 7/13/13 9:50:23.601 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[342]:
>>>>>>>> ([0x0-0x35c35c].CayenneModeler[6610]) Exited: Killed: 9
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'm on Mountain Lion with the latest Java release.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>> <ari@maniatis.org<javascript:;>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 10/07/13 9:04am, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors you
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> must
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>>>>> your approved release to the above release area.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6537
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> -------------------------->
>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>> 
> 
>

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
I suspect OS X already cached some information associated with this particular download on your machine. 

Not sure how we get out of a bind with the release vote here? Maybe you take the release "src" assembly (which is from the ASF perspective is the only thing that matters in a release; of course the end users may have a different opinion :)), build an OS X assembly from it locally, and test the Modeler based on your build? Not ideal, bit without having a clue as to the nature of the Modeler failures not sure what else we can do.

Andrus


On Jul 14, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
> I've rebooted, downloaded using different browsers, and tried Ari's
> trick of docking the modeler/etc, but still no luck running it from
> the distribution copy (the one I built locally runs).  I suppose it
> could just be my system and if so, I'll be neutral on the release.  My
> system is up-to-date:
> 
> [11:05:18] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> java -version
> java version "1.7.0_25"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)
> 
> And I'm on 10.8.4, just like Andrus.
> 
> mrg
> 
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org> wrote:
>> Yes, I see the same random behaviour with another of my projects. Only on
>> OSX and there is no discernable pattern. A workstation will fail in just
>> that way. But then you can drag the app to the Dock and run it from there
>> just fine. After you do that, the original app might then be double
>> clickable again.
>> 
>> I am pretty sure this is just a runtime OSX/Java oddity and nothing to do
>> with the build itself being broken. We have seen it happen less often since
>> our machines moved to Java 7.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Ari
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 14/07/13 1:48am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>> 
>>> I recall one of my colleagues ran into a similar unexplainable behavior
>>> with a newly downloaded Modeler about a year ago. That was a version of
>>> Cayenne that was current back then. We went through a bunch of random
>>> motions - reboots, re-downloads, and eventually it worked. Also couldn't
>>> figure out the cause… I attribute it to some OS X bug.
>>> 
>>> Andrus
>>> 
>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 6:13 PM, John Huss <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Both worked for me as well.
>>>> 
>>>> On Saturday, July 13, 2013, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> This is very odd. I just downloaded a fresh copy via FireFox, and it
>>>>> opens
>>>>> just fine on my laptop (after expected warnings about opening downloaded
>>>>> software for the first time). Also both from mounted image and from
>>>>> Desktop. I have OS X 10.8.4.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Andrus
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Michael Gentry
>>>>> <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> FWIW, I just built the OS X assembly and it runs fine (HD and DMG),
>>>>>> but the downloaded version didn't for some reason.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Michael Gentry
>>>>>> <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -1
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> MD5 for OS X DMG is correct, but Cayenne Modeler fails to launch from
>>>>>>> both the mounted disk image and the HD (copied from the disk image)
>>>>>>> with the following alert:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> “CayenneModeler.app” is damaged and can’t be opened. You should move
>>>>>>> it to the Trash.
>>>>>>> Safari downloaded this file today at 9:37 AM from people.apache.org.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The console didn't provide anything useful when canceling the alert:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 7/13/13 9:50:23.601 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[342]:
>>>>>>> ([0x0-0x35c35c].CayenneModeler[6610]) Exited: Killed: 9
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm on Mountain Lion with the latest Java release.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>> <ari@maniatis.org<javascript:;>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 10/07/13 9:04am, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors you
>>>>> 
>>>>> must
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>>>> your approved release to the above release area.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6537
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> -------------------------->
>> Aristedes Maniatis
>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
I've rebooted, downloaded using different browsers, and tried Ari's
trick of docking the modeler/etc, but still no luck running it from
the distribution copy (the one I built locally runs).  I suppose it
could just be my system and if so, I'll be neutral on the release.  My
system is up-to-date:

