Re: [VOTE] Release Tomahawk 1.1.2

[Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>]

(6) +1 votes.

I didn't count Werner or Mike since we are in fact going to release a
new version of core.  So I assume they are no longer 0 or -1.  We will
release both Tomahawk 1.1.2 and Core 1.1.3 on Monday (peding the
successful core vote.)

Sean

On 4/22/06, Dennis Byrne <de...@dbyrne.net> wrote:
> +1 to release T 1.1.2
>
> ... but only if Core 1.1.3 ( w/ bug fix ) is to be released soon *and* there is no announcement on the site or mailing list about T until both it and Core are released.
>
> Dennis Byrne
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:sean.schofield@gmail.com]
> >Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 08:51 PM
> >To: 'MyFaces Development'
> >Subject: [VOTE] Release Tomahawk 1.1.2
> >
> >This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.2 (and its dependencies:
> >MyFaces Shared 2.0.1 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.2.)
> >
> >There is a non-trivial issue (TOMAHAWK-373) but this requires another
> >core release.  I think the best thing to do is to release tomahawk
> >with this problem and quickly follow up with another core release
> >(this time including all of the goodies from the trunk that were added
> >during the long core branch.)
> >
> >+1 for my vote
> >
> >@Mario: Does TOMAHAWK-373 affect anything else other then tree2?  If
> >so, then I change my vote to -1.
> >
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Tomahawk 1.1.2

[Mikhail Grushinskiy <mg...@gmail.com>]

This solution is generic and not single user's personal, that is why I'm
posting it.
Did you have a chance to look at the patch? It is really simple and might
not worth such
a long email thread discussing it.


On 5/3/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Once things go into SVN (trunk or branch) things tend to stay there.
> So that is not really a a good place to test a single user's personal
> solution.  I still don't understand why you can't just compile your
> own snapshot to test.  Just install maven and follow the wiki.  Post
> on the users list if you are having trouble compiling and someone will
> help you.
>
> Sean
>
> On 5/3/06, Mikhail Grushinskiy <mg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Can it at least be submitted into trunk for tomahawk 1.1.3 so I could
> pick
> > it up from nightly snapshot and test?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --MG
> >
> >
> >
> > On 5/3/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Besides the reasons I mentioned earlier, you are proposing adding
> > > functionality to an existing component (as opposed to fixing broken
> > > functionality.)  Such changes require deliberation because we don't
> > > want to pile a bunch of stuff into the existing components if there is
> > > another way to do this.
> > >
> > > You will have to be patient.  There are a lot of pressing issues that
> > > we are dealing with.  Hopefully someone will get to your patch soon.
> > > In the meantime, you have the source code and with maven its easy to
> > > compile your own components so feel free to help yourself.
> > >
> > > Sean
> > >
> > > On 5/3/06, Mikhail Grushinskiy <mg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Sean,
> > > >
> > > > Few added methods which are not called from anywhere in the code
> can't
> > > > possibly break something.
> > > > The risk that this breaks something is minimal. If you look at the
> patch
> > it
> > > > is all it does - adds 4 new methods to a class
> > > > Release early, release often. I think you could have included it
> into
> > 1.1.2
> > > > too
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > --Mike
> > > >
> > > > On 5/3/06, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Sorry, that release is locked down and the vote is closed.  We
> don't
> > > > > like to inject last minute stuff into the release.  Besides all of
> the
> > > > > work that goes into preparting and testing a release, we may break
> > > > > something.
> > > > >
> > > > > I will take a look and see if I can't apply the patch in the
> nightly
> > > > > trunk for you.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sean
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/3/06, Mikhail Grushinskiy <mg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Would it be possible to include this patch into tomahawk 1.1.2
> > /1.1.3
> > > > before
> > > > > > the Monday release?
> > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-388
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > --Mike
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/3/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > (6) +1 votes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I didn't count Werner or Mike since we are in fact going to
> > release a
> > > > > > > new version of core.  So I assume they are no longer 0 or
> -1.  We
> > will
> > > > > > > release both Tomahawk 1.1.2 and Core 1.1.3 on Monday (peding
> the
> > > > > > > successful core vote.)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sean
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 4/22/06, Dennis Byrne < dennis@dbyrne.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > +1 to release T 1.1.2
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ... but only if Core 1.1.3 ( w/ bug fix ) is to be released
> soon
> > > > *and*
> > > > > > there is no announcement on the site or mailing list about T
> until
> > both
> > > > it
> > > > > > and Core are released.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Dennis Byrne
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:sean.schofield@gmail.com]
> > > > > > > > >Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 08:51 PM
> > > > > > > > >To: 'MyFaces Development'
> > > > > > > > >Subject: [VOTE] Release Tomahawk 1.1.2
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.2 (and its
> dependencies:
> > > > > > > > >MyFaces Shared 2.0.1 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.2.)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >There is a non-trivial issue (TOMAHAWK-373) but this
> requires
> > > > another
> > > > > > > > >core release.  I think the best thing to do is to release
> > tomahawk
> > > > > > > > >with this problem and quickly follow up with another core
> > release
> > > > > > > > >(this time including all of the goodies from the trunk that
> > were
> > > > added
> > > > > > > > >during the long core branch.)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >+1 for my vote
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >@Mario: Does TOMAHAWK-373 affect anything else other then
> > tree2?
> > > > If
> > > > > > > > >so, then I change my vote to -1.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Tomahawk 1.1.2

[Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>]

Once things go into SVN (trunk or branch) things tend to stay there. 
So that is not really a a good place to test a single user's personal
solution.  I still don't understand why you can't just compile your
own snapshot to test.  Just install maven and follow the wiki.  Post
on the users list if you are having trouble compiling and someone will
help you.

Sean

On 5/3/06, Mikhail Grushinskiy <mg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can it at least be submitted into trunk for tomahawk 1.1.3 so I could pick
> it up from nightly snapshot and test?
>
> Thanks,
> --MG
>
>
>
> On 5/3/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Besides the reasons I mentioned earlier, you are proposing adding
> > functionality to an existing component (as opposed to fixing broken
> > functionality.)  Such changes require deliberation because we don't
> > want to pile a bunch of stuff into the existing components if there is
> > another way to do this.
> >
> > You will have to be patient.  There are a lot of pressing issues that
> > we are dealing with.  Hopefully someone will get to your patch soon.
> > In the meantime, you have the source code and with maven its easy to
> > compile your own components so feel free to help yourself.
> >
> > Sean
> >
> > On 5/3/06, Mikhail Grushinskiy <mg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Sean,
> > >
> > > Few added methods which are not called from anywhere in the code can't
> > > possibly break something.
> > > The risk that this breaks something is minimal. If you look at the patch
> it
> > > is all it does - adds 4 new methods to a class
> > > Release early, release often. I think you could have included it into
> 1.1.2
> > > too
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > --Mike
> > >
> > > On 5/3/06, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Sorry, that release is locked down and the vote is closed.  We don't
> > > > like to inject last minute stuff into the release.  Besides all of the
> > > > work that goes into preparting and testing a release, we may break
> > > > something.
> > > >
> > > > I will take a look and see if I can't apply the patch in the nightly
> > > > trunk for you.
> > > >
> > > > Sean
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 5/3/06, Mikhail Grushinskiy <mg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Would it be possible to include this patch into tomahawk 1.1.2
> /1.1.3
> > > before
> > > > > the Monday release?
> > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-388
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > --Mike
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/3/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > (6) +1 votes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I didn't count Werner or Mike since we are in fact going to
> release a
> > > > > > new version of core.  So I assume they are no longer 0 or -1.  We
> will
> > > > > > release both Tomahawk 1.1.2 and Core 1.1.3 on Monday (peding the
> > > > > > successful core vote.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sean
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 4/22/06, Dennis Byrne < dennis@dbyrne.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > +1 to release T 1.1.2
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ... but only if Core 1.1.3 ( w/ bug fix ) is to be released soon
> > > *and*
> > > > > there is no announcement on the site or mailing list about T until
> both
> > > it
> > > > > and Core are released.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Dennis Byrne
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:sean.schofield@gmail.com]
> > > > > > > >Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 08:51 PM
> > > > > > > >To: 'MyFaces Development'
> > > > > > > >Subject: [VOTE] Release Tomahawk 1.1.2
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.2 (and its dependencies:
> > > > > > > >MyFaces Shared 2.0.1 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.2.)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >There is a non-trivial issue (TOMAHAWK-373) but this requires
> > > another
> > > > > > > >core release.  I think the best thing to do is to release
> tomahawk
> > > > > > > >with this problem and quickly follow up with another core
> release
> > > > > > > >(this time including all of the goodies from the trunk that
> were
> > > added
> > > > > > > >during the long core branch.)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >+1 for my vote
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >@Mario: Does TOMAHAWK-373 affect anything else other then
> tree2?
> > > If
> > > > > > > >so, then I change my vote to -1.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Tomahawk 1.1.2

