[jira] [Commented] (MARMOTTA-437) RDFFormat.forFileName / forMIMEType will be deprecated in Sesame 2.8

["ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MARMOTTA-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13894351#comment-13894351 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on MARMOTTA-437:
----------------------------------------------------------

Commit 4b2a9ad753d5583131429ad7f1b63a80da16c068 in branch refs/heads/develop from [~jakob]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=marmotta.git;h=4b2a9ad ]

MARMOTTA-437: replaced RDFFormat.forFileName / forMIMEType with their Rio-successors.


> RDFFormat.forFileName / forMIMEType will be deprecated in Sesame 2.8
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MARMOTTA-437
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MARMOTTA-437
>             Project: Marmotta
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: KiWi Triple Store, Platform
>    Affects Versions: trunk
>            Reporter: Jakob Frank
>            Assignee: Jakob Frank
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.3
>
>
> In Sesame 2.8, {{RDFFormat.forFileName}} and {{RDFFormat.forMIMEType}} will be deprecated in favour of  {{Rio.getParserFormatForFileName}} and {{Rio.getParserFormatForMIMEType}} ([SES-2015|https://openrdf.atlassian.net/browse/SES-2015]).
> We should update to the Rio based access...
> {quote}
> Users should be using Rio.getParserFormatForFileName and Rio.getParserFormatForMIMEType to pick up all of the RDFFormat's available on their classpath. RDFFormat.forFileName does not check the classpath for new RDFFormat definitions, resulting in users wondering why their third-party RDFFormat definitions do not appear.
> {quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)