[11:05:18] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> java -version
java version "1.7.0_25"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)

And I'm on 10.8.4, just like Andrus.

mrg

On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org> wrote:
> Yes, I see the same random behaviour with another of my projects. Only on
> OSX and there is no discernable pattern. A workstation will fail in just
> that way. But then you can drag the app to the Dock and run it from there
> just fine. After you do that, the original app might then be double
> clickable again.
>
> I am pretty sure this is just a runtime OSX/Java oddity and nothing to do
> with the build itself being broken. We have seen it happen less often since
> our machines moved to Java 7.
>
>
>
> Ari
>
>
>
> On 14/07/13 1:48am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>
>> I recall one of my colleagues ran into a similar unexplainable behavior
>> with a newly downloaded Modeler about a year ago. That was a version of
>> Cayenne that was current back then. We went through a bunch of random
>> motions - reboots, re-downloads, and eventually it worked. Also couldn't
>> figure out the cause… I attribute it to some OS X bug.
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 6:13 PM, John Huss <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Both worked for me as well.
>>>
>>> On Saturday, July 13, 2013, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is very odd. I just downloaded a fresh copy via FireFox, and it
>>>> opens
>>>> just fine on my laptop (after expected warnings about opening downloaded
>>>> software for the first time). Also both from mounted image and from
>>>> Desktop. I have OS X 10.8.4.
>>>>
>>>> Andrus
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Michael Gentry
>>>> <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> FWIW, I just built the OS X assembly and it runs fine (HD and DMG),
>>>>> but the downloaded version didn't for some reason.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Michael Gentry
>>>>> <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MD5 for OS X DMG is correct, but Cayenne Modeler fails to launch from
>>>>>> both the mounted disk image and the HD (copied from the disk image)
>>>>>> with the following alert:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> “CayenneModeler.app” is damaged and can’t be opened. You should move
>>>>>> it to the Trash.
>>>>>> Safari downloaded this file today at 9:37 AM from people.apache.org.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The console didn't provide anything useful when canceling the alert:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 7/13/13 9:50:23.601 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[342]:
>>>>>> ([0x0-0x35c35c].CayenneModeler[6610]) Exited: Killed: 9
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm on Mountain Lion with the latest Java release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mrg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>> <ari@maniatis.org<javascript:;>>
>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/07/13 9:04am, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors you
>>>>
>>>> must
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>>> your approved release to the above release area.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6537
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
> --
> -------------------------->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>.
Yes, I see the same random behaviour with another of my projects. Only on OSX and there is no discernable pattern. A workstation will fail in just that way. But then you can drag the app to the Dock and run it from there just fine. After you do that, the original app might then be double clickable again.

I am pretty sure this is just a runtime OSX/Java oddity and nothing to do with the build itself being broken. We have seen it happen less often since our machines moved to Java 7.



Ari


On 14/07/13 1:48am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> I recall one of my colleagues ran into a similar unexplainable behavior with a newly downloaded Modeler about a year ago. That was a version of Cayenne that was current back then. We went through a bunch of random motions - reboots, re-downloads, and eventually it worked. Also couldn't figure out the cause… I attribute it to some OS X bug.
>
> Andrus
>
> On Jul 13, 2013, at 6:13 PM, John Huss <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Both worked for me as well.
>>
>> On Saturday, July 13, 2013, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>
>>> This is very odd. I just downloaded a fresh copy via FireFox, and it opens
>>> just fine on my laptop (after expected warnings about opening downloaded
>>> software for the first time). Also both from mounted image and from
>>> Desktop. I have OS X 10.8.4.
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Michael Gentry <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> FWIW, I just built the OS X assembly and it runs fine (HD and DMG),
>>>> but the downloaded version didn't for some reason.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Michael Gentry <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> -1
>>>>>
>>>>> MD5 for OS X DMG is correct, but Cayenne Modeler fails to launch from
>>>>> both the mounted disk image and the HD (copied from the disk image)
>>>>> with the following alert:
>>>>>
>>>>> “CayenneModeler.app” is damaged and can’t be opened. You should move
>>>>> it to the Trash.
>>>>> Safari downloaded this file today at 9:37 AM from people.apache.org.
>>>>>
>>>>> The console didn't provide anything useful when canceling the alert:
>>>>>
>>>>> 7/13/13 9:50:23.601 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[342]:
>>>>> ([0x0-0x35c35c].CayenneModeler[6610]) Exited: Killed: 9
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm on Mountain Lion with the latest Java release.
>>>>>
>>>>> mrg
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <ari@maniatis.org<javascript:;>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/07/13 9:04am, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors you
>>> must
>>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>> your approved release to the above release area.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6537
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Ari
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>

