Trinidad skinning guide

["Perkins, Nate-P63196" <Na...@gdc4s.com>]

It seems like the skinning guide for Trinidad on the Apache Myfaces site
is out of date.  

I'm trying to recreate the Oracle ADF look-and-feel skin but using
Trinidad components, so far its just been trial and error and Firebug to
help me.  Is there a way to get at the original Oracle ADF css file with
the skin selectors?

On another note, does anybody know what happened to the line that used
to separate content from header in the panelHeader component, I noticed
in Trinidad that it no longer has a separator...do I need to put a
separator component in there by hand for each panelHeader?  Also, is the
skin selector for separator still af|objectSeparator or is updated?
(this prompted the first statement).

I'm trying to port to Trinidad, but I've got to be honest, the
documentation and available resources for skinning is poor!


Nate Perkins
480-441-3667
nate.perkins@gdc4s.com

>This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain GDC4S
> confidential or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution
> is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact
the sender by reply email and
> destroy all copies of the original message.
>

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott O'Bryan [mailto:darkarena@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 8:46 AM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: [Trinidad] Portlet configuration

This reply is confusing.  :)  Oracle's 11 Bridge and Webcenter WILL work

with Trinidad.  10.1.3.2 will not.

Scott

Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> Hey Chris,
>
> The 10.1.3.2 bridge will work with ADFFaces, not Trinidad. The 11 
> Bridge from the latest release should be mostly feature complete. The 
> reason for this is that the 10.1.3.2 solution was done after ADFFaces 
> was released so there was little effort in making it fully complete. 
> Since the 11 bridge was built around the Trinidad work (and takes into

> account much of the issues that will be provided by 301) we were able 
> to provide a relatively stable Proof of Concept.
>
> Let me know if you have issues getting 11 to work and I'll help you 
> our. It should be pretty straight forward though.
>
> Scott
>
> Innes, Chris wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I understand there are a number of issues/limitations around 
>> portletization and Trinidad and that these issues will be resolved 
>> with JSR301. However, from what I've been reading it seems possible 
>> to expose a Trinidad portlet at this time if one accepts these 
>> limitations. I've been trying all sorts of combinations and cannot 
>> get it too work. Can somebody please post a configuration, 
>> portlet.xml & web.xml, of a Trinidad application exposed as a portlet

>> that is functioning and that I can try against my basic application.
>>
>> I am running against the Oracle webcenter preconfigured OC4J, as my 
>> portlet container, that comes bundled with JDeveloper 10.1.3.2
>>
>> I am happy to use with the Oracle Portlet Faces Bridge or any other 
>> bridge.
>>
>> Scott, I've noted entries about a proof-of-concept bridge based on 
>> the Oracle portlet faces bridge, can you please provide us with more 
>> information on that proof-of-concept?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Chris.
>>
>
>