You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@jackrabbit.apache.org by Michael Singer <ja...@it-specialist.at> on 2007/02/19 13:53:19 UTC

Online JavaDoc

Hi all,

is there a reason why the online javadoc is version 1.0 even if the link 
says it is the javadoc from the current release?


-- 
kind regards

Michael

Re: Online JavaDoc

Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,

Good point, I can add the latest javadocs to the site.

On 2/20/07, Michael Singer <ja...@it-specialist.at> wrote:
> Is this worth a jira issue? If yes I will file one ;-)

Please do. In fact please file two issues, one for fixing the javadoc
problem and one for making the latest javadocs available on the web
site.

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Re: Online JavaDoc

Posted by Michael Singer <ja...@it-specialist.at>.
ok, I need to be more specific ;-)

on http://jackrabbit.apache.org/doc/arch/overview/jcrlevels.html

there is this link:

Browse current Jackrabbit API: http://jackrabbit.apache.org/api-1/index.html

This is not the current Jackrabbit API but the API from Version 1.0

I tried to build the javadoc against the latest version of Jackrabbit 
(checkout from SVN) with

mvn javadoc:javadoc

but this fails on jackrabbit-jrc-server due to some errors in the 
javadoc comments (in more than one file)

Is this worth a jira issue? If yes I will file one ;-)

Michael Neale wrote:
> I assume you mean jackrabbit. I generally refer to the JCR docs themselves,
> which are not jackrabbit specific.
> 
> On 2/19/07, Michael Singer <ja...@it-specialist.at> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> is there a reason why the online javadoc is version 1.0 even if the link
>> says it is the javadoc from the current release?
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> kind regards
>>
>> Michael
>>
> 

-- 
kind regards

Michael

Re: Online JavaDoc

Posted by Michael Neale <mi...@gmail.com>.
I assume you mean jackrabbit. I generally refer to the JCR docs themselves,
which are not jackrabbit specific.

On 2/19/07, Michael Singer <ja...@it-specialist.at> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> is there a reason why the online javadoc is version 1.0 even if the link
> says it is the javadoc from the current release?
>
>
> --
> kind regards
>
> Michael
>