-- 
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
I recall one of my colleagues ran into a similar unexplainable behavior with a newly downloaded Modeler about a year ago. That was a version of Cayenne that was current back then. We went through a bunch of random motions - reboots, re-downloads, and eventually it worked. Also couldn't figure out the cause… I attribute it to some OS X bug. 

Andrus

On Jul 13, 2013, at 6:13 PM, John Huss <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Both worked for me as well.
> 
> On Saturday, July 13, 2013, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> 
>> This is very odd. I just downloaded a fresh copy via FireFox, and it opens
>> just fine on my laptop (after expected warnings about opening downloaded
>> software for the first time). Also both from mounted image and from
>> Desktop. I have OS X 10.8.4.
>> 
>> Andrus
>> 
>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Michael Gentry <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> FWIW, I just built the OS X assembly and it runs fine (HD and DMG),
>>> but the downloaded version didn't for some reason.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Michael Gentry <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>>>> -1
>>>> 
>>>> MD5 for OS X DMG is correct, but Cayenne Modeler fails to launch from
>>>> both the mounted disk image and the HD (copied from the disk image)
>>>> with the following alert:
>>>> 
>>>> “CayenneModeler.app” is damaged and can’t be opened. You should move
>>>> it to the Trash.
>>>> Safari downloaded this file today at 9:37 AM from people.apache.org.
>>>> 
>>>> The console didn't provide anything useful when canceling the alert:
>>>> 
>>>> 7/13/13 9:50:23.601 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[342]:
>>>> ([0x0-0x35c35c].CayenneModeler[6610]) Exited: Killed: 9
>>>> 
>>>> I'm on Mountain Lion with the latest Java release.
>>>> 
>>>> mrg
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <ari@maniatis.org<javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>>>>> On 10/07/13 9:04am, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors you
>> must
>>>>>> commit
>>>>>> your approved release to the above release area.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6537
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Ari
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>> 
>> 
>>

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by John Huss <jo...@gmail.com>.
Both worked for me as well.

On Saturday, July 13, 2013, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

> This is very odd. I just downloaded a fresh copy via FireFox, and it opens
> just fine on my laptop (after expected warnings about opening downloaded
> software for the first time). Also both from mounted image and from
> Desktop. I have OS X 10.8.4.
>
> Andrus
>
> On Jul 13, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Michael Gentry <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > FWIW, I just built the OS X assembly and it runs fine (HD and DMG),
> > but the downloaded version didn't for some reason.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Michael Gentry <mgentry@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >> -1
> >>
> >> MD5 for OS X DMG is correct, but Cayenne Modeler fails to launch from
> >> both the mounted disk image and the HD (copied from the disk image)
> >> with the following alert:
> >>
> >> “CayenneModeler.app” is damaged and can’t be opened. You should move
> >> it to the Trash.
> >> Safari downloaded this file today at 9:37 AM from people.apache.org.
> >>
> >> The console didn't provide anything useful when canceling the alert:
> >>
> >> 7/13/13 9:50:23.601 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[342]:
> >> ([0x0-0x35c35c].CayenneModeler[6610]) Exited: Killed: 9
> >>
> >> I'm on Mountain Lion with the latest Java release.
> >>
> >> mrg
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <ari@maniatis.org<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >>> On 10/07/13 9:04am, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors you
> must
> >>>> commit
> >>>> your approved release to the above release area.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6537
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Ari
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> -------------------------->
> >>> Aristedes Maniatis
> >>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
> >
>
>

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
This is very odd. I just downloaded a fresh copy via FireFox, and it opens just fine on my laptop (after expected warnings about opening downloaded software for the first time). Also both from mounted image and from Desktop. I have OS X 10.8.4. 

