You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by gr...@apache.org on 2012/10/14 15:02:04 UTC
svn commit: r1398074 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Author: gryzor
Date: Sun Oct 14 13:02:03 2012
New Revision: 1398074
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1398074&view=rev
Log:
Suggest FallbackResource 'disabled' patch into 2.4
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1398074&r1=1398073&r2=1398074&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Sun Oct 14 13:02:03 2012
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
[ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ]
-
+
* mod_slotmem_plain: honor DefaultRuntimeDir (below doesn't apply since
there is no config directive to speak of)
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1370763
@@ -137,17 +137,17 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
* mod_ssl: Add support for TLS-SRP (Secure Remote Password key exchange
for TLS, RFC 5054).
- trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1347980 and
+ trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1347980 and
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1348653
2.4.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/ssl-TLS-SRP-2_4.patch
- +1: rjung,
+ +1: rjung,
rjung: sf: you applied it to trunk, care to vote?
* mod_ssl: Work correctly with a development version of OpenSSL.
- trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1358167 and
+ trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1358167 and
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1358168
2.4.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/ssl-support-uninstalled-openssl-2_4.patch
- +1:
+ +1:
-1: kbrand: breaks OS X builds, superseded by approach based on MOD_CFLAGS etc.
* mod_proxy: Make balancers server-specific, as they should have
@@ -229,6 +229,10 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
2.4.x patch: trunk patch works
+1: trawick
+ * mod_dir: Support for the 'disabled' FallbackResource argument
+ trunk patch : https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1398066
+ 2.4.x patch: trunk patch works
+
A list of further possible backports can be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/possible-backports-httpd-trunk-2_4.txt
If you want to propose one of those, please still add them here.
@@ -239,11 +243,11 @@ OTHER PROPOSALS
o If a module has a config directive for the run-time file that
treats the configured path as relative to server root, preserve
that behavior but change the location when not configured to
- respect DefaultRuntimeDir. With these changes, users with no
+ respect DefaultRuntimeDir. With these changes, users with no
per-runtime-file configuration directives can control
everything with DefaultRuntimeDir.
BUT: Existing users of DefaultRuntimeDir might get a short-term scare
- when some unconfigured run-time file starts respecting their
+ when some unconfigured run-time file starts respecting their
DefaultRuntimeDir directive after an upgrade.
+1: trawick, jim, rjung
rjung: applicable trunk revisions WITHOUT the compatibility tweaks
@@ -267,7 +271,7 @@ PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED
2.4 patch: http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/diffs/httpd-2.4.x-cross_compile.diff
fuankg: on hold until we agree for a better and more simple solution ...
- * mod_lua: Add a new directive, LuaCodeCache, for controlling the in-memory
+ * mod_lua: Add a new directive, LuaCodeCache, for controlling the in-memory
caching of scripts
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1366890
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1367025
@@ -277,7 +281,7 @@ PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED
2.4.x patch: Trunk patch works
+1: humbedooh, rjung
rjung: docs missing?
- humbedooh: It's in the 2.4 docs already, but commented out, as with a lot
+ humbedooh: It's in the 2.4 docs already, but commented out, as with a lot
of other functions that were never actually made. It's a mess ;)
-1: sf
sf: * If you copy'n'paste code, you need to assign new APLOGNOs.