[Mikhail Grushinskiy <mg...@gmail.com>]

Can it at least be submitted into trunk for tomahawk 1.1.3 so I could pick
it up from nightly snapshot and test?

Thanks,
--MG


On 5/3/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Besides the reasons I mentioned earlier, you are proposing adding
> functionality to an existing component (as opposed to fixing broken
> functionality.)  Such changes require deliberation because we don't
> want to pile a bunch of stuff into the existing components if there is
> another way to do this.
>
> You will have to be patient.  There are a lot of pressing issues that
> we are dealing with.  Hopefully someone will get to your patch soon.
> In the meantime, you have the source code and with maven its easy to
> compile your own components so feel free to help yourself.
>
> Sean
>
> On 5/3/06, Mikhail Grushinskiy <mg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sean,
> >
> > Few added methods which are not called from anywhere in the code can't
> > possibly break something.
> > The risk that this breaks something is minimal. If you look at the patch
> it
> > is all it does - adds 4 new methods to a class
> > Release early, release often. I think you could have included it into
> 1.1.2
> > too
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --Mike
> >
> > On 5/3/06, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Sorry, that release is locked down and the vote is closed.  We don't
> > > like to inject last minute stuff into the release.  Besides all of the
> > > work that goes into preparting and testing a release, we may break
> > > something.
> > >
> > > I will take a look and see if I can't apply the patch in the nightly
> > > trunk for you.
> > >
> > > Sean
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/3/06, Mikhail Grushinskiy <mg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Would it be possible to include this patch into tomahawk 1.1.2/1.1.3
> > before
> > > > the Monday release?
> > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-388
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > --Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 5/3/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > (6) +1 votes.
> > > > >
> > > > > I didn't count Werner or Mike since we are in fact going to
> release a
> > > > > new version of core.  So I assume they are no longer 0 or -1.  We
> will
> > > > > release both Tomahawk 1.1.2 and Core 1.1.3 on Monday (peding the
> > > > > successful core vote.)
> > > > >
> > > > > Sean
> > > > >
> > > > > On 4/22/06, Dennis Byrne <de...@dbyrne.net> wrote:
> > > > > > +1 to release T 1.1.2
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ... but only if Core 1.1.3 ( w/ bug fix ) is to be released soon
> > *and*
> > > > there is no announcement on the site or mailing list about T until
> both
> > it
> > > > and Core are released.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dennis Byrne
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > > > >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:sean.schofield@gmail.com]
> > > > > > >Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 08:51 PM
> > > > > > >To: 'MyFaces Development'
> > > > > > >Subject: [VOTE] Release Tomahawk 1.1.2
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.2 (and its dependencies:
> > > > > > >MyFaces Shared 2.0.1 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.2.)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >There is a non-trivial issue (TOMAHAWK-373) but this requires
> > another
> > > > > > >core release.  I think the best thing to do is to release
> tomahawk
> > > > > > >with this problem and quickly follow up with another core
> release
> > > > > > >(this time including all of the goodies from the trunk that
> were
> > added
> > > > > > >during the long core branch.)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >+1 for my vote
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >@Mario: Does TOMAHAWK-373 affect anything else other then
> tree2?
> > If
> > > > > > >so, then I change my vote to -1.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Tomahawk 1.1.2

[Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>]

Besides the reasons I mentioned earlier, you are proposing adding
functionality to an existing component (as opposed to fixing broken
functionality.)  Such changes require deliberation because we don't
want to pile a bunch of stuff into the existing components if there is
another way to do this.

You will have to be patient.  There are a lot of pressing issues that
we are dealing with.  Hopefully someone will get to your patch soon. 
In the meantime, you have the source code and with maven its easy to
compile your own components so feel free to help yourself.