Andrus

On Jul 13, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:

> FWIW, I just built the OS X assembly and it runs fine (HD and DMG),
> but the downloaded version didn't for some reason.
> 
> 
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>> -1
>> 
>> MD5 for OS X DMG is correct, but Cayenne Modeler fails to launch from
>> both the mounted disk image and the HD (copied from the disk image)
>> with the following alert:
>> 
>> “CayenneModeler.app” is damaged and can’t be opened. You should move
>> it to the Trash.
>> Safari downloaded this file today at 9:37 AM from people.apache.org.
>> 
>> The console didn't provide anything useful when canceling the alert:
>> 
>> 7/13/13 9:50:23.601 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[342]:
>> ([0x0-0x35c35c].CayenneModeler[6610]) Exited: Killed: 9
>> 
>> I'm on Mountain Lion with the latest Java release.
>> 
>> mrg
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org> wrote:
>>> On 10/07/13 9:04am, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors you must
>>>> commit
>>>> your approved release to the above release area.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6537
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> Ari
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> -------------------------->
>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
FWIW, I just built the OS X assembly and it runs fine (HD and DMG),
but the downloaded version didn't for some reason.


On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
> -1
>
> MD5 for OS X DMG is correct, but Cayenne Modeler fails to launch from
> both the mounted disk image and the HD (copied from the disk image)
> with the following alert:
>
> “CayenneModeler.app” is damaged and can’t be opened. You should move
> it to the Trash.
> Safari downloaded this file today at 9:37 AM from people.apache.org.
>
> The console didn't provide anything useful when canceling the alert:
>
> 7/13/13 9:50:23.601 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[342]:
> ([0x0-0x35c35c].CayenneModeler[6610]) Exited: Killed: 9
>
> I'm on Mountain Lion with the latest Java release.
>
> mrg
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org> wrote:
>> On 10/07/13 9:04am, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>>>
>>> It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors you must
>>> commit
>>> your approved release to the above release area.
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6537
>>
>> Thanks
>> Ari
>>
>>
>> --
>> -------------------------->
>> Aristedes Maniatis
>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
-1

MD5 for OS X DMG is correct, but Cayenne Modeler fails to launch from
both the mounted disk image and the HD (copied from the disk image)
with the following alert:

“CayenneModeler.app” is damaged and can’t be opened. You should move
it to the Trash.
Safari downloaded this file today at 9:37 AM from people.apache.org.

The console didn't provide anything useful when canceling the alert:

7/13/13 9:50:23.601 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[342]:
([0x0-0x35c35c].CayenneModeler[6610]) Exited: Killed: 9

I'm on Mountain Lion with the latest Java release.

mrg


On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org> wrote:
> On 10/07/13 9:04am, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>>
>> It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors you must
>> commit
>> your approved release to the above release area.
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6537
>
> Thanks
> Ari
>
>
> --
> -------------------------->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>.
On 10/07/13 9:04am, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors you must
> commit
> your approved release to the above release area.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6537

Thanks
Ari

-- 
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

RE: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Gavin McDonald <ga...@16degrees.com.au>.
Guys,

Can I recommend you ask infra to create you guys an

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cayenne/ 

and 

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cayenne/ 

It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors you must
commit 
your approved release to the above release area.

Can I also suggest from now on you use the above dist /dev/ area for where
you 
put your RC candidates for voting on (instead of using people.a.o) . 
Once approved, you can simply svn mv it from dev to release area and the
mirrors will pick it up.

Thanks

Gav...


