You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@zookeeper.apache.org by "wilsonny371@gmail.com" <wi...@gmail.com> on 2012/12/13 03:06:51 UTC
multi ops support from zkpython
Hi all,
I have a question. I looked into zookeeper.h and zookeeper.c in zkpython
code. I realized we do not have python support for zoo_multi & zoo_amulti
support there yet. Is that correct? Also I saw there is a review at
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4958/ about that. It seems it is not in the
latest distribution yet.
Thanks
Wilson
Re: multi ops support from zkpython
Posted by "wilsonny371@gmail.com" <wi...@gmail.com>.
Thanks a lot!
Thanks
Wilson
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu>wrote:
> As an alternative to zkpython you could also use Kazoo, which supports
> multi-operations - see
> https://kazoo.readthedocs.org/en/latest/basic_usage.html#transactions
>
> Hanno
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:06 AM, wilsonny371@gmail.com <
> wilsonny371@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a question. I looked into zookeeper.h and zookeeper.c in zkpython
> > code. I realized we do not have python support for zoo_multi & zoo_amulti
> > support there yet. Is that correct? Also I saw there is a review at
> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/4958/ about that. It seems it is not in the
> > latest distribution yet.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Wilson
> >
>
Re: multi ops support from zkpython
Posted by Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu>.
As an alternative to zkpython you could also use Kazoo, which supports
multi-operations - see
https://kazoo.readthedocs.org/en/latest/basic_usage.html#transactions
Hanno
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:06 AM, wilsonny371@gmail.com <
wilsonny371@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a question. I looked into zookeeper.h and zookeeper.c in zkpython
> code. I realized we do not have python support for zoo_multi & zoo_amulti
> support there yet. Is that correct? Also I saw there is a review at
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/4958/ about that. It seems it is not in the
> latest distribution yet.
>
> Thanks
> Wilson
>