Sean

On 5/3/06, Mikhail Grushinskiy <mg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sean,
>
> Few added methods which are not called from anywhere in the code can't
> possibly break something.
> The risk that this breaks something is minimal. If you look at the patch it
> is all it does - adds 4 new methods to a class
> Release early, release often. I think you could have included it into 1.1.2
> too
>
>
> Thanks,
> --Mike
>
> On 5/3/06, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sorry, that release is locked down and the vote is closed.  We don't
> > like to inject last minute stuff into the release.  Besides all of the
> > work that goes into preparting and testing a release, we may break
> > something.
> >
> > I will take a look and see if I can't apply the patch in the nightly
> > trunk for you.
> >
> > Sean
> >
> >
> > On 5/3/06, Mikhail Grushinskiy <mg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Would it be possible to include this patch into tomahawk 1.1.2 /1.1.3
> before
> > > the Monday release?
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-388
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > --Mike
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/3/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > (6) +1 votes.
> > > >
> > > > I didn't count Werner or Mike since we are in fact going to release a
> > > > new version of core.  So I assume they are no longer 0 or -1.  We will
> > > > release both Tomahawk 1.1.2 and Core 1.1.3 on Monday (peding the
> > > > successful core vote.)
> > > >
> > > > Sean
> > > >
> > > > On 4/22/06, Dennis Byrne <de...@dbyrne.net> wrote:
> > > > > +1 to release T 1.1.2
> > > > >
> > > > > ... but only if Core 1.1.3 ( w/ bug fix ) is to be released soon
> *and*
> > > there is no announcement on the site or mailing list about T until both
> it
> > > and Core are released.
> > > > >
> > > > > Dennis Byrne
> > > > >
> > > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > > >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:sean.schofield@gmail.com]
> > > > > >Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 08:51 PM
> > > > > >To: 'MyFaces Development'
> > > > > >Subject: [VOTE] Release Tomahawk 1.1.2
> > > > > >
> > > > > >This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.2 (and its dependencies:
> > > > > >MyFaces Shared 2.0.1 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.2.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >There is a non-trivial issue (TOMAHAWK-373) but this requires
> another
> > > > > >core release.  I think the best thing to do is to release tomahawk
> > > > > >with this problem and quickly follow up with another core release
> > > > > >(this time including all of the goodies from the trunk that were
> added
> > > > > >during the long core branch.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >+1 for my vote
> > > > > >
> > > > > >@Mario: Does TOMAHAWK-373 affect anything else other then tree2?
> If
> > > > > >so, then I change my vote to -1.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Tomahawk 1.1.2

[Mikhail Grushinskiy <mg...@gmail.com>]

Sean,

Few added methods which are not called from anywhere in the code can't
possibly break something.
The risk that this breaks something is minimal. If you look at the patch it
is all it does - adds 4 new methods to a class
Release early, release often. I think you could have included it into 1.1.2too

Thanks,
--Mike

On 5/3/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry, that release is locked down and the vote is closed.  We don't
> like to inject last minute stuff into the release.  Besides all of the
> work that goes into preparting and testing a release, we may break
> something.
>
> I will take a look and see if I can't apply the patch in the nightly
> trunk for you.
>
> Sean
>
>
> On 5/3/06, Mikhail Grushinskiy <mg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Would it be possible to include this patch into tomahawk 1.1.2/1.1.3
> before
> > the Monday release?
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-388
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --Mike
> >
> >
> > On 5/3/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > (6) +1 votes.
> > >
> > > I didn't count Werner or Mike since we are in fact going to release a
> > > new version of core.  So I assume they are no longer 0 or -1.  We will
> > > release both Tomahawk 1.1.2 and Core 1.1.3 on Monday (peding the
> > > successful core vote.)
> > >
> > > Sean
> > >
> > > On 4/22/06, Dennis Byrne <de...@dbyrne.net> wrote:
> > > > +1 to release T 1.1.2
> > > >
> > > > ... but only if Core 1.1.3 ( w/ bug fix ) is to be released soon
> *and*
> > there is no announcement on the site or mailing list about T until both
> it
> > and Core are released.
> > > >
> > > > Dennis Byrne
> > > >
> > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:sean.schofield@gmail.com]
> > > > >Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 08:51 PM
> > > > >To: 'MyFaces Development'
> > > > >Subject: [VOTE] Release Tomahawk 1.1.2
> > > > >
> > > > >This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.2 (and its dependencies:
> > > > >MyFaces Shared 2.0.1 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.2.)
> > > > >
> > > > >There is a non-trivial issue (TOMAHAWK-373) but this requires
> another
> > > > >core release.  I think the best thing to do is to release tomahawk
> > > > >with this problem and quickly follow up with another core release
> > > > >(this time including all of the goodies from the trunk that were
> added
> > > > >during the long core branch.)
> > > > >
> > > > >+1 for my vote
> > > > >
> > > > >@Mario: Does TOMAHAWK-373 affect anything else other then
> tree2?  If
> > > > >so, then I change my vote to -1.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Tomahawk 1.1.2

[Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>]

Sorry, that release is locked down and the vote is closed.  We don't
like to inject last minute stuff into the release.  Besides all of the
work that goes into preparting and testing a release, we may break
something.

I will take a look and see if I can't apply the patch in the nightly
trunk for you.

Sean


On 5/3/06, Mikhail Grushinskiy <mg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would it be possible to include this patch into tomahawk 1.1.2/1.1.3 before
> the Monday release?
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-388
>
> Thanks,
> --Mike
>
>
> On 5/3/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > (6) +1 votes.
> >
> > I didn't count Werner or Mike since we are in fact going to release a
> > new version of core.  So I assume they are no longer 0 or -1.  We will
> > release both Tomahawk 1.1.2 and Core 1.1.3 on Monday (peding the
> > successful core vote.)
> >
> > Sean
> >
> > On 4/22/06, Dennis Byrne <de...@dbyrne.net> wrote:
> > > +1 to release T 1.1.2
> > >
> > > ... but only if Core 1.1.3 ( w/ bug fix ) is to be released soon *and*
> there is no announcement on the site or mailing list about T until both it
> and Core are released.
> > >
> > > Dennis Byrne
> > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:sean.schofield@gmail.com]
> > > >Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 08:51 PM
> > > >To: 'MyFaces Development'
> > > >Subject: [VOTE] Release Tomahawk 1.1.2
> > > >
> > > >This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.2 (and its dependencies:
> > > >MyFaces Shared 2.0.1 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.2.)
> > > >
> > > >There is a non-trivial issue (TOMAHAWK-373) but this requires another
> > > >core release.  I think the best thing to do is to release tomahawk
> > > >with this problem and quickly follow up with another core release
> > > >(this time including all of the goodies from the trunk that were added
> > > >during the long core branch.)
> > > >
> > > >+1 for my vote
> > > >
> > > >@Mario: Does TOMAHAWK-373 affect anything else other then tree2?  If
> > > >so, then I change my vote to -1.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Tomahawk 1.1.2

[Mikhail Grushinskiy <mg...@gmail.com>]

Would it be possible to include this patch into tomahawk 1.1.2/1.1.3 before
the Monday release?
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-388

Thanks,
--Mike

On 5/3/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> (6) +1 votes.
>
> I didn't count Werner or Mike since we are in fact going to release a
> new version of core.  So I assume they are no longer 0 or -1.  We will
> release both Tomahawk 1.1.2 and Core 1.1.3 on Monday (peding the
> successful core vote.)
>
> Sean
>
> On 4/22/06, Dennis Byrne <de...@dbyrne.net> wrote:
> > +1 to release T 1.1.2
> >
> > ... but only if Core 1.1.3 ( w/ bug fix ) is to be released soon *and*
> there is no announcement on the site or mailing list about T until both it
> and Core are released.
> >
> > Dennis Byrne
> >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:sean.schofield@gmail.com]
> > >Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 08:51 PM
> > >To: 'MyFaces Development'
> > >Subject: [VOTE] Release Tomahawk 1.1.2
> > >
> > >This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.2 (and its dependencies:
> > >MyFaces Shared 2.0.1 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.2.)
> > >
> > >There is a non-trivial issue (TOMAHAWK-373) but this requires another
> > >core release.  I think the best thing to do is to release tomahawk
> > >with this problem and quickly follow up with another core release
> > >(this time including all of the goodies from the trunk that were added
> > >during the long core branch.)
> > >
> > >+1 for my vote
> > >
> > >@Mario: Does TOMAHAWK-373 affect anything else other then tree2?  If
> > >so, then I change my vote to -1.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>