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andrus@objectstyle.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2013 4:13 PM
> To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2
> 
> > but I'm not sure if we also have to change something in our maven build
> process or upgrade some plugin.
> 
> Me neither. Probably some research is in order. Should we take this to a
> separate thread?
> 
> Andrus
> 
> On Jul 9, 2013, at 2:57 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org> wrote:
> 
> > Did we change the javadoc build process to avoid the javadoc security
flaw
> recently discovered? I patched the website javadocs, but I'm not sure if
we
> also have to change something in our maven build process or upgrade some
> plugin.
> >
> > Ari
> >
> >
> > On 8/07/13 3:31am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >> A new set of artifacts with no Rat failures is here:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.2M1_2/
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-
> 112/
> >>
> >> Please cast your votes.
> >>
> >> Andrus
> >>
> >
> > --
> > -------------------------->
> > Aristedes Maniatis
> > GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
> >

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
> but I'm not sure if we also have to change something in our maven build process or upgrade some plugin.

Me neither. Probably some research is in order. Should we take this to a separate thread? 

Andrus

On Jul 9, 2013, at 2:57 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org> wrote:

> Did we change the javadoc build process to avoid the javadoc security flaw recently discovered? I patched the website javadocs, but I'm not sure if we also have to change something in our maven build process or upgrade some plugin.
> 
> Ari
> 
> 
> On 8/07/13 3:31am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> A new set of artifacts with no Rat failures is here:
>> 
>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.2M1_2/
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-112/
>> 
>> Please cast your votes.
>> 
>> Andrus
>> 
> 
> -- 
> -------------------------->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>.
Did we change the javadoc build process to avoid the javadoc security flaw recently discovered? I patched the website javadocs, but I'm not sure if we also have to change something in our maven build process or upgrade some plugin.

Ari


On 8/07/13 3:31am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> A new set of artifacts with no Rat failures is here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.2M1_2/
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-112/
>
> Please cast your votes.
>
> Andrus
>

-- 
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Good question. "Unstable" refers mostly to the API. And the new API is indeed changing rapidly. "Preview" also sort of misleading. Maybe just live both "dev" and "alpha" labels. This should be enough to distinguish from "GA".

Andrus

On Jul 20, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:

> Speaking of the download page, should we change the wording for 3.2 to
> be something other than "Alpha - Unstable"?  I know I'd never download
> that one.  Maybe "Alpha - Preview" or something.
> 
> mrg
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>> Ok, download page is updated, the mirrors are up to date. I think we are ready to announce. I will prolly post something tomorrow.
>> 
>> A.
>> 
>> On Jul 16, 2013, at 9:22 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> Closed the Maven repo (so this is syncing to central now).
>>> 
>>> Also per new release procedure placed the artifacts under https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cayenne/3.2M1/ Now waiting when Gavin has a chance to kick the svnpubsub process.
>>> 
>>> I guess we'll wait with site updates and announcements until things get posted to the mirrors.
>>> 
>>> Andrus
>>> 
>>> On Jul 16, 2013, at 9:23 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> So, I am adding my own +1 and closing the vote. Here is the tally:
>>>> 
>>>> John Huss +1
>>>> Michael Gentry +1
>>>> Mike Kienenberger +1
>>>> Aristedes Maniatis +1
>>>> Andrus Adamchik +1
>>>> 
>>>> So we have a 3.2 release, congrats and thanks everyone!
>>>> 
>>>> Now I need to figure out the new way for publishing the release per INFRA-6537 and http://apache.org/dev/release.html#upload-ci , which I'll hopefully do tonight. Stay tuned.
>>>> 
>>>> Andrus
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> A new set of artifacts with no Rat failures is here:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.2M1_2/
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-112/
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please cast your votes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Andrus
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
Speaking of the download page, should we change the wording for 3.2 to
be something other than "Alpha - Unstable"?  I know I'd never download
that one.  Maybe "Alpha - Preview" or something.

