You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@nifi.apache.org by Pierre Villard <pi...@gmail.com> on 2026/07/07 13:21:42 UTC

[DISCUSS] Release for NiFi API 2.10.0

Team,

We merged a few changes in the NiFi API and I think it is a good time
to have a release to make those changes available in NiFi and unblock
the work that relies on those changes.

If there are no objections, I'll start the RC process sometime tomorrow.

Thanks,
Pierre

Re: [DISCUSS] Release for NiFi API 2.10.0

Posted by David Handermann <ex...@apache.org>.
Pierre,

Thanks for initiating the discussion, I agree with proceeding to a
NiFi API release candidate as suggested.

Regards,
David Handermann

On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 8:23 AM Pierre Villard
<pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Team,
>
> We merged a few changes in the NiFi API and I think it is a good time
> to have a release to make those changes available in NiFi and unblock
> the work that relies on those changes.
>
> If there are no objections, I'll start the RC process sometime tomorrow.
>
> Thanks,
> Pierre

Re: [DISCUSS] Release for NiFi API 2.10.0

Posted by Mark Payne <ma...@hotmail.com>.
+1 I think we’ve seen a lot of movement in the api recently. Good to get this out! Thanks for initiating Pierre!

-Mark

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 7, 2026, at 9:23 AM, Pierre Villard <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Team,
> 
> We merged a few changes in the NiFi API and I think it is a good time
> to have a release to make those changes available in NiFi and unblock
> the work that relies on those changes.
> 
> If there are no objections, I'll start the RC process sometime tomorrow.
> 
> Thanks,
> Pierre

Re: [DISCUSS] Release for NiFi API 2.10.0

Posted by Matt Burgess <ma...@apache.org>.
Sounds good, thanks Pierre!

On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 9:23 AM Pierre Villard <pi...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Team,
>
> We merged a few changes in the NiFi API and I think it is a good time
> to have a release to make those changes available in NiFi and unblock
> the work that relies on those changes.
>
> If there are no objections, I'll start the RC process sometime tomorrow.
>
> Thanks,
> Pierre
>