You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> on 2010/10/11 13:30:30 UTC
Re: [NPanday] Review for NPanday-13984
Hi Liit,
Do we need to file an issue on this now that JIRA is up?
- Brett
On 03/09/2010, at 1:52 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in reviewing this.
>
> This seems like a short term workaround - this effectively double-builds everything, right?
>
> If that's the case, we should open an issue (once the jira instance is up) to revise the solution in the future.
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> On 17/08/2010, at 9:17 PM, Liit Padilla wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have an initial fix for this issue: http://npanday.codeplex.com/workitem/13984
>>
>> I'd gladly welcome any comments/suggestions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> liit
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
>
>
>
>
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
Re: [NPanday] Review for NPanday-13984
Posted by Adelita Padilla <ap...@g2ix.net>.
Hi Brett,
Sorry for the late reply.
Issue filed in jira already -> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NPANDAY-349
Thanks,
liit
----- "Brett Porter" <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> I still have this flagged. Did this get sorted out Liit? I'm only
> concerned in case it might trigger builds twice.
>
> On 12/10/2010, at 12:30 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> > Hi Liit,
> >
> > Do we need to file an issue on this now that JIRA is up?
> >
> > - Brett
> >
> > On 03/09/2010, at 1:52 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry for the delay in reviewing this.
> >>
> >> This seems like a short term workaround - this effectively
> double-builds everything, right?
> >>
> >> If that's the case, we should open an issue (once the jira instance
> is up) to revise the solution in the future.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Brett
> >>
> >> On 17/08/2010, at 9:17 PM, Liit Padilla wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> I have an initial fix for this issue:
> http://npanday.codeplex.com/workitem/13984
> >>>
> >>> I'd gladly welcome any comments/suggestions.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> liit
> >>
> >> --
> >> Brett Porter
> >> brett@apache.org
> >> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Brett Porter
> > brett@apache.org
> > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
Re: [NPanday] Review for NPanday-13984
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
I still have this flagged. Did this get sorted out Liit? I'm only concerned in case it might trigger builds twice.
On 12/10/2010, at 12:30 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi Liit,
>
> Do we need to file an issue on this now that JIRA is up?
>
> - Brett
>
> On 03/09/2010, at 1:52 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the delay in reviewing this.
>>
>> This seems like a short term workaround - this effectively double-builds everything, right?
>>
>> If that's the case, we should open an issue (once the jira instance is up) to revise the solution in the future.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Brett
>>
>> On 17/08/2010, at 9:17 PM, Liit Padilla wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I have an initial fix for this issue: http://npanday.codeplex.com/workitem/13984
>>>
>>> I'd gladly welcome any comments/suggestions.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> liit
>>
>> --
>> Brett Porter
>> brett@apache.org
>> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
>
>
>
>
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://brettporter.wordpress.com/