mrg


On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> Ok, download page is updated, the mirrors are up to date. I think we are ready to announce. I will prolly post something tomorrow.
>
> A.
>
> On Jul 16, 2013, at 9:22 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>
>> Closed the Maven repo (so this is syncing to central now).
>>
>> Also per new release procedure placed the artifacts under https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cayenne/3.2M1/ Now waiting when Gavin has a chance to kick the svnpubsub process.
>>
>> I guess we'll wait with site updates and announcements until things get posted to the mirrors.
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>> On Jul 16, 2013, at 9:23 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>
>>> So, I am adding my own +1 and closing the vote. Here is the tally:
>>>
>>> John Huss +1
>>> Michael Gentry +1
>>> Mike Kienenberger +1
>>> Aristedes Maniatis +1
>>> Andrus Adamchik +1
>>>
>>> So we have a 3.2 release, congrats and thanks everyone!
>>>
>>> Now I need to figure out the new way for publishing the release per INFRA-6537 and http://apache.org/dev/release.html#upload-ci , which I'll hopefully do tonight. Stay tuned.
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> A new set of artifacts with no Rat failures is here:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.2M1_2/
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-112/
>>>>
>>>> Please cast your votes.
>>>>
>>>> Andrus
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Ok, download page is updated, the mirrors are up to date. I think we are ready to announce. I will prolly post something tomorrow.

A.

On Jul 16, 2013, at 9:22 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:

> Closed the Maven repo (so this is syncing to central now).
> 
> Also per new release procedure placed the artifacts under https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cayenne/3.2M1/ Now waiting when Gavin has a chance to kick the svnpubsub process. 
> 
> I guess we'll wait with site updates and announcements until things get posted to the mirrors.
> 
> Andrus
> 
> On Jul 16, 2013, at 9:23 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> 
>> So, I am adding my own +1 and closing the vote. Here is the tally:
>> 
>> John Huss +1
>> Michael Gentry +1
>> Mike Kienenberger +1
>> Aristedes Maniatis +1
>> Andrus Adamchik +1
>> 
>> So we have a 3.2 release, congrats and thanks everyone!
>> 
>> Now I need to figure out the new way for publishing the release per INFRA-6537 and http://apache.org/dev/release.html#upload-ci , which I'll hopefully do tonight. Stay tuned.
>> 
>> Andrus
>> 
>> 
>> On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> A new set of artifacts with no Rat failures is here:
>>> 
>>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.2M1_2/
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-112/
>>> 
>>> Please cast your votes.
>>> 
>>> Andrus
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
>

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Closed the Maven repo (so this is syncing to central now).

Also per new release procedure placed the artifacts under https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cayenne/3.2M1/ Now waiting when Gavin has a chance to kick the svnpubsub process. 

I guess we'll wait with site updates and announcements until things get posted to the mirrors.

Andrus

On Jul 16, 2013, at 9:23 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:

> So, I am adding my own +1 and closing the vote. Here is the tally:
> 
> John Huss +1
> Michael Gentry +1
> Mike Kienenberger +1
> Aristedes Maniatis +1
> Andrus Adamchik +1
> 
> So we have a 3.2 release, congrats and thanks everyone!
> 
> Now I need to figure out the new way for publishing the release per INFRA-6537 and http://apache.org/dev/release.html#upload-ci , which I'll hopefully do tonight. Stay tuned.
> 
> Andrus
> 
> 
> On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> 
>> A new set of artifacts with no Rat failures is here:
>> 
>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.2M1_2/
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-112/
>> 
>> Please cast your votes.
>> 
>> Andrus
>> 
> 
>

Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2

Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
So, I am adding my own +1 and closing the vote. Here is the tally:

John Huss +1
Michael Gentry +1
Mike Kienenberger +1
Aristedes Maniatis +1
Andrus Adamchik +1

So we have a 3.2 release, congrats and thanks everyone!

Now I need to figure out the new way for publishing the release per INFRA-6537 and http://apache.org/dev/release.html#upload-ci , which I'll hopefully do tonight. Stay tuned.

Andrus


On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:

> A new set of artifacts with no Rat failures is here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.2M1_2/
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-112/
> 
> Please cast your votes.
> 
> Andrus
>