You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Rex Wang <rw...@gmail.com> on 2010/03/23 03:34:33 UTC
{DISCUSS} Remove Spnego Support from Geronimo 2.1.5?
Will Tomcat community plan to apply our fixes to their code base soon? If
not, because this Friday we will ship release candidate build of G 2.1.5, I
prefer to remove Spnego support this time.
The related JIRAs that need to revert are:
GERONIMO - 5128
GERONIMO - 5129
Thoughts?
--
Lei Wang (Rex)
rwonly AT apache.org
Re: {DISCUSS} Remove Spnego Support from Geronimo 2.1.5?
Posted by Rex Wang <rw...@gmail.com>.
5129 has been reverted.
I think 5128 don't need to revert since it just add a new login module
class.
-Rex
2010/3/24 Rex Wang <rw...@gmail.com>
> if no objections, I will revert the code today
>
> Thanks
>
> 2010/3/23 Delos <da...@gmail.com>
>
> I agree, since Tomcat hasn't accepted the patch
>>
>> 2010/3/23 Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:34 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
>>>
>>> > Will Tomcat community plan to apply our fixes to their code base soon?
>>> If not, because this Friday we will ship release candidate build of G 2.1.5,
>>> I prefer to remove Spnego support this time.
>>> >
>>> > The related JIRAs that need to revert are:
>>> > GERONIMO - 5128
>>> > GERONIMO - 5129
>>> >
>>> > Thoughts?
>>>
>>> I think that's reasonable. I'd rather not start adding additional
>>> function that hasn't also been applied to Tomcat. So, unless the patch is
>>> accepted soon, I'd be in favor of reverting the updates.
>>>
>>> --kevan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Delos
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lei Wang (Rex)
> rwonly AT apache.org
>
--
Lei Wang (Rex)
rwonly AT apache.org
Re: {DISCUSS} Remove Spnego Support from Geronimo 2.1.5?
Posted by Rex Wang <rw...@gmail.com>.
if no objections, I will revert the code today
Thanks
2010/3/23 Delos <da...@gmail.com>
> I agree, since Tomcat hasn't accepted the patch
>
> 2010/3/23 Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
>
>
>> On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:34 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
>>
>> > Will Tomcat community plan to apply our fixes to their code base soon?
>> If not, because this Friday we will ship release candidate build of G 2.1.5,
>> I prefer to remove Spnego support this time.
>> >
>> > The related JIRAs that need to revert are:
>> > GERONIMO - 5128
>> > GERONIMO - 5129
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>>
>> I think that's reasonable. I'd rather not start adding additional function
>> that hasn't also been applied to Tomcat. So, unless the patch is accepted
>> soon, I'd be in favor of reverting the updates.
>>
>> --kevan
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Delos
>
--
Lei Wang (Rex)
rwonly AT apache.org
Re: {DISCUSS} Remove Spnego Support from Geronimo 2.1.5?
Posted by Delos <da...@gmail.com>.
I agree, since Tomcat hasn't accepted the patch
2010/3/23 Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
>
> On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:34 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
>
> > Will Tomcat community plan to apply our fixes to their code base soon? If
> not, because this Friday we will ship release candidate build of G 2.1.5, I
> prefer to remove Spnego support this time.
> >
> > The related JIRAs that need to revert are:
> > GERONIMO - 5128
> > GERONIMO - 5129
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> I think that's reasonable. I'd rather not start adding additional function
> that hasn't also been applied to Tomcat. So, unless the patch is accepted
> soon, I'd be in favor of reverting the updates.
>
> --kevan
--
Best Regards,
Delos
Re: {DISCUSS} Remove Spnego Support from Geronimo 2.1.5?
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:34 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
> Will Tomcat community plan to apply our fixes to their code base soon? If not, because this Friday we will ship release candidate build of G 2.1.5, I prefer to remove Spnego support this time.
>
> The related JIRAs that need to revert are:
> GERONIMO - 5128
> GERONIMO - 5129
>
> Thoughts?
I think that's reasonable. I'd rather not start adding additional function that hasn't also been applied to Tomcat. So, unless the patch is accepted soon, I'd be in favor of reverting the updates.
--kevan