You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Jonathan Ellis (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/06/03 18:09:23 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-5608) "Primary range" repair still
isn't quite NTS-aware
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jonathan Ellis updated CASSANDRA-5608:
--------------------------------------
Description:
Consider the case of a four node cluster, with nodes A and C in DC1, and nodes B and D in DC2. TokenMetadata will break this into ranges of (A-B], (B-C], (C-D], (D-A].
If we have a single copy of a keyspace stored in DC1 only (none in DC2), then the current code correctly calculates that node A is responsible for ranges (C-D], (D-A].
But, if we add a copy in DC2, then we only calculate (D-A] as primary range. This is a bug; we should not care what copies are in other datacenters, when computing what to repair in the local one.
was:
Consider the case of a four node cluster, with nodes A and C in DC1, and nodes B and D in DC2. TokenMetadata will break this into ranges of (A-B], (B-C], (C-D], (D-A].
If we have a single copy of a keyspace stored in DC1 only (none in DC2), then the current code correctly calculates that node A is responsible for ranges (C-D], (D-A].
But, if we add a copy in DC1, then we only calculate (D-A] as primary range. This is a bug; we should not care what copies are in other datacenters, when computing what to repair in the local one.
> "Primary range" repair still isn't quite NTS-aware
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-5608
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5608
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Tools
> Affects Versions: 1.2.5
> Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
> Assignee: Jonathan Ellis
> Fix For: 1.2.6
>
>
> Consider the case of a four node cluster, with nodes A and C in DC1, and nodes B and D in DC2. TokenMetadata will break this into ranges of (A-B], (B-C], (C-D], (D-A].
> If we have a single copy of a keyspace stored in DC1 only (none in DC2), then the current code correctly calculates that node A is responsible for ranges (C-D], (D-A].
> But, if we add a copy in DC2, then we only calculate (D-A] as primary range. This is a bug; we should not care what copies are in other datacenters, when computing what to repair in the local one.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira