You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA)" <de...@db.apache.org> on 2005/02/10 01:57:12 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (DERBY-139) LOCAL as a reserved keyword does not match other databases

     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-139?page=history ]
     
Daniel John Debrunner resolved DERBY-139:
-----------------------------------------

     Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version: 10.1.0.0

> LOCAL as a reserved keyword does not match other databases
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: DERBY-139
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-139
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: SQL
>     Versions: 10.0.2.1
>     Reporter: Daniel John Debrunner
>     Assignee: Daniel John Debrunner
>      Fix For: 10.0.2.2, 10.1.0.0

>
> While the SQL standard mandates LOCAL as a reserved keyword, most other databases such as Oracle, SQL Server, MySQL and DB2 do not enforce it.
> Derby enforces this and limits application migration to Derby.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira