GORA-103 Queries?

[Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>]

Hi All,
I thought I would open this thread in as a platform for people to (if they
so wish) voice what  issue(s) theu are having post GORA-103 e.g. DynamoDB
integration, changes to API and introduction of webservice API?
IMHO the best, most time efficient way we can verify if we've introduced
bugs (or whatever) is to get the code tested, get it released (if entirely
possible), get people using it, and get feedback within the Gora community.
We will address this much more adequately if the discrepancies/doubts are
voiced and we can begin to think about what went wrong (if it actually
did), when, how and where.
Can anyone comment on their findings?
I posted on this list a couple of times recently my personal experiences
using Gora trunk[0] with gora-cassandra. I couldn't pin point the issues I
was having though.

Lewis

[0] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40gora.apache.org/msg02354.html

-- 
*Lewis*

Re: GORA-103 Queries?

[Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo <re...@gmail.com>]

Hi all,

My main two concerns here are:

1) The key types used by GoraDynamoDB module. They seem "too
specific"? I think maybe we could work with the QueryOptimizer
approach Keith and Enis were working on, and to finally implement
specific optimizations per data store.
2) GoraDynamoDB uses a non-avro based bean, but this causes that the
user would have to generate different classes for each data store he
would like to use. I don't think this is the proper behaviour because
the user would have to create different java classes every time he
wished to use a different data store? maybe we could make all data
stores use Persistent objects and in that manner the java generated
class may have some extra methods or annotations but could still be
usable by any of the other data stores. What do you guys think?


Renato M.

2013/5/3 Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>:
> Hi All,
> I thought I would open this thread in as a platform for people to (if they
> so wish) voice what  issue(s) theu are having post GORA-103 e.g. DynamoDB
> integration, changes to API and introduction of webservice API?
> IMHO the best, most time efficient way we can verify if we've introduced
> bugs (or whatever) is to get the code tested, get it released (if entirely
> possible), get people using it, and get feedback within the Gora community.
> We will address this much more adequately if the discrepancies/doubts are
> voiced and we can begin to think about what went wrong (if it actually
> did), when, how and where.
> Can anyone comment on their findings?
> I posted on this list a couple of times recently my personal experiences
> using Gora trunk[0] with gora-cassandra. I couldn't pin point the issues I
> was having though.
>
> Lewis
>
> [0] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40gora.apache.org/msg02354.html
>
> --
> *Lewis*